Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
"Rush Limbaugh is bad for business"
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 7:57 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:SEARS Becomes the First Company to DUMP RUSH LIMBAUGH TWICE Sears has made Rush Limbaugh a two time loser by putting out a second statement announcing that they have pulled their ads from his show. After Limbaugh’s Sandra Fluke comments Sears tweeted this statement, “Sears and Kmart did not intentionally advertise on the Rush Limbaugh show. Sears Holdings has taken actions to ensure our ads do not run on this show. We appreciate our customers, fans and followers and thank you for your business.” Sears responded to a tweet about their continued advertising on Limbaugh’s show with this statement, “Sears Holdings has taken actions to ensure our ads do not run on this show. We appreciate our customers and thank you for your feedback.”
Quote:Even though the dust seems to have settled after Rush Limbaugh attacked Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke, some advertisers are still pulling out of the radio giant's show. UPS became the latest company to pull its ads from Limbaugh's show. More than forty companies -- including AOL, the parent company of The Huffington Post -- pulled its content.
Quote:Last week, Carbonite's CEO told shareholders that although dropping their major endorsement deal with Rush Limbaugh had a short term impact on revenue, he did not regret the decision. Notably, the CEO added that "things would have been worse" had Carbonite not dropped Limbaugh.
Quote:Advertisers continue to exclude their ads from running during Rush Limbaugh's show. Over the past few weeks, big name advertisers, like Sam's Club and eBay, as well as lesser known advertisers issued issued public statements confirming that that their ads will not run during Limbaugh's show. And, this doesn't account for the scores of local advertisers that refuse to advertise on Limbaugh's show.
Quote:Yesterday, Cumulus Media, a major affiliate of Rush Limbaugh's show reported millions of dollars in losses attributable Limbaugh's advertiser troubles. During a call with investors Cumulus CEO Lew Dickey acknowledged Limbaugh's "drag" on business while being careful not to mention Limbaugh by name: Quote:On Thursday, speaking to investors again, Dickey said that, though his profits were up in his latest quarter, his revenues were down thanks to ten out of the 570 stations he owns. These stations, he said, were mostly "news/talk" formats in major media markets. Dickey chalked up the sluggish performance -- the top three stations cost him $5.5 million, he said -- in part to "some extraordinary issues," such as "the boycott that we saw from some remarks in a talk radio show." That, he said, had "impacted us."Dickey made news when Cumulus last reported earnings in May when he said that the Limbaugh advertiser efforts lost his company millions of dollars in the first and second quarters, but indicated that things would be back to normal in June. Limbaugh's defenders heralded Dickey's projection as proof that the efforts to hold Rush Limbaugh accountable had failed. Things did not return to normal in June. On yesterday's call, Dickey informed investors that he anticipated the drag on business to continue for at least another six months to a year. Limbaugh continues to engage in the same kinds of vitriol and reckless attacks that put his intersecting business interests and affiliates in this position in the first place, like his renewed attacks on Sandra Fluke or a recent statement that "feminism was established" so "unattractive women" could have "easier access to the mainstream." This continued recklessness signals to advertisers that Limbaugh remains volatile. For many advertisers, this volatility is what keeps them away. They look at Limbaugh's long record of vitriol, they see the damange to businsess it can unpredictably create sometimes, they recognize that he continues to engage in similar conduct and they rightfully conclude that the risk just isn't worth it. Bottom line: Rush Limbaugh continues to demonstrate that he's bad for business.
Quote:On Thursday, speaking to investors again, Dickey said that, though his profits were up in his latest quarter, his revenues were down thanks to ten out of the 570 stations he owns. These stations, he said, were mostly "news/talk" formats in major media markets. Dickey chalked up the sluggish performance -- the top three stations cost him $5.5 million, he said -- in part to "some extraordinary issues," such as "the boycott that we saw from some remarks in a talk radio show." That, he said, had "impacted us."
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 10:48 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 12:46 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 12:53 PM
WHOZIT
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL