REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria

POSTED BY: KPO
UPDATED: Thursday, June 13, 2024 17:34
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 74491
PAGE 4 of 17

Friday, February 19, 2016 11:12 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

First of all, KPO, the definitions that you quoted for a coup describe what happened in Ukraine.

They were YOUR definitions, and why can't you provide links/evidence for this happening in Kiev on Feb 21st 2014 (the day Yanukovich fled Kiev), if this is in fact what happened?

Quote:

So, yes, parts of the FSA have allied with ISIL. There are just too many reports of that happening to link all of them, so here is a sampling from various sources (and none of them Russian):

Ha, well I appreciate you going out of your way to find them then.

Quote:

U.S. Bombings Driving anti-Assad Rebels Into Alliance With ISIS, Report Says

If you'd read the Guardian report, which I'm guessing you haven't, at least not critically, then you would see that there is nothing in there about a formal alliance between the FSA and ISIS. So when you say "the FSA and their ISIS allies" you are speaking pure bullshit. What the report does talk about is individual rebel fighters or brigades splintering off from the FSA and joining ISIS (often for money or food, despite what they say, and to outcry amongst the rest of the FSA). The report also talks about individual FSA groups making truces with ISIS. A truce, in case you didn't realise, is not an alliance. The report is based on a series of interviews, chief of which is with an ISIS fighter and as such should be treated with extreme caution. "All these rebel groups are joining us and swearing their allegiance to us! The civilians in the areas we control love us!" Yeah right.

Quote:

US-Backed Moderate Group In Syria Signs Truce With ISIS: Reports

A truce is not an alliance! A truce, in fact, implies recent hostilities - hardly what you would expect from allies and friends.

Quote:

On Monday, the Daily Star in Lebanon quoted a FSA brigade commander saying that his forces were working with the Islamic State

A single example of a single FSA-aligned brigade (out of hundreds) cooperating with ISIS - back in 2014. Weigh that against all of the FSA brigades constantly fighting ISIS (more reliably than the Syrian regime and Russia) and you still say that the FSA is allies with ISIS? Only Russian propaganda can make someone this dumb. LOL that you immediately followed up your post by linking an RT article, by the way.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 11:40 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


There are too many reports for me to link them all. I can link some more, if you want, but that will just make you look even more stupid and stubbornly ignorant than you already do.

First of all, nobody said ... especially not me ... that "the FSA" has allied itself with ISIL (or other extremist groups).

The "FSA" is a group of smaller organizations under a common banner (in order to be labeled as "moderate" terrorists ... er, I mean rebels ... in order to get USA support) and not necessarily under a common command.

The fact that smaller groups and even individuals have joined ISIL ... al Nusra, Arhar ash Sham, and the too many other extremist groups to even name ... should tell you about the nature of many of the groups and individuals fighting under the "FSA" banner. Because they aren't really "pro-democracy freedom fighters", what they really are is anti-Assad sectarian Sunnis, who can't establish their strict theocracy as long as Assad is in power and the government is officially secular.

And, in reality, some of the groups HAVE allied with ISIL (and other extremist groups) while maintaining their individual identity.

What you have just demonstrated, KPO, is that the "pro-democracy FSA" is a fiction. There is no such thing. There are a few individuals who still want democracy in Syria, but they aren't the FSA. And in fact, the BBC just floated a discussion last night that maybe the future of Syria shouldn't be decided by a vote after all, so even your vaunted government is revealing its true intentions. (see my addendum to the Catholic Bishop post above.)

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 11:53 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

There are too many reports for me to link them all.

Try quality over quantity. And try ones that actually back up what you claim.

Quote:

First of all, nobody said ... especially not me ... that "the FSA" has allied itself with ISIL

You're backtracking (or lying), and you are right to do so. Because you are wrong. Your words:

Signy:"Then the FSA can be bombed with their ISIL/ ahrar ash Sham/ al nusra / al Qaida allies."


The rest of the nonsense in your post I will let go.

Where is this 'coup' evidence for Kiev on Feb 21st 2014?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 12:03 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


In today's twisted BBC reporting, while ...


Russia to call U.N. Security Council session on Syria on Friday
Quote:

Russia's foreign ministry said it intends to call a session of the United Nations Security Council on Friday to discuss the Turkish government's statements about a possible ground operation in Syria.

Russia plans to table a Security Council resolution demanding an end to actions that undermine Syria's sovereignty, ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a statement posted on the ministry's Internet site.


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-russia-syria-un-idUSK
CN0VS1Z0


Turkish military force burned alive around 150 Kurds Sirnak Province
Quote:

“In Cizre district of Sirnak, around 150 people have been burned alive in different buildings by Turkish military forces. Some corpses were found without heads. Some were burned completely, so that autopsy is not possible,” [Pro-Kurdish MP] Uca said on Thursday.
(Shades of Odessa!)
http://katehon.com/news/turkish-military-force-burned-alive-around-150
-kurds-sirnak-province


ISIS used chemical weapons against the Kurds, US officials say
Quote:

The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) used chemical weapons against the Kurdish peshmerga in August, two U.S. defense officials tell The Hill. The officials said they have confirmed that ISIS used chemical weapons during fighting in northern Iraq and that the Kurdish military — a staunch ally of the United States — was targeted.

“We can confirm some type of chemical weapon was employed by ISIL in that August mortar attack,” a U.S. defense official told The Hill on the condition of anonymity, using another acronym for ISIS.


http://thehill.com/policy/defense/269551-isis-used-chemical-weapons-ag
ainst-the-kurds-us-officials-say


... what is the BBC's message of the day [the only item about Kurds or Syria on the current website]?

Turkey says US arms used by Syria Kurds, blamed for Ankara blast
Quote:

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said he will tell President Barack Obama that US weapons have helped Syrian Kurds, blamed by Turkey for Wednesday's Ankara bombing.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35612531

BAD KURDS! BAD KURDS! Not worthy of US support!

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 12:19 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh for gods' sake ... I have repeatedly said, both before and after that post, that the FSA is hodge-podge of individuals and groups. I have repeatedly referenced the parts of the FSA which have chosen to fight BOTH ISIL and the SAA (Syrian Arab Army), and parts which have either defected to, or allied with extremist groups.

So, to the context of that quote ... First of all, I'm quoting YOU, and YOUR generalized characterization of "the FSA". What YOU posted was ...

Quote:

FSA and other rebel groups say they won't lay down their weapons until Russia stops its bombing campaign on their cities.


The link that you provided with that statement doesn't contain it. So your quote is corrupted, and I can't find the source that you were drawing from.

As far as "the FSA" (no such thing) and its alliance with ISIL or other extremist groups ... if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. The part of the FSA that made that statement ... whatever part that is... has clearly thrown in its lot with the extremists. So let them all be bombed together, I don't care and I doubt Russia or Syria does either, whether you characterize their relationship as an alliance or a coalition or an association really doesn't matter: They have joined their force of arms in a common cause and will be treated as a common enemy.

As for your other points, I'm not going to engage in continued conversation with someone who refuses to acknowledge the obvious: Without the violence of the Maidan, Yanukovich would not have fled and been rescued, and there would have been early elections in a few months. The change of power was violent, and non-democratic. It was a coup.

It doesn't matter whether you think you're making points here or not. If you choose to hang on to that boulder of ignorance while you're going under, that's your problem, not mine, and you'll continue to neither understand nor be able to predict what happens next.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 12:29 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


In today's twisted BBC reporting, while ...


Russia to call U.N. Security Council session on Syria on Friday
Quote:

Russia's foreign ministry said it intends to call a session of the United Nations Security Council on Friday to discuss the Turkish government's statements about a possible ground operation in Syria.

Russia plans to table a Security Council resolution demanding an end to actions that undermine Syria's sovereignty, ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a statement posted on the ministry's Internet site.


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-russia-syria-un-idUSK
CN0VS1Z0


Turkish military force burned alive around 150 Kurds Sirnak Province
Quote:

“In Cizre district of Sirnak, around 150 people have been burned alive in different buildings by Turkish military forces. Some corpses were found without heads. Some were burned completely, so that autopsy is not possible,” [Pro-Kurdish MP] Uca said on Thursday.
(Shades of Odessa!)
http://katehon.com/news/turkish-military-force-burned-alive-around-150
-kurds-sirnak-province


ISIS used chemical weapons against the Kurds, US officials say
Quote:

The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) used chemical weapons against the Kurdish peshmerga in August, two U.S. defense officials tell The Hill. The officials said they have confirmed that ISIS used chemical weapons during fighting in northern Iraq and that the Kurdish military — a staunch ally of the United States — was targeted.

“We can confirm some type of chemical weapon was employed by ISIL in that August mortar attack,” a U.S. defense official told The Hill on the condition of anonymity, using another acronym for ISIS.


http://thehill.com/policy/defense/269551-isis-used-chemical-weapons-ag
ainst-the-kurds-us-officials-say


... what is the BBC's message of the day [the only item about Kurds or Syria on the current website]?

Turkey says US arms used by Syria Kurds, blamed for Ankara blast
Quote:

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said he will tell President Barack Obama that US weapons have helped Syrian Kurds, blamed by Turkey for Wednesday's Ankara bombing.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35612531

BAD KURDS! BAD KURDS! Not worthy of US support!



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 12:30 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


'Russian operation in Syria is our salvation' – top Syrian Catholic bishop to RT

Quote:

The majority of Syrian people support Moscow's anti-terror campaign, the top Catholic bishop in Syria said in an interview with RT, adding that it's not only military assistance, but the promotion of peace process by Russia that they pin their hopes on.

"We see Russia's military operation as a real effort to fight terrorism. What is especially important is that this military campaign goes in parallel with promotion of peace process," Most Reverend Georges Abou Khazen, Apostolic Vicar of Aleppo for the Latins who was appointed by Pope Francis in 2013, told RT in a telephone interview. "We really hope that the peace process will soon prevail over fighting all across Syria," the bishop added.

"The majority of Syrian people" of all backgrounds and faith "regard Russian military campaign as salvation, a way out of the state we've been enduring for five years," the Catholic bishop said, adding that "Syrians are very positive about it."

"Russia's actions are not limited to the military operation. Russia makes a very positive impact by stimulating the negotiations process, and promotes dialogue between various Syrian groups," Bisoph Abou Khazen said.

Syrian minorities have been especially suffering from the conflict, the bishop told RT. Noting that there are over 20 religious and ethnic groups in the Syrian society, the Aleppo vicar said that before the conflict they've all lived in harmony. "Our pre-war society was like a beautiful multicolored mosaic. But unfortunately, it has been destroyed," he said.

Describing the harsh conditions that his congregation and other Syrians have been living in, the vicar said that there is no electricity in Aleppo and water supplies have been disrupted. "The lack of water is what has really made our lives harder," he said, adding that people have been living without water supplies for over a month now.

Many families have fled the violence and the conditions caused by constant fighting, Bishop Abou Khazen told RT, but added: "In light of recent military advances in the Aleppo region, we hope that tension will ease and situation in the city will improve."

Last week, leaders of the Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches, Vatican's Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia have held a historic meeting in Havana, Cuba. After the first ever face-to-face talks, a joint declaration has been signed, in which a special attention is given to the situation in the Middle East.

Saying that challenges of the situation in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region with "the massive exodus of Christians from the land in which our faith was first disseminated," require "a shared response," the religious leaders called upon the international community "to act urgently."

"We wish to express our compassion for the suffering experienced by the faithful of other religious traditions who have also become victims of civil war, chaos and terrorist violence," the joint declaration said, with Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill urging global leaders "to seek an end" to the violence in Syria and Iraq


https://www.rt.com/news/332922-aleppo-bishop-russia-support/

ETA ...


This is another thing I'm sure you won't believe, because it just doesn't fit within your ideology, because you're good and Russia is bad and therefore how can anyone be for Russia? Just like you thought the people who were celebrating their liberation from extremists were ... oh, I dunno ... mistaken, or cowards, or were somehow unaware of the cost in terms of lives that their liberation meant, I'm sure you'll find some reason to discredit this statement by the Bishop of Syria, just as you've found reasons to discredit the statement by my Syrian Xtian acquaintance from four years ago.

As an aside, I listen to the BBC World Service news from time to time, and last night they had a frantic discussion on the potentially-upcoming Turkish-Russian war. Some of the comments that I particularly remember:

Russia won't go to war with Turkey because Russia and Turkey have too much economy in common.
Uh huh.
Russia has already isolated its economy from the EU and western banks as much as possible, do they really think that it would take much notice of adding Turkey to the list of unfavored nations?

Syria must take into account that the gap and supply line into Syria represents a significant security consideration for Turkey
Wait.. what ...??? Syria has to take into account Turkey's security considerations, when Turkey has been busy for the past several years supplying ISIL and destabilizing Syria along that gap? What are these radio people ... nuts?

Major powers need to step in and map out Syria's future, because as long as it remains uncertain, people will continue to fight over it. It should not be decided by a vote.
Yep, let's NOT let the Syrians decide what they want! Let's impose a "solution" from the outside .... an outsiders' solution to a problem that was totally exacerbated by the outside to begin with! This is just another expression of hegemony by "color revolution" and the BBC's attempt to sugar-coat it and get its listeners to accept this "solution" as a positive step. SO MUCH FOR DEMOCRACY!

Their discussion bordered between fatuous and ludicrous.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 6:14 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


G: You're as insane as those commentators.

Quote:

From your buddies at putin.com:
https://www.rt.com/business/318746-russia-turkey-trade-projects/



This was from Oct 2015. Once the Russian jet was shot down, I think the Russian government became willing to shit-can the entire Russian-Turkish effort. They have stopped, or dropped, every major contract since then, including the gas pipeline and the nuclear reactor, and have sanctioned Turkish agricultural products and have delayed others with endless "inspections" at the border. You think Russia will back down? I don't think so. Putin once spoke of "Life after Erdogan". Once that idiot is gone, I'm sure the Russians will test the waters again- but not before.

Quote:

Of course they should. They are suggesting that Turkey could/might/maybe want to protect that supply line with military means. Not knowing the context of the statement it's hard to be sure, but that is likely a true statement no matter what and no matter who they are supplying.

OMFG, I can't believe what an idiot you are.
WHAT supply line is that??? It's the supply line from Turkey to the extremists in Syria, including ISIL in Raqqa.

Now, why in god's name should Syria protect supply lines within its own borders, which are supplying their terrorist enemies? To put it in terms you MIGHT understand that would be like the USA protecting Cuban supply lines to Cuban terrorists in FLA. You're either posting drunk, or posting in complete ignorance, or both. You're pathetic.

Quote:

"....because as long as it remains uncertain, people will continue to fight over it." Brilliant - truer words were never spoken. Assad is not "certainty." Non of the rabble lined up against him are either. Even Russia understands this.
Uncertainty. That's precisely why they are where they are, and why the situation drags so many people into it. It's bad for every one to have an uncertain Syria.



ANOTHER part of the BBC interview was a historical perspective on civil wars, and how they were resolved. Pre-cold war, they were usually resolved by military victory.

Post-cold war, half were resolved by military victory, and half were negotiated. Of the military victories, half were won by the established government, and half were won by the insurgents. Military victories were more durable than negotiated settlements, which tended to break down more often. Proxy wars lasted longer (7 years) than internal civil wars (5 years). What I got out of that is that the Russians should nail the terrorists' hides to the wall, drive all foreign actors out of Syria, and Assad should achieve total victory. THAT would be certainty and according to a historical perspective it would provide a more certain future than anything currently proposed.



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 6:38 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
'Russian operation in Syria is our salvation' – top Syrian Catholic bishop to RT


Don't duplicate your posts Signy. You copied and pasted this entire RT article just a few posts earlier (once was bad enough). And your post before that was also a duplicate of one of your own posts from just half an hour earlier... Let me remind you these are discussion forums, not opportunities for you to spam for the motherland. Desist.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 6:50 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Without the violence of the Maidan, Yanukovich would not have fled and been rescued

'The violence of the Maidan...' is about as vague a statement as you can make. What violence are you referring to, specifically? People throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at riot police?

Quote:

The change of power was violent... It was a coup.

Leaving aside that revolutions in history often involve violence, and you are completely backtracking on your own definition of a 'coup'; what violence are you referring to that took place on Feb 21st, when the change of power happened?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 6:50 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, your posts are pretty much spam. I didn't want your idiocy to be the last thing that people saw when they left the thread, because it's easy to bury points in a flurry of stupid posts. Which, frankly, your posts and G's and THUGR's pretty much qualify for. (I'm just waiting for that ever-fresh "comrade troll" post from THGUR!)

So, how about responding to the post, then?' Yanno, discuss the point? In case you missed it here it is:

Quote:

Russian operation in Syria is our salvation' – top Syrian Catholic bishop to RT
Quote:


The majority of Syrian people support Moscow's anti-terror campaign, the top Catholic bishop in Syria said in an interview with RT, adding that it's not only military assistance, but the promotion of peace process by Russia that they pin their hopes on.

"We see Russia's military operation as a real effort to fight terrorism. What is especially important is that this military campaign goes in parallel with promotion of peace process," Most Reverend Georges Abou Khazen, Apostolic Vicar of Aleppo for the Latins who was appointed by Pope Francis in 2013, told RT in a telephone interview. "We really hope that the peace process will soon prevail over fighting all across Syria," the bishop added.

"The majority of Syrian people" of all backgrounds and faith "regard Russian military campaign as salvation, a way out of the state we've been enduring for five years," the Catholic bishop said, adding that "Syrians are very positive about it."

"Russia's actions are not limited to the military operation. Russia makes a very positive impact by stimulating the negotiations process, and promotes dialogue between various Syrian groups," Bisoph Abou Khazen said.

Syrian minorities have been especially suffering from the conflict, the bishop told RT. Noting that there are over 20 religious and ethnic groups in the Syrian society, the Aleppo vicar said that before the conflict they've all lived in harmony. "Our pre-war society was like a beautiful multicolored mosaic. But unfortunately, it has been destroyed," he said.

Describing the harsh conditions that his congregation and other Syrians have been living in, the vicar said that there is no electricity in Aleppo and water supplies have been disrupted. "The lack of water is what has really made our lives harder," he said, adding that people have been living without water supplies for over a month now.

Many families have fled the violence and the conditions caused by constant fighting, Bishop Abou Khazen told RT, but added: "In light of recent military advances in the Aleppo region, we hope that tension will ease and situation in the city will improve."

Last week, leaders of the Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches, Vatican's Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia have held a historic meeting in Havana, Cuba. After the first ever face-to-face talks, a joint declaration has been signed, in which a special attention is given to the situation in the Middle East.

Saying that challenges of the situation in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region with "the massive exodus of Christians from the land in which our faith was first disseminated," require "a shared response," the religious leaders called upon the international community "to act urgently."

"We wish to express our compassion for the suffering experienced by the faithful of other religious traditions who have also become victims of civil war, chaos and terrorist violence," the joint declaration said, with Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill urging global leaders "to seek an end" to the violence in Syria and Iraq




https://www.rt.com/news/332922-aleppo-bishop-russia-support/

ETA ...


This is another thing I'm sure you won't believe, because it just doesn't fit within your ideology, because you're good and Russia is bad and therefore how can anyone be for Russia? Just like you thought the people who were celebrating their liberation from extremists were ... oh, I dunno ... mistaken, or cowards, or were somehow unaware of the cost in terms of lives that their liberation meant, I'm sure you'll find some reason to discredit this statement by the Bishop of Syria, just as you've found reasons to discredit the statement by my Syrian Xtian acquaintance from four years ago.






--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 6:52 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

Without the violence of the Maidan, Yanukovich would not have fled and been rescued

'The violence of the Maidan...' is about as vague a statement as you can make. What violence are you referring to, specifically? People throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at riot police?

The answer is "no". But please take this to another thread. Like one about Ukraine, maybe.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 6:56 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

Without the violence of the Maidan, Yanukovich would not have fled and been rescued

'The violence of the Maidan...' is about as vague a statement as you can make. What violence are you referring to, specifically? People throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at riot police?

Quote:

The change of power was violent... It was a coup.

Leaving aside that revolutions in history often involve violence, and you are completely backtracking on your own definition of a 'coup'; what violence are you referring to that took place on Feb 21st, when the change of power happened?


Correction, the change of power was Feb 22nd, when the Ukrainian parliament voted to remove Yanukovich from office.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 7:02 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


So you go and paste the RT article again. Stop spamming for the motherland Siggy.

Quote:

So, how about responding to the post, then?

It's Russian state propaganda, why would I respond to it, or even read it?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 7:37 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

...why would I respond to it, or even read it?

Because it's a statement by the Catholic Bishop in Syria, and you might want to know his POV? Because this is a discussion board, as you so helpfully pointed out?

Yanno, I read and listen to BBC and a wide variety of sources. I'm sorry that you're so intellectually fragile that you can't handle the truth if it's outside of your very small bubble. Ir's terribly unfortunate for you that you think that anyone who has a different POV than you is illegitimate, even if he is the Bishop of Syria. But in case you missed it, this is what the Syrian Catholic Bishop thinks...

Russian operation in Syria is our salvation' – top Syrian Catholic bishop to RT

Quote:

The majority of Syrian people support Moscow's anti-terror campaign, the top Catholic bishop in Syria said in an interview with RT, adding that it's not only military assistance, but the promotion of peace process by Russia that they pin their hopes on.

"We see Russia's military operation as a real effort to fight terrorism. What is especially important is that this military campaign goes in parallel with promotion of peace process," Most Reverend Georges Abou Khazen, Apostolic Vicar of Aleppo for the Latins who was appointed by Pope Francis in 2013, told RT in a telephone interview. "We really hope that the peace process will soon prevail over fighting all across Syria," the bishop added.

"The majority of Syrian people" of all backgrounds and faith "regard Russian military campaign as salvation, a way out of the state we've been enduring for five years," the Catholic bishop said, adding that "Syrians are very positive about it."

"Russia's actions are not limited to the military operation. Russia makes a very positive impact by stimulating the negotiations process, and promotes dialogue between various Syrian groups," Bisoph Abou Khazen said.

Syrian minorities have been especially suffering from the conflict, the bishop told RT. Noting that there are over 20 religious and ethnic groups in the Syrian society, the Aleppo vicar said that before the conflict they've all lived in harmony. "Our pre-war society was like a beautiful multicolored mosaic. But unfortunately, it has been destroyed," he said.

Describing the harsh conditions that his congregation and other Syrians have been living in, the vicar said that there is no electricity in Aleppo and water supplies have been disrupted. "The lack of water is what has really made our lives harder," he said, adding that people have been living without water supplies for over a month now.

Many families have fled the violence and the conditions caused by constant fighting, Bishop Abou Khazen told RT, but added: "In light of recent military advances in the Aleppo region, we hope that tension will ease and situation in the city will improve."

Last week, leaders of the Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches, Vatican's Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia have held a historic meeting in Havana, Cuba. After the first ever face-to-face talks, a joint declaration has been signed, in which a special attention is given to the situation in the Middle East.

Saying that challenges of the situation in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region with "the massive exodus of Christians from the land in which our faith was first disseminated," require "a shared response," the religious leaders called upon the international community "to act urgently."

"We wish to express our compassion for the suffering experienced by the faithful of other religious traditions who have also become victims of civil war, chaos and terrorist violence," the joint declaration said, with Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill urging global leaders "to seek an end" to the violence in Syria and Iraq




https://www.rt.com/news/332922-aleppo-bishop-russia-support/

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2016 8:49 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Stop spamming the thread with your RT article Sig.

Back to the subject of the thread. War crimes. Airstrikes in rebel-held Douma target civilian first responders (typical Russian tactic):


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 8:27 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hmmm... let's see:

No coverage of this on any other media, not even on Syria direct.

No sound of warplanes overhead.

A single explosion, not multiple ones, which may be something else (like a propane tank or can of stove-fuel exploding).

No indication that these are "first responders"; if anything the constant refrain of Allahu Akhbar sort of indicates that these are Islamist extremists.

That's pretty thin there, KPO, which indicates that you're ready to swallow anything that satisfies your ideological anti-Russian addiction, even potentially-terrorist propaganda.

Meanwhile, the Bishop of Syria hopes for Russian success

Russian operation in Syria is our salvation' – top Syrian Catholic bishop to RT

Quote:


The majority of Syrian people support Moscow's anti-terror campaign, the top Catholic bishop in Syria said in an interview with RT, adding that it's not only military assistance, but the promotion of peace process by Russia that they pin their hopes on.

"We see Russia's military operation as a real effort to fight terrorism. What is especially important is that this military campaign goes in parallel with promotion of peace process," Most Reverend Georges Abou Khazen, Apostolic Vicar of Aleppo for the Latins who was appointed by Pope Francis in 2013, told RT in a telephone interview. "We really hope that the peace process will soon prevail over fighting all across Syria," the bishop added.

"The majority of Syrian people" of all backgrounds and faith "regard Russian military campaign as salvation, a way out of the state we've been enduring for five years," the Catholic bishop said, adding that "Syrians are very positive about it."

"Russia's actions are not limited to the military operation. Russia makes a very positive impact by stimulating the negotiations process, and promotes dialogue between various Syrian groups," Bisoph Abou Khazen said.

Syrian minorities have been especially suffering from the conflict, the bishop told RT. Noting that there are over 20 religious and ethnic groups in the Syrian society, the Aleppo vicar said that before the conflict they've all lived in harmony. "Our pre-war society was like a beautiful multicolored mosaic. But unfortunately, it has been destroyed," he said.

Describing the harsh conditions that his congregation and other Syrians have been living in, the vicar said that there is no electricity in Aleppo and water supplies have been disrupted. "The lack of water is what has really made our lives harder," he said, adding that people have been living without water supplies for over a month now.

Many families have fled the violence and the conditions caused by constant fighting, Bishop Abou Khazen told RT, but added: "In light of recent military advances in the Aleppo region, we hope that tension will ease and situation in the city will improve."

Last week, leaders of the Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches, Vatican's Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia have held a historic meeting in Havana, Cuba. After the first ever face-to-face talks, a joint declaration has been signed, in which a special attention is given to the situation in the Middle East.

Saying that challenges of the situation in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region with "the massive exodus of Christians from the land in which our faith was first disseminated," require "a shared response," the religious leaders called upon the international community "to act urgently."

"We wish to express our compassion for the suffering experienced by the faithful of other religious traditions who have also become victims of civil war, chaos and terrorist violence," the joint declaration said, with Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill urging global leaders "to seek an end" to the violence in Syria and Iraq




--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 9:16 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


GSTRING:

So YOUR response to the Syrian Bishop is that RT made this up, or distorted the content? And the fact that his English is "too good" makes you suspicious?

First of all, if he doesn't speak English, there ARE good translators available. Or did you not know that?

Second, yes, some people DO speak like that. The speaker is not just some random person off the street, he's a highly-educated Church official. Plus, I've had the oppty to both read and watch other educated people from the region- particularly Hassan Nasrallah, head of Hezbollah, and he is not a fiery orator spouting Allahu Akbar endlessly; he speaks in complex flowing sentences in measured cadences and human tone. He kind of reminds me of one of the Pastors of my Catholic Church back in the day ... but that's another story.

Thirdly, officials of powerful organizations are highly aware of what is being said by them, and about them. The Bishop's secretary CERTAINLY read over RT's coverage of the interview; if there were any misrepresentation the Bishop would complain to RT, and he would have the power of the Catholic Church to back him up. I doubt misrepresentation would be allowed.

Fourth, there is a Catholic YouTube report on the Synod of Bishops of ANOTHER Catholic Bishop who says virtually the same thing (first few minutes only, but if you want to hear how a foreign-language Bishop sounds, forward to the end):


Syrian Bishop Lauds Russian Intervention - Perspectives Daily




So either this Bishop is being misquoted by everyone, or this is pretty much what they've been saying for some time now.

Quote:

I find this telling, how there's a break in the quoting where rt adds in some editorial content:

"The majority of Syrian people" of all backgrounds and faith "regard Russian military campaign as salvation, a way out of the state we've been enduring for five years," the Catholic bishop said, adding that "Syrians are very positive about it."

Well, since you find it "telling", what does it tell you? 70% of the official Syrian government army is Sunni. That's a statistic that can be verified.

Quote:

It's another rt fluff editorial propaganda piece. The fact that you can't see it or acknowledge it is not surprising.

It is an expression of support from an important Catholic official in Syria. I didn't post it to provide the latest military updates, but to show you that there are perspectives DIFFERENT THAN YOURS. Of course, you're doing exactly what I said you would do:

You're doing your best to invalidate anything that anyone says which doesn't match exactly what you think.

So you try your best to "invalidate" what I say, and what the liberated Syrians say, and what the Catholic Bishop says, and what my Syrian acquaintance said, and I'm sure if a vote were to be held in Syria where Assad was voted back into power you would find a way to mentally "invalidate" that too. So, first of all, you're an opinion-Nazi. You think that everyone should believe as you believe, because anything else is just "wrong" or doesn't exist. Secondly, you can do your best to explain away things that you don't like, but you really can't invalidate reality. But hey, have fun trying!

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 9:59 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

The best summation piece so far imho - a better, more objective pov:-GSTRING


http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/putins-winning-in-syria-but-making-
a-powerful-new-enemy
/

Quote:

Russia’s bombing of the city of Aleppo this week sent a clear message: Vladimir Putin is now in charge of the endgame in Syria. Moscow’s plan — essentially, to restore its ally Bashar al-Assad to power — is quickly becoming a reality that the rest of the world will have to accept. America, Britain and the rest may not be comfortable with Putin’s ambitions in the Middle East, or his methods of achieving them. But the idea of backing a ‘moderate opposition’ in Syria has been proved a fantasy that leaves the field to Putin and Assad.
This is what I've been saying all along.

Quote:

The Syrian partial ceasefire, brokered in Munich last week by America’s John Kerry, only served to reinforce this sense of Putin’s power. Under the terms of the deal, all combatants were to cease hostilities while humanitarian aid was delivered to rebel enclaves besieged by government troops. Except Russia, whose planes have continued bombing ‘terrorist targets’ — and since Assad insists that all his enemies are ‘terrorists’, the Munich ceasefire effectively means business as usual for Russian and Syrian warplanes.
Ah, those infamous "terrorist targets" quotation marks! Since the "FSA" - whatever it is- has made common cause with ISIL and other foreign extremist groups, they should share the same fate. Or they can lay down their arms ... which some have done.

Quote:

In recent days, they
The infamous "they". And "them". Those are the words you use when you don't know who, exactly

Quote:

have bombed Médecins Sans Frontières hospitals in rebel-held Idlib and Azaz
Did you know that MSF did NOT provide the coordinates of its makeshift treatment centers to the Syrian government?

Quote:

and "Free Syrian Army" positions in the northern suburbs of Aleppo. In response to international condemnation, the Russian foreign ministry has declared that it ‘has still not received convincing evidence of civilian deaths as a result of Russian air strikes’.
The FSA- whatever it is- has taken up arms against the government and has either defected to ISIL and other extremists groups, or called a cease-fire with them to focus on Assad, or formed a coalition of sorts. Trying to tease the "FSA" apart from other extremist groups is well-nigh impossible, unless they lay down their arms.

Quote:

Presidents Putin and Obama have both sought to intervene in the conflict militarily, but all the successes have been Russia’s.
Been saying that too, while KPO, G, and THUGR have been busy denying Russia's success.

Quote:

Between August 2014 and December last year, the US Air Force made 4,669 air strikes to aid Syria’s elusive ‘moderate opposition’ and degrade ISIS. But while this made little impact strategically, Russian air power has proved decisive. Since last September, a single squadron of Russian bombers flying some 510 sorties a week has turned the balance of the war in Assad’s favour. Russian armour and tanks have reinvigorated the Syrian army’s battered forces. Ostensibly flown in to protect the Khmeimim airbase, Russian T-90 tanks have since been reported in the vanguard of Syrian army assaults on rebel strongholds south of Aleppo.
"rebel". Phffft! The area is widely regarded as being held by al Nusra and other foreign fighters.

Quote:

Putin is also seeking to reconcile Syria’s warring factions. While the Pentagon spent billions trying to train an army of democracy–friendly moderates which turned out not to exist
Yep, said that too

Quote:

Russian military intelligence has been working with its Syrian counterparts to identify rebel groups who would be willing to cut a deal with Assad. The senior Syrian officer corps was largely trained in Moscow during the Cold War. According to one well-placed Russian diplomat, the Kremlin has drawn up a list of 38 potential opposition allies and has been actively wooing them since last October. The list is said to include the Syrian National Council’s current president, Khaled al-Khoja, together with three of his predecessors — Ahmad Jarba, Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib and Hadi al-Bahra.
Knew that, didn't even TRY to bring this to the board because THUGR, KPO, and G would refuse to listen, and I didn't want to spend endless posts trying to convince the brain-dead that both Russia and the Syrian government were working with the opposition. They would have said that this was just Russian propaganda and for my pains THUGR would have called me "comrade troll".

Quote:

Throughout the winter, a number of rebel leaders have gone to Moscow to discuss terms — with mixed success. Late last month, a Russian attempt to bring several Syrian opposition parties together in Moscow collapsed. Brigadier General Manaf Tlass, a close Assad ally who defected from the Syrian Republican Guard in 2012, has drawn up an 11-point ‘national project’ which envisions a general ceasefire, followed by a joint regime-rebel assault on Isis. It is a proposal backed by Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov and part of a wider strategy that Russia pursued successfully in Chechnya in the early 2000s: reward rebels who are willing to change sides with a place at the winners’ table, while mercilessly bombing those who resist.
The recipe to success. Also, bombing from above with no reliable "boots on the ground" - which the USA has been trying to do - simply won't work.

Quote:

Russia’s new best friends are Syria’s Kurds. Earlier this month, the ‘Rojava Democratic Self-Rule Administration’ proclaimed itself the new government in Kurdish-held northern Syria and opened its first overseas representative office, in Moscow. Meanwhile, 200 Russian military advisers have been deployed to the Kurdish-controlled town of Qamishli, next to the Turkish border, to secure a military airport for Russian use. That gives Russia a stronghold from which to strike Isis in northeast Syria and protect its new Kurdish friends from attack by Turkey.
Wrote about that too.

Quote:

A wider Kurdish-Russian pact could be a game-changer for Assad — but it also massively raises the risk of the Syrian conflict spilling over into a wider war. A deal between the Kurdish YPG militia and Damascus would deprive the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces — a coalition that includes Arab and Assyrian groups — of some of their most effective soldiers.
So what?

Quote:

It would also further confuse United States policy in Syria, since the Kurds have been Washington’s closest allies in the region for years.
SOME Kurds. The USA likes SOME Kurds, particularly the Kurds in northern Iraq under Barzani. These are the Kurds who are selling oil to Turkey without paying their taxes to Iraq. As a result, the Iraq government has cut them off from government funding, and the economy in northern Iraq has completely collapsed for the average person. Just remember, you heard it here first.

In any case, there are several different groups of Kurds, and they're not all the same. Some are USA-friendly and some are not.

Quote:

The danger is that Russia’s overtures to the Kurds could put Moscow on a direct collision course with the Turks. Ankara sees the Syrian Kurdish YPG as an offshoot of Turkey’s home-grown Kurdistan Workers’ Party — or PKK — which has been fighting a renewed insurgency against the Turkish state since last summer.
After Turkey unilaterally broke the truce they had been operating under for the past few years, and engaged in renewed oppression- including shelling their own Kurdish towns and burning people to death.

Quote:

Turkey’s tough-talking [idiot] president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has repeatedly declared that he will not tolerate a de-facto Syrian Kurdish state on his southern border.

Last week, Turkey’s army — the second largest in NATO — backed up Erdogan’s words by shelling YPG positions from across the frontier, ostensibly in self-defence.

And yet, this is the Turkey whose "security concerns" Syria is supposed to consider?

Quote:

Moreover, Erdogan recently said that a Turkish-US buffer zone mooted for northern Iraq in 2003 would have preserved Iraq from its current problems with ISIS. Erdogan added that he saw no need ‘currently’ for a similar buffer zone in northern Syria — but said that the Turkish military had all the parliamentary authority it needed to create one if the order was given.
But not the international authority.

Quote:

More worryingly, Putin and Assad have accused the Turkish army of running weapons to Ankara-backed rebel groups [ISIL] deep inside Syrian territory via the Bab al-Salam border crossing point.
It's not just Russia that is saying this. EVERYBODY familiar with the situation knows that Turkey has been running arms into Syria for years, in a effort to topple Assad. Heck, they transshipped arms from Libya into Syria, and that was a long time ago!

Quote:

The Russians expect Turkey to go further. ‘At a certain point, a full Turkish intervention is inevitable,’ Fyodor Lukyanov, who heads Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defence Policy, told Bloomberg last week. ‘That would mean a completely different conflict, with a much larger force fighting on the side of the opposition and the risk of a direct Russian-Turkish conflict.’ Nationalist-leaning media on both sides are already fighting a war of words. It’s highly likely that another clash — beginning with, say, a Russian airstrike hitting Turkish troops inside Syria — would escalate quickly. In that case, Turkey could potentially invoke article five of NATO’s founding treaty, which states that an ‘armed attack against one [member] shall be considered an attack against them all’. The terrifying result: war between NATO and Russia.
If NATO is stupid enough to support a war of aggression by one of its member states, that is.

Quote:

To further complicate the situation, Saudi Arabia moved fighter jets to Turkey last week to carry out strikes inside Syria — and both Turkish and Saudi foreign ministers agreed that Saudi special forces troops deploying via Turkey might be involved in a future operation to liberate Raqqa from ISIS.
Give me a moment to consider.... BWAHAHAHA! Did somebody actually type that with a straight face?

Quote:

But Saudi troops on the ground in Syria would be a red rag to Assad’s other key ally, Iran — which already has troops from its revolutionary guards fighting in Syria.

Speaking at a security conference in Munich, US senator John McCain correctly predicted that Russia would not observe the recent ceasefire. ‘Russian presses its advantage militarily, creates new facts on the ground, uses the denial and delivery of humanitarian aid as a bargaining chip, negotiates an agreement to lock in the spoils of war, and then chooses when to resume fighting,’ he said. ‘The only thing that has changed about Mr Putin’s ambitions is that his appetite is growing with the eating.’

Putin's "ambition" is to support the recognized government of Syria, while McCain's ambitions have always been about destroying nations.

Bomb bomb bomb,
Bomb bomb Iran


Remember that precious McCainsianism?

Quote:

Certainly part of Putin’s plan in Syria is to distract international attention from his own unfinished intervention in eastern Ukraine. That conflict has cost Russia dearly: international banking sanctions and falling oil prices have sent inflation soaring and halved the value of the ruble. Putin is also ambitious to restore his country’s status as a world power. And he would like to show potential allies in the Middle East and the wider world that Russia stands by its friends. For the first time since the 1980s, Moscow’s military and diplomatic backing is something truly worth having.

Putin’s intervention in Syria is an act of reckless geopolitical buccaneering

While the destruction of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya was just responsible international political engineering

Quote:

— just like his invasion of Georgia in 2008
AFTER Georgia struck them first with missiles

Quote:

and his annexation of Crimea in 2014. But it’s worth asking the question: if Assad wins decisively, and peace breaks out, is Putin’s plan so terrible?
It is, for Washington, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia!

Quote:

Washington and Moscow want many of the same things: an end to hostilities on the ground,
HAHAHAHAHA!

Quote:

the destruction of radical Islamist groups such as ISIS and the Al-Nusra Front
HAHAHAHAHA!

Quote:

the establishment of a transitional government and, eventually, free elections.
HAHAHAHAHA!

Quote:

Even the Americans are willing to
have been forced into

Quote:

fudge on a key rebel demand — that Assad, personally, be removed from power. They agree that he could at least stay for a transitional period.

If Putin’s latest gambit does bring peace to Syria

Let's reiterate that- Putin brings peace to Syria ...,

Quote:

even if it is a peace on Assad’s terms, it may one day be counted as a success, albeit a self-serving one. But it is also Putin’s riskiest move yet, and growing riskier by the second. So far Putin’s opponents have consisted of the disorganised regimes of former Soviet nations. In his Syrian war, he faces a ruler every bit as choleric and ruthless as himself — Erdogan — and an increasingly belligerent Saudi Arabia.


Saudi Arabia is already backing off of it's choleric demands. Erdogan, OTOH, has painted himself into a corner. Rumor has it that Putin told Obama that if Turkey invades Syria, the Russians will use tactical nukes.

Quote:

The prospect of peace in Syria is now dependent on the wisdom, restraint and goodwill of Putin and Erdogan: an unsettling prospect.


What I got out of this posting is that G needs a western-press source to do his thinking for him. He (and KPO, and THUGR) cna read the exact same thing elsewhere, but unless it comes from a "source" they agree with, they reject the information. None of this is new to anyone who's been paying attention.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 11:22 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


And now, for a bit of speculation:

According to RT

US 'concerned' about Syrian Army & Kurdish Syria gains, urges stopping actions upsetting Turks

Quote:

The US president has sided with Turkey and warned the Syrian Kurdish militia not to seize more territory in Syria to avoid upsetting Ankara or the so-called “moderate” opposition. Obama voiced support for Erdogan against the Kurdistan Workers’ Party.

In a long phone conversation that lasted an hour and twenty minutes, Obama told his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan that the US has an “unwavering commitment” to Turkey’s national security.

Obama said he is “concerned” about the Syrian Army’s and Kurdish fighters’ gains in northern Syria as he “urgently called for a halt to actions that heighten tensions with Turkey and with moderate opposition forces in northern Syria,” according to a statement from the White House.

The US president stressed that the ongoing advance of Syrian armed forces and Kurdish militia, with support from the Russian Air Force, could “undermine our collective efforts in northern Syria to degrade and defeat ISIL.”

And he presumably said this with a straight face!

Quote:

While advising Erdogan to show “reciprocal restraint” and avoid shelling northern Syria where Ankara is engaging Kurds
Because cross-border shelling is OK

Quote:

Obama stressed that “YPG forces should not seek to exploit circumstances in this area to seize additional territory.”


Do you remember those 50 USA Special Forces that were parachuted somewhere into "northern Syria"? Where do you suppose they're operating?

According to some speculation, the YPG (the Kurdish forces in far northeastern Syria) aren't on the forefront of the drive to close the "gap" on the Syrian Turkish border thru which arms and fighters flow to ISIL in Syria. According to this speculation, it's a conglomerate of other fighting forces including Arabs and Turkmen loyal to Syria called Jaish al-Thuwar (Army of Revolutionaries), which are allied to the same Syrian Democratic Forces mentioned G's post. And according to speculation, this is where the Special Forces are operating: in the drive to take Azaz back from Al Nusra.

Interestingly, what this might mean is a split between the USA Pentagon (Special Forces and Syrian allies) and the USA CIA (al Nusra etc.) That might be one of the reasons why the USA wants the Russians and SAA to hold back from Azaz and "the gap". Well, WE don't know where these spec ops are taking place, but Obama knows EXACTLY where they are!

In the same article

Quote:

Earlier in the day, Washington [and France] rejected a Russian draft resolution at the UN Security Council condemning any plans for foreign military intervention in Syria. Ambassador Samantha Power even accused Moscow of trying to “distract the world” with its resolution.
Because the USA still wants to intervene militarily?

And again from the same article

Quote:

De Mistura told Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet that the peace talks won't resume in Geneva on February 25 as he had hoped. He said he can’t "realistically" get the parties in the Syrian conflict back to negotiations by that time. However, he added that he hopes the parties will gather “soon.”


--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 11:40 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


If you've been wondering about Aleppo, here is an interesting article about life in the city as it is now, by Peter Osborne

Journey to Aleppo: How the war ripped Syria's biggest city apart

http://www.middleeasteye.net/essays/journey-aleppo-how-war-ripped-syri
as-biggest-city-apart-1376989223#sthash.a8griASo.dpuf


It describes the hardships and the fracturing, even of families, between al Nusra and the Syrian government, and also the views of Syrians in Jordanian refugee camps. People speak of crimes by everyone: al Nusra, the FSA, Assad, and Iranians.

Syrian Army sitrep as of Sept 19



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 12:32 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by G:

I find this telling, how there's a break in the quoting where rt adds in some editorial content:

"The majority of Syrian people" of all backgrounds and faith "regard Russian military campaign as salvation, a way out of the state we've been enduring for five years," the Catholic bishop said, adding that "Syrians are very positive about it."

Wonder what else they added?


Ha, good spot G. Exactly what you would expect from a propaganda outlet for the Russian state - an 'interview' where they add in extra words where the Bishop doesn't quite hit the Kremlin's editorial line, and hope you don't notice.

And exactly the reason why no one should read RT, Sputnik or any other of Signy's cherished propaganda outlets masquerading as 'news' sources.

Signy you've embarrassed yourself enough, kindly stop repeatedly spamming the thread with this article.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 12:53 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

If you've been wondering about Aleppo, here is an interesting article about life in the city as it is now, by Peter Osborne

Ah, the article by erratic anti-Western journalist Peter Oborne. I was wondering when you were going to post this.

To his credit he does make this confession, deep into the article:

Quote:

"I should state that I stayed exclusively in government-held areas. I made no attempt to cross the lines into rebel zones (I would have been kidnapped [Also the Syrian government doesn't let journalists into the areas it besieges - KPO]). Government minders accompanied me throughout the trip and were present at almost every conversation. But I am as certain as I can be that people told me the truth as they saw it."

You'll forgive me if I take your interview quotes with a pinch of salt, Peter, since you were escorted everywhere and your conversations were watched over by Government minders of the most brutal, murderous regime of the century?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2016 2:19 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, you're embarrassing yourself, KPO, because if you read my post to G about that Syrian Catholic Bishop, you'll see why the article should be accurate given the context of the interview, and also a YouTube link which a Catholic-based website reports on another Syrian Catholic Bishop saying exactly the same thing.

Also, did you not wonder why the Orthodox Pope and the Catholic Pope met in Cuba, and not the USA? It must be because they share the same anti-Communist bent that you do! (not)

Whole posts of yours, and G's, consist of 'Nyah nyah nyah, I can't hear you'. Closed-minded much?



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 21, 2016 9:24 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Syrian army, allies advance against Islamic State in eastern Aleppo - reports

Quote:

Syria's army and allies, backed by Russian air strikes, recaptured 18 villages from Islamic State fighters in eastern Aleppo province on Saturday, a monitoring group said. The advance extended their control of parts of a road running towards the jihadist group's stronghold of Raqqa, and built on gains made in assaults that intensified sharply earlier this month.

Damascus's offensive, drawing heavily on Russian air cover and ground support from Lebanese Hezbollah and Iranian fighters, has brought the Syrian army to within 25 km (15 miles) of Turkey's border. The British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said Syria's army and allied fighters recaptured 18 villages east of Aleppo, bringing under their control some 40 km (25 miles) of a highway that leads from the city to Raqqa.


http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-mideast-crisis-syria-aleppo-idUKKCN0V
T0UN


Well, aside from the military gains reported here, there are three other pieces of information that one can glean from this article

1) Aleppo was controlled at least in part by ISIL. The idea that it was just "Syrian rebels" who took control of Aleppo was like the belief in the existence of the "FSA"- a fantasy.

2) Given that Aleppo was controlled at least in part by ISIL, I think we can ditch the propaganda point that Russia was just focusing on 'the rebels'. I could go into the tactical and strategic reasons why the Four plus one did what they did ... but I'll let KPO, G, and THUGR figure that one out for themselves.

3) The article is missing the usual embedded anti-Russian propaganda. That should tell people something. Again, intelligent people can figure that one out for themselves.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 21, 2016 11:39 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

And now, for a bit of speculation:
According to RT... - SIGNY

That should be on their masthead! You're a crack-up Sniggles.- GSTRING



The facts are from RT< the speculation is mine.
Yanno, you quoted an entire article from somewhere that you thought was "more objective", and yet it referenced the same facts that I quoted from elsewhere.

You have no response the the fact that nearly everything this "objective" article wrote, I posted here, long before? Does that make me "objective" too? And is that something you're too afraid to admit? "cause you've been avoiding those rather long posts ever since.

Quote:

Syrian army, allies advance against Islamic State in eastern Aleppo - reports

Syria's army and allies, backed by Russian air strikes, recaptured 18 villages from Islamic State fighters in eastern Aleppo province on Saturday, a monitoring group said. The advance extended their control of parts of a road running towards the jihadist group's stronghold of Raqqa, and built on gains made in assaults that intensified sharply earlier this month.

Damascus's offensive, drawing heavily on Russian air cover and ground support from Lebanese Hezbollah and Iranian fighters, has brought the Syrian army to within 25 km (15 miles) of Turkey's border. The British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said Syria's army and allied fighters recaptured 18 villages east of Aleppo, bringing under their control some 40 km (25 miles) of a highway that leads from the city to Raqqa.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-mideast-crisis-syria-aleppo-idUKKCN0V
T0UN


Well, aside from the military gains reported here, there are three other pieces of information that one can glean from this article

1) Aleppo was controlled at least in part by ISIL. The idea that it was just "Syrian rebels" who took control of Aleppo was like the belief in the existence of the "FSA"- a fantasy.

2) Given that Aleppo was controlled at least in part by ISIL, I think we can ditch the propaganda point that Russia was just focusing on 'the rebels'. I could go into the tactical and strategic reasons why the Four plus one did what they did ... but I'll let KPO, G, and THUGR figure that one out for themselves.

3) The article is missing the usual embedded anti-Russian propaganda. That should tell people something. Again, intelligent people can figure that one out for themselves.

-SIGNY

You left out:

"Russia intervened in Syria's nearly five-year-old civil war in September with an air campaign to bolster Assad



I think Russia, I, and your objective article has already said that. For myself, I believe I've said that many times. This is not news.

Quote:

Quote:

Its air strikes have hit Islamic State targets but mostly other insurgents, including Western- and Turkish-backed fighters.


Western and Turkish =backed fighters INCLUDE Islamist extremists and terrorists. My response to that point is- so what? Just because they're western-backed and Turksih-backed doesn't mean that they're "moderate". In fact, didn't your "objective" article concede that the idea of "moderate rebels" is a fantasy?

Quote:

Quote:

U.S.-led air strikes are also hitting Islamic State in areas it controls in Raqqa, Deir al-Zor and Hasaka provinces in the north and east of the country."


I don't think you know the difference between "assumptions" and "lies."

"Given that Aleppo was controlled at least in part by ISIL" - what's that word you love? Evidence?- GSTRING



Oh, but who needs "evidence" GSTRING? Certainly NOT YOU! This is form REUTERS, after all, a solid western source, the kind you swallow hook, line, and sinker!

Quote:

3rd time - What again is Russia's gain from all this? Loosing billions worth of business with Turkey? Propping up a hated "dictator?" More dead Russians? More dead civilians?- GSTRING


I can think of several possible reasons. First of all, they stop ANOTHER western-led regime-change project in the Mideast- yanno, the kind that has left great swaths of the Mideast smoking ruins which are crawling with jihadists.

That brings them cred to their allies.

It stops the chaos that the USA and its Saudi, GCC, and Turkish allies have fostered .... well, everywhere. And brings peace and stability back to Syria.

It blocks the potential gas pipeline from Qatar to the Mediterranean.

It reduces the number of jihadists who could then go back home, war-hardened, to spread terrorism elsewhere. As I said, they will now go home- in body bags.

I can think of a lot of reasons for Russia to do what it did.

But riddle me this, Batman:

Why did the USA want to destroy Syria, as it destroyed Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya?

Why does it WANT to create chaos everywhere?

I find those reasons more inscrutable than possible Russian ones. Because I can see the direct benefit to Russia for being involved in Syria, but no benefit at all for the USA to rampage thru the Middle East as it has done. Coming up with answers to THOSE questions is a lot more challenging.



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 21, 2016 2:46 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Yanno, you quoted an entire article from somewhere that you thought was "more objective", and yet it referenced the same facts that I quoted from elsewhere.- SIGNY

Some facts are so obvious even you can't miss them.

And some facts are so obvious that you even can't deny them. Which you've done, over and over. When I have more time, I'll detail every fact that you denied (because it came from a source that you didn't "like", especially me) that you later thought was "objective".

Quote:

I've have exhaustively posted about agreeing with you on some things
Oh, bull. Everyone knows that you disagree with me on nearly everything I post. That whole "I've have [sic] exhaustively posted about agreeing with you on some things characterization doesn't even pass the laugh test for anyone who's been reading our exchanges. And the point is the information in THIS thread, not some mythical other topics. You accept information when it comes from some sources, and reject the exact same information when it comes through me.

Yanno, if I were you, I'd reconsider how I assess information.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 22, 2016 10:41 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I can't freakin' wait! It's going to be great to see how you twist my words to make your point! Half the time you confuse what poster said what! Please tell me we expect your favorite habit of presuming the negative from a statement! So even if someone didn't say something you will say they were obviously thinking it?! Ha! It always makes you look like a desperate fool but it's worth the laugh.
When I parse through your posts to show you how you changed your mind 180 degrees depending on WHO said it, it will be obvious to everyone who reads it - except for you. I don't expect objectivity from you, because you're defending yourself.

Quote:

I do consider how you assess information :) - you push it through a pro-Russian filter. That has been obvious since the 'Russia Invades Ukraine' thread over a year ago. You are still in denial. Thing is as long as Crimea is under Russian rule it is a cold hard fact. One that I expect you deny in your next post.
So yes - I am picky about sources, and you as a source is untrustworthy as hell. Even your choice of sources shows you to be a untrustworthy echo bot.

And this is yet another example of exactly the problem that you have with information. I guess you STILL don't get it!

Quote:

I am more likely to trust sources that are not blatant propaganda for governments - you should try it (IF you can find one from Russia). I can't believe someone has to tell you that!
Then don't read the BBC, don't read any of the major media, don't listen to NPR.

Quote:

I think a lifetime of trusting government shills acting as "reporters" has broken your objectivity when it comes to professional journalism. I'm not even sure you understand what that means or just how hard those pros work at finding the story amongst all the junk. And the more you make these sweeping, blanket statements about the "Western Press" being in the pocket of Big Gov, and how you try and smear their efforts, just underscores how much you realize the West has a much freer flow of information. Truth be told, I think you are jealous - of course you will not admit it!
That is not to say there isn't plenty of bad reporting in the West, or poorly concealed political agendas like in Russia. Fox comes to mind.


Ok, for anyone who is NOT G, please re-read the above statement.

G "trusts" some sources. But when I talk about sources, I NEVER talk about trust. That's because I don't "trust" ANY sources. What I try to do is analyze them.

G: I read websites and listen to radio from sources that your would consider to be our side and ALSO sources that you would consider to be their side. When I read BBC, or the NYT, or RT, or Sputnik News, or Xihnua, or the International Business Times, or Syria Today, or Kyiv Post, or any of the other couple-dozen websites that I go to for viewpoints, or listen to NPR or the BBC World Service, or watch YouTube, not only do they have different views of the same thing, they usually focus on entirely different things.

Reality is complex, and people see what they want or fear, or what the government or the media's corporate sponsors want or fear. Everyone has a POV. Nobody has the whole picture. NOT EVEN THOSE SOURCES THAT YOU "TRUST"

So taking into account that every media's POV is shaped differently, you need to try to understand what THEY want, what THEY fear, and try to figure out from THEIR POV whether the reported news makes sense. Cui bono? (to whose benefit?) is a very good question to ask, but first you need to understand the other's view of "benefit".

So, for example, the Libyan destruction was presented (to the west) as saving those poor people of Libya who were being massacred by that ogre Qaddafi and who only wanted to breathe free under democracy under some "right to protect" clause, when IN REALITY a large portion of the Libyan population vigorously supported Qaddafi (they were of his extended tribe), another large portion was mildly supportive of Qaddafi, the "massacres" really weren't taking place, and the "rebels" were really Wahhabist terrorists.

So, who benefited from that biased reportage? Well, France stole Libya's gold, Saudi Arabia got to implant their jihadists into another formerly secular nation, the USA destroyed another oil state that was threatening to go off the dollar (which also benefited Saudi Arabia, as Saudi wealth is primarily in dollars and Treasuries), and the only people who did NOT benefit appeared to be the very same poor Libyan people, who are not only less free and a lot more frightened than they were before, they're also a lot poorer.

G, your approach is that you get some random warm fuzzy feeling about a source of information. You trust those that agree with you; the more they agree with you, the more you trust them.

That's a helluva way to stay inside your bubble, dude!


--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 22, 2016 11:08 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Just to give you an idea of how different the reportage is, here istoday's top headline from websites around the world

http://www.bbc.com/news
India caste unrest: 'Ten million without water' in Delhi

http://www.bloomberg.com/
The U.S. States Where Recession Is Already a Reality

cnn.com
Why Bush Stumbled

http://www.ibtimes.com/
China’s ‘Zombie Firms’ Threaten Global Growth


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/
Battle over who won the Hispanic vote in Nevada vote

http://www.reuters.com/
US-Russia draft calls for Syria ceasefire to start Feb. 27

https://www.rt.com/
‘He is paying for freedom of speech’: Palestinian journo on hunger strike near death (EXCLUSIVE)


http://sputniknews.com/
Liberation Continues: Syrian Army Regains Control Over Aleppo Supply Route

http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/
Xi underscores CPC's leadership in news reporting


zerohedge.com
Safes Sell Out In Japan, 1,000 Franc Note Demand Soars As NIRP Triggers Cash Hoarding

Like I said: different worlds.


--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 22, 2016 2:38 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


'G'
... you never make a mistake and you're never wrong (what a 5 year old) ... You as a source will never be trusted without extensive verification - your bias and conceit are way too well known.




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 22, 2016 2:55 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"it is likely that all of these "headlines" will change throughout the day"

Just to show how little experience you have with world news, the answer is ... not really, except CNN and FOX as msm examples.

What appears to be updating during the day (for example the BBC and Reuters) has to do with time zones. When you (if you're in New York) look at the headlines at 08:00 it's already 13:00 in London and 14:00 in Berlin. (if you're in Los Angeles the numbers are 08:00, 16:00 and 17:00 respectively.) By the time you in New York look at the headlines again at 19:00 it's 24:00 in London and 01:00 in Berlin. It's already the next day and they're on to the next news day. (In Los Angeles those numbers are 19:00, 03:00 and 04:00 respectively.)

I know because I track those specific news sources every day, and I know they DON'T change during the day. Neither does the NYTimes, WashPost, or LATimes. Of the sources I track, the only ones that continually update during the day are CNN, FOX, and Zero Hedge.

BTW, the same time zone effect is even more true for other news sources even further away, like RT and Xinhua.

Your lack of knowledge and experience with international news is showing. Again.




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:29 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Amnesty International joins the outcry against Russian war crimes in Syria: http://news.sky.com/story/1645573/russia-guilty-of-syria-war-crimes-sa
ys-amnesty


Report also contains footage (mercifully pixelated) of children and infants being pulled from the rubble after an airstrike in Aleppo.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:42 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


My mistake, Amnesty spoke out against Russian crimes back in December as well:
Quote:

Russian air strikes in Syria have killed hundreds of civilians and caused massive destruction in residential areas, striking homes, a mosque and a busy market, as well as medical facilities, in a pattern of attacks that show evidence of violations of international humanitarian law, said Amnesty International in a new briefing published today.

‘Civilian objects were not damaged’: Russia’s statements on its attacks in Syria unmasked highlights the high price civilians have paid for suspected Russian attacks across the country. The report focuses on six attacks in Homs, Idleb and Aleppo between September and November 2015 which killed at least 200 civilians and around a dozen fighters. The briefing includes evidence suggesting that Russian authorities may have lied to cover up civilian damage to a mosque from one air strike and a field hospital in another. It also documents evidence suggesting Russia’s use of internationally banned cluster munitions and of unguided bombs in populated residential areas.

“Some Russian air strikes appear to have directly attacked civilians or civilian objects by striking residential areas with no evident military target and even medical facilities, resulting in deaths and injuries to civilians. Such attacks may amount to war crimes,” said Philip Luther, Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Amnesty International.


https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/12/syria-russias-shameful-
failure-to-acknowledge-civilian-killings
/

Amnesty's methodology of research into the incidents:

Quote:

Amnesty International interviewed eyewitnesses and survivors of attacks as well as examining video evidence and images showing the aftermath of attacks, aided by analysis by weapons experts. The attacks were identified as suspected Russian air strikes by cross-referencing details of each attack with statements from the Russian Ministry of Defence announcing “terrorist” targets struck, or from details about the nature of the attack in witness testimony.

The organization’s research into these strikes indicate that there were no military targets or fighters in the immediate vicinity of the areas that were struck. This suggests that the attacks may have violated international humanitarian law and may, in some circumstances, constitute war crimes.

In one of the deadliest attacks documented in the briefing three missiles were fired on a busy market in the centre of Ariha in Idleb governorate killing 49 civilians. Witnesses described how within seconds the bustling Sunday market turned to a scene of carnage...


Follow the link and read on, if you have the stomach for it.

EDIT:

Oh what the hell I'm posting it anyway:

Quote:

...In just a few moments, people were screaming, the smell of burning was in the air and there was just chaos. There was a primary school nearby, and children were running out absolutely terrified… there were bodies everywhere, decapitated and mutilated,” said Mohammed Qurabi al-Ghazal, a local media activist.

He saw one woman sitting and crying beside 40 bodies lined up in a row. She had lost her husband and three children. ”Her children were literally in bags. To this day, I cannot get over it,” he added.

In another suspected Russian attack, at least 46 civilians, including 32 children and 11 women who were sheltering for safety in the basement of a residential building, were killed on 15 October in al-Ghantu, Homs governorate. Video footage of the scene after the attack shows no evidence of a military presence. Weapons experts who analysed images of the attack said the nature of the destruction indicated possible use of fuel-air explosives (also known as “vacuum bombs”), a type of weapon particularly prone to indiscriminate effects when used in the vicinity of civilians...



Russian government lies and deflection to cover up its atrocities:

Quote:

The Russian authorities’ reaction to an attack on Omar Bin al-Khattab mosque in central Jisr al-Shughour, Idleb governorate, on 1 October raises serious questions about the tactics they are prepared to deploy to undermine criticism of their operations. After reports and photos of the destroyed mosque emerged, the Russian authorities responded by calling it a “hoax”, presenting a satellite image purporting to show the mosque still intact. However, the mosque shown in the image was a different one from the one destroyed in the attack.

“By presenting satellite imagery of an intact mosque and claiming it showed another that had been destroyed, the Russian authorities appear to have used sleight of hand to try to avoid reproach and avert scrutiny of their actions in Syria...


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 25, 2016 9:21 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:

“Some Russian air strikes appear to have directly attacked civilians or civilian objects by striking residential areas with no evident military target and even medical facilities, resulting in deaths and injuries to civilians. Such attacks may amount to war crimes,” said Philip Luther, Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Amnesty International.




It seems to be Russia's and Russian trolls' go-to response for these allegations - the "no response" response. We see it here even. "If I don't acknowledge it, then it didn't happen." Or, at the very least, it will go away sooner.

And even when they do try and "explain"... it's little green men time.

Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Russian government lies and deflection to cover up its atrocities:

"The Russian authorities’ reaction to an attack on Omar Bin al-Khattab mosque in central Jisr al-Shughour, Idleb governorate, on 1 October raises serious questions about the tactics they are prepared to deploy to undermine criticism of their operations. After reports and photos of the destroyed mosque emerged, the Russian authorities responded by calling it a “hoax”, presenting a satellite image purporting to show the mosque still intact. However, the mosque shown in the image was a different one from the one destroyed in the attack.

“By presenting satellite imagery of an intact mosque and claiming it showed another that had been destroyed, the Russian authorities appear to have used sleight of hand to try to avoid reproach and avert scrutiny of their actions in Syria..."



The level of immaturity in their cover ups is what stands out to me - like a game almost - or like a junior high school kid trying to avoid parental detection. I only wish it was that funny.



Russia always addresses controversial issues by shaping their statements towards appeasing the home front. Then the comrade trolls fall in line and repeat the Russian talking points.

For the last year or so we here have witnessed this process in abundance.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 28, 2016 8:43 AM

THGRRI


TEHRAN, Iran - Partial results released Sunday indicate that Iranian reformists will win all 30 parliamentary seats in Tehran, handing hard-liners an embarrassing defeat in the first elections held since last year's nuclear deal.


Rafsanjani, a former president himself and close ally of current President Rouhani, is leading the race for membership to the influential Assembly of Experts, a body that chooses Iran's most powerful figure, the supreme leader, according to Reuters.

State TV said Sunday that reformists -- who favor expanding social freedoms and improving relations with the West -- are set to win all of Tehran's seats. It said 62 percent of the capital's votes have been counted."

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/iran-hard-liners-defeated-parliamentary-el
ections-tehran
/

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 28, 2016 3:05 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Let me get this straight...You track those news sources every day, throughout the day, when you know they don't change?"

Hmmm ... did I say 'throughout'? Where did I say 'throughout'? What DID I say? I said "I know because I track those specific news sources every day, and I know they DON'T change during the day." Ie I check them in the AM and PM and I see they haven't changed.

So you've posted ANOTHER STRAWMAN!!! You must be working on setting some kind of trolling record! Or you really are just that stupid.




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 28, 2016 5:21 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"the "no response" response"

If any of you can learn to read what I post and reply to that, or post some, yanno, facts - instead of responding to the voices in your head, or posting about whatever it is you're hallucinating that day - I'll respond. But as long as you keep posting idiocy, like "Let me get this straight...", all I'll do is just keep pointing at you and laughing.

Maybe you'll eventually acquire some honesty and intelligence, and learn to discuss facts. But I'm not going to patiently wait for you all to grow up.





SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 29, 2016 12:18 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"You took 5 days to come up with that answer?? "

You don't work? You don't have a family? Figures.

"My bad. When you said DURING the day I thought you meant DURING the day."

1. throughout the duration, continuance, or existence of:
2. at some time or point in the course of:

And you cherry pick definitions to cover up your weak language skills? Yeah, it goes along with your general dishonesty.




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 29, 2016 4:09 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


This is why I'm not participating in this thread anymore:

1) It started out biased, like "Russian Invasion of Ukraine". If there was a thread about "WAR CRIMES IN SYRIA" - of which there are a-plenty - that would be more informative. But KPO - being the anti-Russian troll that he is - zeros right in on every presumed Russian infraction, and ignores proven ones like the ones ISIL is committing right now.

2) Just like the "Russian Invasion of Ukraine" thread KPO (and the two other stooges) takes every oppty to air that particular bee in his bonnet.

3) The thread gets its lifespan by attention. I refuse to pay attention to it from now. All of the time that I might have spent arguing minor points, I spent more productively recovering from surgery and managing my health better, going to a newly-discovered CA-native nursery, starting and re-potting plants, helping build a new computer, trying out new recipes, cleaning up, and being present for my family. What's the point of engaging fully-biased people who even REFUSE to look at a website because it might dirty their ideological skirt hems? After this, I'll refill the hummingbird feeders.

4) Just as an aside of how ridiculous G, KPO, and THUGR are: "G" - the top headlines that I posted were a SNAPSHOT- a 10-minute or less moment in time from various websites. Yes, some websites have "scrolling headlines", but for those which don't, I posted THE top headline at the moment, and for those which do they fortunately had a "Breaking news" headline which I chose. The point still stands: If you look at various websites- whether over a 10-minute or 24-hour or 1-week period, they present very different viewpoints, "updates" or not. Comparing ALL of the headlines across ALL of the websites at any one time, I'm fortunate if they overlap by 7%. Arguing over whether "updates" changes that fact ( it doesn't) is pointless - as are you.

5) I've found a much better discussion board- one that isn't filled by ideological trolls, like you three.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 29, 2016 5:07 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Your work and family are so demanding you can't post?"

Yes.

I see you avoided the question. So, what's your excuse for endlessly trolling? No job? No family?

Figures.

And what's your excuse for your dishonesty? Oh, you have none, you say?

And what's your excuse for being so stupid you lied about a word definition of all things, something ANYONE could easily refute in under 30 seconds?

So, no job, no family, troll, dishonest AND stupid! You really got it going on, dontcha?




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 1, 2016 11:01 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Great job, great family, not lying (you wish) or dishonest or stupid or trolling.



And yet, your obvious lying, trolling and stupidity are there for all to see. Like your little lie pretending that ;the; definition of 'during' can only mean throughout, continuously.

Which is why you're so funny. You're like a really not very bright kid, saying 'is TOOOO!' when all the grownups can see 'is not'. And the more you pretend to be right in your pompous yet impotent little way, stamping your little feet, the funnier you are.

So please, keep it up.




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 2, 2016 1:57 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Syrian regime accused again of using Chlorine barrel bombs, by Israel this time: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-israel-idUSKCN0
W356M


Quote:

A fact-finding mission of the global chemical weapons watchdog (OPCW) concluded in 2014 that the use of chlorine gas has been "systematic" in the Syrian civil war, even after the country surrendered its stockpile of toxic weapons.

Both sides have denied using chlorine "barrel" bombs, which the OPCW said are dropped out of helicopters. The Syrian air force is the only party in the conflict known to have helicopters.


Hmm, well this doesn't take a genius...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 2, 2016 2:01 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
This is why I'm not participating in this thread anymore:

1) It started out biased, like "Russian Invasion of Ukraine". If there was a thread about "WAR CRIMES IN SYRIA" - of which there are a-plenty - that would be more informative. But KPO - being the anti-Russian troll that he is - zeros right in on every presumed Russian infraction, and ignores proven ones like the ones ISIL is committing right now.

2) Just like the "Russian Invasion of Ukraine" thread KPO (and the two other stooges) takes every oppty to air that particular bee in his bonnet.

3) The thread gets its lifespan by attention. I refuse to pay attention to it from now. All of the time that I might have spent arguing minor points, I spent more productively recovering from surgery and managing my health better, going to a newly-discovered CA-native nursery, starting and re-potting plants, helping build a new computer, trying out new recipes, cleaning up, and being present for my family. What's the point of engaging fully-biased people who even REFUSE to look at a website because it might dirty their ideological skirt hems? After this, I'll refill the hummingbird feeders.

4) Just as an aside of how ridiculous G, KPO, and THUGR are: "G" - the top headlines that I posted were a SNAPSHOT- a 10-minute or less moment in time from various websites. Yes, some websites have "scrolling headlines", but for those which don't, I posted THE top headline at the moment, and for those which do they fortunately had a "Breaking news" headline which I chose. The point still stands: If you look at various websites- whether over a 10-minute or 24-hour or 1-week period, they present very different viewpoints, "updates" or not. Comparing ALL of the headlines across ALL of the websites at any one time, I'm fortunate if they overlap by 7%. Arguing over whether "updates" changes that fact ( it doesn't) is pointless - as are you.

5) I've found a much better discussion board- one that isn't filled by ideological trolls, like you three.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.


What a gracious sign-off!

Well, you've fought the good fight for the motherland, no one can deny that. Have fun over at PutinFangirls.com!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 2, 2016 2:23 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Good for Signy that she got out when she did. How would she have been able to defend THIS?

U.N. RIGHTS CHIEF: 'THOUSANDS' MAY HAVE STARVED IN BESIEGED AREAS OF SYRIA - http://europe.newsweek.com/un-rights-chief-thousands-may-have-starved-
besieged-areas-syria-431311


I repeat: this is happening in the 21st century, to innocent men, women and children.

But which groups are responsible for the sieges? Perhaps, as Signy suggests, the rebels are just as guilty as the Syrian government? Well, a new website, siegewatch.org, has been set up to monitor the sieges in Syria, and this is what they say:

Quote:

At the present time, according to Siege Watch, there are forty-six sieges operating in Syria, forty-three of them (93.5%) imposed by the Assad regime, two (4.5%) imposed by Jaysh al-Fatah, an insurgent coalition that includes Jabhat an-Nusra (al-Qaeda in Syria), and one (2%) by the Islamic State (IS).

Siege Watch also documents the severity of the sieges in three categories. Category one (C1) is the most severe: very little gets in even by smuggling and international aid deliveries are rare if at all; the risk of malnutrition is high. Category two (C2) sieges are porous enough for the black market and/or locals might have some access to locally-grown produce, but prices for basics are extremely high and residents are at “some risk of malnutrition/dehydration”. Category three (C3) sieges require smuggling to get food, but there is a consistent supply, even if home-grown. While risk of malnutrition is low in C3 zones, medical emergencies are likely because of attacks by besieging forces.

All six C1 sieges are imposed by the regime. Thirty category C2 sieges are operating: twenty-nine by the regime and one by IS. The regime is also operating eight C3 sieges and Jaysh al-Fatah is operating two C3 sieges


https://kyleorton1991.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/the-sieges-of-syria/

So the Syrian regime is responsible for the vast majority of sieges, and ALL of the most severe (C1) ones. Their sieges are even worse than the 1 imposed by ISIS (C2) and much worse than the 2 imposed by Al Nusra (C3).

So the Assad regime, and Russia are worse than the terrorists. If there's one key truth to learn about the Syrian conflict, that's it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2016 3:31 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


From what I hear the regime is starting to grudgingly allow aid to the desperate besieged areas, although far less than what is needed - http://www.npr.org/2016/03/04/469149282/food-aid-welcomed-in-besieged-
syrian-city-of-madaya


And the Syrian people in rebel areas, free from Assad's barrel bombs, gas attacks and Russia's terror bombing for the first time in years, take to the streets to protest and call for freedom and the downfall of the Assad regime. 104 protests across Syria today:







Remember, according to Sig and her friends at Zerohedge, those protesters in Aleppo (last vid) are 'ISIS collaborators' who deserve to be carpet-bombed by Russia. We should cheer on Russia as it bombs them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2016 6:26 PM

THGRRI


Putin just shit himself watching the Syrian protesters because he now realizes this ain't going away before the money runs out.

Hey SIG, Putin's gonna clean this up in a couple of months huh.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:24 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

And the Syrian people in rebel areas, free from Assad's barrel bombs, gas attacks and Russia's terror bombing for the first time in years, take to the streets to protest and call for freedom and the downfall of the Assad regime. 104 protests across Syria today


As far as I can tell Russia is seeking a POLITICAL solution in Syria. That's why those terrible dastardly Russians negotiated a cease-fire, when they were militarily gaining ground ... and rather rapidly at that. According to various military strategists, once the Four + one had taken control of the northeast, which is rough terrain and easily defended, they could have rolled pretty quickly thru the desert and taken Raqqa and freed Deir el Zor without much trouble.

The only thing I would look at rather closely is whether the various interest groups agree to a unified, secular, democratic Syria. If not, then they're just Sunni extremists looking to establish some sort of Sunni theocracy. If the demonstrators are trying to achieve a democratic, unified, secular Syria, I'm all for them. Right now, I don't know WHAT they're for, other than to "defeat Assad". Are they for a future of Syria that will protect everyone's rights? Or are they just another group of "freedom loving" protesters with embedded theocrats? Do you know what their goals are?

I know that you celebrate anyone who is anti-Russian ... it doesn't seem to matter whether they're corrupt oligarchs, Nazis, ISIL, sectarian Sunni extremists trying to create a Greater Sunnistan .... you don't tend to look too closely, as long as they're waving a flag and shouting.



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:29 AM

THGRRI


Are you too stupid SIG to realize they are calling for the destruction of Assad? Really, are you that stupid?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:41 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Are you too stupid SIG to realize they are calling for the destruction of Assad? Really, are you that stupid?



AND THEN WHAT?

Do you have any idea? (no)

Do you care? (no)

Or are you so reflexively anti-Russian that you really don't care what happens to Syria, as long as "your side" (whatever that is) "wins"? (yes)

I can't believe the circle-jerk this thread has devolved into.


--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, March 5, 2016 3:56 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Troll, much?




SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia should never interfere in any other nation's internal politics, meanwhile the USA and IMF is helping kill Venezuela
Sun, November 24, 2024 07:48 - 103 posts
Japanese Culture, S.Korea movies are now outselling American entertainment products
Sun, November 24, 2024 07:24 - 51 posts
The parallel internet is coming
Sun, November 24, 2024 06:04 - 180 posts
Giant UFOs caught on videotape
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:43 - 8 posts
California on the road to Venezuela
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:41 - 26 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:37 - 71 posts
MAGA movement
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:04 - 14 posts
Will Your State Regain It's Representation Next Decade?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:53 - 113 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:44 - 170 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:40 - 42 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sun, November 24, 2024 01:01 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 23:46 - 4761 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL