Quote:

---

Originally posted by MynameisJonas:
It makes me sad when people try to make themselves feel smarter then other people, based on what television shows they whatch.

People go to school and university to learn things and become smarter. They whatch tv to be entertained, maybey they enjoy whatching paris hilton be a stupid whore, who are you to say that makes them dumb?.

They should whatch television shows based purely on how much enjoyment they get out of it, not on what the critics say. I mean i can tell the office is an amazingly well written show, but that doesn't mean i enjoy whatching it.

If you want to make yourself feel smart go and study advanced mathematics, don't whatch tv.

Oh and about fox, they might cancel alot of shows, but they also make alot of very good ones that no other network would like, family guy, futurama, firefly, arrested development, The simpsons, none of these shows would be made on other networks.

So while your cursing fox for canceling your favourite shows, you might also consider thanking them for giving you hundreds of hours of enjoyment you wouldn't of gotten on other networks.

---

Quote:

---

If you want to make yourself feel smart go and study advanced mathematics, don't whatch tv.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MynameisJonas:
It makes me sad when people try to make themselves feel smarter then other people, based on what television shows they whatch.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
[ Who am I to have an opinion? I'm sorry, is there a line I have to stand in so I can get my 'experss your thoughts' license?
. "

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Hans:

What is truly rare is TV that makes you think, with complex storylines, that does not lead the viewer around by the nose like a dumb animal but challenges thier perceptions. If it is elitist to want to not only be entertained but also challenged, then I'm proud to be an elitist.
Hans

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Gee, sounds like I struck a nerve, eh?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MynameisJonas:

since when did firefly "challenge our perceptions"?, the stories were mostly the same stuff you have seen a thousand times but with a slight twist.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

"

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MynameisJonas:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

"

---

Are you coming on to me?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MynameisJonas:
What the hell is challenging about sci fi with cowboys?. I think most people diddn't like the western element, because it was unrealistic and hardly anybody likes western.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MynameisJonas:

because they have a different taste in art.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SevenPercent:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MynameisJonas:

because they have a different taste in art.

---

I'm sorry- Did you just call the Simple Life, the Swan, and My Boyfriend is a Midget (or whatever it was) art? Did I miss something, or wake up on drugs, or maybe I'm having a psychadelic experience caused by too much MSG in my noodles-

There is no way you can possibly call the reality shows we get forcefed to us by Fox, art-

You also may be on record as one of the few defenders of that particular network to ever grace us here on FFF - It's a rarity, but I'm with AURaptor on this one- Anyone that can watch the Simple Life and not think tv is sliding to Hell on a fast sled pulled by morons, take a look in the mirror, because you are the lowest common denominator -

------------------------------------------
He looked bigger when I couldn't see him.

---