REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Do you know who I am ???

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Monday, August 12, 2013 06:48
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2933
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, August 9, 2013 5:29 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Usually, it's b-list celebs who break out that line, when they feel they've been jilted , or deserve better treatment from plebeians who make up the rest of the world.

But this time, it was ... Oprah ?

Really?

Oprah Winfrey's brush with racism in Swiss boutique sparks international uproar after employee refused to show her $38K bag

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/oprah-winfrey-brush-ra
cism-sparks-international-incident-article-1.1422325#ixzz2bX4Z2cJE


Never mind the price tag ( $ 38 K ), Oprah is claiming ( are you ready ? ) RACISM !!

Yes. Ms Trayvon-is-the-modern-day-Emmett-Till herself is claiming that she was denied the RIGHT to buy a $ 38K FREAKING HAND BAG No, Oprah wasn't denied service, nor was she shown the door ( ala lunch counter incidents which occurred in the South, circa the 1950's ) , she was just told ( allegedly ) by the clerk that the bag she was interested in was too expensive for her to even look at, up close.

Did Oprah 'fight for her right ' ?

Nope. She claims she just took what the clerk told her, and then left.

Atta girl, Oprah! Rosa Parks would be proud !!

Fight the power ! ( or not. and just whine about it later )

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 9, 2013 7:30 PM

BYTEMITE


Why would anyone want to buy anything from a place that treats potential costumers like that?

That would be like Julia Robert's character in Pretty Women insisting she buy from the store that kicked her out because they thought she was trashy before her makeover, instead of her rubbing it in their faces that they lost some serious business from her.

Store also probably lost business from people who hear this story. Oprah will have made a serious impact on the business for their practices without making a scene in public that the tabloids would spin in the worst possible way. Sounds classy to me.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 9, 2013 9:46 PM

AGENTROUKA


I can't judge whether it was racism or just plain classist rudeness, but that sort of thing is just not okay. I think she handled it well. Why WOULD she demand service from a place that would treat her so condescendingly? Leaving and talking about her experience is much more effective. And it avoids the very scene your thread title wants to imply.

Racism and xenophobia are problems in Switzerland. Auraptor, I see you're doing the same thing here that you do with the subject of sexism in the Western world. Try to silence it. By comparing it to something worse in an entirely different place, geographically or historically. Why do you always do that?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 9, 2013 10:27 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


When you tell a billionaire that she can't look at a handbag, what other reasons could you cite besides her race?



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 9, 2013 11:18 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Ha ha. Stupid store. I bet they're kicking themselves now.

As Eddy would say 'you can drop the attitude, you only work in a shop'

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 1:02 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:

Store also probably lost business from people who hear this story. Oprah will have made a serious impact on the business for their practices without making a scene in public that the tabloids would spin in the worst possible way. Sounds classy to me.



And that's what kinda irks me. IF this incident took place as she claimed, she should have just nipped it in the bud, and told the lady, indeed, who she was! She didn't need to make a scene, but just inform the lady, in an oh-by-the-way manner, that she could have bought that store, several times over, and that clerk just talked herself out of a huge sale.

I'm a bit skeptical that the event took place as recalled by Oprah, though. Might be true, I just can't say.

Quote:

Racism and xenophobia are problems in Switzerland. Auraptor, I see you're doing the same thing here that you do with the subject of sexism in the Western world. Try to silence it. By comparing it to something worse in an entirely different place, geographically or historically. Why do you always do that?


First of all, I do no such thing as you describe w/ regards to sexism. No idea where you're getting that from.

Second of all, MANY on there make exaggerated examples to make their point, and yet some how you only see it when I allegedly do that ? I bring up Emmett Till because Oprah has indeed claimed that Trayvon Martin is virtually the same thing. It's no where near the same, and to even TRY to compare the 2 incidents is to make a mockery of the memory of Emmett Till, as well as to display colossal ignorance on her part, of both cases.

Why do I always do that ? Because someone has to.

MD - Ab Fab reference, huh? Nicely done.


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 5:27 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Racism and xenophobia are problems in Switzerland. Auraptor, I see you're doing the same thing here that you do with the subject of sexism in the Western world. Try to silence it. By comparing it to something worse in an entirely different place, geographically or historically. Why do you always do that?


First of all, I do no such thing as you describe w/ regards to sexism. No idea where you're getting that from.



I get that from, for example, your derailment into FGM in the "colluding with violence toward women" thread which was about sexism in Western culture. You always bring up oppression of women in muslim cultures when issues in Western culture are discussed.

Quote:


Second of all, MANY on there make exaggerated examples to make their point, and yet some how you only see it when I allegedly do that ?



I didn't say that only you do it. But you did it here, so I brought it up.

Quote:

I bring up Emmett Till because Oprah has indeed claimed that Trayvon Martin is virtually the same thing. It's no where near the same, and to even TRY to compare the 2 incidents is to make a mockery of the memory of Emmett Till, as well as to display colossal ignorance on her part, of both cases.

Why do I always do that ? Because someone has to.



Yet neither incident has a bearing on what happened in that store in Switzerland.

From your initial post:
Quote:

No, Oprah wasn't denied service, nor was she shown the door ( ala lunch counter incidents which occurred in the South, circa the 1950's ) , she was just told ( allegedly ) by the clerk that the bag she was interested in was too expensive for her to even look at, up close.


Clearly, you're trying to silence her accusation of racism by contrasting it to worse racism from another time and place. Because nothing can be bad unless it's a full-on catastrophe. Nothing should be addressed if anything else, elsewhere or long ago, was ever worse. At least that is how it reads to me. I can't imagine why else you would make that comparison.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:32 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Racism and xenophobia are problems in Switzerland. Auraptor, I see you're doing the same thing here that you do with the subject of sexism in the Western world. Try to silence it. By comparing it to something worse in an entirely different place, geographically or historically. Why do you always do that?


First of all, I do no such thing as you describe w/ regards to sexism. No idea where you're getting that from.



I get that from, for example, your derailment into FGM in the "colluding with violence toward women" thread which was about sexism in Western culture. You always bring up oppression of women in muslim cultures when issues in Western culture are discussed.



Yeah. Sorry about that. Women are women, anywhere on the globe. Violence in the form of forced mutilation is pretty gorram bad. Period. Not only had I addressed the thread issue in my primary post, but I also missed the part that specified WESTERN culture. I'll look to that, and try NOT to care so much about folks who live far away from me.

Quote:



Quote:


Second of all, MANY on there make exaggerated examples to make their point, and yet some how you only see it when I allegedly do that ?



I didn't say that only you do it. But you did it here, so I brought it up.



Selectively calling me out on what others do, as much if not more. Got it.

Quote:



Quote:

I bring up Emmett Till because Oprah has indeed claimed that Trayvon Martin is virtually the same thing. It's no where near the same, and to even TRY to compare the 2 incidents is to make a mockery of the memory of Emmett Till, as well as to display colossal ignorance on her part, of both cases.

Why do I always do that ? Because someone has to.



Yet neither incident has a bearing on what happened in that store in Switzerland.



That's your opinion. I brought it up as a commentary on " racism ", which is what Oprah was talking about.

Quote:



From your initial post:
Quote:

No, Oprah wasn't denied service, nor was she shown the door ( ala lunch counter incidents which occurred in the South, circa the 1950's ) , she was just told ( allegedly ) by the clerk that the bag she was interested in was too expensive for her to even look at, up close.


Clearly, you're trying to silence her accusation of racism by contrasting it to worse racism from another time and place. Because nothing can be bad unless it's a full-on catastrophe. Nothing should be addressed if anything else, elsewhere or long ago, was ever worse. At least that is how it reads to me. I can't imagine why else you would make that comparison.




Clearly? Well again, that's YOUR opinion. If she wants to drudge up Emmett Till to discuss Trayvon Martin, I'll do the same to her w/ regards to lunch counters in the 50's and $38 K handbags in Switzerland.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:51 AM

BYTEMITE


Ah.

AuRaptor: Mad about comments about Trayvon Martin, lolz about unable to buy ridiculously expensive handbag that no one would ever need to spend that much money on.

Fair enough.

I speculate that the urge to buy such an expensive bag must be related to the status symbol aspect of being able to plunk that much money down - perhaps because of treatment like this. Vicious cycle?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 11:09 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
Ah.

AuRaptor: Mad about comments about Trayvon Martin, lolz about unable to buy ridiculously expensive handbag that no one would ever need to spend that much money on.

Fair enough.



Now, I never brought NEED into the equation. Her money, she should be able to spend it as she sees fit, as is the case with all of us. ( On things legal, that is. A handbag made from baby black rhinos, or an elephant's foot waste basket, then we're in different territory. )

Quote:



I speculate that the urge to buy such an expensive bag must be related to the status symbol aspect of being able to plunk that much money down - perhaps because of treatment like this. Vicious cycle?



Discrimination took place, no doubt. But as to whether it was in how she was dressed, or how much light her skin reflected, isn't known for certain. Would a punked out, blonde haired, blue eyed Miley Cyrus have been treated likewise ?

Dunno.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:44 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

First of all, I do no such thing as you describe w/ regards to sexism. No idea where you're getting that from.

Second of all, MANY on there make exaggerated examples to make their point, and yet some how you only see it when I allegedly do that ?

Why do I always do that ? Because someone has to.





So your argument boils down to this:

I don't do that! And if I do, so what? I do it because someone has to.

You deny, then you quibble a bit, then you admit while trying to rationalize and justify doing what you just denied you do.

Good show.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:51 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

And that's what kinda irks me. IF this incident took place as she claimed, she should have just nipped it in the bud, and told the lady, indeed, who she was! She didn't need to make a scene, but just inform the lady, in an oh-by-the-way manner, that she could have bought that store, several times over, and that clerk just talked herself out of a huge sale.




So in other words, she should have trotted out the old "Do you know who I am?" line? Why? So you could judge her for that?

Quote:

Usually, it's b-list celebs who break out that line, when they feel they've been jilted , or deserve better treatment from plebeians who make up the rest of the world.


Isn't using the "Do you know who I am?" line "making a scene"?


If someone in a store wants to treat me like shit because they don't know who I am, and think I'm just an average person (thereby justifying in their mind their idea that they can treat average people like shit with no repercussions), then no, I'm not going to make a scene. If I had a stage the size of Oprah's, I'd do what she did and tell the world about it. The shop worker has a right to be a jerk and an asshole, and Oprah has a right to talk about it in public.

Perhaps the lesson here is that maybe we shouldn't assume the worst of our customers if we work in retail, because maybe, just maybe, that customer has the money and wherewithal to buy our store many times over.




"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:00 PM

BYTEMITE


I bring need into it. Maybe people can buy what they want but that doesn't mean I can't think it's completely pointless. Or a huge waste of resources.

When someone can afford it, I suppose it's less objectionable but still sort of an annoying "look at me, I spend $35,000 on a hand bag." But if someone's house is being foreclosed and they buy a hummer to live in instead I am going to judge the fuck out of that.

And everything else? Judging people is kind of what I do, and I don't really abide by the social niceties most do where paying a shit ton of money for a fashion accessory becomes an admirable or envious purchase. Instead I tend to think "this is dumb as hell. Use a hemp bag or something, CHRIST."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 11, 2013 12:14 AM

AGENTROUKA


To play devil's advocate, creating and paying for useless pretty things is what people do.

Much of art and architectural heritage exists only because some rich person paid some talented person to make it. It's a highly specialized expression of culture, some more durable and practical, some more short-lived and fanciful. But much of it comes down to "look at this shiny, expensive thing I can afford".

Being elaborate and valuable is what allows such items (or buildings) to survive through the ages, be it because they are made of expensive, durable materials or because they are preserved, and it's enduring proof of human creativity and skill and changing taste. It's also an indulgence that documents, even encourages intellectual development. It's what happens when humans have surplus beyond subsistence. We decorate and play.

Being a tremendous geek for art history, I can't find much fault with that on principal, except for where it relates to underlying woeful wealth inequality that makes some people obscenely rich while others suffer.

Overpriced handbags may seem like an offensive frivolity but as a mosaic piece they're part of a fundamental aspect of human culture. They're not the problem, they just become symbolic of one when you're looking at contrasts in wealth.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 11, 2013 6:15 AM

BYTEMITE


...Hmm, you have a point. Perhaps my problem with this is a disconnect between the concept of "fashion" and the concept of "art", because of all the unfortunate health messages and pointless commercialism that fashion promotes.

On the other hand, I also think it's kind of ridiculous for an art patron to pay an artist or a studio a million bucks for a painting, even IF the painting is really good. If people want a painting that bad, maybe they should learn to paint their OWN.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 11, 2013 6:39 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Being a tremendous geek for art history, I can't find much fault with that on principal, except for where it relates to underlying woeful wealth inequality that makes some people obscenely rich while others suffer."

Art doesn't need rich patrons to exist - all it requires is an artist, time, materials and tools. Unless the tools and materials are extremely expensive - like a nanotechnology that can paint the Mona Lisa in an area less than the diameter of a human hair ( http://www.upi.com/Science_News/Technology/2013/08/06/Nanotechnology-c
reates-worlds-smallest-version-of-the-Mona-Lisa/UPI-21361375826126
/) or ruby glass made of glass infused with gold ( http://www.bobbrooke.com/rubyglass.htm) what the artist needs is a way to stay alive in order to have time ... time to create. Keeping someone alive so they can create is not that expensive.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 11, 2013 7:53 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"Being a tremendous geek for art history, I can't find much fault with that on principal, except for where it relates to underlying woeful wealth inequality that makes some people obscenely rich while others suffer."

Art doesn't need rich patrons to exist - all it requires is an artist, time, materials and tools. Unless the tools and materials are extremely expensive - like a nanotechnology that can paint the Mona Lisa in an area less than the diameter of a human hair ( http://www.upi.com/Science_News/Technology/2013/08/06/Nanotechnology-c
reates-worlds-smallest-version-of-the-Mona-Lisa/UPI-21361375826126
/) or ruby glass made of glass infused with gold ( http://www.bobbrooke.com/rubyglass.htm) what the artist needs is a way to stay alive in order to have time ... time to create. Keeping someone alive so they can create is not that expensive.



I didn't say it required rich people paying artists to create specific things on order. But it is a significant aspect of art production in the past. Much if not most art treasures we now house in museums, that reflect the progress of human expression and culture, are products that were ordered specifically by a certain person or body, for a particular purpose. The artist's style and skill are expressed in their creation, but as such these things were chosen by the customer according to their priorities.

The artist working for himself, for the concept of art, or for his own personal creative output, is a relatively new thing. Even now, you wouldn't expect to "keep alive" an architect so he can design buildings into the blue. They sell their skill and creativity to people or bodies who pay them for a particular purpose.

I'm not saying don't support artists, or that all art should pay for itself, but the concept and purpose of high art as an artisanal product shouldn't be discounted. Historically, it was mostly that.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 12, 2013 6:48 AM

FREMDFIRMA



I grok ya, AgentR - myself I think it's silly, but it's their money, their life, far as I am concerned.

I've gotten some attitude myself in regards to buying things, given that I dress like a blue collar hoodlum, and am a firm believer in making a business with such poor customer service pay dearly for it - conversely I do kind of enjoy the way their eyes light up when they choose to "play along" thinking the poor schmuck in front of them can't actually afford their product and choose to be polite regardless, and then that fat wad of cold, hard cash comes out, meh heh.

The sales dude at that car lot where I bagged my little BMW was a good example of that, he started talking finance and I was like "Who said anything about finance ?" and out came the roll - the way his eyes bugged out was hi-larious.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 00:26 - 4511 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, November 4, 2024 23:40 - 4674 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Mon, November 4, 2024 20:13 - 636 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Mon, November 4, 2024 18:24 - 175 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Mon, November 4, 2024 16:54 - 7421 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Mon, November 4, 2024 16:52 - 37 posts
The DEI Hires Thread
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:23 - 4 posts
U.S. Senate Races 2024
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:15 - 11 posts
Election fraud.
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:09 - 37 posts
Unemployment Rate Facts
Mon, November 4, 2024 14:06 - 828 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Mon, November 4, 2024 13:58 - 164 posts
The predictions thread
Mon, November 4, 2024 10:48 - 1181 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL