Sign Up | Log In
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
Male and Female Imponderables--Snow Blind
Friday, October 13, 2006 4:36 AM
ZEEK
Quote:Originally posted by Ged: Hey all, I'm hanging in there. It seems I am single once again. I was just in CA this past weekend visiting my, now ex-girlfriend, and well... things went very well when I got there. But, towards the end it kind of went south. She was on the rebound and she had some other issues going on, and compiled with the distance, it just wasn't a formula for success. I must say that she's still very special to me... she's such an amazing girl... it was just kind of bad timing and distance that happened... a casualty of circumstance, you could say. I am sad, though. But, I'll be okay. We're still friends and keeping in touch and all that. Well, enough of my bad weekend... hope you guys are doing better than me!
Friday, October 13, 2006 4:37 AM
KELKHIL
Friday, October 13, 2006 4:57 AM
MAGDALENA
"No power in the 'verse can stop me!"
Friday, October 13, 2006 5:00 AM
NICODEMUS
Friday, October 13, 2006 5:03 AM
PHOENIXROSE
You think you know--what's to come, what you are. You haven't even begun.
Friday, October 13, 2006 5:17 AM
GED
Friday, October 13, 2006 6:56 AM
Friday, October 13, 2006 7:31 AM
TRISTAN
Friday, October 13, 2006 8:17 AM
Friday, October 13, 2006 8:19 AM
Friday, October 13, 2006 8:50 AM
MINK
Friday, October 13, 2006 9:09 AM
Friday, October 13, 2006 9:14 AM
Quote:Originally posted by mink: Maybe it's quiet because there's nothing good to ponder. One month left to live is indeed a classic, but somehow it doesn't fire my imagination at the moment. Tats don't either. What do you think is the right legal age for: a) consumption of alcohol b) voting c) driving d) registration for military conscription e) marriage f) sex My answers are: unrestricted, sixteen, eighteen, eighteen, eighteen, and f requires a more detailed response - wrt same age partners, unrestricted, wrt to partners age 16-20, sixteen, wrt partners 21 and over, eighteen "When I write my memoirs, that sh!t'll be in there, guaranteed."
Friday, October 13, 2006 10:03 AM
JONNYQUEST
"Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?"
Friday, October 13, 2006 11:02 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: My reasoning is that around 25 people seem to get over the "I'm a big boy cause I'm drinking" phase. So, then they are drinking for social purposes for the most part. >snip< Kids gots hormones. You're not gonna stop them from having sex by making it illegal anyway. So let em hump like bunnies.
Friday, October 13, 2006 11:14 AM
Quote:Originally posted by mink: Raising the legal age to 25, however, would make someone feel like a "really big boy" when drinking.
Friday, October 13, 2006 11:38 AM
RMMC
Friday, October 13, 2006 2:16 PM
Quote:Originally posted by RMMC: And how about an: i.) age to be able to have a job. 17. I think kids need to be able to concentrate on school and the school & job thing is a major physical/mental drain that they should be a bit older when trying to juggle those.
Friday, October 13, 2006 2:40 PM
JAMESTHEDARK
Friday, October 13, 2006 2:57 PM
Quote:Originally posted by mink/JonnyQuest/RMMC: What do you think is the right legal age for: a) consumption of alcohol b) voting c) driving d) registration for military conscription e) marriage f) sex g) tat or piercing i) age to be able to have a job
Friday, October 13, 2006 4:51 PM
TRAVELER
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: Quote:Originally posted by mink/JonnyQuest/RMMC: What do you think is the right legal age for: a) consumption of alcohol b) voting c) driving d) registration for military conscription e) marriage f) sex g) tat or piercing i) age to be able to have a job Tried to find the original post but there are over 100 to look through already. a) Well I didn't start drinking until I was 21. Became a raving alcoholic by age 35. Was in treatment with two 18 year olds and a guy in his 60's. So my vote is alcohol is a stupid waste of time. b) When I was eligible for the draft back in 1970 I was not old enough to vote. So I could have been sent to war without any say as to whether we should be in the war or not. So will stick with 18. Look at the people who are in political office and tell they are mature. c) That is the one thing I could do at 16. Males are the worst at that age. Women are more responsible behind the wheel. But we can't be sexist, so will stick with 16. Most really bad accidents don't occur until alcohol is involved. See "a" above. d) The reason the miltary takes people at a very young age is because they vulnerable to persuasion. Their minds are still clay and can be molded into anything. If you have seen "Full Metal Jacket" you can see how good the military is at persuasion. Of course no moral values are attached to this so you have the attrocities that are occuring in Iraq. So I go with 21. At least give them some time to learn about life before they learn about death. e) This is one I will pass on because I never married and don't feel qualified to answer. Most people I know end up getting divorced if they married to young. f) Since most people are not mature until the are 50 they might as well have sex when they are 16. Hormones dictate a lot of our actions and they are hard to fight against. Problem is most people don't know what safe sex is. God forbide we teach anyone in our schools about it. My parents didn't know everything when they taught me. If we teach our children from day one that it is something wonderful and not a dark secret than 16 would work because they would know what they are doing. So there are a lot of ifs to this plan. g) Here again you have to teach your children what is responsible. I met a parent who allowed her 10 year old boy to have a pierced ear. But I have seen piecing in places on the body that are not allowed to be exposed in public. So piercing is a fuzzy subject. Ear at 13. Below the ear 18. h)Work at a young age helps create responsibility. But it has to be safe. I read a book on the turn of the century, 1800's to 1900's. There was a photograph of the crew that would pull foreign objects out of coal coming up conveyors from the mines. They were all dressed the same. Coveralls, heavy coats, caps, and scarves to cover their faces from the coal dust. They were black from the dust. They stood together like they were a team. They had stern faces of hard working and serious men. Not one of them was over 13. But you could see it in their faces, they were men. Not a profession I would choose for my child, but you could see the confidence and the selfesteem in their faces, even through the coal dust. Maybe the coal dust added to the effect. Footnote: Maturity is on going and is not a constant. Life experinces can bring on maturity and also stagnate it. I grew up in a disfunctional family. That is putting it mildly. Believe me! So I was not very mature until much later than most. I still have a long way to go. But the journey is the thing, if you have the right goals. Give your children the right goals and show them the results of those goals and they will surprize you. So how old do you have to be to have children? Traveler
Friday, October 13, 2006 6:29 PM
CHRISMOORHEAD
Friday, October 13, 2006 8:04 PM
Saturday, October 14, 2006 5:01 AM
Quote: Originally posted by mink/JonnyQuest/RMMC: What do you think is the right legal age for: a) consumption of alcohol b) voting c) driving d) registration for military conscription e) marriage f) sex g) tat or piercing i) age to be able to have a job
Quote: Maturity is on going and is not a constant. Life experinces can bring on maturity and also stagnate it. I grew up in a disfunctional family. That is putting it mildly. Believe me! So I was not very mature until much later than most. I still have a long way to go. But the journey is the thing, if you have the right goals. Give your children the right goals and show them the results of those goals and they will surprise you.
Saturday, October 14, 2006 10:08 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: e)Don't get me started on statutory rape laws. (17-17 is "legally" okay though "morally" reprehensible. 18-18 is okay all around; eh. 18-17 and somebody goes to jail. Huh? Same two kids in each case, born 6 months apart. Don't get me started.) 'Course this part o' the rant should probably be in the next section.
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: "h)" - apparently the equivalent of the 13th floor in this thread...
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: In fact, that pretty much summarizes my whole stance. No "restriction" by law under parental supervision when very young; experimentation, investigation and probationary restrictions when pubescent; and full right to fall down and make an ass of yourself at adulthood. Hurt ANYONE along the way and the responsible party (parent with appropriate, child when appropriate, shared when appropriate.) Rights increase as responsibility does: age is not the determining factor. Am I a radical?
Sunday, October 15, 2006 12:52 AM
Monday, October 16, 2006 4:23 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RMMC: Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: e)Don't get me started on statutory rape laws To me that does seem reasonable as I really think that kids under 16 do need protecting.
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: e)Don't get me started on statutory rape laws
Quote: Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: In fact, that pretty much summarizes my whole stance. No "restriction" by law under parental supervision when very young; experimentation, investigation and probationary restrictions when pubescent; and full right to fall down and make an ass of yourself at adulthood. Hurt ANYONE along the way and the responsible party (parent with appropriate, child when appropriate, shared when appropriate.) Rights increase as responsibility does: age is not the determining factor. Am I a radical?
Quote:Part of this sounds okay, but it also sounds a bit too "Big Brother is watching" to me. Parenting actually needs to be done by the parents involved. Maybe if they just make one age the go for adulthood, and anyone who 'screws up' which results in anyone being injured and you lose your adult status immediately, and have to then work to prove when and if you ever get it back.
Monday, October 16, 2006 5:09 AM
MSG
Monday, October 16, 2006 11:24 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: I don't think age has ever been the appropriate guideline for any of these things. We use age because it's easy and definable. Maturity ability and responsibility are those qualities which should determine what we should be able to do when. It's different for every individual. What gets tricky is determing when this occurs for each individual.
Monday, October 16, 2006 11:27 AM
Monday, October 16, 2006 1:02 PM
Quote:Originally posted by RMMC: **WARNING: DOUBLE POST SILLINESS AHEAD** *turn back now* *Really, there's nothing pertainant to the conversation here* *I warned you* ♪ We live for you, We die for you The National Embalmers School We dig our graves Just Six by three We like to give You room you see. Post-mortem! Post-mortem! Post-mortem! Embalming we must go! Post-mortem! Post-mortem! Post-mortem! Embalming we must go! ♪ *Told ya*
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL