Quote:

---

Last week, Congress received a brief, nine-page report from the State Department, which summarizes the department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email account to conduct work business while she was secretary of state. The report can be fairly summarized in two sentences: She shouldn’t have done that. But it wasn’t that big of a deal.

---

Quote:

---

A State Department report into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server for government business, obtained by Fox News on Friday, found dozens of individuals at fault and hundreds of security violations.

The report summarized an administrative review of the handling of classified information relating to Clinton’s private email server used during her tenure as the nation’s highest-ranking diplomat between 2009 and 2013. The report, dated Sept. 13., was delivered to the office of Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa., who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee until last year.

---

Quote:

---

A State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email account found no widespread effort by her aides or other staffers to mishandle classified information.

The three-year-long investigation by State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security concluded that 38 individuals committed a total of 91 security violations involving emails sent to or from Clinton’s private server.

---

Quote:

---

“While there were some instances of classified information being inappropriately introduced into an unclassified system in furtherance of expedience, by and large, the individuals interviewed were aware of security policies and did their best to implement them in their operations,” the report said.

“Instances of classified information being deliberately transmitted via unclassified email were the rare exception and resulted in adjudicated security violations. There was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.”

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
3 long years and nothing. Sheesh, I too would be embarrassed to even mention
it on the back pages of any tabloid, or on broadcast news.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Oh, and BTW... it's not over.

It's been months since anything happened with the Covington kid's case against the WaPo, and that's still on.

Until Hillary tells us why she acid washed her server and had all of her aides destroy cell phones with hammers, nobody with half a brain is going to believe she didn't know she was doing something wrong.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
3 long years and nothing. Sheesh, I too would be embarrassed to even mention
it on the back pages of any tabloid, or on broadcast news.

---

I know, right?

Oh...

You weren't referring to the Trump Russiagate hoax.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Child pornography, or didn't you hear?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Really!? There was a Hoax!? What? Where?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Child pornography, or didn't you hear?

---

That was all on Podesta's and Weiner's phones.

Podesta's uglier brother wasn't into that though. He was too busy working with Manafort laundering money in the Ukraine while his better looking brother was having pizza parties with 8 year old boys.

Just ask Epstien all about it.

Oh.... wait.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Really!? There was a Hoax!? What? Where?

---

I believe the reports of Hillary's Emails were at the same time that a bi-partisan senate committee confirmed there was definite, no doubt about it, actual Russian hacking of the 2016 election to favor of Trump.

For H's Emails I think the MSM were as sick of that subject as the majority of people were. I never once saw anything substantive or damning in her emails, like, "You get dirt on Joe Biden and his son and we'll think about giving you military aid."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Guess nothing is ever "final", huh?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Mr. Combetta is an IT specialist who was involved with the transfer and deletion of Secretary Clinton’s emails. Judicial Watch seeks to depose Mr. Combetta to learn more about the archiving, existence, and deletion of any of Secretary Clinton’s emails. Additionally, Judicial Watch asks the Court to require Mr. Combetta to bring to his deposition all records in his possession relating to Secretary Clinton’s emails from her time at State. On December 30, 2019, Judicial Watch informed the Court that Mr. Combetta would assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination if Judicial Watch served a subpoena on him. The Court sees no reason to authorize what would be an exercise in futility. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Judicial Watch’s request to depose Mr. Combetta.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Guess nothing is ever "final", huh?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Death is final

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
When she's deposed she's just gonna lie and/or not remember. We've all seen this act many times before. Nice try JW, but you're out of your league here.

---

Quote:

---

Mr. Combetta is an IT specialist who was involved with the transfer and deletion of Secretary Clinton’s emails. Judicial Watch seeks to depose Mr. Combetta to learn more about the archiving, existence, and deletion of any of Secretary Clinton’s emails. Additionally, Judicial Watch asks the Court to require Mr. Combetta to bring to his deposition all records in his possession relating to Secretary Clinton’s emails from her time at State. On December 30, 2019, Judicial Watch informed the Court that Mr. Combetta would assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination if Judicial Watch served a subpoena on him. The Court sees no reason to authorize what would be an exercise in futility. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Judicial Watch’s request to depose Mr. Combetta.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
When she's deposed she's just gonna lie and/or not remember. We've all seen this act many times before. Nice try JW, but you're out of your league here.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
When she's deposed she's just gonna lie and/or not remember. We've all seen this act many times before. Nice try JW, but you're out of your league here.

---

A lot of folk said they wouldn't succeed to this stage. Ooops

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
When she's deposed she's just gonna lie and/or not remember. We've all seen this act many times before. Nice try JW, but you're out of your league here.

---

A lot of folk said they wouldn't succeed to this stage. Ooops

---

They got Capone back in the day. They even eventually got Gotti. But Hillary, not so much as a mussed hair. Anyone that's tried has been found dead. If I were Judicial Watch and that judge that ordered the deposition I'd have bodyguards watching my ass 24/7.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
The nuts are out in force I see. Nothing here that represents sanity. The title of this thread should be scary thread.


T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/in-the-news/judge-orders-hillary-clinton
-deposition-in-judicial-watch-lawsuit/

---