Sign Up | Log In
TALK STORY
Musings on Babylon5
Friday, August 19, 2005 6:34 AM
CITIZEN
Friday, August 19, 2005 6:36 AM
ZOOT
Friday, August 19, 2005 6:45 AM
Friday, August 19, 2005 1:08 PM
RELFEXIVE
Quote:Originally posted by RelFexive: Hmmm, Klingon vs Narn... Have to say Narn. They are much cooler than Klingons, if only because it seems Narns want to be things other than warriors. All Klingons seem to want to be warriors and nothing else. How in hell does their society work? And how could they possibly mirror Earth culture enough to produce Hamlet yet be as different as they are? Typical Trek stupidness. Plus, Narn use swords that actually make sense. Y'know, straightish blade, sharp on one edge. Swing it around, stick it in someone. None of that daft batleth crap. What use is one of those things really? Klingons would lose every time. Then Mal would shoot the Narn. Game over.
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Rel, where did the Klingon Hamlet refrence come from? The Narns are way better than Klingons, even though they were conquered by a bunch of wannabe Prussians with stupid hairstyles... Klingon Society Geek note: A society like Klingons is all wrong. They ascend the hierarchy by killing/beating their superiors... It would be entirely counter-productive to team work which would prevent a coherent society from forming...
Friday, August 19, 2005 1:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Besides, in a fight between Babylon5 and Star Trek, B5 would rule...
Friday, August 19, 2005 1:24 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Rel: It gets referenced in the sixth film, The Undiscovered Country, when General Kang (or whatever his name was) mentions that Hamlet is better in the original Klingon - 'tach bah, tach beh' (or some such thing) for 'to be or not to be'.
Friday, August 19, 2005 1:37 PM
Friday, August 19, 2005 3:28 PM
Friday, August 19, 2005 8:36 PM
THEREALME
Saturday, August 20, 2005 1:19 AM
EMMA
Saturday, August 20, 2005 4:19 AM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL