Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
lol

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The Mueller invesigation is over, and there will be no indictments for "collusion" or "obstruction of justice" which was Mueller's formal remit.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The Mueller invesigation is over, and there will be no indictments for "collusion" or "obstruction of justice" which was Mueller's formal remit.

---

Formally:
(b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump . . .
www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-M
ueller-special.html

That is not within a mile of what Signym says it was.

Surprising how many people went to jail over just that 1 page letter of instructions.
http://time.com/5556331/mueller-investigation-indictments-guilty-pleas/

www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-fury-and-failure-of-donald-
trump-w444943


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

The Mueller invesigation is over, and there will be no indictments for "collusion" or "obstruction of justice" which was Mueller's formal remit. - SIGNY

Formally:

Quote:

---

(b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump . . .
www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-M
ueller-special.html

---

That is not within a mile of what Signym says it was. SLOPPYSECONDS

---

Quote:

---

Surprising how many people went to jail over just that 1 page letter of instructions.
http://time.com/5556331/mueller-investigation-indictments-guilty-pleas/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

How is "collusion" different from "links and/or coordination"? In fact, my description was even broader than what you quoted, because I included "obstruction of justice" which (according to you) wasn't even in Mueller's scope. You're lying (again) by insinuating that I'm somehow giving Trump a "pass" by mis-describing Mueller's remit, but I'm not and I didn't. Jeez, untwist your panties, willya?

Quote:

---

Surprising how many people went to jail over just that 1 page letter of instructions.
http://time.com/5556331/mueller-investigation-indictments-guilty-pleas/

---

And none of them had to do with RUSSIA!!!, so it seems to me that Mueller took his investigation beyond what he was authorized.

---

Quote:

---

However, if that is NOT the case then ... with "sit on my hands" Sessions out of office, and the Trump administration free from "obstruction of justice" accusations (since the investigation is now over) ... the administration would be free to investigate the investigators, including DOJ, FBI, CIA, and NSA staff as well as Obama and Hillary for evidence that the investigation was politically-motivated and evidence that the investigation was tainted by illegal acts (such as withholding information from the FISA court.)

---

Quote:

---

If Barr conducts a thorough investigation, then the deep state and Trump have NOT reached an accommodation. But if Barr stays quiet, or conducts a whitewash, then a deal probably took place.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

It's really hard for me to understand the logic of the right. Oh, I know, they swallow hook,line and sinker whatever Trump vomits.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Signym, a dozen Russians that work for the KGB were indicted.
www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/read-muellers-full-indictment-against-12-r
ussian-officers-for-election-interference

---

Quote:

---

By the way, everybody Mueller investigated was either indicted or jailed

---

Quote:

---

except for Trump.

---

Quote:

---

Trump was not because Mueller was told he can't indict a President for any reason

---

Quote:

---

even if guilty as hell.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Signym, a dozen Russians that work for the KGB were indicted.
www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/read-muellers-full-indictment-against-12-r
ussian-officers-for-election-interference] Notably - not for collusion! What is wrong you?

Quote:

---

By the way, everybody Mueller investigated was either indicted or jailed

---

But not for collusion!

Quote:

---

except for Trump.

---

Because Mueller couldn't find proof of collusion!collusion!collusion!

Quote:

---

Trump was not because Mueller was told he can't indict a President for any reason

---

Especially because there was no proof of collusion!

Quote:

---

even if guilty as hell.

---

Of NOT COLLUSION!!!

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I'm using the word "collusion" because that's what the know-nothings (that means YOU TOO, SLOPPYSECONDS) here have been using, but the real word is "conspiracy".

TRUMP WASN'T FOUND INDICTABLE ON THAT, EITHER.

Deal with it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Go back to what the letter said: “did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

Even if Mueller were inhibited from indicting Trump, Jared, Trump Jr, Flynn, Manafort ... NONE of these people were recommended for indictment of "conspiracy" or "coordination".

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
And still, no collusion.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Another 27 posts today?
When will the Mueller Witch Hunt end?
And they'll still never dream up any Evidence.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SECOND:
On the June 21 episode of Preet Bharara’s podcast, “Stay Tuned with Preet,” a listener called in to ask about the legal meaning of the word “collusion.” Bharara and his two guests were quick to set the record straight; the term collusion, despite its frequent use, has no actual legal definition outside of antitrust law.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SECOND:
Did you not get the memo? Collusion is not illegal.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I just like watching SLOPPYSECONDS walking himself over the edge.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:

There have been dozens of pages and roughly 100 'collusion' posts in one thread alone that you thought were perfectly acceptable.

So why are you objecting now?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Another 17 posts today?

When will the Mueller Witch Hunt end?

And they'll still never dream up any Evidence.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Another 17 posts today?

When will the Mueller Witch Hunt end?

And they'll still never dream up any Evidence.

---

Agreed.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Republicans are growing more and more alarmed about Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/republicans-growing-alarmed-trumps-in
creasingly-erratic-behavior/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Republicans are growing more and more alarmed about Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/republicans-growing-alarmed-trumps-in
creasingly-erratic-behavior/

---

Quote:

---

Sorry, but nothing matched your search terms. Please try again with different keywords.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SECOND:
The rule of law does not include GOP Senators. What would the Senate do if Trump obstructed justice? The Senate could ignore obstruction or it could remove Trump from office. In the latter case, ordinary citizen Trump, the ex-President, goes to a criminal trial. Then jail. Trump did obstruct justice, but no Republican Senator will vote to remove Trump. Those Senators have already decided Trump is innocent and there is no rule of law that will force them to change their minds. Trump admits the allegations of collusion between his advisers and Russian officials played into sacking of FBI director in order to obstruct justice. But the Republican Senators have decided to ignore what they heard Trump say on TV:
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/11/donald-trump-james-comey-firin
g-russia-investigation

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SECOND:
Are we following the convicted felon Manfort's example? Are we going to keep blowing smoke to camouflage what is happening?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
My reply should be Benghazi, but I'll simply say: Why? Don't you think that the Republicans would take advantage were it about Obama? Stringing things out is their M.O.

McConnell's infamous obstruction of Obama's administration, for one.

As far as no collusion and the rest. Those will turn out to be a "Jack in the Box" surprise.

Just so you know, I prefer Dunkin' Donuts....ha, ha, ha

Whole report please!


SGG

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THUGGER:
Yep, just a new phase of the investigation into Trump and his super corrupt administration. The rule of law is running it's course and that's what the trolls don't get.

They also don't get that they've exposed themselves as trolls who care nothing about the crimes exposed. They only talk about collusion. If conspiracy is not proven then to them Trump is somehow vindicated. That level of ignorance is off the charts.

tick tock

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
I wouldn’t find a “no collusion” finding to be so surprising. But MAGAkultists shouldn’t find it to be very reassuring either. From all we’ve seen, Trump has laundered a lot of Russian mob money. Putin has a lot of “Kompromat” on him, and that’s why he did everything he could to install him. Trump is a Putin asset not necessarily because he wanted to be, but because he allowed himself to be duped into the role. Trump is a criminal being blackmailed by another criminal to commit treason on his behalf. Both Occam’s and Hanlon’s Razors apply here.

We haven’t seen the report yet. We've seen evidence of collusion, proof of corruption, and some real slimy behavior by Trump's campaign. Is that enough to indict Trump? Or is there enough plausible deniability to keep him away from any real consequences? He's already survived scandals and outrages that would have sunk a normal president. But this isn't a normal president.

The nervous posturing of the trumpjugend and their older reichskult groomer-handlers is just that. They don’t have to admit that Mueller has already been devastating to Trump’s organization and reputation and that the rest of the report will only do more damage. We know. They don’t need to tell us how scared they are of the numerous other ongoing and imminent congressional and judicial investigations into the criminal-in-chief’s conduct. We know, and the trumptards are so high on the Kool aid, they don't care.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by GEEBERS:
So nice of you to notice. Do the words, "Can't indict a sitting president" sound familiar? Trump will do more damage to the GOP in office than out, imho. So - we'll see what the report says if they release it all.

Wasn't it interesting that when Trump went to Mar a Lago this weekend, he brought along his "Russian Collusion" lawyers? Was he tipped off? Curious.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Republicans are growing more and more alarmed about Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/republicans-growing-alarmed-trumps-in
creasingly-erratic-behavior/

---

Ya don't say?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=rawstory

Quote:

---

Sorry, but nothing matched your search terms. Please try again with different keywords.

---

Mediabiasfactcheck doesn't even seem to recognize rawstory as a news outlet.


One might ask if that's better or worse than only quoting extreme left biased websites.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

lol. You beat me to it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Republicans are growing more and more alarmed about Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/republicans-growing-alarmed-trumps-in
creasingly-erratic-behavior/

---

Ya don't say?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=rawstory

Quote:

---

Sorry, but nothing matched your search terms. Please try again with different keywords.

---

Mediabiasfactcheck doesn't even seem to recognize rawstory as a news outlet.


One might ask if that's better or worse than only quoting extreme left biased websites.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:

A Dummies' Guide To What Dems Will Say When Mueller Report Is Released

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
https://www.zerohedge.com...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:


A Dummies' Guide To What Dems Will Say When Mueller Report Is Released

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-11/dummies-guide-what-dems-will
-say-when-mueller-report-released

---

Quote:

---

Russiagaters in 2017: YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT MUELLER KNOWS
Russiagaters in 2018: YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT MUELLER KNOWS
Russiagaters in 2019: Shut up Mueller, what would you know.
— Caitlin Johnstone ? (@caitoz) March 22, 2019

---

Quote:

---

Mueller's report will almost certainly disappoint you, and it's not his fault. It's your fault for buying into Trump's false narrative that it is Mueller's' job to prove "collusion," a nearly impossible bar for any prosecutor to clear.
My piece in @TIME: https://t.co/VQ2WhhC996
— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) March 1, 2019

This is, of course, the weakest volley. It’s absurd, patent bad faith, for Russiagaters to pretend that they knew, thought, or suggested the Mueller investigation was irrelevant. It is they who have been insisting that the integrity and super-sleuthiness of the “revered” Robert Mueller himself was the thing that would nail Donald Trump for Russian collusion. To now deny that any of that was important only acknowledges how thoroughly they have been fooling the American people and/or themselves for two years. Either Adam Schiff had the goods on Trump’s traitorous Russian collusion two years ago, in which case he’s got a lot of explaining to do about why he’s been stringing us along with Mueller, or Schiff is just bluffing.

---