Quote:

---

Another member of the committee wrote (to Trey Gowdy):

The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


Again, anyone surprised by this news?

http://www.occupydemocrats.com/cia-catches-republicans-red-handed-alte
ring-hillarys-emails-to-smear-her/

Quote:

---

Another member of the committee wrote (to Trey Gowdy):

The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.

---

What's the usual charge for fabricating evidence before Congress?

Remember, more than one House Republican has already admitted that this whole Benghazi investigation is aimed at nothing more than trying to do political damage to Hillary Clinton. It's a partisan witch-hunt, and they've already admitted that.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


What's the usual charge for fabricating evidence before Congress?

Remember, more than one House Republican has already admitted that this whole Benghazi investigation is aimed at nothing more than trying to do political damage to Hillary Clinton. It's a partisan witch-hunt, and they've already admitted that.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


What's the usual charge for fabricating evidence before Congress?

Remember, more than one House Republican has already admitted that this whole Benghazi investigation is aimed at nothing more than trying to do political damage to Hillary Clinton. It's a partisan witch-hunt, and they've already admitted that.

---

Not only did no e-mails get altered, not one GOP member admitted any such thing that the Benghazi investigation was " aimed at nothing more than trying to do political damage to Hillary Clinton ".

The lazy, reckless lies and spin coming from the anarchists who simply want to destroy this country is beyond pathetic.


As for her " performance " , that's all it was. She lied comfortably, even when shown to be clearly contradicting herself, multiple times.

This did not go well for her, at all.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:



Boy, they looked really miserable today trying to trip her up.

And even Fox said she looked "presidential" and "in control."

That has to hurt a bit.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


What's the usual charge for fabricating evidence before Congress?

Remember, more than one House Republican has already admitted that this whole Benghazi investigation is aimed at nothing more than trying to do political damage to Hillary Clinton. It's a partisan witch-hunt, and they've already admitted that.

---

Not only did no e-mails get altered, not one GOP member admitted any such thing that the Benghazi investigation was " aimed at nothing more than trying to do political damage to Hillary Clinton ".

The lazy, reckless lies and spin coming from the anarchists who simply want to destroy this country is beyond pathetic.


As for her " performance " , that's all it was. She lied comfortably, even when shown to be clearly contradicting herself, multiple times.

This did not go well for her, at all.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


Not only is nothing you posted here remotely true, nothing you've ever posted or said or done anywhere on the planet is remotely close to being true.


Hey, I can engage in the same kind of hyperactive bullshittery you can! Anything you don't agree with or like, just deny it exists!


This is probably the closest thing to the truth you've ever posted, in your description of that bowel movement you call conservatism:

"The lazy, reckless lies and spin coming from the anarchists who simply want to destroy this country is beyond pathetic."

A near-perfect and almost honest representation of the modern GOP, especially the Koch-sucking teabagger wing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


Not only is nothing you posted here remotely true, nothing you've ever posted or said or done anywhere on the planet is remotely close to being true.


Hey, I can engage in the same kind of hyperactive bullshittery you can! Anything you don't agree with or like, just deny it exists!


This is probably the closest thing to the truth you've ever posted, in your description of that bowel movement you call conservatism:

"The lazy, reckless lies and spin coming from the anarchists who simply want to destroy this country is beyond pathetic."

A near-perfect and almost honest representation of the modern GOP, especially the Koch-sucking teabagger wing.

---

Precisely. I don't understand why he'd lie so blatantly and expect to be believed by anyone.

I guess it's just a teanderthal thing.

---