REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Alaskan "island" drilling under scrutiny

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 3, 2010 17:39
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1113
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 8:48 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Good! It's BP gaming the system again; here's hoping they don't get away with it this time!
Quote:

Three miles into the Beaufort Sea from the North Slope of Alaska sits a 32-acre, man-made gravel island with a gigantic blue drilling rig atop it.

It is BP's Liberty Island, a nearly $1 billion project. As planned, the rig would drill two miles down into the seabed, then sideways up to eight miles across it, to find an enormous reservoir of oil.

BP had been scheduled to begin drilling later this year. But since the environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, when a BP-owned well blew out off Louisiana and spewed crude oil into the ocean for nearly three months, federal and state regulators are taking a new look at the Liberty project.

By dumping tons of gravel into the sea, only 22 feet (7 meters) deep at that point, environmentalists say BP has managed to game the federal permit system by getting the Liberty project classified as an onshore installation. That means its subject to less rigorous rules than offshore projects.

"If anything were to go wrong, if there were an oil spill, that oil is going into the ocean," said Rebecca Noblin, an attorney for the advocacy group Center for Biological Diversity. "It's not on land. So this is drilling in the water."

Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff told CNN, "In light of the BP oil spill in the Gulf and new safety requirements, we will be reviewing the adequacy of the current version of the Liberty project's spill plan."

On Liberty Island, BP is attempting to drill down and sideways -- a method known as "extended reach" -- to an extent never tried in the United States. BP touts it as "one of the oil and gas industry's most significant technological advances."

But oil experts say drilling sideways has some risks, including the threat of so-called "gas kicks" that can erupt when methane bubbles rush through the sideways pipe -- and of course, the inability to control a huge oil spill in an already fragile environment.

"Industry's most significant technological advances"--they're real proud of that, but if it blows? Well, hell, "we didn't do no technological advances in cleanup...:


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 1:47 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I keep putting up real things in hopes of the sane among us having a discussion. Unfortunately, all I get are the sickos among us who want to spurt venom. Wish someone would come along who wants to actually converse...sigh...


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 4:39 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Problem with that, Niki, is my reluctance to discuss issues I know jack shit about, cause I honestly do not know enough about the tech in question to comment intelligently.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 5:04 PM

IREMISST


I second that, and what's there to discuss? We all agree someone needs to fly a fleet of planes into every single BP office.

I think we've proven the American public is pretty much impotent -pun intended- when it comes to doing anything about BP... I don't buy their gas. What more you want me to do about it?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 5:39 PM

L1GHTBR1NGER


Quote:

Originally posted by Iremisst:
I second that, and what's there to discuss? We all agree someone needs to fly a fleet of planes into every single BP office.

I think we've proven the American public is pretty much impotent -pun intended- when it comes to doing anything about BP... I don't buy their gas. What more you want me to do about it?




bout time it were said out loud.

problem ain't 9.11. problem is, that they flew there planes into teh wrong buildings. should of been exxon, bp, goldman sacks, and city bank.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, June 26, 2026 14:26 - 10520 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, June 26, 2026 13:32 - 7575 posts
Strange stuff happening in the Airline industry
Fri, June 26, 2026 12:27 - 25 posts
United States 2028 Presidential Election
Fri, June 26, 2026 11:54 - 76 posts
The parallel internet is coming
Fri, June 26, 2026 11:54 - 276 posts
"Feminism" really means more Femtacular than you at EVERYTHING.
Fri, June 26, 2026 11:52 - 168 posts
Trump Is Destroying Everything He Touches
Fri, June 26, 2026 10:17 - 1316 posts
The Islamic Way Of War
Fri, June 26, 2026 09:22 - 78 posts
Here comes sharia!
Fri, June 26, 2026 09:21 - 197 posts
Brexit is official: Article 50 is invoked.
Fri, June 26, 2026 08:59 - 84 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Fri, June 26, 2026 08:51 - 1098 posts
Khamenei, One of Most Evil People in History, is Dead
Fri, June 26, 2026 08:25 - 545 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL