Quote:

---

Originally posted by RingofFire:
I would also pick Mal and he might even be more of my first choice now that I have given it added thought. That is a man with deep well-springs of emotion, no question. Plus he would be loyal to the death once he made up his mind that you were the "one".

RingofFire

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by sab39:
I find it very interesting that (as a sweeping generalization) the ... majority of the heterosexual menfolk (myself included) give answers that essentially boil down to "which of the male members of the crew would be easiest for you to avoid anything actually happening with".
Time for another imponderables thread?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by PhoenixRose:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by sab39:
I also wonder whether there's any connection between that fact and the way that (as another sweeping generalization) any straight man will respond to the thought of two women with a firm "I'll be in my bunk" where as far as I can tell it's pretty rare for a woman to have that reaction to the thought of two men.

---

Hey, as long as it's loving, I think it's hot. I've read some slash fics that left me cold, and some that left me, well, not cold. I'll say, though, that I never eally thought about it before reading them. As far as someone I was with... Well, I wouldn't want to watch them get it on with anyone else, regardless of gender. But cute couples are cute, and they can be across the whole spectrum. There are some lesbian couples that are really not that cute, some that are; some hetero cuples that are also decidedly not cute, and some that are. See where I'm going with this? anyway, my theory is that it's usually the thought of pleasure that causes the "I'll be in my bunk" reaction. Women can be very good at pleasuring each other since they are, uh, quite familiar with the parts. The same could probably be said of men. It's not a regualr fantasy, but I can dig it.
That brings up another thought. another generalization that I might be totally off on: I, as a woman, tend to have fantasies that include myself. I think this is true of most women, which is possibly why we don't tend to fantasize about two men together. Where would we fit in? But men seem to be able to imagine two completely different people and still find it enjyable, which is possibly why they would fantasize about two women. Am I right?


*************************************************
One summer.
One mission.
One legion of Browncoats.

Starting June 23rd, we aim to misbehave.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by FollowMal:


Just dropping by the thread to hand SuzFromOz
a browncoat since she's new...

*hands SuzFromOz a browncoat that fits perfectly*

Welcome and you're gonna fit right in.

And what is the matter with all you girls.... where is the Cap'n love!?

*leaves thread... going back to my storeroom where I can stare at the Cap'n's pics all I want to.*

"You hold. Hold 'til I get back." Mal

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by RingofFire:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by PhoenixRose:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by sab39:
I also wonder whether there's any connection between that fact and the way that (as another sweeping generalization) any straight man will respond to the thought of two women with a firm "I'll be in my bunk" where as far as I can tell it's pretty rare for a woman to have that reaction to the thought of two men.

---

Hey, as long as it's loving, I think it's hot. I've read some slash fics that left me cold, and some that left me, well, not cold. I'll say, though, that I never eally thought about it before reading them. As far as someone I was with... Well, I wouldn't want to watch them get it on with anyone else, regardless of gender. But cute couples are cute, and they can be across the whole spectrum. There are some lesbian couples that are really not that cute, some that are; some hetero cuples that are also decidedly not cute, and some that are. See where I'm going with this? anyway, my theory is that it's usually the thought of pleasure that causes the "I'll be in my bunk" reaction. Women can be very good at pleasuring each other since they are, uh, quite familiar with the parts. The same could probably be said of men. It's not a regualr fantasy, but I can dig it.
That brings up another thought. another generalization that I might be totally off on: I, as a woman, tend to have fantasies that include myself. I think this is true of most women, which is possibly why we don't tend to fantasize about two men together. Where would we fit in? But men seem to be able to imagine two completely different people and still find it enjyable, which is possibly why they would fantasize about two women. Am I right?


*************************************************
One summer.
One mission.
One legion of Browncoats.

Starting June 23rd, we aim to misbehave.

---

I see where you are going with this and I do think you are right.If its love, what's the difference? I dont understand why some folks get all freaked out over gender. I also fantasize about myself and one other rather than 2 others. Me and MAl for instance!!!


I aim to misbehave.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by sab39:
I also wonder whether there's any connection between that fact and the way that (as another sweeping generalization) any straight man will respond to the thought of two women with a firm "I'll be in my bunk" where as far as I can tell it's pretty rare for a woman to have that reaction to the thought of two men.

---