REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

fracking

POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Saturday, August 16, 2014 21:08
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 665
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:08 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/inquiring-minds/id711675943

The science of fracking


http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2014/august/a
-new-look-at-whats-in-fracking-fluids-raises-red-flags.html


A new look at what’s in ‘fracking’ fluids raises red flags

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 13, 2014 — As the oil and gas drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing (or “fracking”) proliferates, a new study on the contents of the fluids involved in the process raises concerns about several ingredients. The scientists presenting the work today at the 248th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS) say that out of nearly 200 commonly used compounds, there’s very little known about the potential health risks of about one-third, and eight are toxic to mammals.

The meeting features nearly 12,000 presentations on a wide range of science topics and is being held here through Thursday by ACS, the world’s largest scientific society.

William Stringfellow, Ph.D., says he conducted the review of fracking contents to help resolve the public debate over the controversial drilling practice. Fracking involves injecting water with a mix of chemical additives into rock formations deep underground to promote the release of oil and gas. It has led to a natural gas boom in the U.S., but it has also stimulated major opposition and troubling reports of contaminated well water, as well as increased air pollution near drill sites.

“The industrial side was saying, ‘We’re just using food additives, basically making ice cream here,’” Stringfellow says. “On the other side, there’s talk about the injection of thousands of toxic chemicals. As scientists, we looked at the debate and asked, ‘What’s the real story?’”

To find out, Stringfellow’s team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of the Pacific scoured databases and reports to compile a list of substances commonly used in fracking. They include gelling agents to thicken the fluids, biocides to keep microbes from growing, sand to prop open tiny cracks in the rocks and compounds to prevent pipe corrosion.

What their analysis revealed was a little truth to both sides’ stories — with big caveats. Fracking fluids do contain many nontoxic and food-grade materials, as the industry asserts. But if something is edible or biodegradable, it doesn’t automatically mean it can be easily disposed of, Stringfellow notes.

“You can’t take a truckload of ice cream and dump it down the storm drain,” he says, building on the industry’s analogy. “Even ice cream manufacturers have to treat dairy wastes, which are natural and biodegradable. They must break them down rather than releasing them directly into the environment.”

His team found that most fracking compounds will require treatment before being released. And, although not in the thousands as some critics suggest, the scientists identified eight substances, including biocides, that raised red flags. These eight compounds were identified as being particularly toxic to mammals.

“There are a number of chemicals, like corrosion inhibitors and biocides in particular, that are being used in reasonably high concentrations that potentially could have adverse effects,” Stringfellow says. “Biocides, for example, are designed to kill bacteria — it’s not a benign material.”

They’re also looking at the environmental impact of the fracking fluids, and they are finding that some have toxic effects on aquatic life.

In addition, for about one-third of the approximately 190 compounds the scientists identified as ingredients in various fracking formulas, the scientists found very little information about toxicity and physical and chemical properties.

“It should be a priority to try to close that data gap,” Stringfellow says.

He acknowledges funding from the University of the Pacific, the Bureau of Land Management and the state of California.

The American Chemical Society is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 161,000 members, ACS is the world’s largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.

To automatically receive news releases from the American Chemical Society, contact newsroom@acs.org.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Tue, February 25, 2025 08:04 - 7932 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Tue, February 25, 2025 07:41 - 643 posts
Tariffs.... Wins/Losses
Tue, February 25, 2025 05:31 - 8 posts
Justin Trudeau Resigns
Tue, February 25, 2025 05:14 - 53 posts
The next boogeyman: China
Tue, February 25, 2025 05:06 - 48 posts
Futurist movement, Techno Science Optimists
Tue, February 25, 2025 05:04 - 76 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Tue, February 25, 2025 04:57 - 287 posts
Why are French women killing their babies?
Tue, February 25, 2025 04:54 - 30 posts
Packs of Terminator robots hunt down uncooperative humans
Tue, February 25, 2025 04:53 - 6 posts
What kind of superpower could China be?
Tue, February 25, 2025 04:51 - 75 posts
Meanwhile, in France...
Tue, February 25, 2025 04:45 - 3 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Tue, February 25, 2025 04:40 - 213 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL