Here's your hero Rand Paul, who wants us to go easier on BP, and thinks it's just a matter of "shit happens"! Whatcha think his vote would be on Big Oil..."/>
Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Rand Paul says Obama being too tough on BP
Friday, May 21, 2010 7:24 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul is taking aim at President Barack Obama's handling of the oil crisis off the Gulf Coast. The president, Paul told ABC, is being too tough on BP - the oil giant that controls the well that has been leaking thousands of barrels of oil a day in the Gulf since late last month. "What I don't like from the president's administration is this sort of 'I'll put my boot heel on the throat of BP,'" said Paul who overwhelmingly won Tuesday's GOP Senate primary in Kentucky and is a favorite of Tea Party activists. "I think that sounds really un-American in his criticisms of businesses." "I think it's part of this blame game society in the sense that it's always got to be someone's fault, instead of the fact that sometimes accidents happen." Since capturing the Senate nomination, Paul has faced a barrage of questions over his past criticisms of several federal regulations that intrude on the private sector, including provisions of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the national minimum wage. "When does my honeymoon period start?" said Paul when he was again asked about his past statements Friday. "I had a big victory. I thought I got a honeymoon period from you guys in the media."
Friday, May 21, 2010 7:34 AM
ANTHONYT
Freedom is Important because People are Important
Friday, May 21, 2010 7:43 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Friday, May 21, 2010 7:54 AM
Quote:GOP Blocks Bill to Raise Oil Companies' Liability to $10 Billion Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska objected Thursday when a group of Democrats tried to pass a bill to increase oil companies' liability after an oil spill from $75 million to $10 billion. With Murkowski's objection to the bill, the measure is stalled for now. Murkowski, the top Republican on the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee criticized the bill as the wrong way to make local businesses whole because it would inadvertently help large global oil companies by driving smaller U.S. operators out of business. She said independent oil companies could not afford the increased liability costs associated with offshore drilling and would be forced from the market. Rather than lifting the liability cap, Murkowski suggested that private businesses, such as shrimpers, be allowed to seek unlimited damages in state court. But the three Democrats sponsoring the bill, Sens. Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, and Bill Nelson of Florida, vowed to find another way to pass their measure to force BP and other oil companies to pay for all of the damages they cause. "When BP makes $5.6 billion in three months, when the top five companies make $25 billion in three months, $10 billion is a drop in the bucket," said Menendez. He also rejected the suggestion that businesses affected by an oil spill should take oil companies to court to recoup their damages. "I know my distinguished colleague from Alaska knows what happened in the Exxon Valdez case -- that took 20 years for claimants to try to get their just response, and some of them fell off along the way because they couldn't hang in there and they lost everything," he said. Lautenberg said that small companies should be able to afford the same liability as large corporations or they should not be drilling in the first place. "If you want to make the money, you have to pay the bills that go with it," Lautenberg said. "If an independent company causes that kind of damage and goes out of business, so be it."
Friday, May 21, 2010 8:41 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: If they require help from We the People to clean it up, then they owe us. Period.
Friday, May 21, 2010 2:21 PM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 3:19 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 6:21 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 6:24 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 7:07 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 7:30 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 7:47 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 7:54 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:02 AM
KANEMAN
Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: Hello, Perhaps Rand Paul supporters are not as whackadoodle as everyone would like to believe. I supported him. I liked the idea of a Ron Paul Junior. But I think his recent performance and statements are shite. --Anthony "Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner "You can lose a quark you don't girth." -Dreamtrove's words to live by, translated by Ipad
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:06 AM
KIRKULES
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:09 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:11 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kirkules: I think that BP has been the most environmentally responsible oil company in the word for years and this is just a terrible accident. Everyone that drives an automobile shares equal responsibility for this spill, they should and will help pay for the cleanup.
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:15 AM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:18 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:19 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: Hello, Kaneman, he won't even remain firm in stance on civil rights laws. He ought to at least say what he believes in without any wishy washyness. I know where I draw my lines on such laws and why. I'd respect him more if he held a firm, predictable conviction. I lost a lot of respect for Mccain when he started angling for the presidency, and many of his cherished beliefs blew away in the wind of presidential ambition.
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:22 AM
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: Yeah, let's shut down the entire US economy and live in caves...
Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:29 AM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 12:17 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: Quote:Originally posted by Kirkules: I think that BP has been the most environmentally responsible oil company in the word for years and this is just a terrible accident. Everyone that drives an automobile shares equal responsibility for this spill, they should and will help pay for the cleanup. Hello, What a startling point of view, Kirk. If a pizza deliveryman runs you over with his car, are all pizza customers responsible for the accident? --Anthony
Saturday, May 22, 2010 1:04 PM
Saturday, May 22, 2010 1:36 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kirkules: Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: Quote:Originally posted by Kirkules: I think that BP has been the most environmentally responsible oil company in the word for years and this is just a terrible accident. Everyone that drives an automobile shares equal responsibility for this spill, they should and will help pay for the cleanup. Hello, What a startling point of view, Kirk. If a pizza deliveryman runs you over with his car, are all pizza customers responsible for the accident? --Anthony Of course the pizza customer is liable and so is every person who eats that companies pizza. Who do you think pays the pizza boys car insurance. No business ever pays for anything, their customers do. That's why the idea of taxing businesses is so laughable, it's just a way of fooling gullible taxpayers into thinking big business is getting taxed, when in reality the tax is passed on to the consumer of their product. You all are like a bunch of squeamish school kids touring a slaughter house a day after your parents took you out for a big steak dinner. You just need to face the fact that you share some of the responsibility for the slaughter of the cow and understand that your choices have consequences.
Saturday, May 22, 2010 1:44 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: "You just need to face the fact that you share some of the responsibility for the slaughter of the cow and understand that your choices have consequences." Hello, I hate to say it, but I agree, Kirk. We need to be willing to liquidate our oil company if necessary to pay for our liability in fostering our disaster. And then we need to be willing to tax ourselves by fining our other industries whenever we let them step out of line. And if we have to sue ourselves (in the body of our industries) whenever we fail ourselves, then we should do it. And we will continue to punish, and sue, and tax ourselves as much as is necessary until we learn to operate safe industries. --Anthony
Saturday, May 22, 2010 1:51 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: So, Kirk, in your world, exactly how much responsibility DOES Colt share for the Columbine slaughter?
Saturday, May 22, 2010 1:56 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kirkules: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: So, Kirk, in your world, exactly how much responsibility DOES Colt share for the Columbine slaughter? Exactly the same responsibility as Pizza Hut does if I throw one of their pizzas at you (assuming it's fresh and not to hot).
Sunday, May 23, 2010 4:26 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote:a key part of the oil pipe's Blow Out Preventer was damaged days before the explosion
Quote:A 2008 report authored by officials of BP America and Transocean and published by the Society of Petroleum Engineers raised new questions about whether the blowout preventers on deepwater wells such as the one the Deepwater Horizon was drilling could have a new problem. Blowout preventers, or BOPs, which weigh 500,000 pounds and are roughly as tall as a five-story building, activate rams that punch a hole in the pipeline connecting the well to the surface, and then block the pipeline. The rams, the report said, may have "difficulty shearing today's high-strength, high-toughness drillpipe" used in deepwater wells. The 10-page report, delivered at the 2003 Offshore Technology Conference in Houston, suggests that the industry was so focused on drilling that it was willing to pay higher maintenance costs to keep rigs operating and avoid downtime rather than address some of the fundamental problems with the blowout preventers. "Floating drilling rig downtime due to poor BOP (blowout preventer) reliability is a common and very costly issue confronting all offshore drilling contractors," the report said, adding that every major disruption could cost $1 million. The report said the reliability issues were directly related to the fact that drilling companies didn't have detailed design and functional specifications to give companies that manufactured blowout preventers. The preventers were being rushed into the field with limited testing, and if one malfunctioned, the pressure to keep drilling meant it was fixed with little time spent trying to figure out what had caused the malfunction. "Because of the pressure on getting the equipment back to work, root cause analysis of the failures is generally not performed," the report said. "In many operations, high maintenance is accepted as a necessary evil to prevent downtime." The report said the problems were mostly with the control system that activates the large rams that punch through the pipe to stop the flow of oil. The control system has electrical and hydraulic components. The electrical circuits activate the hydraulic equipment that moves the rams. Each blowout preventer has two complete control systems as a backup. "History has shown that more subsea problems have been associated with hydraulic components than the electrical," the report said. Hydraulic problems can only be fixed by bringing the top half of the blowout preventer to the surface. Crews on the Deepwater Horizon have said they activated the blowout preventer from the deck of the rig before fleeing. The blowout preventer is also equipped with sensors that should trigger a shutdown automatically. U.S. rigs, unlike those in Norway and Brazil, don't have to be equipped with a device to pick up an acoustic signal sent from the surface that also can activate the blowout preventer. "The control system has historically been a problem area," Shanks said during the telephone interview from Houston, where he's an industry consultant. "The preventer itself is just a big hunk of metal."
Quote:Blankenship said that he didn't know of any steps his company could have taken to prevent the disaster, though the Montcoal mine had received 58 citations in February alone. Blankenship deflected suggestions that his company's coal mines are more dangerous than others.
Quote:The federal records... show the company was fighting many of the steepest fines, or simply refusing to pay them.
Sunday, May 23, 2010 7:02 AM
Sunday, May 23, 2010 1:54 PM
Sunday, May 23, 2010 11:18 PM
Monday, May 24, 2010 1:24 PM
Monday, May 24, 2010 1:30 PM
Monday, May 24, 2010 3:57 PM
Monday, May 24, 2010 4:06 PM
Monday, May 24, 2010 4:56 PM
Monday, May 24, 2010 5:02 PM
Quote:You forgot Anarchist = Bomb throwin nihilist, Mikey.
Monday, May 24, 2010 5:38 PM
Quote:and he made the same sort of generalizations and assumptions about Libertarians that Signy did.
Monday, May 24, 2010 5:53 PM
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 3:39 AM
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 4:18 AM
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 5:30 AM
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 6:11 AM
Quote: You all are like a bunch of squeamish school kids touring a slaughter house a day after your parents took you out for a big steak dinner. You just need to face the fact that you share some of the responsibility for the slaughter of the cow and understand that your choices have consequences.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 6:16 AM
STORYMARK
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:15 AM
Quote: Well presented, Sig, thank you. I didn’t know Paul was giving the same excuse for that incident, when AGAIN, it was proven clearly that the coal company had skipped and/or ignored safety precautions in the name of profit, was under indictment, had been fined, etc., for such actions in the past. It was no “accident”, it was a predictable failure; employees have testified that they didn’t dare complain under threat of losing their jobs, etc., and again, those in charge shirked their responsibility and have been doing so for ages.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:43 AM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL