GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Interesting Article on FF, SciFi TV, and cable networks

POSTED BY: LEEH
UPDATED: Thursday, August 18, 2005 09:23
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1535
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 1:58 PM

LEEH


A nice piece on why Fox killed FF, and how scifi producers ought to avoid the broadcast networks and go for cable instead:

http://www.syfyportal.com/features.php?id=141

"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle. . . ."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 3:54 PM

NYWOE


Cool article, thanks for the link!

_____________________________________
If you're an Arizonan and a Browncoat, come join us:

http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/AZ_Browncoats/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 4:22 PM

CAPTAINCDC


I hope Tim Minear reads this article and takes it to heart. Maybe then we will be able to enjoy one of his brilliant series the way he intends us to.

---------------------------------------

The only sovereign you can allow to rule you is reason!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:23 AM

YT

the movie is not the Series. Only the facts have been changed, to irritate the innocent; the names of the actors and characters remain the same


Seems like a reasonable article, until I try to apply it to Firefly.
Quote:

But a word of advice to would-be scifi producers: yeah, you can take the fancy-pants network development deal, take your chances, and probably end up back in the unemployment line in six months. Or, scale back your expenses, skip the networks, put your show on cable, and like "Stargate SG-1," someday you might find yourself still on the air, nine years later.

How could Joss have scaled back expenses? Let me count the ways:

1) Hire mostly unknown actors (he did)
2) Scale back the sets
3) Scale back costumes
4) Scale back locations
5) Scale back special effects
6) Make it in Canada, with enough Canadian content to qualify for gov't subsidies
7) Do without a co-executive producer
8) Take a smaller cut for himself

It's left as an exercise for the student how much 2), 4) & 5) would affect the product, but . . .

6) Nathan could work it, probably Jewel, but three other cast members would be replaced, and fuggedabout Greg Edmonson & David Boyd. You figure it out.

7) Joss was producing three TV series @that time so, not possible.

Imo, one of the reasons Firefly was so good was the FOX network gave Joss US$38million to make it.

Keep the Shiny Side Up . . .

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
The Conspiracy Thread
Thu, November 13, 2025 06:02 - 27 posts
Once, We Were Spacemen podcast Nathan Fillion and Alan Tudyk
Thu, November 13, 2025 05:18 - 3 posts
Shiny New Year early, early bird pricing for Shiny New Year 2026 ends Halloween, Friday, 10/31/25, at midnight
Tue, November 11, 2025 09:53 - 2 posts
SERENITY screenings FANFEST Tuesday, November 18, 2025 11 theatres. Six states. 10 cities.
Sat, November 8, 2025 19:32 - 2 posts
Thank you Haken!
Tue, November 4, 2025 21:38 - 6 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Tue, November 4, 2025 05:58 - 117 posts
D-Con Chamber
Mon, October 27, 2025 20:18 - 4 posts
Videos Battlestar Galactica
Mon, October 27, 2025 20:11 - 2 posts
The Order of Things
Sun, October 26, 2025 05:14 - 70 posts
Halloween 1
Mon, October 20, 2025 08:14 - 47 posts
The Fascist Ideology of Star Trek
Fri, October 17, 2025 17:49 - 137 posts
Happy Birthday Star Trek!!
Tue, October 14, 2025 18:44 - 20 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL