Quote:

---

Originally posted by sab39:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by FlatTop:
I'll see what I can do Ray. Shouldn't be difficult, and would be interesting.

---

Care to do "total number of days above 1500 EVER" counts for everyone who's ever had any - ie us and Xena - while you're at it? (makes puppydog eyes)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by fedexxx:
Thank you, browncoats, for your help! Based on today's results I calculated that Combat! will catch us in 111 days, but we 21 days before that when we catch La Femme Nikita. SG-1 which was also a danger got 5 votes less than Lexx today, so if the trend continues, they won't pass us. That means that Lexx's place in top 10 is safe for the very near future. However Angel will pass us in 156 days, which takes us back on 11th place :( But anyway, Lexxians are extremely grateful for your help and will continue to vote for Firefly every time they vote for Lexx!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Raycheetah:
'Nother TV Tally VUMP!

http://www.tvtally.com/shows/weeklytop.php?top=50

You only vote every six hours, and, you get the instant gratification of seein' Firefly's score rise when you hit the "VOTE!" button next to the title. You can also refresh, or, revisit the page, from time to time, to see how the scores change, over time.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Belcarran:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Raycheetah:
'Nother TV Tally VUMP!

http://www.tvtally.com/shows/weeklytop.php?top=50

You only vote every six hours, and, you get the instant gratification of seein' Firefly's score rise when you hit the "VOTE!" button next to the title. You can also refresh, or, revisit the page, from time to time, to see how the scores change, over time.

---

If you delete the cookies that TV Tally places when you vote, you can vote twice and they will both count. For some reason it only works twice-the third time doesn't show up. Also, by deleting the cookies, you can sneak back in less than 6 hours, sometimes as soon as 3.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Raycheetah:

Ermmm... I've heard of deletin' cookies to vote more often on some polls; it doesn't strike me as playin' fair. I'm glad Rich Labonte's poll isn't subject to that sort of thing, or, I think I'd just not bother, anymore.

Fair play VUMP!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Belcarran:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Raycheetah:

Ermmm... I've heard of deletin' cookies to vote more often on some polls; it doesn't strike me as playin' fair. I'm glad Rich Labonte's poll isn't subject to that sort of thing, or, I think I'd just not bother, anymore.

Fair play VUMP!

---

The point is that TV_Vote is about voting fanatically, but according to the rules--other polls don't have the same safeguards built in.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Sister:

here's a little {bump{grind] for ya.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Raycheetah:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Belcarran:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Raycheetah:
Ermmm... I've heard of deletin' cookies to vote more often on some polls; it doesn't strike me as playin' fair. I'm glad Rich Labonte's poll isn't subject to that sort of thing, or, I think I'd just not bother, anymore.

Fair play VUMP!

---

The point is that TV_Vote is about voting fanatically, but according to the rules--other polls don't have the same safeguards built in.

---

Oog... So, how many voters in TV Tally you figger delete their cookies *pictures something disturbingly akin to "binge-and-purge"*?
-Raycheetah ='[.]'=

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by leadb:
It's funny you started voting and highlighting this poll; this is the week I quit it.

Why? There's a lot of 'insincere' voting going on there. Some one is alternating between Jericho and Firefly week to week; who ever is doing it (multiple or one) seems to be having fun 'forcing' one show to win over the other and alternating weeks. This makes the overall weekly votes quite the joke.

When you consider the 'laxer standards' for TV_vote's enforcement, or lack of, one person / one vote, you quickly realize that one person can actually get a pretty large number of votes in; it quickly becomes a contest of which side is willing to be most unethical. In any case, I've lost interest over there.

If you find it fun, have at it. But I've lost interest in it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Raycheetah:


Double-oog ='[.]'=. Just to clarify: Do you mean " the 'laxer standards' for TV_vote's enforcement," or, do you mean TV Tally's?

---