REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Press Coordinates Question to Ask Romney

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Thursday, September 13, 2012 14:02
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2351
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, September 13, 2012 3:19 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


For any one left who STILL denies that the MSM are fully, completely and totally in the bag for Obama, here's your sign.

The blog RightScoop.com has audio of the press coordinating which question to ask Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at his press conference this morning on the events in Libya and Egypt. “[N]o matter who he calls on we’re covered on the one question,” an unidentified journalist says.

Here's the transcript:


UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: …pointing out that the Republicans… *unintelligible* …Obama….

CBS REPORTER: That’s the question.

UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: *unintelligible*

CBS REPORTER: Yeah that’s the question. I would just say do you regret your question.

UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: Your question? Your statement?

CBS REPORTER: I mean your statement. Not even the tone, because then he can go off on…

UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: And then if he does, if we can just follow up and say ‘but this morning your answer is continuing to sound…’ – *becomes unintelligble*

CBS REPORTER: You can’t say that..

**Later**

CBS REPORTER: I’m just trying to make sure that we’re just talking about, no matter who he calls on we’re covered on the one question.

UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: Do you stand by your statement or regret your statement?




http://www.therightscoop.com/exclusive-open-mic-captures-press-coordin
ating-questions-for-romney-no-matter-who-he-calls-on-were-covered
/


That the media are doing this so casually, so matter of fact, they're attempting to not gather or report the news, but in fact coordinating ways to manufacture the news.

" faked, but accurate "

You taught them well, Dan Rather.




" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:15 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Isn't it the media's job to ask politicians tough questions? Romney got caught out making a cynical, dishonest smear on a day of national tragedy, and he should be made to squirm, in my view. Same for any politician who gets caught lying like he did.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:19 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Isn't it the media's job to ask politicians tough questions?

It's not personal. It's just war.



Missing the point on purpose, or what ?

Lots of tough questions don't get asked when it's Obama, but that's another issue.

The reporters are conspiring, coordinating to 'get' Romney, and plotting out how to attack him w/ questions, regardless of which answers he gives.

ETA - Romney made no 'cynical,dishonest smear' , at all. And there is the root of your problem, I see.

He didn't lie.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:46 AM

BLUEHANDEDMENACE


He claimed that a statement made before the attacks was a response to it. He said the admin apologized, when there was no apology in the statement.

How do you not get that thats exactly what we (people who speak English) call a lie?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 5:02 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by BLUEHANDEDMENACE:
He claimed that a statement made before the attacks was a response to it. He said the admin apologized, when there was no apology in the statement.

How do you not get that thats exactly what we (people who speak English) call a lie?



He doesn't care.

Just more pointless whining from Rappy. Nothing here.


Note to anyone - Please pity the poor, poor wittle Rappyboy. He's feeling put upon lately, what with all those facts disagreeing with what he believes.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 6:30 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


What are the odds that the "unidentified" reporter they don't want to out is actually Bret Baier, who asked Romney exactly that question in his own interview with him?

And what was Romney's response when asked why he didn't mention the troops, and whether he regretted not doing so?

"I only regret you repeating it day in and day out. (LAUGHS)... Because when you give a speech, you don't give a laundry list. You talk about the things that uh you think are important"


In his own words, the troops ARE NOT IMPORTANT.

His words, his answer.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 6:32 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by BLUEHANDEDMENACE:
He claimed that a statement made before the attacks was a response to it. He said the admin apologized, when there was no apology in the statement.

How do you not get that thats exactly what we (people who speak English) call a lie?




It was also claimed that the statements were made before anyone knew that any Americans had been killed, another "claim" that is categorically false.


Rappy, facts, and "claims" have a long and tenuous relationship. It's really no wonder he would choose as his dear and fluffy leader(s) people who are pathologically incapable of telling the truth. That's why he's a Republican, and that's why he'll vote for Romney and Lyin' Ryan.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:13 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


First off, a "blog" titled "RightScoop.com" isn't necessarily anything I would trust.

Second, "unidentified journalist", "unidentified reporter"... isn't this from the guy who rants and raves about "anonymous" sources and speakers?

Lastly, reporters work together all the time; I don't see why this is anything worth mentioning. Candidates coordinate with journalists all the want these days, thanx to the PAC decision:
Quote:

The effect of the media exemption is this. A press entity can spend an unlimited amount of their own money promoting, attacking, supporting, or opposing a candidate. They could even use the magic words; they can ad-vocate the election or defeat of a candidate in their broadcasts and publica-tions. Publications like the New York Times do this all the time. They use their corporate money to produce editorials and news stories, and then pub-licly distribute their views. Now, anybody who has that media exemption, including the bloggers, can do the same thing.

And here?s the good part. They can do all of this while their employees coordinate with the campaigns. We don?t call it this. We call the employees reporters or editorial writers, or we call them political cartoonists. But essentially, they are employees and they can coordinate with the campaign. They would call it covering the campaign. But essentially, it?s the same activity; activities that, if these people were employees of, say, Procter & Gamble, it would count as coordination. In other words, as long as the media are pursuing their journalistic function, for all practical pur-poses they are exempt from campaign finance laws.page 253 at http://www.chapman.edu/law/_files/publications/2008v11PDF.pdf


So campaign employees can call themselves "journalists" in order to coordinate with candidates' campaigns; what's the difference between that and regular journalists getting together to decide what questions to ask?

Whole issue is a non-issue, essentially.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:19 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Weren't there some memos that made the rounds where FauxNews was telling people exactly what to call "ObamaCare", among other things? Didn't they all powwow with Frank Luntz to decide what unsavory names ("Death Panels!") they'd give to various policies in order to put them in a negative light?





"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:41 AM

HERO


For any one left who STILL denies that the MSM are fully, completely and totally in the bag for Obama, here's your sign.

The blog RightScoop.com has audio of the press coordinating which question to ask Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at his press conference this morning on the events in Libya and Egypt. “ [N]o matter who he calls on we’re covered on the one question,” an unidentified journalist says.

Here's the transcript:


UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: …pointing out that the Republicans… *unintelligible* …Obama….

................................

No wait, I thought I was supposed to post this message.

We need better coordination.

H

Hero...must be right on all of this. ALL of the rest of us are wrong. Chrisisall, 2012

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:43 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:

Second, "unidentified journalist", "unidentified reporter"... isn't this from the guy who rants and raves about "anonymous" sources and speakers?



Sounds a lot like FOX and their sleazy "Some people say" tactic.


Note to anyone - Please pity the poor, poor wittle Rappyboy. He's feeling put upon lately, what with all those facts disagreeing with what he believes.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:44 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Weren't there some memos that made the rounds where FauxNews was telling people exactly what to call "ObamaCare", among other things? Didn't they all powwow with Frank Luntz to decide what unsavory names ("Death Panels!") they'd give to various policies in order to put them in a negative light?





"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."




Indeed there were.

But shush.

Republicans will not let facts dictate their reality.


Note to anyone - Please pity the poor, poor wittle Rappyboy. He's feeling put upon lately, what with all those facts disagreeing with what he believes.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:45 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Prize for first giggle of the day goes to poster two posts before this one--I'd mention his name, but it might end up in his signature...

And yes, there was "coordination" around ObamaCare. And never forget Frank Luntz, who gives them virtually ALL their "talking points":
Quote:

Ernest Dumas writes this week about the tribute Republicans should pay to Frank Luntz, the message master whose sloganeering — from the disingenuous to the blatantly dishonest — has done everything from killing the estate tax to making evil out of health care legislation that's good for tens of millions of people.

"Cut Medicare." "Government takeover of health care." "Rationing." "Runaway debt." "Preserve the doctor-patient relationship."

Baloney all. But facts don't matter. It's what people think they hear. Dumas explains:
Quote:

The slogans describe nothing about the Affordable Care Act. Take the threat to seniors. The law makes no cuts in Medicare benefits. Instead, as you would expect a bunch of Democrats to do, it adds a laundry list of new assistance for seniors: lower prescription drug costs, free preventive-care screenings like mammograms and colonoscopies for the rest of your life, and bonuses for family doctors and nurse practitioners who treat the elderly at any age.

Yes, the law does phase out the huge taxpayer bonuses to insurance companies that since 2004 has guaranteed them big profits if they sell Medicare Advantage plans.

...Here is what the “government takeover of health care” amounts to: The government stops insurance companies from ending coverage when people get acute illnesses like cancer, prevents them from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions, stops them from ending insurance for critically ill children and limits their profits and overhead to 15 or 20 percent of the premiums they collect. More than that and they must rebate the money to customers. Millions of rebate checks will go out next month and every August hereafter.

But, as Luntz had explained, facts don’t matter much.


If Republicans seize the White House and Congress, they should name the Washington national airport for the man who was responsible. Let’s make it the Dr. Frank Luntz National Airport.
http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/07/17/republicans-s
hould-name-an-airport-for-frank-luntz

Again; this thread is stupid. Coordination goes on constantly, on both sides, and journalists these days aren't "journalists" anyway, those are long dead; they're patsies for whatever talking points they hear. Supposedly the press was TOLD what to say by the Dubya White House, and I'm sure we oculd find all kinds of articles on Republicans coordinating with FauxNews. Or FoxNoise, if you will.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:41 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


How come they could identify "CBS Reporter", but nobody else?


I'm still going with my theory that the "unidentified reporter" is the Bret guy from FauxNews. To date, he is the ONLY reporter (and I use that term reservedly) I've heard ask Romney that exact question. I even have it on video.


I wonder if Rappy's being ordered by his coordinators not to answer... ;)



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:05 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
How come they could identify "CBS Reporter", but nobody else?


I'm still going with my theory that the "unidentified reporter" is the Bret guy from FauxNews. To date, he is the ONLY reporter (and I use that term reservedly) I've heard ask Romney that exact question. I even have it on video.


I wonder if Rappy's being ordered by his coordinators not to answer... ;)



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."



The unidentifided reporter is some douche from PBS who's name I've forgotten and am not going to bother searching for, you libs can spin this all you like but you know what you've read or heard. The MSM whore themselves for Barry, this is the 1st time they got caught. What really pisses you libs off is FOX News and Conservative Talk Radio are having a field day with this and all you libs can do is ignore it or say it isn't real, all I can tell you libs is IN YOUR FACE!!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 13, 2012 2:02 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Here's Bret Baier "whoring himself for Barry":




Fox is the MSM? The Zit says yes!



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 21:42 - 4534 posts
With apologies to JSF: Favorite songs (3)
Tue, November 5, 2024 18:25 - 68 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Tue, November 5, 2024 17:35 - 4677 posts
Election fraud.
Tue, November 5, 2024 17:19 - 39 posts
Multiculturalism
Tue, November 5, 2024 17:16 - 53 posts
Funny Cartoon sparks Islamic Jihad !
Tue, November 5, 2024 17:12 - 248 posts
Elon Musk
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:57 - 32 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:55 - 40 posts
What kind of superpower could China be?
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:02 - 54 posts
End of the Democratic Party (not kidding)
Tue, November 5, 2024 14:18 - 56 posts
Disgruntled Tepublicans vow to move to Australia
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:53 - 76 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:47 - 639 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL