GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Serenity's engines

POSTED BY: MISBEHAVIN
UPDATED: Sunday, February 12, 2006 11:54
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1615
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, February 12, 2006 8:38 AM

MISBEHAVIN


Raising a technical question about a fictional ship that is 500 years in the future puts me at risk of being numbered among the overly-serious convention goers of "Galaxy Quest," but here goes:

Serenity's engines fold down to the side when the ship is on the ground. I couldn't think of any reason for the engines to be lowered, other than that maybe Joss wanted them to be at ground level to facilitate scenes like the one in The Train Job where Niska's man is shoved through the engine. Now I notice on a conceptual drawing that the engines were apparently designed to also be elevated at times above the horizontal wings. (Note the left side of the image.) Has anyone seen a reason for the engines to be raised or lowered? Normal VTOL and even the "Crazy Ivan" maneuver only require that they be rotated.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 8:38 AM

MISBEHAVIN


Raising a technical question about a fictional ship that is 500 years in the future puts me at risk of being numbered among the overly-serious convention goers of "Galaxy Quest," but here goes:

Serenity's engines fold down to the side when the ship is on the ground. I couldn't think of any reason for the engines to be lowered, other than that maybe Joss wanted them to be at ground level to facilitate scenes like the one in The Train Job where Niska's man is shoved through the engine. Now I notice on a conceptual drawing that the engines were apparently designed to also be elevated at times above the horizontal wings. (Note the left side of the image.) Has anyone seen a reason for the engines to be raised or lowered? Normal VTOL and even the "Crazy Ivan" maneuver only require that they be rotated.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 8:45 AM

PDCHARLES

What happened? He see your face?


I have not SEEN a reason.

But my best guess from a design standpoint is that it is utilitarian.

Much like Navy planes/jets on aircraft carriers, the design stems from landing spaces. It seems to be an old mass produced cargo ship. Folding the engines down maybe could conserve space in some crowded docking areas. After they have landed of course.



______________________________________________
U gonna be smart here Riva?!?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 8:45 AM

MARMOSET54


I dunno...perhaps it cuts down on the drag in atmo? Probably enables a speed-increase without the use of fuel with the "firefly" burst?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:07 AM

DAVESHAYNE


Quote:

Originally posted by misbehavin:
Has anyone seen a reason for the engines to be raised or lowered?



Perhaps to allow maintenance access?

David

You wanna go, Little Man?
Only if it's someplace with candle light.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:23 AM

MISBEHAVIN


Quote:

Originally posted by daveshayne:
...Perhaps to allow maintenance access?...


Yeah, I guess that's a good enough reason as any for a fictional ship. I really liked thinking that it was just a value-added feature so that Mal could throw people through the engines. But then that's just the romantic in me.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:23 AM

MISBEHAVIN


Quote:

Originally posted by daveshayne:
...Perhaps to allow maintenance access?...


Yeah, I guess that's a good enough reason as any for a fictional ship. I really liked thinking that it was just a value-added feature so that Mal could throw people through the engines. But then that's just the romantic in me.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:30 AM

DAVESHAYNE


Quote:

Originally posted by misbehavin:
Quote:

Originally posted by daveshayne:
...Perhaps to allow maintenance access?...


Yeah, I guess that's a good enough reason as any for a fictional ship. I really liked thinking that it was just a value-added feature so that Mal could throw people through the engines. But then that's just the romantic in me.



You mistake my meaning. The engines tilt up for maintenance. They tilt down, as you said, for dealing with the odd Crow.

David

You wanna go, Little Man?
Only if it's someplace with candle light.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:45 AM

CITIZEN


Aircraft on Aircraft carriers often are designed to allow the wings to fold down so that more planes can fit into the same space.

When mooring a yachet the price includes the amount of space the boat takes up, so maybe Serenitys folding engines are to allow the ship to be docked cheaper, since with them folded down it takes up less space.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
You should never give powers to a leader you like that you’d hate to have given to a leader you fear

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:48 AM

MISBEHAVIN


Quote:

Originally posted by daveshayne:
You mistake my meaning. The engines tilt up for maintenance. They tilt down, as you said, for dealing with the odd Crow...


Wacky fun!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:48 AM

MISBEHAVIN


Quote:

Originally posted by daveshayne:
You mistake my meaning. The engines tilt up for maintenance. They tilt down, as you said, for dealing with the odd Crow...


Wacky fun!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 11:49 AM

DAVESHAYNE


Quote:

Originally posted by misbehavin:
Quote:

Originally posted by daveshayne:
You mistake my meaning. The engines tilt up for maintenance. They tilt down, as you said, for dealing with the odd Crow...


Wacky fun!



The very best kind.

David

You wanna go, Little Man?
Only if it's someplace with candle light.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 12, 2006 11:54 AM

DOG13000


They're for landing/takeoff. They are copying the Harrier Jet's V-Toll Capibilities. They also want the ship to seem more charecter like with the engines folding in like the wings of a bird.

Consult "Serenity: The Tenth Charecter" on your FF features for more info.

"Someone Ever Tries to Kill You, You Try and Kill Em' Right Back"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Fan-Made ‘Green Lantern’ Trailer Receives Nathan Fillion’s Endorsement
Fri, December 20, 2024 18:31 - 9 posts
MERRY CHRISTMAS
Fri, December 20, 2024 17:58 - 5 posts
Why Firefly deserved to die
Wed, December 18, 2024 16:34 - 99 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Tue, December 17, 2024 08:58 - 56 posts
What if... Firefly had been British?
Tue, December 17, 2024 08:40 - 44 posts
Shiny New Year 2025 — Philadelphia, PA
Sun, December 15, 2024 15:25 - 2 posts
Joss was right... Mandarin is the language of the future...
Fri, December 13, 2024 20:35 - 36 posts
James Earl Jones, commanding actor who voiced Darth Vader, dies at 93
Thu, December 12, 2024 09:17 - 6 posts
What's wrong with Star Trek Voyager, and Enterprise?
Thu, December 12, 2024 09:14 - 30 posts
WE WAITED 18 YEARS FOR A REBOOT AND DISNEY IS GOING TO DO IT...AND THEN STERILIZE COMPANIONS???!
Tue, December 10, 2024 14:25 - 95 posts
Host the 2025 Browncoat Ball! - Request for Proposals
Mon, December 2, 2024 00:22 - 4 posts
Is Joss Whedon finished as a film maker, is his future destiny to be some muttering version of Brigitte Bardot, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, Charlie Sheen, Danny Glover?
Sun, November 24, 2024 06:15 - 13 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL