Sign Up | Log In
BUFFYVERSE
is she serious?
Thursday, November 11, 2004 4:10 AM
STEVETHEPIRATE
Thursday, November 11, 2004 4:19 AM
WILDHEAVENFARM
Thursday, November 11, 2004 4:24 AM
RHYMEPHILE
Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:25 AM
NAKEDANDARTICULATE
Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:38 AM
EMBERS
Select to view spoiler:
Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:57 AM
PURPLEBELLY
Thursday, November 11, 2004 8:24 AM
SIGMANUNKI
Thursday, November 11, 2004 8:43 AM
DIETCOKE
Thursday, November 11, 2004 9:10 AM
GOJIRO
Quote:Originally posted by RhymePhile: That's in stark contrast to someone like James Marsters, who emphatically said on the Rove Live show (in Australia)
Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:30 AM
RUXTON
Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:08 AM
CAPNRAHN
Quote:Originally posted by Ruxton: Any of you ignorant clowns ever stop to think what Joss Whedon would have done WITHOUT Sarah? Don't you realize what SHE did for him? If Buffy had flopped because of inept acting on the part of the main character, none of you would know who Joss Whedon is today. Sarah's acting on the show was so good that it is constantly being overlooked by so-called movie editors in these forums. But if you mentally block out her character from ANY episode, you get NOTHING left. They just don't make sense without her subtle input. That is the mark of great acting. You don't notice it, but without it the show would have been a great zero. Sarah seems to be a wonderful person who -- not even slightly whining -- declared it was time for her to move on. Why can't you all understand that, and the fact that the story has two sides?
Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:30 AM
Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:36 AM
Quote: http://www.findadeath.com/ Alfred Hitchcock's celebrated comment, "Actors are cattle," stirred up a great deal of protest. So the master issued a correction; "I have been misquoted. What I really said is: Actors should be treated as cattle."
Thursday, November 11, 2004 12:48 PM
HEB
Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:35 PM
STRAYBAT
Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:17 PM
RKWALSH
Thursday, November 11, 2004 7:07 PM
AMANDA4U
Thursday, November 11, 2004 8:22 PM
Friday, November 12, 2004 12:44 AM
CHRONICTHEHEDGEHOG
Friday, November 12, 2004 4:40 AM
RABIT
Friday, November 12, 2004 4:41 AM
JK
Friday, November 12, 2004 5:34 AM
BIKISDAD
Friday, November 12, 2004 1:19 PM
Friday, November 12, 2004 2:19 PM
ELLIQUINN
Quote:Originally posted by CapnRahn: Mz. Gellar is just a character actor - lacking that true spark of a complete actress.
Friday, November 12, 2004 2:49 PM
Friday, November 12, 2004 4:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SigmaNunki: And yes, after they defeated Glory they should've ended the series. It was the perfect ending. The slayer died saving the world in a grand last battle. But, then they had to ruin it with the pathetic ending of every potential slayer becoming one etc. Damn disappointment if you ask me.
Friday, November 12, 2004 5:28 PM
Friday, November 12, 2004 6:00 PM
WITLESSCHUM
Friday, November 12, 2004 8:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by witlesschum: Select to view spoiler: They were just men, is what Buffy said in the finale. They didn't create the Slayer, they harnessed power already there, from Yahweh, Vishnu, Abe Begota, doesn't matter, into the Slayer.
Quote:Originally posted by witlesschum: Select to view spoiler: Willow tapped into the same power the did and there's not reason to believe she's less powerful than all three of them
Quote:Originally posted by witlesschum: I wouldn't have wanted it to end without season 6, the ending, with the villain revealed, was the best end game since Season 2, because of the possible tragedy inherent. That and the musical was brilliant.
Saturday, November 13, 2004 8:37 AM
ROSEHOPE
Quote:Originally posted by straybat: Quite frankly, well said Sarah. Sums up pretty well how I felt about the series - I was a rabid fan until season 4, a serious fan until the second half of season 6, and I still haven't bothered watching the final few episodes. And probably never will. It wasn't Buffy anymore. Who can blame her for quitting? Stray
Saturday, November 13, 2004 3:41 PM
RICKKER
Saturday, November 13, 2004 8:29 PM
SUCCATASH
Saturday, November 13, 2004 9:03 PM
Sunday, November 14, 2004 8:58 AM
Sunday, November 14, 2004 9:41 AM
DBLADE
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:32 AM
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:40 AM
THESOMNAMBULIST
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:37 PM
Quote:Originally posted by witlesschum: Agree to disagree? And the flaying was undisputedley cool.
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:11 PM
Thursday, January 6, 2005 4:31 AM
BLOODYAWFULPOET
Quote:Originally posted by nakedandarticulate: here is what sarah said- In the latest Big Issue, Sarah Michelle Gellar discusses why she didn't want to carry on making Buffy. "You think about it ever year for eight years (sic): when is the right time? But all the signs pointed to the eighth year. I was emotionally and physically exhausted. I wasn't being challenged in the way that I needed any more. "I really didn't have any [input]. Maybe I should have, 'cause then we wouldn't have got so lost. It took me a while to work up the nerve to say something. "It didn't feel like Buffyå But it's easy to be vocal now, because Joss isn't going to be yelling at me tomorrow." okay,now here is my interpretataion of what she said- "blah blah blah blah buffy made me famous blah blah blah blah whine whine whine blah blah blah i will be reduced to a b movie actress in 5 years blah blah blah blah freddie prinze jr tarnished his fathers legacy blah blah blah david caruso. "Hamsters is nice."
Friday, January 7, 2005 9:31 AM
KATERI
Friday, January 7, 2005 11:45 AM
BIBSY
Quote:Originally posted by kateri: well all you need to know to act is; 1)know your lines 2)know your parts 3)and rememberthat shirley temple did it when she was three
Friday, January 7, 2005 12:41 PM
AX
Friday, January 7, 2005 2:11 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL