Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Hitchens: Mosque a one-way test of tolerance?
Monday, August 23, 2010 3:42 PM
MINCINGBEAST
Quote: From the beginning, though, I pointed out that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf was no great bargain and that his Cordoba Initiative was full of euphemisms about Islamic jihad and Islamic theocracy. I mentioned his sinister belief that the United States was partially responsible for the assault on the World Trade Center and his refusal to take a position on the racist Hamas dictatorship in Gaza. The more one reads through his statements, the more alarming it gets.
Quote: As for the gorgeous mosaic of religious pluralism, it's easy enough to find mosque Web sites and DVDs that peddle the most disgusting attacks on Jews, Hindus, Christians, unbelievers, and other Muslims—to say nothing of insane diatribes about women and homosexuals. This is why the fake term Islamophobia is so dangerous: It insinuates that any reservations about Islam must ipso facto be "phobic." A phobia is an irrational fear or dislike. Islamic preaching very often manifests precisely this feature, which is why suspicion of it is by no means irrational.
Monday, August 23, 2010 3:56 PM
CHRISISALL
Monday, August 23, 2010 4:01 PM
ANTHONYT
Freedom is Important because People are Important
Monday, August 23, 2010 4:08 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Monday, August 23, 2010 4:47 PM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote: Christianity and Judaism have at least had to accommodate (or gasp...tolerate) secularism for some time.
Monday, August 23, 2010 4:58 PM
Monday, August 23, 2010 5:15 PM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: So has Islam...did you read the material put up on the historical shift from religious rule to secular? It's been there for a loooong time, is nothing new and refutes your inference that Islam hasn't accommodated secularism.
Quote: NAIROBI -- Behind the blue gates of his Islamic school in Nairobi's Eastleigh neighborhood, Ahmed Awil cannot escape his country's civil war. Schools and mosques where extremist views are taught are reshaping this Somali immigrant community that for years has lived peacefully in the capital of this predominantly Christian country. Moderate imams now compete with hard-line preachers pushing a strict interpretation of Islam. Bookstores sell anti-Western literature. Residents speak fearfully of militant spies, and children like Ahmed are taught to praise al-Shabab, an al-Qaeda-linked militia, for waging jihad in Somalia against the U.S.-backed government. "My teachers tell us al-Shabab is fighting for our religion and for our country," said Ahmed, a skinny 11-year-old who fled Somalia after al-Shabab fighters slaughtered his neighbor and tried to recruit him. "Sometimes they ask us if we would like to go there and fight." Eastleigh, a run-down enclave where tens of thousands of Somalis live, has become an incubator for Islamic extremism, Kenyan officials and community leaders say. It has also emerged as a micro-battlefield in the war on terrorism, attracting American funds. "What most worries me is that this extremist ideology will continue to grow," said Dualle Abdi Malik, the director of Fathu Rahman, a moderate Islamic school. "We have to confront it before it is too late." Somali immigrant communities across the Horn of Africa and Yemen have come under greater scrutiny since twin bombings last month targeted World Cup soccer fans in the Ugandan capital of Kampala. Al-Shabab asserted responsibility for the attacks, its first major international operation since it rose to power several years ago in Somalia. Members of al-Shabab, which in Arabic means "The Youth," and other Somali militants freely travel to Nairobi to raise funds, recruit and treat wounded fighters, according to U.N. and Kenyan security officials. Somali-American jihadists have met contacts in Eastleigh before heading to Somalia to fight with al-Shabab. "Eastleigh is a copy of Mogadishu," said Mohamed Omar Dalha, Somalia's social affairs minister, referring to the Somali capital. "Everything that happens in Mogadishu happens in Eastleigh, except the fighting." Fertile ground for radicals At the al-Huda Islamic bookshop, a closet-sized stall nestled near one of Eastleigh's radical mosques, several youths browsed the fare on a recent day. Koranic tomes pack the shelves. Recordings of lectures and debates that glorify the neighborhood's radical Somali preachers are sold openly. "Our religion calls on us to kill everyone who does not believe in Allah and his Prophet Muhammed deeply," Abdulrahman Abdullahi, a black-clad imam, declares in one DVD.
Monday, August 23, 2010 5:26 PM
Monday, August 23, 2010 5:31 PM
Monday, August 23, 2010 6:09 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: "Yet there has been a pretty good expansion of Sharia law in Asia and Africa." Hello, I am more concerned with the influence of Christian law and principles on our country currently.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 2:58 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:20 AM
KANEMAN
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Quote: Christianity and Judaism have at least had to accommodate (or gasp...tolerate) secularism for some time.So has Islam...did you read the material put up on the historical shift from religious rule to secular? It's been there for a loooong time, is nothing new and refutes your inference that Islam hasn't accommodated secularism. I find considerable difference between islamophobia, anti-islam, and people who disagree with the COMMUNITY CENTER for reasons of supposed "sensitivity", etc. I don't like the word, but I don't think every disagreement with Islam comes down to Islamophobia. Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani, Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”, signing off
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:23 AM
Quote:Originally posted by mincingbeast: Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: "Yet there has been a pretty good expansion of Sharia law in Asia and Africa." Hello, I am more concerned with the influence of Christian law and principles on our country currently. I have never agreed with you before, and I may never agree with you again, but I agree with you now. It sort of tickles. I have no desire to live under Sharia law; I'd rather not be subject to Leviticus, either, or even the Code of Hammurabi. But practically, right wing Christian zealots are a more immediate threat to my delicate sensibilities than Sharia. See generally abortion, stem cell research, gay marriage.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:06 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AnthonyT: "Yet there has been a pretty good expansion of Sharia law in Asia and Africa." Hello, I am more concerned with the influence of Christian law and principles on our country currently. In my opinion, rights of homosexual persons have been retarded in this country largely due to sentiments borrowed from religion, and that religion is not the Muslim faith.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:09 AM
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:22 AM
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:38 AM
Quote: I realize that not all Muslims feel this way, certainly not anywhere near a majority, but there's a pretty good number who do
Quote: I am more concerned with the influence of Christian law and principles on our country currently. In my opinion, rights of homosexual persons have been retarded in this country largely due to sentiments borrowed from religion
Quote:I am more concerned with the influence of Christian law and principles on our country currently.
Quote:Frankly, these assholes NEED each other, the fanatic Muslims and Christian zealots, cause each one points to the other as the handy "external enemy" and "outside threat" to wind up their own collective - without which many of em would start to question why the hell they're listening to such murderous nutters...
Quote: No, any Muslims who come to the U.S. will be altered in the same way as the other fundamentalist religions who have come here or been born here. They will be forced, perhaps kicking and screaming, into the future. The best way to bring them into that future is to emphatically give them not only all the law's restrictions, but also its boons. When we give in to hysterics, it makes our claims to be more civilized seem suspect. It delays the process.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:19 PM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Somehow, "Our religion calls on us to kill everyone who does not believe in Allah and his Prophet Muhammed deeply," doesn't jibe with "religion of peace". I realize that not all Muslims feel this way, certainly not anywhere near a majority, but there's a pretty good number who do - and are willing to carry out those killings of the unbelievers. This is pretty obvious in the number of bombings by radical Muslims of civilian targets throughout Asia and Africa.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:56 PM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:17 PM
HKCAVALIER
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:23 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Although there are plenty enough Christians who believe the same crap, and want to stick pretty closely to a lot of the garbage in the Old Testament, none of which jibes with Christianity as any kind of "peaceful" religion. I realize that not all Christians feel this way, but there's a pretty good number who do - and are willing to kill the unbelievers. This is pretty obvious in the number of bombing of abortion clinics and the murders of doctors who perform legal abortions and the murders of gays like Matthew Shepard. Shall we put a moratorium on building any new churches in the U.S.?
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:51 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Although there are plenty enough Christians who believe the same crap, and want to stick pretty closely to a lot of the garbage in the Old Testament, none of which jibes with Christianity as any kind of "peaceful" religion. I realize that not all Christians feel this way, but there's a pretty good number who do - and are willing to kill the unbelievers. This is pretty obvious in the number of bombing of abortion clinics and the murders of doctors who perform legal abortions and the murders of gays like Matthew Shepard.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:04 PM
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 9:52 PM
CATPIRATE
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:52 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: When's the last time any fundie Christians stoned a young couple to death, for the unpardonable sin of eloping ? Or sought to sever the spinal cord of a man, in the name of " an eye for an eye " justice ?
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:56 PM
Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:05 AM
Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:54 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Wednesday, August 25, 2010 4:15 AM
Friday, August 27, 2010 6:20 AM
KPO
Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.
Quote:This is why the fake term Islamophobia is so dangerous: It insinuates that any reservations about Islam must ipso facto be "phobic." A phobia is an irrational fear or dislike. Islamic preaching very often manifests precisely this feature, which is why suspicion of it is by no means irrational.
Quote:From the beginning, though, I pointed out that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf was no great bargain and that his Cordoba Initiative was full of euphemisms about Islamic jihad and Islamic theocracy. I mentioned his sinister belief that the United States was partially responsible for the assault on the World Trade Center and his refusal to take a position on the racist Hamas dictatorship in Gaza. The more one reads through his statements, the more alarming it gets.
Friday, August 27, 2010 8:47 AM
Quote:Originally posted by kpo: I find the horror (I'm thinking more of 'raptor's video in the other thread) at Rauf's pretty standard (and tame) international-Muslim-worldview a little strange... The only Muslims who have a rosy/friendly view of America are American Muslims (mainly just because they have first-hand experience of America). To foreign Muslims America is the bad guy, the great Satan, the oppressor of Muslims everywhere. Perhaps you're liked a little better than Israel. A majority of British Muslims poll as believing 9-11 was not perpetrated by muslims; more moderate ones will have a Fahrenheit 911-type view. I hate it, but that's the way it is, around the world. How do you correct it? I don't know, but you can't build bridges with people only on your side of the river. People like Rauf are part of the solution, even if they are to some extent a perpetuation of the problem.
Friday, August 27, 2010 8:59 AM
Friday, August 27, 2010 1:00 PM
Quote: Islamophobia is just as valid as a term as arachnophobia - spiders have some rare, deadly varieties. But hysterical, all-consuming fear of every perfectly harmless innocent-looking spider IS irrational. Some people obsess over the poisonous types, and cannot tell the difference between the ordinary types. So I will continue to resist Islamophobes like Auraptor/RiverLove etc - and now also Islamophobiaphobes, like Hitchens.
Quote:the sinister belief that the United States was partially responsible for the assault on the World Trade Center and his refusal to take a position on the racist Hamas dictatorship in Gaza
Quote:According to a new poll, a majority of people surveyed in six European countries believe American foreign policy is partly to blame for the Sept. 11 attacks. Researchers interviewed people in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland for the survey, which was done for the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations and the German Marshall Fund of the United States. The French were most critical of U.S. foreign policy, with 63 percent saying U.S. foreign policy was partly to blame for the attacks. The Italians were the least critical - 51 percent of them blamed U.S. policy for Sept. 11. Among the other four countries, 57 percent of Britons, 52 percent of Germans, 59 percent of Dutch and 54 percent of Poles saw such a connection. Marshall Bouton, president of the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, said Tuesday the poll found that many Europeans also disagreed with how the United States has handled conflicts in the Middle East. Bouton said when he was in France that some residents told him they perceive American policy as anti-Muslim. They believe "it has provided the sea in which the terrorist can swim, so to speak," he said.
Quote: The simmering discussion of what role, if any, U.S. foreign policy may routinely play in bringing contempt and hatred down on America was bullied out of the marketplace in the wake of 9/11 by the contention that any criticism of foreign policy amounted to being an apologist for terrorism or a knee-jerk, blame-America-first type. Suggesting that U.S. foreign policy, and specifically its intrusive and interventionist character, was a contributing factor to the terror attacks is not to apologize for terrorism. Even if Al Qaeda’s cause were as “just and pure” as, say, Woodrow Wilson’s, nothing can justify that kind of wanton destruction, that deliberate attack on innocents who had nothing to do with creating your real or imagined grievances. I don’t know anybody who was not outraged. If we really want to reduce our vulnerability to terrorism, however, surely it cannot be out of bounds to try to understand the rage, madness, twisted ideas or whatever that motivates terrorists. If we discover, as I’m convinced we will, that U.S. foreign policy contributed to that rage, we might well not change it. Life is full of trade-offs, and after assessing the risks and benefits we might well decide that a terrorist attack now and then is an acceptable price for being the acknowledged sole superpower and the bringer of truth and enlightenment to the places in the world where democracy and healthy markets have yet to be established. But we should discuss the risks and benefits openly, assuming that perfection is not to be found in this world and any policy will have both advantages and drawbacks. Whether or not 9/11 can be classified strictly as “blowback”—the CIA-originated term for the unfortunate, sometimes unforeseen, sometimes violent or tragic results that accompany any operation, even a successful one, which Chalmers Johnson took for the title of his recent, pre-9/11 book criticizing U.S. foreign policy—U.S. foreign policy did play some role in motivating the attacks. Osama bin Laden, in statements prior to 9/11, specifically listed the presence of U.S. troops and bases in the land containing Mecca and other holy Islamic places as one of his grievances. Whether it was a real motivator or a pretext might be impossible to know without psychological analysis, but it’s got to be significant that he mentioned it. We know and have known that U.S. policy toward Israel—which I believe has been less lockstep than some critics claim but might be described as support-with-kvetching—angers many Muslims. The United States has troops in more than 130 countries and interests and facilities virtually everywhere. It may well be unfair that others resent us, and it is undoubtedly true that resentment against the United States is stirred up and manipulated by ambitious and unscrupulous political opportunists. But fair or not, those resentments are there and are not likely to disappear. They are part of the price of empire, hegemony, success, desire to share benefits, great achievement, or whatever term you use to describe the U.S.’s place in the post-cold-war world. Any mature, reflective person, any leader with a smattering of historical understanding should know this. It turns out—as pointed out by Independent Institute senior fellow Ivan Eland prior to 9/11 and based on Department of Defense studies—that the presence of heavy concentrations of U.S. troops, positions, or activity in some part of the world is closely correlated with increased terrorist activity. It’s hardly a surprise. The presence of a foreign power, even a perfectly benevolent one, will breed local resentment. The Defense Department knows this—they studied it first to put numbers and values on a phenomenon they knew intuitively was present. The danger is when instead of acts of self-defense, such efforts become interventionist crusades abroad and the muzzling of debate and opinion at home. America’s Founders fought an empire in order to create a republic, and they were firmly opposed to re-creating a new empire, with the requisite foreign adventures, entangling alliances, and tyrannical policies. We would be wise indeed to take their advice now in dealing with terrorism and end U.S. interventionism.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL