Sign Up | Log In
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
Rewrite???
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:51 AM
DARKHOOD
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:52 AM
HOWDYROCKERBABY1
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:53 AM
GUNHAND
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:54 AM
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:56 AM
Quote:Originally posted by howdyrockerbaby1: Joss originally wrote it to be a kind of Big Damn Finale for the series... but Universal wanted more of a spring board for a series or for additional movies. so its definately a good re-write *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* "Here's to Jayne, the box dropping man-ape-gone-wrong-thing" *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:58 AM
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:27 AM
Quote:Originally posted by DarkHood: Not sure how I stand with this rewrite. It is all fine if Joss gets more movies or a TV show but what if Universal back out of a sequal of any kind after Serenity? It would mean that they messed up Joss' one chance of wraping everything up. I LOVE KAYLEE!!!
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:28 AM
RKLENSETH
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:31 AM
Quote:Originally posted by rklenseth: To point out, Universal can't make a TV series for Firefly or Serenity because of legality. Probably becuase 20th Century still owns the TV rights. That is why I think Universal is pursuing the trilogy deal rather than a Tv series because that is what they can do as of this time. Oh, and play Cantr II at www.cantr.net.]
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:37 AM
STEVE580
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:49 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Steve580: So the budget is 50 million now?
Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:10 AM
BROWNCOAT1
May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.
Wednesday, May 12, 2004 12:11 PM
KARENKAY99
Quote:Originally posted by Gunhand: Which doesn't seem like a lot when you see these multi-hundred-million budgets that sometimes pop up, but even though money helps a lot with quality it doesn't guarantee it. I can think of a few really horrible flops that cost well over $100 million to make.
Wednesday, May 12, 2004 12:25 PM
TRACER
Quote:Originally posted by karenkay99: yep. i just saw van helsing. i hear it cost 148 million. they could of saved a few bucks for my part. all cgi, no charactors/story/acting/etc. i was disappointed. even found myself wanting to laugh at the serious moments. joss and company will do much better with much less, i'm sure of it. "They say the snow on the roof is too heavy. They say the ceiling will cave in. His brains are in terrible danger."
Thursday, May 13, 2004 1:20 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Tracer: Van Helsing that bad? well you've probably saved me about £3.50 then anything you could recommend,
Thursday, May 13, 2004 1:27 AM
Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:58 AM
CALHOUN
Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:50 AM
Quote:3 of us went. one felt pretty much as i did. the other loved it. she's a big hugh jackman fan. i read a review in entertainment weekly and it was dead on in my opinion. d+ i think. i havent seen anything else recently but we are talking about meeting on monday's every other week to see something. the movies are empty on mondays.
Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:00 AM
BADGERSHAT
Quote:Originally posted by Gunhand: Yeah I've heard that Van Helsing was pretty bad. Well actually I heard it was a stinking pile that wasn't worth the powder to blow it up with. Of course I'll have to see it, because I love cheesy movies, but I'll wait until it's on HBO or something rather than directly pay for a ticket or anything. No way I'll be included in the ticket revenue for it because then if it makes enough you know there will be Van Helsing II. ~-~-~-~-~-~-~- "Oh hey, I got an idea. Instead of us hanging around playing art critic till I get pinched by the Man, how's about we move away from this eerie-ass piece of work and get on with our increasingly eerie-ass day, how's that?" My eerie-ass website: http://gunhandsfirefly.homestead.com/Index.html
Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:37 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Gunhand: Of course I'll have to see it, because I love cheesy movies,
Thursday, May 13, 2004 1:36 PM
ZOID
Quote:Van Helsing was okay, if you like LOUD CRASHING NOISE at a fairly constant rate... which I suspect you do, Gunny... also, there's like a grand total of 12 nanoseconds that do NOT have CGI SFX in it... but it's fun enough to watch, if you suspend your need for high quality acting.... plus, Kate Beckinsale in skin tight pants... heh heh...
Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by zoid: El Jefé Magnifico, Badger's Hat wrote: Quote:Van Helsing was okay, if you like LOUD CRASHING NOISE at a fairly constant rate... which I suspect you do, Gunny... also, there's like a grand total of 12 nanoseconds that do NOT have CGI SFX in it... but it's fun enough to watch, if you suspend your need for high quality acting.... plus, Kate Beckinsale in skin tight pants... heh heh... Do what I do when there is 'LOUD CRASHING NOISE' and Ms. Beckinsale in tight pants within the same movie... Put your fingers in your ears and read her lips. (Hello? Is this thing on?) And now, like Gunny, I shall away to an underground missile silo located somewhere amidst the rural charm and 2-dimensional grandeur of a Midwestern 'fly-over state' until the radiation returns to a safe level. Respectfully, zoid _________________________________________________ "Even back when, River had that indefinable 'it', y'know? Inquisitive, insightful -- Very focused... Some things never change." - 'Wash' Warren, Chief Architect and co-proprietor, "Cretaceous Park", Hera; from A Child Shall Lead Them: A History of the Second War of Independence Wilkins, Richard
Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:14 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL