REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Again, Gore is going to be PISSED !!!!

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Saturday, August 10, 2013 03:40
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 653
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, August 9, 2013 3:20 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 9, 2013 6:10 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Omigawd; this from the guy who claims U.S. News and the Christian Science Monitor (and supposedly Forbes and Fiscal Times) are "extreme, hard core Left wing MSM".
Quote:

"Climate Depot.com" is the website of Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow employee Marc Morano, a conservative global warming denier who previously served as environmental communications director for a vocal political denier of climate change, Republican Sen. James Inhofe. Launched in spring 2009, Climate Depot claimed it would be "the Senate EPW website on steroids," and "the most comprehensive information center on climate news and the related issues of environment and energy."

ClimateDepot.com is being financed by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, a nonprofit in Washington that advocates for free-market solutions to environmental issues. Public tax filings for 2003-7 (the last five years for which documents are available) show that the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the ExxonMobil Foundation and foundations associated with the billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, a longtime financier of conservative causes, including being the primary source of money used to fund attacks against Bill Clinton during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky eras of his presidency. According to a report issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists, from 1998-2005, approximately 23% of the total ExxonMobil funding for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow was directed by ExxonMobil for climate change activities [p. 32]. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Climate_Depot



They touted themselves initially by saying they would "offer a balanced perspective and serve as an ombudsman of the 4th Estate’s Eco-Reporting." I invite anyone to go to their website and look (HARD!) for any kind of "balanced perspective".

Regarding Murano:
Quote:

Marc Morano is a wingnut propagandist and global warming denier. He kicked off his career by learning the tricks of the trade as a producer on Rush Limbaugh's show in the early '90s. He then went on to work for L. Brent Bozell's Media Research Center. In 2004, he was one of the first "reporters" to hype the John Kerry swiftboating story. In 2006, preeminent denier and wingnut Jim Inhofe hired Morano to be his "Director of Communications." Morano's position got him into a number of climate conferences and policy hearings. He also put out a bogus report about 700+ number of scientists who "disagreed" with the consensus. Some scientists called for his resignation due to the number of distortions and lies about their work he promulgated. In 2009, Morano left Inhofe and became the proprietor of the website "Climate Depot."

Supposedly, he exposes the "lies" of the "warmists" and "scientific McCarthy-ites" who do research in that inconvenient thing called science. The site is really more of a denialist-style Drudge Report that links to whatever nonsense it can find. In 2010, Morano was given the "Petr Beckmann award" by Doctors for Disaster Preparedness. Apparently, he thinks this is something to be proud of. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Marc_Morano]


The "Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow"?
Quote:

CFACT's Board of Academic and Scientific Advisors is a who's who of climate skeptics and industry-funded scientists. Their semi-monthly newsletter, "Citizen Outlook," includes an update on news from the environmental movement called "From the Dark Side," a title indicative of the contempt CFACT's members have for all facets of environmentalism. CFACT received $710, 000 between 1991 and 2002 from Richard Mellon Scaife controlled foundations, the Carthage Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation.

7 June, 2002: President David Rothbard signed a letter to President Bush, asking him to withdraw the "Climate Action Report 2002", and recommending that Bush "dismiss or re-assign all administration employees who are not pursuing your agenda, just as you have done in several similar instances."

2 August, 2002: Wrote to President Bush, discouraging him from attending the UN Summit on Sustainable Development. Bush did not attend. http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=25]


About that physicist?
Quote:

He is known for his theory on the effects of cosmic rays on cloud formation as an indirect cause of global warming.

An early (2003) critique of Svensmark's theory reanalyzed Svensmark's data and suggested that it does not support a correlation between cosmic rays and global temperature changes; it also disputes some of the theoretical bases for the theory.

Mike Lockwood of the UK's Rutherford Appleton Laboratory and Claus Froehlich of the World Radiation Center in Switzerland published a paper in 2007 which concluded that the increase in mean global temperature observed since 1985 correlates so poorly with solar variability that no type of causal mechanism may be ascribed to it

In April 2008, Professor Terry Sloan of Lancaster University published a paper in the journal Environmental Research Letters titled "Testing the proposed causal link between cosmic rays and cloud cover",[26] which found no significant link between cloud cover and cosmic ray intensity in the last 20 years. Svensmark responded by saying "Terry Sloan has simply failed to understand how cosmic rays work on clouds"

More recently, Laken et al (2012)[30] found that new high quality satellite data show that the El_Niño–Southern_Oscillation is responsible for most changes in cloud cover at the global and regional levels. They also found that Galactic Cosmic Rays, and total solar irradiance did not have any statistically-significant influence on changes in cloud cover whatsoever.

Lockwood (2012)[31] conducted a thorough review of the scientific literature on the "solar influence" on climate. It was found that when this influence is included appropriately into climate models, causal climate change claims such as those made by Svensmark are shown to have been exaggerated. Lockwood's review also highlighted the strength of evidence in favor of the solar influence on regional climates. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrik_Svensmark



Five strikes: he's out.

ClimateDepot.com: a WEBSITES run by an Inhofe-buddy kook, financed by a right-wing think tank funded by Exxon.

I hereby reject your "source" and their "expert". Not only will "Gore" (who is irrelevant to the discussion) not be pissed, he's not even going to notice. Try again.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 9, 2013 7:30 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Thanks Niki. Rappy is quoting some know-nothing rightwing blog? Whooda thunk!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 1:11 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
I hereby reject your "source" and their "expert". Not only will "Gore" (who is irrelevant to the discussion) not be pissed, he's not even going to notice. Try again.




Of course you reject it, because it goes against your religious views.

And it's useful idiots like YOU, Niki, who'll continue to spread the lies of AGW, and there by making Gore more and more $. Bravo. I stand corrected. As long as there are plenty of gullible , guilt laden dupes to fall in line, Gore will carry on with his charade.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 3:40 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


There's a difference, Sig, between checking out sources from which people post material and just sticking one's fingers in one's ears and saying "nanananana". I tend to check out sources people post here, and sometimes, like this one, it's so blatant I can't resist checking out more, and more, and the more I check out, the more ridiculous it is. This is about as bad a case as some of what PN slathers the board with, so I found it interesting.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 00:26 - 4511 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, November 4, 2024 23:40 - 4674 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Mon, November 4, 2024 20:13 - 636 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Mon, November 4, 2024 18:24 - 175 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Mon, November 4, 2024 16:54 - 7421 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Mon, November 4, 2024 16:52 - 37 posts
The DEI Hires Thread
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:23 - 4 posts
U.S. Senate Races 2024
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:15 - 11 posts
Election fraud.
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:09 - 37 posts
Unemployment Rate Facts
Mon, November 4, 2024 14:06 - 828 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Mon, November 4, 2024 13:58 - 164 posts
The predictions thread
Mon, November 4, 2024 10:48 - 1181 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL