Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Would female leaders solve debt crisis?
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 7:09 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:There have been press conferences and secret meetings. Golf outings, walk-outings, ball-dropping and finger-pointing. For every line a Democrat draws in the sand regarding the debt ceiling, a Republican introduces a new line of his own. Or sometimes for kicks, a constitutional amendment. Yes, over the past three weeks, we've seen just about every act there is to this political theater and, staying true to the time of Shakespeare, it seems every character is played by a man. Odds are that if there were more women in these discussions, the crisis would have been resolved by now. Despite representing 51% of the country, women account for just 16.6% of Congress -- 17 of the 100 seats in the Senate, 72 of the 435 seats in the House. When President Obama had his "Big 8" meeting to talk debt ceiling a couple of weeks ago, there was only one woman present, Nancy Pelosi. Now I don't claim to be a great mathematician, but that just seems off to me. Especially when you consider that for more than 20 years there have been more women enrolled in college than men and today there are a million more female college graduates than male. Frum: GOP wants Obama's unconditional surrender Between the growing education gap and gap in population, the fact that those numbers have not translated into a bigger voice in how the country is run can only be described as the result of sexism. And it's likely hindering our governance when you consider what we know about neuroscience. Women use both sides of their brain more effectively and thus are naturally hardwired to be better communicators, more creative problem solvers and in moments of stress, less likely to walk out of meetings -- debt-ceiling variety and others -- than men. Furthermore, testosterone not only prompts a fight-or-flight response to stress, it suppresses oxytocin, the hormone that encourages bonding and positive social behavior. So while culturally people like to cast women as mentally weak and unable to control their emotions -- supposedly making them bad leaders -- the science suggests we really don't know if Eric Cantor and President Obama abruptly left their respective tense budget meetings as a negotiating tactic or if they simply couldn't control their hormones. This is not to suggest women are naturally better at governing than men, only that it is difficult to see how the country can continue to believe we benefit from their absence on the Hill. We've always handled our affairs through a patriarchal prism, but today that ideology marginalizes the more educated and largest segment of the population. When you factor in our love for waving our gender-equity finger at other nations, it would seem we're in dire need of a mirror if we're truly going to turn things around. America is 235 years old but only a total of 267 women have served in Congress, including Rebecca Latimer Felton, who was there for one day. Four states -- Delaware, Iowa, Mississippi and Vermont -- have never even elected a woman to Congress, according to the Center for American Women and Politics. What does it say about us as an industrialized nation that after three decades of dramatic social, economic and demographic shifts between the genders, there has only been one woman to follow the late Geraldine Ferraro as a major-party national nominee? And I bet if Sen. John McCain could do it all over again, Ferraro would still be the only one. Of course, we can't blame the absence of women in budget talks and such entirely on the boys club in Washington, seeing how it's we the people who elect members of Congress in the first place. And to be sure, voting based solely on gender or simply having more women on the Hill hardly solves our economic problems. Women have egos and are susceptible to pride, peer pressure and pandering just like men. And as Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann have proven, they can be just as clueless. But as the August 2 debt ceiling deadline looms, the real issue doesn't appear to be Dems vs Repubs; tax hikes vs spending cuts; or adults vs children. It's an overall lack of diversity of thought. Nearly 85% of the people in Congress are men. So if you ever wonder why these debt ceiling negotiations appear to have an inordinate amount of chest-pounding and tree spraying, that number -- more than the $14 trillion we owe -- seems like the best place to start.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 7:18 AM
Quote: When Republican presidential candidate and tea party favorite Michele Bachmann was recently asked by Fox News' Chris Wallace if she was "a flake," the moment seemed like déjà vu all over again for some women active in politics. Bachmann's response -- she was "insulted" -- was stern, but it pointed to a larger bias many women perceive in presidential politics. "Nobody in the GOP establishment is going to hand anything to Bachmann or (Sarah) Palin -- just like (Democrats) did not for Hillary (Clinton)," said Amy Siskind, who supported Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential bid. "And it takes a certain type of leader to go out there and have the courage and the guts to say 'I'm running (for president)' and I admire Bachmann for that." After Clinton's failed Oval Office bid, Siskind and a small group of women who had supported Clinton decided the best way to break the glass ceiling in presidential politics was to put ideology and partisanship aside and support any woman seeking a top political office -- including Bachmann and Palin, two darlings of the tea party movement known for their conservative views on economic and social issues. But some Democratic leaders dismissed the idea, arguing the electorate is more sophisticated. "Women don't support women candidates simply because of their status as women, simply because of their gender," said Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, head of the Democratic National Committee.
Quote:"McCain sent (former California Republican senatorial candidate) Carly Fiorina to my home," said Siskind, who used to trade distressed debt on Wall Street, "to meet with a lot of the women that then became The New Agenda to say: What would you want to get McCain's support?" "One of the things we asked for was to have a woman on the ticket," said Siskind
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 8:24 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11:08 AM
MAGONSDAUGHTER
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11:31 AM
DREAMTROVE
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:22 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 2:51 PM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Quote:Bush thought of himself as a man who brought equality. And he did bring some equality into the world.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:05 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote:Bush thought of himself as a man who brought equality. And he did bring some equality into the world. Yes, of the "we'll bomb you whether you're involved with terrorists or not" variety. Some equality!
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:11 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Nancy Pelosi, Sheila Jackson Lee, Corine Brown.... There's your answer. Not only "no", but HELL no. " I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:15 PM
RIONAEIRE
Beir bua agus beannacht
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 7:15 AM
Quote:It depends far more on the content of the character of the person
Quote: You might laugh if I said we'd be better off with Sarah Palin
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 7:16 AM
Thursday, July 21, 2011 11:52 AM
Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:07 PM
Quote:Originally posted by dreamtrove: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Nancy Pelosi, Sheila Jackson Lee, Corine Brown.... There's your answer. Not only "no", but HELL no. " I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. " Rap, Those are three women, but the negative does not actually prove the positive. There are women in office who have financial sense, like Barbara Boxer. Presidential candidates, not so much. Not yet. I certainly wouldn't take the extension that "barack obama is dreadful at economics, ergo, so will the next black president be" and I think you'd agree that Herman Cain would be more economically sensible. I thought Charles Barron who ran for gov of NY was quite sensible. The unfortunate answer to ts question is Yes, Hillary Clinton, but boy do I not want that answer. I think we migt get a balanced budget in the middle of a nuclear war. I mean, picture a war with russia, china and Iran, in which we cut costs by using nuclear armed robots. The world would turn dayglo, but at least we'd be rid of the debt.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL