GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Uncle Cecil Explains the Nielsens

POSTED BY: RADEGUND
UPDATED: Friday, February 21, 2003 09:21
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1142
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:42 AM

RADEGUND


Today's "Straight Dope" entry explains Nielsen ratings:

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/030221.html

Radegund

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:54 AM

LOSTANGEL


Quote:

The sample size isn't a few hundred thousand people, though--for daily ratings, called "overnights," it's just 25,000 homes (5,000 for national programming, 20,000 for local stations), which collectively are supposed to reflect the viewing habits of 106 million U.S. households in 210 markets. That leaves a pretty wide margin for error, you might think, and you wouldn't be the only one.


Ack! To me this is not logical. That sample size is not nearly enough to project the viewing habits of the entire US.

Also, the part of the TV execs not signing up for the improved rating system because it told them what they didn't want to hear is PROOF that these people are ostrichs and short-sighted insecure people that don't have the courage or the desire to say,"Well, we're not as popular as we thought we were, how do we change it?"

TV executive

______________________
Lost Angel

WASH: Psychic, though? That sounds like something out of science fiction.
ZOE: We live in a space ship, dear.
WASH: So?


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:57 AM

BRTICK


Quote:

Nielsen Media Research, an offspring of the firm founded in 1923 by market research pioneer Arthur Nielsen, recently began introducing new sampling technology that it hopes will depict local TV viewership with much greater accuracy. Early results have been controversial, mainly because, in highly simplified terms, they consist of the following:

Q: Do people actually watch all this crap?

A: No."



glad I'm not the only one that thought that.


Keep Flying!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 9:21 AM

BROWNCOAT1

May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.


I have always had trouble believing the Nielsen rating system could accurately depict the viewing habits of so many households w/ such a small sampling. A couple of people at the official board swear that the Nielsen system is sound and more accurate than any method. Personally, I think that is wishful thinking.

If this article is to be believed, it is a half hearted effort at getting a sampling of what people are watching. Personally it would be easier to contact cable providers and devise a system that would allow mass monitoring of what is being watched by viewers so they can get something a lot more accurate than Nielsen can provide.

"May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Wed, February 12, 2025 09:00 - 65 posts
Joss's Fascination with Crazy Female Characters
Wed, February 12, 2025 04:07 - 15 posts
Joss was right... Mandarin is the language of the future...
Mon, February 10, 2025 18:56 - 39 posts
Star Trek
Mon, February 10, 2025 11:29 - 20 posts
D-Con Chamber
Mon, February 3, 2025 18:30 - 2 posts
We've lost Jimmy Carter
Mon, February 3, 2025 18:28 - 30 posts
kaliwali YouTuber watches Firefly
Mon, January 27, 2025 07:13 - 2 posts
Fan-Made ‘Green Lantern’ Trailer Receives Nathan Fillion’s Endorsement
Sat, January 25, 2025 13:41 - 11 posts
Twin Peaks Returns After 26 Years
Fri, January 17, 2025 21:25 - 4 posts
High Five: The Top 5 Dispatches from Hollywood's Front Lines
Thu, January 16, 2025 18:44 - 32 posts
Firefly a ripoff of Andromeda?
Thu, January 16, 2025 14:04 - 48 posts
The Rookie season 7 started Tuesday January 7th, 2025 Nathan Fillion stars. ABC 10pm Eastern
Wed, January 15, 2025 05:11 - 1 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL