Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
The first modern humans pushed back to 300,000 years ago, based on fossils from Morocco.
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/1/eaao5961.full

How about the possibility that Homo sapiens traveled between Morocco and Spain between 300,000 and 65,000 years ago? It’s only hundreds of miles between the cave paintings in Spain and the human fossils in Morocco. That gives ‘em almost a quarter million years to figure out how to sail across the Strait of Gibraltar.
www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-neanderthals-were-artists
-20180222-htmlstory.html

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
The first modern humans pushed back to 300,000 years ago, based on fossils from Morocco.
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/1/eaao5961.full

How about the possibility that Homo sapiens traveled between Morocco and Spain between 300,000 and 65,000 years ago? It’s only hundreds of miles between the cave paintings in Spain and the human fossils in Morocco. That gives ‘em almost a quarter million years to figure out how to sail across the Strait of Gibraltar.
www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-neanderthals-were-artists
-20180222-htmlstory.html

---

Strait of Gibraltar is 9 miles across, right?
Assuming humans wanted to leave the lush forests of the Morocco to venture among the sharks with their minimal population, why would they feel the need to return home and not leave fossils in Spain?


So it was assumed humans were in Iberia 45,000 years ago. But these are from 64,000 years ago.

If Atlantians were not in the Med from 14,000 years ago to 40,000 years ago, their predecessors may have been around 66,000 years ago to 92,000 years ago.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
The first modern humans pushed back to 300,000 years ago, based on fossils from Morocco.
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/1/eaao5961.full

How about the possibility that Homo sapiens traveled between Morocco and Spain between 300,000 and 65,000 years ago? It’s only hundreds of miles between the cave paintings in Spain and the human fossils in Morocco. That gives ‘em almost a quarter million years to figure out how to sail across the Strait of Gibraltar.
www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-neanderthals-were-artists
-20180222-htmlstory.html

---

Strait of Gibraltar is 9 miles across, right?
Assuming humans wanted to leave the lush forests of the Morocco to venture among the sharks with their minimal population, why would they feel the need to return home and not leave fossils in Spain?


So it was assumed humans were in Iberia 45,000 years ago. But these are from 64,000 years ago.

If Atlantians were not in the Med from 14,000 years ago to 40,000 years ago, their predecessors may have been around 66,000 years ago to 92,000 years ago.

---

Those 300,000 year old humans buried in Morocco had a grandson. Their grandson in Morocco can see Spain when standing on a beach in Africa. Does he stay on the beach for 235,000 years? Or does he cross over to Spain just because the mystery land is always waiting for him and he leaves his mark on a cave that says "I was here"?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Here is an interesting linky. It is clickbait, which I usually avoid, But I misunderstood the reference for it to mean something else.
However, numerous unexplained items in here.
#23. The Piri Reis Map. Extremely hard to unearth this subject unless you have the exact name beforehand, and even then not so easy. Made in 1513.

#36. Stepped Pyramid at the bottom of Sea of Galilee.

#1 Lava Spheres.

See how many others you can logically fit into your worldview.

http://headcramp.com/historical-artifacts-hc/?as=2100019199544&utm
_source=yahoo&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=historical-artifacts-hc_hc_us_english_desktop_c4_t1_v20180829_l_1_rj_0_b72-78_headcramp_-_sunday&utm_term=34378034550&utm_content=HOMEPAGE_CA

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
The first modern humans pushed back to 300,000 years ago, based on fossils from Morocco.
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/1/eaao5961.full

How about the possibility that Homo sapiens traveled between Morocco and Spain between 300,000 and 65,000 years ago? It’s only hundreds of miles between the cave paintings in Spain and the human fossils in Morocco. That gives ‘em almost a quarter million years to figure out how to sail across the Strait of Gibraltar.
www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-neanderthals-were-artists
-20180222-htmlstory.html

---

Strait of Gibraltar is 9 miles across, right?
Assuming humans wanted to leave the lush forests of the Morocco to venture among the sharks with their minimal population, why would they feel the need to return home and not leave fossils in Spain?


So it was assumed humans were in Iberia 45,000 years ago. But these are from 64,000 years ago.

If Atlantians were not in the Med from 14,000 years ago to 40,000 years ago, their predecessors may have been around 66,000 years ago to 92,000 years ago.

---

Those 300,000 year old humans buried in Morocco had a grandson. Their grandson in Morocco can see Spain when standing on a beach in Africa. Does he stay on the beach for 235,000 years? Or does he cross over to Spain just because the mystery land is always waiting for him and he leaves his mark on a cave that says "I was here"?

---

The Alboran Sea is about 90 miles across, from Morocco to Spain, right?
The minimal width of Lake Michigan is 91 miles, right?
About the same for Lake Superior, from Wisconsin to Canada, right?
And isn't Cuba about 90 miles from Florida?
From the lakeshore bluffs of East Wisconsin, I don't recall being able to see Michigan - it's just endless water view. At Beach level I can't imagine it would be visible.
Same thing from the taller bluffs of northern Wisconsin lakeshore, other than islands in the lake - which are not visible from the beach.
Can Floridians see Cuba from the beach? Or Vice versa?
If your eyes are 6ft above water, you may be able to see the wet sand of a beach 3 miles away.
A 6 ft person's hair, about 6 miles away.
Tip of a 25 ft tall boat, about 9 miles away - the span of the Strait of Gibraltar.
The top of a 100 ft tall tree, about 15 miles away.
Top of a 400 ft tall tree, about 27 miles away.
Top of a 1,600 ft tall tree, about 51 miles away.
Peak of a 4,900 ft tall hill, about 87 miles away. Is there such a seashore hill along Spain's Med coast?
Peak of a 6,400 ft tall hill, about 99 miles away, or 9 miles inland Spain. Denver is a mile above sea level, but a long way from a coastline.
Peak of a 10,000 ft tall hill, about 123 miles away, or 33 miles inland.


The Moroccans may have needed to travel West before even seeing land across the sea. For a new species, being attacked by other species and carnivores roaming the jungle, such ventures away from the clan or tribe seem foolish. Better to eat, reproduce, protect and propagate the species rather than explore treacherous environs. Man had not yet outgrown the available landmass, like later generations.
Or are you regurgitating your Libtard Flat Earth claims again? I hear Kylie Jenner is breathing new life into your beliefs.



Your link does not state that the species Homo Sapiens was fossilized in Morocco 300,000 years ago.
I find mention of the Jebel Irhoud site in Morocco, where hominin fossils from 300,000 years ago were found. It mentions that this species was an early origin of the line which they think eventually became Homo Sapiens. Of all the species within subfamily homonin, the only known current day surviving species is Homo Sapiens. Are you saying that you are a surviving member of the non-Homo Sapien species which was thought extinct, the same species found at Jebel Irhoud, a species believed to be a precursor to Homo Sapien? For you to proclaim that you are not Homo Sapien, but rather a species not benefiting from the advancements to Homo Sapiens, explains a lot.
So, other than your species, the earliest fossil evidence of the rest of us (Homo Sapien) is still around 45,000 years ago, right?
And so the discovery of Art from 64,000 years ago can present a dilemma of the Human timeline.
Did Neanderthals create the art?
Or was there a gap of 19,000 years indicating absence from the region, for Homo Sapiens? I would feel better if that gap was closer to a 26,000 year figure, but no need to quibble.

---