REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Illinois Law Closes Background Check Loophole For Private Guns

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Monday, August 19, 2013 07:53
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 466
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, August 19, 2013 5:05 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Illinois gun owners will have to report missing firearms to police and check the background of potential buyers under a law Gov. Pat Quinn enacted Sunday.

Quinn signed the legislation at a South Side park near where an off-duty Chicago police officer was killed with an illegally trafficked gun in 2010. He said the law will make it easier to recover stolen weapons and help ensure that only responsible people buy firearms. The measure passed both chambers of the Illinois General Assembly with healthy majorities.

"It's going to help our law enforcement," the Democratic governor said. "It's going to help all of us be safe."

Starting immediately, gun owners whose weapons are lost or stolen will have 72 hours to notify police. And beginning Jan. 1, individual gun owners will have to contact the Illinois State Police before selling a weapon or transferring ownership to ensure that the purchaser is allowed to have a gun.

Quinn said the legislation closes a loophole in the state's gun laws, which previously required gun show merchants and licensed firearms dealers — but not private sellers — to check that the customer had a valid firearm owner's identification card. Under the new law, private sellers must contact state police, who will then search records and determine the prospective buyer's eligibility.

According to the governor's office, Illinois joins seven other states and the District of Columbia in requiring gun owners report missing firearms to law enforcement.

Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez was among several officials who spoke at Sunday's signing at Nat King Cole Park in the Chatham neighborhood. She said the new law will hold accountable people who buy guns legally and then sell them privately, sometimes to gang members without the credentials to own a weapon.

"This legislation makes perfect sense," said Grau, who spent 28 years with the Chicago Police Department. "It will make my officers safer and our communities safer." http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-quinn-gun-law-20130819
,0,3480343.story


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 19, 2013 7:53 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
"This legislation makes perfect sense," said Grau, who spent 28 years with the Chicago Police Department. "It will make my officers safer and our communities safer."


Oh I doubt that, given that Chicago is a classic example of how increasing regulation and restriction in blatant violation of the Second Amendment not only increases violence overall, but also in combination with lack of oversight, results in one of the most corrupt and abusive police forces in the entire nation, allowing endless and extreme abuses in the name of "officer safety" despite the fact that police work is one of the least dangerous professions in the world.

That said, I do think that someone selling a weapon to someone else has a MORAL imperative to assure themselves the buyer has the proper training and lacks malicious intent - but the moment the Gov gets involved morality goes out the window in favor of political, religious, ethic, or cultural acceptability, and that is just plain offensive.
One might remember I had a very good proposal in this respect that satisfied every single spoken and admitted requirement of both "sides", and once given suddenly the goalposts started getting moved by folk who didn't honestly admit their intentions in the first place.

But it comes down to this - what part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is unclear to them ?
And would you be so accepting, even cheerleading, if it were your RELIGION that was hemmed in with such restrictions ?
Or if you needed a special permit to speak in public ?
Or perhaps, a specific form of ID in order to vote ?
Or had to jump through certain "reasonable" (but in truth anything but) hoops to terminate a pregnancy ?

Rights are Rights - if you don't like em, say so, but don't pretend to support them and then play pick and choose like any other would be tyrant and then hold up some pretense that it isn't what's really going on here.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Well... that's gay
Thu, February 27, 2025 22:04 - 1 posts
TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS ARE NAZI MORONS
Thu, February 27, 2025 20:46 - 246 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Thu, February 27, 2025 19:32 - 735 posts
Elon Musk
Thu, February 27, 2025 18:59 - 73 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, February 27, 2025 18:44 - 5154 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, February 27, 2025 18:35 - 7943 posts
Trunp loses again in Court
Thu, February 27, 2025 18:03 - 443 posts
Why are young liberal women so unhappy?
Thu, February 27, 2025 14:39 - 1 posts
Another ‘debunked’ story Trump was right about
Thu, February 27, 2025 14:36 - 1 posts
Jeff Bezos Announces Major Change to Washington Post Opinion Page
Thu, February 27, 2025 14:24 - 1 posts
Reversing Biden’s regulatory decrees
Thu, February 27, 2025 14:22 - 1 posts
The NSA’s Secret Sex Chats
Thu, February 27, 2025 14:14 - 6 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL