GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Reavers!

POSTED BY: ZOID
UPDATED: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 06:24
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 8021
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 1:43 PM

ZOID


Greetings, 'coats:

Having enjoyed your posts on an extended basis for the past week or so (less frequently before that), I've found quite a few that basically express, "Reavers are intriguing/scary/cool". So I thought we might like to explore exactly what Reavers are.

Well, since Firefly is basically a Western, an analogue from old oaters might apply. I think they're Injuns, Redskins, Heathen Red Devils, whatever...

Now, when I had this thought originally, I thought, "Wow. An archaic racial stereotype/epithet. I'm not so sure that's a very good idea." The American 'Indian' (Amerind, in anthropology), has gotten a raw deal since European settlers first came to the Americas, and only recently have misconceptions about their culture and value systems been revised to reflect that theirs was, at the very least, a thriving one, less violent than ours, and in equilibrium with their environment. So, Reavers being equated with 'Injuns' from the epic Westerns of the late 50's, seemed more than a bit unfair and unsympathetic to the treatment those peoples received during our Manifest Destiny Era.

Then, I started thinking in greater depth. What do we know about Reavers based on clues from the show? We know they'll "rape us to death, eat our flesh and sew our skins into their clothing", per Zoe, who added we'd be very lucky if they did it in that order. Not very neighborly. We also know that they frequently don't kill everyone, but rather "make them watch" while they -- in variable order -- rape/skin/eat family members and friends. That's how we got our survivor in "Bushwhacked", you'll recall.

That survivor, by the time FF's crew had found him, was already babbling and showing signs of 'converting' into a Reaver himself. That transformation completed itself on the Alliance Cruiser Dortmund(?), and he split his tongue, slashed up some medicos, and pierced his cheek and possibly other parts of his anatomy with large, sharp looking pieces of metal.

Let's break for a second and examine a corresponding scene from a Western flick. There's one I remember from my youth in which the white settler daughter had been abducted by 'Injuns' and turned into a savage over the years of living with them. I can no longer recall the name of the movie ("The Searchers", or "Cheyenne Autumn"?), but in it a party of lawmen regain several now-grown children from the captivity of 'Injuns'. One of the rescued females, clearly chafing in 'civilized' clothing, is found having just murdered her father or husband, holding his bloody scalp in one hand and a knife in the other, letting out a war whoop.

That's the correlation between Reavers of the "New West" of Firefly and the "Old West" of North America. But what other similarities may exist? While it was certainly true that there were some genuinely bellicose tribes, most Amerinds fought because they were being invaded, chased off of their lands and hunting routes, and their primary source of food, shelter and clothing -- the buffalo -- methodically hunted to extinction.

Perhaps -- and this is a stretch -- the new worlds upon which the Earth settlers performed terraforming and established colonies were not uninhabited? Perhaps some form of hive mind microorganism inhabited one or more of the planets. When these come into contact with human life, they invade the body and eventually take over the mind of the victim. Hence the delay btween finding the survivor and his 'conversion' into a Reaver.

While I'm shooting in the dark here, what if the 'hive' don't care about radiation poisoning, because a human body is just a vehicle to them, and their use of it wears it out pretty quickly anyway. They only need to make sure they get a fresh supply of humans, some for food and some to supply new bodies for the ones they're burning out. This would explain Reaver raids of human colonies, the stated fact that their territories are spreading, and why sometimes they would attack, others not, depending on whether or not they "are hungry".

...Or just needing a new set of wheels?

What if Reavers aren't the 'Injuns'... What if the native life form of the local region of space -- inhabiting men's bodies -- is?

P.S.
I know this theory may be reminiscent of "Ghosts of Mars", but then again, so was the physical appearance of the one 'converted' Reaver we've seen...



Respectfully,

zoid
_________________________________________________

"River didn't fix faith. Faith fixed River."

- Senator Richard 'Book' Wilkins, Independent Congress
author of A Child Shall Lead Them: A History of the Second War of Independence

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 2:21 PM

ZORIAH


Sounds interesting but then it makes me think of the Borg assimilating people too.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 2:28 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Reavers ain't human...or they forgot how to be. So says Mal. He seems to know alot about Reavers, how I'm not sure. Even to the point of how they make victims watch...

Then there is Book, who thinks there is a 'higher power' ..or puts out that viewpoint as a man of god.

As for Reavers, I don't know. I get your point about 'Injuns' , but please don't make such a broad brush. They're either men who went too far to the edge of the Galaxy, or perhaps they are an experiment gone really really bad. eg) see hands of blue, 2 x 2.

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. Worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 2:47 PM

SERGEANTX


They're freelance terrorists working for/created by the Alliance to scare the frontier planets and justify the need for Alliance "protection".

SergeantX

"..and here's to all the dreamers, may our open hearts find rest." -- Nanci Griffith

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 2:56 PM

TALVIN


Reavers are almost certainly not alien organisms. Joss has been quoted several times in the top-bar of this site as rejecting "aliens".

As for the Native American Analogy...eh...I see them as being a little more archetypal than that. "Barbarians", certainly. To the Romans the Celts, the Goths, and the Vandals were all pretty scary things, and they told some wild tales about them, too.

Though, if you want to use the Native American analogy, let's remember that scalping was not a practice of theirs until the "civilized" nations of the French and British starting paying bounties for proof that the other nation's settlers were dead.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 2:56 PM

LJOSALF


Ah, yes, as far as operating without core containment, Wash tells us it is suicide but doesn't elaborate. Who knows, operating without core containemtnt might up your energy output and redline your engine making you go really, really fast. But it might also increase your chances of blowing up at the same time. Kinda like the difference between riding bareback and with a stiff, heavy saddle. Bareback you get a real good feel for the horse but you risk falling off more readily than if you use the saddle. 'Course if you ride so well you're apt to be mistaken for a centaur, you might not think fallin' off was all that likely. Might be contemptuous of those as employ saddles.

See, it might not have anything to do with radiation poisoning....

Ljosalf

The voyage of discovery is not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.
Marcel Proust (1871 - 1922)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 3:10 PM

LEMAT


I don't post much here, and I have not been active on this board except in the last month. So, hi to Zoid and anyone else reading this.

While I think your possible explanation for the origins of the Reavers is well thought out, Zoid, I think it is wrong. Your explaination, while as good as most and very well thought out, does not seem to jive with the other "scifi" elements of the series. There seems to be an attempt to minimize the most extreme scifi elements of Firefly to the extent that is needed to tell the story. The introduction of Ghosts of Mars style microbes--good analogy their, by the way--into the mix just seems out of step with that general feel of the show; that seems to be more of a Star Trek style plot device, anyway. Also, if their were microbes doing this, it would seem that the capitan of the Alliance crusier would have had some blood-to-blood contact with Reaver-boy, and could be infected (although Mal and Jayne are not, despite also having very close contact with him). I really don't think that if we see that capitan again, it will be as the capitan of a Reaver vessel that used to be an Alliance crusier.

I think that from a dramatic stand point, you are very right that the Indians in older Westerns are similar to the Reavers. I personally think of the Reavers in terms of the boys (good, civilized, English boys) in Lord of the Flies and the Vikings or some other raiding culture. They seem to have developed their own society out alone in the black and don't have much of a problem using other people to have fun or obtain the nessecities of life. The other people they take from and kill are maybe not viewed as real people.

Just a thought. Perhaps the mindset of the Reavers could be better explained in terms of Uruk Hai in Tolkien. They value their own strength, and don't mind testing the 'strength' of their captives to see "what's inside." The Uruk Hai leader pulls Stider's sword into him at the end of the Fellowship of the Ring movie, because he is just that hardcore; seems kinda like a Reaver thing to me. (BTW, I am not saying that the Reavers are tortured and corrupted Elves twisted into the service of Morgoth or that they are the hybrid of Men and affore mentioned corrupted Elves. They are still Homo sapiens, even if they ain't men.)

This post has been edited for greater clarity, and edited again because I didn't proof read my gorram post.

Jon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 3:35 PM

GUNRUNNER


Quote:

Originally posted by ljosalf:
Ah, yes, as far as operating without core containment, Wash tells us it is suicide but doesn't elaborate. Who knows, operating without core containemtnt might up your energy output and redline your engine making you go really, really fast. But it might also increase your chances of blowing up at the same time. Kinda like the difference between riding bareback and with a stiff, heavy saddle. Bareback you get a real good feel for the horse but you risk falling off more readily than if you use the saddle. 'Course if you ride so well you're apt to be mistaken for a centaur, you might not think fallin' off was all that likely. Might be contemptuous of those as employ saddles.

See, it might not have anything to do with radiation poisoning....

Ljosalf

The voyage of discovery is not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.
Marcel Proust (1871 - 1922)



A more modern analogy is the Soviet Submarines of the 60's (Hotels, Echoes, and Novembers). These poorly constructed ships had half the radiation shielding of other nuclear subs of their day, this had the effect of increasing their speed but eradiating the crew and leaving a radioactive wake that can be tracked. Sounds very similar to the Reaver Ship.

The idea that the Reavers are really people operating on the behalf of the Alliance to enforce law in the border worlds is renascent of the game Independence War 2: Edge of Chaos. In the game the "Marauders" are a group of pirates who pray upon ships in a particular region on behalf of a corporation that controls part of the government.


The Firefly CCG Web Site:
http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Bllm119/firefly_ccg_web_site.htm
>Help out today!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 3:48 PM

LJOSALF


My point is that everyone assumes that operating "without core containment" means "radiation hazard" when Joss has very cleverly avoided telling us exactly how things work. His characters frequently just know. For instance, Mal and Kaylee looking at the floating chandelier in Shindig know how it is done but they don't lecture each other (and us) about the how of it. They just react to its extravagance. So, engines in the Firefly 'verse might not be powered by radioactive material. Nobody seemed too concerned about radiation in Out of Gas when the fire ripped through the engine room.

Alternately, radioactivity is involved but there could be a whopping hell of a difference between operating without core containment and operating without adequate shielding.

Ljosalf

The voyage of discovery is not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.
Marcel Proust (1871 - 1922)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 6, 2004 4:18 PM

ZORIAH


I agree, when Wash said that line the first time I watched I did not automatically think of radiation poisioning. I was thinking more of the engine being pushed to a limit that might be dangerous and unstable resulting in a possible explosion.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 7, 2004 4:45 PM

LJOSALF


The engine doesn't have to explode for the result to be disastrous--just seize up or burn up. Out of Gas shows the results of something like that happening. You lose your engine deep in the black and you suffocate or freeze to deat--if you're lucky--waiting for rescue (unlikely in the event you are a Reaver ship). If you're not lucky, you burn to death. Near planetfall, you might find yourself auguring in instead of making that controlled descent your flight instructor kept hammering home. Your thrust might go all asymetrical on you sending you off in an unexpected and unwelcome direction before the engine blows out altogether. Oh, yeah, catastrophic engine failure could get all kinds of messy.

Ljosalf

The voyage of discovery is not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.
Marcel Proust (1871 - 1922)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 7, 2004 6:31 PM

ANKHAGOGO


Quote:

Originally posted by LeMat:
While I think your possible explanation for the origins of the Reavers is well thought out, Zoid, I think it is wrong.
I think that from a dramatic stand point, you are very right that the Indians in older Westerns are similar to the Reavers. I personally think of the Reavers in terms of the boys (good, civilized, English boys) in Lord of the Flies and the Vikings or some other raiding culture



There was an "origins of Reavers" thread a while back, but I am somewhat technologically impaired and don't know how to link it in, so I'll repeat my thoughts here on what I said there..

My idea is that Reavers were originally militia, stationed out beyond the edge of civilization, probably to keep intrepid (read: stupid) people from travelling into nothingness, or to keep "someone" from coming into civilization. (We know there won't be aliens -- they don't.)
I'm thinking of a deal vaguely like the movie "The Thing" -- a group of men out in the middle of nowhere, with little or no contact with anyone but each other. One little thing goes wrong, fingers start being pointed, and suddenly, it is "Lord of Flies", but with adult, military men who are armed,very,very bored, and pretty much completely isolated. After a certain point in the reorganization of the microcosm (what a sentence!), it makes sense that they'd go prowling after those who were weaker. Now we don't know how long there have been Reavers, or rumours of Reavers, but I think that might explain the age of at least that one ship --perhaps it's a ship that came to re-supply the outpost that they seized after doing God-knows-what to the crew.

I do see the parallels to the Indians of the Old West, but that's so obvious (to me, at least) that I'm not convinced Whedon would go the "they're only defending their territory and everyone's unfairly demonized them" route.
I think that Whedon's more going for the psychological affect the idea of the Indians had on settlers, and particualarly people back East, who only heard the really bad stuff, not the actual "they're a fully formed civilized society with some bad members who get all the publicity" anle.
But he does like to pull the "there's always an exception to the rule" card, otherwise known as the "not all demons are bad" rule, so I wouldn't be entirely shocked to run across a Reaver with a soul at some point.


"You're usin' wiles on me!"

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 7, 2004 6:38 PM

VETERAN

Don't squat with your spurs on.


I like the freelance terroist idea.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 3:38 AM

HARDWARE


You want to know what I think?

I think Reavers are religious fanatics led by a charismatic figure. Someone like Rasputin the mad monk. Picture a religious zealot going wandering in the wilderness, in this case deep into the black. Out there he finds something. Maybe himself, maybe god, maybe aliens, hell, maybe he just hallucinates when his atmo goes bad.

So, the wandering lunatic comes back to the rim of human civilization and finds a camp of bandits. No leaders, just a group of outlaws with the strongest and meanest in charge. Now charismatic madman comes to town and kills the strongest of the bunch, or maybe he just lures them all in with his charisma.

I think it was very astute of Joss to use canibalism for his "monsters". Once you've crossed that threshhold voluntarily there's no turning back. Who wants to be your friend if they know you've eaten human flesh when there was real food laying about? It is an initiation rite that there is no turning back from. Maybe the reason the survivor from Bushwhacked went mad is because he was forced to eat the flesh of his friends and family?

You want to add the religious spin to it... how easy is it pervert the Christian "flesh of Christ, blood of Christ"? Imagine that surivior tied down and made to witness his friends being tortured and killed. Even worse, imagine the many surivors on that ship being lined up and the first one is offered a chance to eat the flesh of their dead kin. They refuse and are slowly tortured to death in front of the other survivors. Then their flesh is offered to the next person in line. The one who does it isn't harmed in any other way, but made to watch the others all refuse to eat human flesh. If he is not the last, then he has to watch all that with the shame of being unharmed, having eaten human flesh, and maybe the contempt of the others who haven't been killed yet or the forgiveness of those who are being tortured to death for refusing. It is no wonder he went mad.

{Joss, if you're reading this and want to use any ideas, just give me a credit. ;) }

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 9:24 AM

BADGERSHAT


Quote:

Originally posted by zoid:

Perhaps -- and this is a stretch -- the new worlds upon which the Earth settlers performed terraforming and established colonies were not uninhabited? Perhaps some form of hive mind microorganism inhabited one or more of the planets. When these come into contact with human life, they invade the body and eventually take over the mind of the victim. Hence the delay btween finding the survivor and his 'conversion' into a Reaver.

While I'm shooting in the dark here, what if the 'hive' don't care about radiation poisoning, because a human body is just a vehicle to them, and their use of it wears it out pretty quickly anyway. They only need to make sure they get a fresh supply of humans, some for food and some to supply new bodies for the ones they're burning out. This would explain Reaver raids of human colonies, the stated fact that their territories are spreading, and why sometimes they would attack, others not, depending on whether or not they "are hungry".

...Or just needing a new set of wheels?

What if Reavers aren't the 'Injuns'... What if the native life form of the local region of space -- inhabiting men's bodies -- is?

P.S.
I know this theory may be reminiscent of "Ghosts of Mars", but then again, so was the physical appearance of the one 'converted' Reaver we've seen...

Respectfully,
zoid



Honestly, I gotta say I think this can;t be true, with NO disrespect to the ever-dilligent zoid. And the reason I say this is, Lord Whedon (does that sound too simpering?) made it very clear that this is TOTALLY non-"alien" oriented, just humans exploring. I know, maybe we find this organism in the exploration process, but I think it's just too simplified for the mind of Joss Whedon.

It's probably a lot more in-depth and psychological, like the endless depths of space have some horrible effect (didn't Zoe say something about going to the edge of space or somesuch? I can't recall, but there was something).

Sort of, a little tiny bit, like "Event Horizon" where they discover something that drives them all batst... except not really like that, either... simply the closest similarity I can come up with.

But anyway, I think Reavers are along the line of people who have seen into the depths of Hell and lived to regret it.

But I wonder, do Reavers reproduce? And if so, are their offspring sane and go nuts, or is whatever makes Reavers nuts passed on genetically? Hmmm... intriguing... could open up a whole new forum on the whole "Product of my environment" thing. At least the super-violent child of a Reaver has a better excuse than some kid who blames video games.

Okay, enough rambling.

***************************
"I like smackin 'em"--Jayne

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 11:44 AM

BLAZINGBUG


I think we've been told exactly what Reavers are. I just think it's hard to accept.

It doesn't seem to matter what kind of sci-fi you have, almost none of them seem to touch on the idea that maybe not all of humanity is ready to go into space.

That what Reavers are. That portion of humanity who have seen something with their own eyes that they cannot comprehend... the true vastness of space. It shattered them... the "realization" of the insignificance of their lives. Now, all they live for is to bring that "realization" to others. Mostly by using them for their basest needs, food, sex, clothing... but occasionally by forcing one to see as they do.

To paraphrase Mal, they saw the nothing, and now the nothing is within them.

Like I said, I think it's hard to accept. We'd rather place the blame on the government, alien microbes, radiation, or something else.

Anything other than the darkness that lies within us all.

But then that's what I think makes Reavers truly frightening.

"Wacky fun..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 11:55 AM

EMBERS


Badgershat: I thought we saw an example of Reaver reproduction on the show: where someone goes so completely insane from the fear and violence of a Reaver attack than they self-mutilate themselves and become a Reaver.

I thought the lack of core confinement would mean radiation throughout the ship causing all kinds of cancer/mutations as well...but that isn't really very scientific because normally constant exposure would end up bringing death.

I do agree with Talvin, Joss said there are no aliens and I think he is going to stick to that, so I don't believe Reavers are non-humans...but they are violently insane humans.

Interestingly enough my theory ties in with early Indian mythology:
There is a theory running around Sociologists that the Anasazi (translated as Ancient Enemy) who appearantly abandonded their pueblos and cliff dwellings 700 years ago may have become canibals... Killing each other and driving other Indian nations out of the area as well.

eta: Blazingbug: I didn't see your post when began working on my reply...and I do agree w/you, I think that the vastness of space is too much...and I am actually satisfied w/Joss' (Mal's) explanation

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 1:38 PM

ZOID


Great posts all!

Okay, I admit -- as I did in my original post -- that the "hive mind" micobial invader was perhaps far-fetched. But, I was really just trying to think of a way to give JW an out.

As a child, I was exposed to many Westerns (my Dad, God rest his soul, loved 'em), and the Native Americans in them received a disproportional characterization as being warlike and murderous. Some undoubtedly were, but most were not.

The first movie I can recall that escaped this negative stereotype was "Little Big Man", with Dustin Hoffman. Later, as a PoliSci major at UofH (lo, these many years ago), I was stunned to learn that our American system of government, with its Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches, its system of checks and balances was copied by our Forefathers from the League of the Iroquois!

While researching this response on the Internet, I was surprised to find this citation, at:
http://www.senecaindians.com/seneca_tribal.htm

Quote:


"The Seneca were also great conquerors, highly skilled at warfare, and having been given guns by the Dutch colonists, were fierce adversaries to any other tribe who tried to resist their takeover. One of the distinctive features of the Iroquois warriors' appearance was their hair, which they kept shaved in "Mohawk" fashion, and their heavily tattooed bodies. Iroquois warriors were also believed to have participated in ritual cannibalism, and were also know to torture their prisoners.

"Ironically, Iroquois politics were the most sophisticated in all of the North-American Native cultures; the Seneca, with the exception of one tribe (The Tonawanda), having adopted a democratic form of government after years of questionable leadership by Chiefs who had come into their positions out of lineage rather than virtue. The Seneca women were in charge of elections, and decided who was to become tribal leader, Leaders usually held their posts for life, but could be removed if they became corrupt or proved to be incompetent; the Seneca political system also included a constitution, which is believed to have been the model for the American constitution."



Umm, maybe the Reavers are literally bloodthirsty, not just territorial?

Still, the broad-stroke treatment that Native Americans have received in Westerns belies their actual history, in which they saved the European settlers from starvation at Plymouth Rock (see also, "Thanksgiving") and Jamestown (which repaid the debt by later becoming the first port for African slaves in the continental US).

I was just hoping that JW was coming from a different angle on the whole 'Injuns' thing, that they were only engaging in savagery to protect their territories; but then again, he included slavery in Firefly, too...



Respectfully,

zoid
_________________________________________________

"River didn't fix faith. Faith fixed River."

- Senator Richard 'Book' Wilkins, Independent Congress
author of A Child Shall Lead Them: A History of the Second War of Independence

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 3:29 PM

BLAZINGBUG


Quote:

Originally posted by zoid:
Still, the broad-stroke treatment that Native Americans have received in Westerns belies their actual history, in which they saved the European settlers from starvation at Plymouth Rock (see also, "Thanksgiving") and Jamestown (which repaid the debt by later becoming the first port for African slaves in the continental US).

I was just hoping that JW was coming from a different angle on the whole 'Injuns' thing, that they were only engaging in savagery to protect their territories; but then again, he included slavery in Firefly, too...



I'm thinking he is taking a different angle. Yeah, Native Americans got a bad rap in old Westerns, but since "Little Big Man" that has faded away. You can't have a Native American bad guy in a movie anymore unless the good guy is also a product of their culture. And usually you end up with someone "learning their lesson."

Joss has made the Reavers into the old time "Injuns" who you couldn't put into a movie or TV show nowadays. He's made them pure bad guys, unremorseful and unredeemable, but also unilateral with no racial, cultural, or religious ties to their barbarism.

They're simply the darkness that lies within mankind with no exceptions.

Or that's how I see it at least.

"Wacky fun..."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 3:56 PM

ZOID


BlazingBug:

You wrote:
Quote:


Joss has made the Reavers into the old time "Injuns" who you couldn't put into a movie or TV show nowadays. He's made them pure bad guys, unremorseful and unredeemable, but also unilateral with no racial, cultural, or religious ties to their barbarism.

They're simply the darkness that lies within mankind with no exceptions.


Never let it be said that I'm single-minded; you've convinced me, and thanks. My memories were coloring my reactions to the obvious parallel of Reavers and 'Injuns'. I was experiencing a conditioned aversion to the stereotype of yesteryear, without considering that JW might be just making a statement about Mankind's capacity for brutality, irrespective of cultural identity or values.

It's a true statement, and one with value. Thanks again.

If, on the other hand, we meet a Reaver named 'Red Jacket', grrrr... ;)




Respectfully,

zoid
_________________________________________________

"River didn't fix faith. Faith fixed River."

- Senator Richard 'Book' Wilkins, Independent Congress
author of A Child Shall Lead Them: A History of the Second War of Independence

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 4:24 PM

TALVIN


Cultural Cannibalism (as opposed to Jeffrey Dahmer and certain other sorts) was (is?) far more common than people realize. I don't have the time or resources for a thesis on it tonight (you may all breathe a sigh of relief now) but I will toss out a few things that I recall reading about it:

1) It had spiritual or religious significance.

2) It was not intended to terrify the foes so much as to honor them.

3) Eating their flesh was supposed to give some of the qualities of the slain, their courage/ferocity/what have you.

4) The "long pig" idea of a whole body being roasted over a fire and feasted upon makes good horror stories, but in reality the cannibalism ritual (and ritual it was) usually centered around some specific part: heart, brain, perhaps liver...all depended on what symbolism that culture used. Nor were humans ever a primary food source. Used in sacred ritual only.

5) Sewing the skin into clothing? Well, a few Nazis were fond of the leather that could be made from human skin, and let's not discuss that any further, thanks. If you wish to carry the idea that consuming/using the flesh confers the attributes of the slain a bit further, it fits with the whole.

Too,let us consider:

A) Mal says that if they run, the Reavers have to chase them--it's their way. (Exact quote escapes me.) This implies some form of ethical and moral code they live by, which tends to go along with the spiritual significance thing.

B) We hear alot about famine out on the Rim. With that in mind, eating the dead could be simply a matter of letting nothing go to waste (in their view). Read Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein. What if that guy in Bushwhacked was *unclean*, *unworthy* of joining the spiritual community in some way? Leaving him alive could have been a form of insult and rejection. His later actions? A twisted form of atonement.

C) This is all very well and nice, but my arguments have one great potential fallacy: they assume that Joss reads the same sorts of books and articles that I do (which, admittedly, is most anything I could get my hands on since pre-school. Drove the parental units nuts.)

"OK. I give up. I admit it. I'm a Browncoat."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 8, 2004 4:39 PM

EMBERS


I'm pretty sure the whole 'raping to death' aspect kind of refutes the concept of cannibalism to honor one's ememy...

I also think it is too much to just assume that Reavers are the Firefire version of Native Americans... It is just as likely that they are the 'Jesse James gang', coming in to rob and kill and disrupt society....

Personally I think Joss just wanted to come up with something vaguely terrifying, something much worse than the Alliance could ever be.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 9, 2004 4:00 AM

TALVIN


Quote:

Originally posted by embers:
I'm pretty sure the whole 'raping to death' aspect kind of refutes the concept of cannibalism to honor one's ememy...



Don't be so sure! There have been and are some awfully strange customs out there.

If we are willing to perform Fraternity Initiation Hazings on people we wish to honor as worthy of being our friends and equals, we'll do most any weird thing to our enemies.

And we are *ahems* "civilized".

Quote:


Personally I think Joss just wanted to come up with something vaguely terrifying, something much worse than the Alliance could ever be.



Oh, I agree! Just pointing out that there are some solid models from history that resemble what he is using. It's all the more terrifying when you realize that they probably consider their actions normal, moral, and ethical.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 9, 2004 5:19 PM

HARDBURN


Just wanted to post reguarding the Reaver's and Radiation since I was rewatching Serenity last night. Just gonna quote Wash on this one.

"I'm picking up alot of Radiation... they are operating without a core containment... that's suicide."

I made sure to rewind it he definatley says the part about Radiation. Now that isn't an end to the debate entirely, but it definatley pushes me towards that side of it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 10, 2004 7:59 AM

LJOSALF


I sit corrected! Radiation *is* involved when you operate without core containment. And that *is* suicide.

So, is this standard operating procedure for all Reaver ships all the time? They shouldn't pose too much of a longterm problem then, unless the Reavers are immune to the laws of physics or can psychically deflect radiation. Maybe they travel in lead-lined cryo pods until they get close to their target, then they wake up, rape, kill, and skin folks and jump back into their cryo pods for the trip back to base.

Ljosalf

The voyage of discovery is not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.
Marcel Proust (1871 - 1922)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 12, 2004 5:42 AM

HARDBURN


I guess the best we can do is speculate since they aren't discussed any further in the series. I always figured that they are just so crazy that they don't care anymore. I'd have to assume that the engine must pump out radiation at a level that they can withstand for some time. Maybe Wash is only saying it's alot of radiation, because he should be picking up next to none. As long as there was a low amount of radiation the effect would take a while to do them any serious damage. A fanfic I was reading and had an interesting idea about Reaver's though that they might not always kill everyone, but recruit people. In a way similar to what happened in Bushwacked. Since a Reaver raiding party destroyed an entire town according to Mal in Serenity, maybe when they are running low on people they just pick up some more.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 12, 2004 11:50 PM

AMNESIAC


I just don't see how the Reaver/Native American parallel came up. I don't think it's quite right to assume that Firefly is a direct copy of old Western films set in space with direct 1 to 1 relationships between all the different story elements. Firefly is more complex than that, and it takes parts from almost every genre. The Reavers seem to be from the world of Sci-Fi horror. The're the souless destructive beast that can turn you into them. I think Native Americans have been squeezed into the 'Monster' role by hack writers of bad films, but I don't think that is the case with Firefly. Yes the firefly crew fights Reavers, and John Wayne fought Native Americans, but I think that's the extent of the similarities between the two groups.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:48 AM

STEVE580


I disagree; I don't think that the reaver/native American parallel should be dismissed so quickly. To the colonists, these peolpe were savages, and they were feared. The tribes lived away from civilizitation - that is to say, they were an external threat. I do think that reavers are the native Americans of this space western. Barbaric, with lesser technology, living on the edge of space...the parallels are there.

-Steve

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 13, 2004 5:59 AM

BLAZINGBUG


I think the confusion may come from refering to Reavers as a Native American analogy. They aren't.

Reavers are an "Injun" analogy. They are analogous to a fictional treatment of Native Americans common to early Westerns.

As Steve said, they fill the role of barbaric savages that the people living at the fringes of civilization have to fear and whom people in the Core regard as campfire stories.

Bushwhacked is a great example. It has elements of the classic, "The Searchers." Throughout most of that movie John Wayne's character makes the same comment about his niece kidnapped by Indians that Mal does about the survivor of the Reaver attack, that death would be preferable to living after being among them.

Only Joss turns it on its ear (once more) by removing the racial and cultural influences and truly making Reavers the barbarism within humanity.

Now, as a social commentary they represent the extreme side of humanity's barbarism when it fails to be open-minded. For what greater a concept to comprehend than the vastness of space and existence, and thus how much farther does humanity fall when it fails to do so.

So in a way the Reavers could represent both the "Cowboys" and the "Indians." The "Indians" by way of their function in the story, and symbolically, the "Cowboys," like Wayne in "The Searchers," who would commit barbarism due to their narrow-mindedness.

Or maybe they're just cool bad guys.

"Wacky fun..."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:24 AM

DORAN


I'd really like to see a fashback sometime to show the event that allow Zoe and Mal to have som much knowledge about Reavers.

Perhaps there isn't one event.. maybe it's knowledge accumlated over the years in space.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Is Joss Whedon finished as a film maker, is his future destiny to be some muttering version of Brigitte Bardot, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, Charlie Sheen, Danny Glover?
Sun, November 24, 2024 06:15 - 13 posts
Bad writers go on strike, late night talk is doomed
Fri, November 22, 2024 13:49 - 22 posts
Here's how it was.....Do you remember & even mourn the humble beginnings?
Mon, November 18, 2024 09:38 - 13 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Sat, November 16, 2024 20:08 - 54 posts
Serenity Rescued by Disney!
Fri, November 15, 2024 00:31 - 5 posts
What is your favourite historical or war film/television show???
Fri, November 8, 2024 07:18 - 37 posts
When did you join poll?
Tue, November 5, 2024 04:28 - 69 posts
Joss was right... Mandarin is the language of the future...
Mon, November 4, 2024 09:19 - 34 posts
Best movie that only a few people know about
Mon, November 4, 2024 07:14 - 118 posts
Halloween
Sun, November 3, 2024 15:21 - 43 posts
Teri Garr, the offbeat comic actor of 'Young Frankenstein' has died
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:20 - 5 posts
Poetry in song
Sat, October 26, 2024 20:16 - 19 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL