GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Interesting Article on FF, SciFi TV, and cable networks

POSTED BY: LEEH
UPDATED: Thursday, August 18, 2005 09:23
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1596
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 1:58 PM

LEEH


A nice piece on why Fox killed FF, and how scifi producers ought to avoid the broadcast networks and go for cable instead:

http://www.syfyportal.com/features.php?id=141

"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle. . . ."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 3:54 PM

NYWOE


Cool article, thanks for the link!

_____________________________________
If you're an Arizonan and a Browncoat, come join us:

http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/AZ_Browncoats/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 4:22 PM

CAPTAINCDC


I hope Tim Minear reads this article and takes it to heart. Maybe then we will be able to enjoy one of his brilliant series the way he intends us to.

---------------------------------------

The only sovereign you can allow to rule you is reason!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:23 AM

YT

the movie is not the Series. Only the facts have been changed, to irritate the innocent; the names of the actors and characters remain the same


Seems like a reasonable article, until I try to apply it to Firefly.
Quote:

But a word of advice to would-be scifi producers: yeah, you can take the fancy-pants network development deal, take your chances, and probably end up back in the unemployment line in six months. Or, scale back your expenses, skip the networks, put your show on cable, and like "Stargate SG-1," someday you might find yourself still on the air, nine years later.

How could Joss have scaled back expenses? Let me count the ways:

1) Hire mostly unknown actors (he did)
2) Scale back the sets
3) Scale back costumes
4) Scale back locations
5) Scale back special effects
6) Make it in Canada, with enough Canadian content to qualify for gov't subsidies
7) Do without a co-executive producer
8) Take a smaller cut for himself

It's left as an exercise for the student how much 2), 4) & 5) would affect the product, but . . .

6) Nathan could work it, probably Jewel, but three other cast members would be replaced, and fuggedabout Greg Edmonson & David Boyd. You figure it out.

7) Joss was producing three TV series @that time so, not possible.

Imo, one of the reasons Firefly was so good was the FOX network gave Joss US$38million to make it.

Keep the Shiny Side Up . . .

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Game Of Thrones!
Wed, March 4, 2026 03:00 - 18 posts
Joss was right... Mandarin is the language of the future...
Tue, March 3, 2026 14:42 - 127 posts
The Conspiracy Thread
Sun, March 1, 2026 13:44 - 35 posts
Star Trek as a Firefly replacement.
Fri, February 27, 2026 20:44 - 39 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations?
Wed, February 25, 2026 05:08 - 133 posts
Use a VPN
Mon, February 23, 2026 13:16 - 2 posts
Where are the Russians?
Fri, February 20, 2026 06:43 - 4 posts
Recommend me some shows
Sun, February 15, 2026 02:48 - 36 posts
Arcata, CA Serenity screening Wednesday February 11, 2026
Fri, February 13, 2026 18:20 - 3 posts
RIP, Jimmy V...
Thu, February 12, 2026 17:59 - 3 posts
Was Mars a Mars-That-Was in the Firefly 'verse?
Tue, February 10, 2026 03:11 - 7 posts
Did the 'Companion' thing ever bug you in Firefly?
Sat, February 7, 2026 04:42 - 201 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL