Vaxx Kills Prince Philip by JEWELSTAITEFAN

Why are you lying like a little bitch again?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 1:53 AM

He was 99 and something was going to take him sooner rather than later. Also this last stint in the hospital had to do with his heart. Try learning the facts.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 2:04 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
He was 99 and something was going to take him sooner rather than later. Also this last stint in the hospital had to do with his heart. Try learning the facts.

Yep. It's all just a coincidence.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 4:32 AM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

You know, people die all the time. And they die for reasons not related to the COVID-19 vaccines.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 7:04 AM

WHOZIT

I this is awful, I hope Meghan is will be OK. She's the most important royal ya know.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 7:14 AM

THG

Some people cannot accept reality as it is and have to assign a conspiracy theory to every current event. Many of those beset with such difficulties have multiple psychological disorders Brenda.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 8:56 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Quote:
Originally posted by whozit:
I this is awful, I hope Meghan is will be OK. She's the most important royal ya know.

1) Fox News host suggests Meghan Markle may be to blame for Prince Philip's death
"Fox and Friends" host Brian Kilmeade wasted no time in placing the blame for 99-year-old Prince Philip's death
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/09/fox-news-host-suggest-megan-markle-ma
y-be-to-blame-for-prince-phillips-death/

2) Meghan Markle & Prince Harry Are Already Being Blamed For Prince Philip’s Death
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/meghan-markle-prince-harry-already
-151916054.html

3) The British media narrative of Prince Philip’s death is about Meghan Markle
https://www.vox.com/culture/2021/4/9/22375557/prince-philips-death-meg
han-markle-british-media-racism

The Duke of Edinburgh was 99 years old. Any efforts to place blame for his death reveal far more about the state of the media than about Meghan Markle.

About 19,100,000 results for 'Meghan Markle blamed by media'
www.google.com/search?q=Meghan+Markle+blamed+by+media

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 8:58 AM

Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 9:22 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.

6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated. You went on: if the media wasn't inflating and sensationalizing the numbers, and the true number of deaths was known, then the Chinese Flu was a joke, a hoax, a big nothing that the media was using to make Trump look bad:

The fact that deaths surged at the end of 2020, nine months after the pandemic reached the United States, with the highest daily death tolls in early January 2021, is perhaps the most discouraging comparison to the historical record. We ignored the lessons of 1918, and then we disregarded warnings issued in the first months of this pandemic. We will never know how many lives could have been saved if we had taken this threat more seriously. We are paying a terrible price now for this failure of policy and practice. -- Measuring Mortality In The Pandemics Of 1918–19 And 2020–21
https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20210329.51293/full/

It is not at all peculiar that the week after Trump left the White House, the daily death toll started to drop, going from 4,500 per day to less than 1,000 per day. Some days are less than 300. Could it possibly be because Trump is a fat, stupid and crazy loudmouth who is a disorganized disaster that can't stop bragging about how smart he is?
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

The polite name for what happened to Trump is Hubris syndrome, a disorder of the possession of power, particularly power which has been associated with overwhelming success, held for a period of years and with minimal constraint on the leader. Its 14 clinical features include: manifest contempt for others, loss of contact with reality, restless or reckless actions, and displays of incompetence. --
Power Causes Brain Damage
How leaders lose mental capacities—most notably for reading other people—that were essential to their rise
https://web.archive.org/web/20210326121750if_/https://www.theatlantic.
com/magazine/archive/2017/07/power-causes-brain-damage/528711/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 9:49 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.
6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.

That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.

But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.

Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.

Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:16 AM

Prince Philip Was the Godfather of Anglo-British Nationalism
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/04/prince-philip-was-the-godfathe
r-of-anglo-british-nationalism.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29

Yves here. It may seem odd to commemorate the death of Prince Philip, since the British monarchy is a hoary symbol of [take your pick of positive or negative associations] whose main purpose today is brand-building. Yet even today, the Royals exercise influence over politics (one recent article described the Queen’s extensive but quiet lobbying in defense of her tax havens), opinion, and fashion. A bare minimum, they are billionaires whose deal with the British public is they get to rattle around their drafty castles, have staff and allowances, in return for looking useful and making lots of appearances. One friend explained that the reason Meghan was so quickly unhappy with her new role was that she didn’t understand the job description. No, you do not fly on private jets. Yes, you spend about 100 days a year in Bumfuck England cutting ribbons at hospital openings and the like. Diana loved hobnobbing with ordinary people and basking in their appreciation of attention from a Royal. Meghan can’t abide regular folks.

As this article explains, Prince Philip lived through the long decline of British power and along with it, a reduction in the role of the throne.

In the year before Prince Philip was born, 1920, the British empire was the largest it would ever be. The year after he was born, 1922, Charles Francis Jenkins demonstrated the first principles of the television.

The changes driven by decolonisation and the invention of the modern media, between them, could easily have ended the reign of the House of Windsor. The fact that they didn’t, the success of the British monarchy in transitioning from the divine rulers at the apex of history’s biggest empire to the celebrities at the centre of a modern nationalist project built on TV and the tabloids, was, in large part, because of the duke of Edinburgh, who died today at 99.

As chair of the Queen’s coronation committee in 1953, Philip proposed a radical idea: why not televise it? The result was the most-watched TV show in history at the time, doing more than anything else to make television a mainstream medium.

The next day, a Daily Express journalist wrote that the show “set up brilliant new standards in linking the crown with the people”; viewers, he said, “virtually rode with the Queen through London and stood near to her in the ancient Abbey itself”.

By grabbing such a vast audience and directly – or so it seemed – involving them in the once-distant rituals of the state, Philip fathered a whole new phenomenon. And the tension between the institutions he pulled together – TV, the tabloids, and the monarchy – became the tripod on which Anglo-British nationalism hung, as the empire fell apart.

Philip also became an icon of this world view: his racist ‘jokes’ were carefully delivered in a cheeky tone as if he was a naughty boy mocking some kind of power, when in reality, he was the one with the power. It’s a tone he perfected: I remember him using it when we joked together on the three occasions I met him. But what they hid was something more insidious.

Philip’s uncle and mentor, Louis Mountbatten, was the man who did more than anyone else to partition India. Indeed it was extraordinary that William Windsor named his son Louis after one of the greatest criminals of late empire and yet has since gone on to say the monarchy is “very much not a racist family”.

The atrocities of the late British empire – from concentration camps in Malaysia to castrations in Kenya – were quietly ignored. The decorative function of the monarchy was always intended to mask the violence of the state, and Philip played a vital role in bringing that screen to life in the 20th century.

If modern nations are imagined communities convened by the media and feudal states were family affairs, then the new relationship he arranged fused the one with the other, giving birth to a gaudy heritage of Churchillism, imperial revisionism, Thatcherism and, most recently, Brexit.

Of course this relationship was always tense. But it was Diana who briefly mastered it, before it killed her. As Anthony Barnett has argued in his book ‘The Lure of Greatness’, she transformed herself into the first celebrity populist, who Trump obsessed over.

Now, the godfather of Anglo-British nationalism has died just as it enters a crisis, with riots in Northern Ireland as Loyalists realise the risk of Ireland uniting, elections in Scotland likely to advance the movement for independence, the Harry-and-Meghan rift and a deep loss of faith in the British ruling class.

And so we can expect the institutions of the Anglo-British nation to desperately peddle their usual message. The BBC’s Nicholas Witchell, a wibbling belligerent of monarchical propaganda, is already prostrating himself on television. Tomorrow, the tabloids will smear themselves in red, white and blue. Conservative politicians and the Labour figures who like to hide behind them will bellow mournful tears of sorrow.

But the truth is that 99-year-olds die, and their eras dissipate.

TV and tabloids are no longer the vivid and exciting formats they once were. They’ve been replaced with social media and streaming websites, which have formed different kinds of audience: audiences who aren’t amazed simply to be allowed to watch the affairs of state, but insist on participating in them; audiences who it’s much harder to bind into national borders and tell which ‘we’ they belong to. Audiences who, through their connections with each other, find their understandings of the world start to shift. Audiences who, in the case of Netflix’s ‘The Crown’ are now able to access a less propagandised version of their history than the British press presents.

Harry and Meghan’s split from the royal family was driven by this divide: they wouldn’t tolerate being bound into the toxic racism of tabloid Britain, and instead launched themselves as a transatlantic king and queen of Instagram. And they represent a generation. Anglo-British nationalism has largely failed to make the leap into modern media. For younger generations on the UK’s periphery, Scottish, Welsh, and Irish or Northern Irish identities are more common. And for England, who knows?

Anglo-British nationalism was already waning. Today, its godfather passed away. And once its mother has gone, who knows how long it will survive?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:17 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

Comparatively nobody dies each year from road crashes (38,000 www.asirt.org/safe-travel/road-safety-facts/ ) but hundreds of billions have been spent on safer cars and roads.

Comparatively nobody dies in nuclear wars (214,000 www.newsweek.com/how-many-people-died-hiroshima-nagasaki-japan-second-
world-war-1522276 ) but trillions have been spent to prevent more nuclear war deaths. https://armscontrolcenter.org/issues/security-spending/nuclear-weapons
-spending/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:20 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.
6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.

That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.

But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.

Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.

Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

Well, there it is. 6ix says it, so it has to be true.

Ignore science. Ignore facts. Just tell yourself whatever story you feel good about. That's the way to arrive at the conclusions your media predetermines.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:30 AM

I'm not ignoring science.

You're following people who are bending it to their will.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 11:05 AM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.
6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.

That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.

But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.

Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.

Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.

Except all of those "excess deaths".

Old people tend to die off at a steady rate, unless something pushes them off the ledge faster.

Well, something pushed a LOT of old people off the ledge faster, and it wasn't the vaccine.

You're so smart about a lot of things, and so emotionally driven by a few.

Not that I think you'll take notice of reality because I point it out ONE MORE TIME, but ... hope springs eternal.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 1:09 PM

I think it's time Canada revisited our connection with the Crown. Think it's time to toss them out.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 1:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.
6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.
That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.

But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.

Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.

Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

Except all of those "excess deaths".

Old people tend to die off at a steady rate, unless something pushes them off the ledge faster.

Well, something pushed a LOT of old people off the ledge faster, and it wasn't the vaccine.

You're so smart about a lot of things, and so emotionally driven by a few.

Not that I think you'll take notice of reality because I point it out ONE MORE TIME, but ... hope springs eternal.

Excess deaths from excessive suicide and murder? And isolation of elderly, from friends and family?

Those are not from Covid, but from from the overreaction of lockdowns.

Lockdowns caused the excess deaths, not covid.

Libtards caused the lackdowns, Libtards caused the excess deaths.

LIBTARDS CAUSE DEATH.

38% increase of suicide, just because of lockdown. Skyrocketing murder rates.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 1:57 PM

WHOZIT

Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
I think it's time Canada revisited our connection with the Crown. Think it's time to toss them out.

At least you're not stuck with Biden, he's insane...and a perv.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 2:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.
6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.

That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.

But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.

Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.

Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.
Except all of those "excess deaths".

Old people tend to die off at a steady rate, unless something pushes them off the ledge faster.

Well, something pushed a LOT of old people off the ledge faster, and it wasn't the vaccine.

You're so smart about a lot of things, and so emotionally driven by a few.

Not that I think you'll take notice of reality because I point it out ONE MORE TIME, but ... hope springs eternal.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

I'd say the exact same thing about your response to this the last year.

I'm never changing my mind about any of this. I'm right.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 3:25 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
I think it's time Canada revisited our connection with the Crown. Think it's time to toss them out.

Why?

I've never understood the relationship between the Crown and its various loyal democracies, not even Britain's.

As I understand it, the Monarchy has functional role in British politics: Altho Britain has a Constitution (written and unwritten), elections, a Parliament, Prime Minister and Supreme Court, the Crown (in some fashion) can supersede all of that. I know this came up on some matter relating to Brexit (I think it was about proproguing Parliament) and once it has wrung its way thru Parliament and the Supreme Court there was a real question as to whether the Queen would assent to the decision ... or something like that ... but in the end she chose not to change the judgment. And I know the Crown owns a lot of land which generates revenues for (among other things) maintenance of the Royal family.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_land

But none of this applies to Canada, right? Canada has its own Constitution, correct? Crown does not hold Canadian lands? Taxes don't go to Britain? Queen (or King) can't supersede Parliament and the Canadian Supreme Court? Britain can't determine Canadian foreign policy? (I thought that was the USA's CIA anyway.)

So aside from maybe having an image of the Queen on your currency (and I'm not sure you een have that anymore) and a residual fondness for the monarchy, what does the British Royal Family have to do with Canada, and Canadians?

Just curious how you see it, and explain how this works.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 3:39 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
SIX: Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.
Good. You should. It's a valid argument.
But do check your hypocrisy.

SECOND: 6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.

SIX: That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.

You also claimed that the virus was a hoax. Let's not forgt that.

Quote:
SIX: But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.
Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.
Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

SIGNY: Except all of those "excess deaths".
Old people tend to die off at a steady rate, unless something pushes them off the ledge faster.
Well, something pushed a LOT of old people off the ledge faster, and it wasn't the vaccine.
You're so smart about a lot of things, and so emotionally driven by a few.
Not that I think you'll take notice of reality because I point it out ONE MORE TIME, but ... hope springs eternal.

JSF: Excess deaths from excessive suicide and murder? And isolation of elderly, from friends and family?
Those are not from Covid, but from from the overreaction of lockdowns.
Lockdowns caused the excess deaths, not covid.
Libtards caused the lackdowns, Libtards caused the excess deaths.
LIBTARDS CAUSE DEATH.
38% increase of suicide, just because of lockdown. Skyrocketing murder rates.

Baloney. I PERSONALLY know two elderly people who died OF COVID. Not because of "isolation" and NOT because of "suicide" but because they were elderly and frail ... and they didn't die until after they got sick with Covid.

A lot of the early deaths were of the elderly (a fact that SIX was cheering on, because he hates "boomers") and that was long before the economic and social effects of lockowns took hold, and way before a vaccine was in the picture.

I don't know where you get this delusion from, that the only "real" problem with Covid-19 was the lockdowns. A lot of elderly people died from Covid. SIX was even cheering it on, and (in a backhand kind of way) recognizing the event.

You think mother nature is so benign ... or human ingenuity so altruistic ... that a real shit sandwhich can't evolve/be developed?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 4:53 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
I think it's time Canada revisited our connection with the Crown. Think it's time to toss them out.

Why?

I've never understood the relationship between the Crown and its various loyal democracies, not even Britain's.

As I understand it, the Monarchy has functional role in British politics: Altho Britain has a Constitution (written and unwritten), elections, a Parliament, Prime Minister and Supreme Court, the Crown (in some fashion) can supersede all of that. I know this came up on some matter relating to Brexit (I think it was about proproguing Parliament) and once it has wrung its way thru Parliament and the Supreme Court there was a real question as to whether the Queen would assent to the decision ... or something like that ... but in the end she chose not to change the judgment. And I know the Crown owns a lot of land which generates revenues for (among other things) maintenance of the Royal family.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_land

But none of this applies to Canada, right? Canada has its own Constitution, correct? Crown does not hold Canadian lands? Taxes don't go to Britain? Queen (or King) can't supersede Parliament and the Canadian Supreme Court? Britain can't determine Canadian foreign policy? (I thought that was the USA's CIA anyway.)

So aside from maybe having an image of the Queen on your currency (and I'm not sure you een have that anymore) and a residual fondness for the monarchy, what does the British Royal Family have to do with Canada, and Canadians?

Just curious how you see it, and explain how this works.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

Canada is still part of the Commonwealth. So there is that, which means we are obliged to help out various other Commonwealth Nations if they need it.

Yes, we have our own Constitution and it was brought back to Canada by Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. The Crown has no control over anything that happens on Canadian soil. The Canadian government(Federal) runs everything.

Yes, we do. Her face is on the $20 and still scattered on some coinage, like the quarter.

My personal feeling is that we are long past the Colonial stage and we don't need a figure head coming over here. It's just show and we, meaning the Canadian taxpayer has to foot the bill for them being here and for however long they stay. I find their visits to patronizing.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 5:13 PM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Quote:
Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

You must think all medical people are stupid - that nobody can tell a COVID-19 death from a heart attack death from a broken leg and sepsis death from a diabetic death from a kidney failure death from a cancer death.

In fact, ALL causes of death before AND after COVID-19 are completely bogus because doctors and MEs and pathologists and coroners are all just that stupid. And they've all been pushing sheer fantasies over all these decades.

Cause of death? PIFFLE!! There ain't no stinkin' cause of death ever!

Right?

That said, 'age' isn't a diagnosis or a cause of death. But the cause of death hasn't been released.

Quote:
At 99 years old, the duke had been hospitalized several times throughout recent years for various illnesses, but his most recent stay was his longest. Philip was admitted to the private King Edward VII hospital on February 16 after feeling under the weather and ended up spending a month there, Reuters reported. He was given treatment for an unspecified illness, but Buckingham Palace noted it was not related to COVID-19.

During the extended hospital stay, he was treated for an infection, Buckingham Palace later revealed.

This could have been a bedsore (now called a pressure sore), an infection due to an indwelling urinary catheter, or an infection in an IV line, or pneumonia due to shallow, slow breathing over time.

Quote:
Nearly two weeks into his stay, the duke was transferred to St. Bartholomew’s Hospital for cardiac treatment for a pre-existing heart condition, according to the Telegraph.

Whatever his 'preexistinge' heart condition was, it was something he - obviously - already had. Perhaps it was CHF or atrial fibrillation.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 5:19 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
SIX: Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.
Good. You should. It's a valid argument.
But do check your hypocrisy.

SECOND: 6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.

SIX: That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.
You also claimed that the virus was a hoax. Let's not forgt that.

Quote:
SIX: But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.
Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.
Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

SIGNY: Except all of those "excess deaths".
Old people tend to die off at a steady rate, unless something pushes them off the ledge faster.
Well, something pushed a LOT of old people off the ledge faster, and it wasn't the vaccine.
You're so smart about a lot of things, and so emotionally driven by a few.
Not that I think you'll take notice of reality because I point it out ONE MORE TIME, but ... hope springs eternal.

JSF: Excess deaths from excessive suicide and murder? And isolation of elderly, from friends and family?
Those are not from Covid, but from from the overreaction of lockdowns.
Lockdowns caused the excess deaths, not covid.
Libtards caused the lackdowns, Libtards caused the excess deaths.
LIBTARDS CAUSE DEATH.
38% increase of suicide, just because of lockdown. Skyrocketing murder rates.
Baloney. I PERSONALLY know two elderly people who died OF COVID. Not because of "isolation" and NOT because of "suicide" but because they were elderly and frail ... and they didn't die until after they got sick with Covid.

A lot of the early deaths were of the elderly (a fact that SIX was cheering on, because he hates "boomers") and that was long before the economic and social effects of lockowns took hold, and way before a vaccine was in the picture.

I don't know where you get this delusion from, that the only "real" problem with Covid-19 was the lockdowns. A lot of elderly people died from Covid. SIX was even cheering it on, and (in a backhand kind of way) recognizing the event.

You think mother nature is so benign ... or human ingenuity so altruistic ... that a real shit sandwhich can't evolve/be developed?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

I was either cheering it on, or I said it was a hoax. You can't have it both ways.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 5:27 PM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Quote:
I was either cheering it on, or I said it was a hoax. You can't have it both ways.

No Jack, YOU can't have it 2 ways. People are just pointing out that you tried.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 5:32 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:
I was either cheering it on, or I said it was a hoax. You can't have it both ways.
No Jack, YOU can't have it 2 ways. People are just pointing out that you tried.

I was never cheering it on. I always said it was bullshit.

Don't conflate two separate issues.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 5:35 PM

Oh...

I also never used the word "hoax".

And I never said "FUCK YEAH! OLD PEOPLE ARE DYING!!!".

Let's try to keep hyperbole out of this discussion too, m'kay?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 7:08 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.

Good. You should. It's a valid argument.

But do check your hypocrisy.
6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.
That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.

But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.

Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.

Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

Except all of those "excess deaths".

Old people tend to die off at a steady rate, unless something pushes them off the ledge faster.

Well, something pushed a LOT of old people off the ledge faster, and it wasn't the vaccine.

You're so smart about a lot of things, and so emotionally driven by a few.

Not that I think you'll take notice of reality because I point it out ONE MORE TIME, but ... hope springs eternal.
Excess deaths from excessive suicide and murder? And isolation of elderly, from friends and family?

Those are not from Covid, but from from the overreaction of lockdowns.

Lockdowns caused the excess deaths, not covid.

Libtards caused the lackdowns, Libtards caused the excess deaths.

LIBTARDS CAUSE DEATH.

38% increase of suicide, just because of lockdown. Skyrocketing murder rates.

To finish, all of the Cancer deaths resulting from cancelled cancer removal surgeries, which were declared "elective" and prohibited during the Fake Bed Shortage - which never happened in 2020.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 7:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.
You must think all medical people are stupid - that nobody can tell a COVID-19 death from a heart attack death from a broken leg and sepsis death from a diabetic death from a kidney failure death from a cancer death.

In fact, ALL causes of death before AND after COVID-19 are completely bogus because doctors and MEs and pathologists and coroners are all just that stupid. And they've all been pushing sheer fantasies over all these decades.

Wow.
Even you accidentally swerved into the truth of reality.

This is rich.

Of course, you forgot to mention that medical people are so stupid that they cannot tell a Covid-19 death from a decapitation, or from 3 bullets in the chest. Funny how even lay folk can understand those, yet you cannot up until now.

Welcome to the Real World.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 7:22 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
I think it's time Canada revisited our connection with the Crown. Think it's time to toss them out.
Why?

I've never understood the relationship between the Crown and its various loyal democracies, not even Britain's.

As I understand it, the Monarchy has functional role in British politics: Altho Britain has a Constitution (written and unwritten), elections, a Parliament, Prime Minister and Supreme Court, the Crown (in some fashion) can supersede all of that. I know this came up on some matter relating to Brexit (I think it was about proproguing Parliament) and once it has wrung its way thru Parliament and the Supreme Court there was a real question as to whether the Queen would assent to the decision ... or something like that ... but in the end she chose not to change the judgment. And I know the Crown owns a lot of land which generates revenues for (among other things) maintenance of the Royal family.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_land

But none of this applies to Canada, right? Canada has its own Constitution, correct? Crown does not hold Canadian lands? Taxes don't go to Britain? Queen (or King) can't supersede Parliament and the Canadian Supreme Court? Britain can't determine Canadian foreign policy? (I thought that was the USA's CIA anyway.)

So aside from maybe having an image of the Queen on your currency (and I'm not sure you een have that anymore) and a residual fondness for the monarchy, what does the British Royal Family have to do with Canada, and Canadians?

Just curious how you see it, and explain how this works.
Canada is still part of the Commonwealth. So there is that, which means we are obliged to help out various other Commonwealth Nations if they need it.

Yes, we have our own Constitution and it was brought back to Canada by Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. The Crown has no control over anything that happens on Canadian soil. The Canadian government(Federal) runs everything.

Yes, we do. Her face is on the $20 and still scattered on some coinage, like the quarter.

My personal feeling is that we are long past the Colonial stage and we don't need a figure head coming over here. It's just show and we, meaning the Canadian taxpayer has to foot the bill for them being here and for however long they stay. I find their visits to patronizing.

Can you describe any differences between Canada and Australia? What other Commonwealths are there? Are your obligations in writing, codified?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 7:39 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
SIX: Everybody is making the argument defending the vaccine that I was making about the virus the whole time.
Good. You should. It's a valid argument.
But do check your hypocrisy.

SECOND: 6ix, you were claiming the virus hasn't killing enough people to matter, since the world is overpopulated.

SIX: That is AN arrangement I made. Look at the population clock today. I assure you that it's still MUCH larger than it was at this time last year when this all started.
You also claimed that the virus was a hoax. Let's not forgt that.
Quote:
SIX: But that's NOT the argument I'm talking about here.
Prince Phillip didn't die because of the vaccine. He died because he was 99 years old.
Now apply that to all the old people who died last year from everything that wasn't Covid, and nearly nobody died of Covid at all.

SIGNY: Except all of those "excess deaths".
Old people tend to die off at a steady rate, unless something pushes them off the ledge faster.
Well, something pushed a LOT of old people off the ledge faster, and it wasn't the vaccine.
You're so smart about a lot of things, and so emotionally driven by a few.
Not that I think you'll take notice of reality because I point it out ONE MORE TIME, but ... hope springs eternal.

JSF: Excess deaths from excessive suicide and murder? And isolation of elderly, from friends and family?
Those are not from Covid, but from from the overreaction of lockdowns.
Lockdowns caused the excess deaths, not covid.
Libtards caused the lackdowns, Libtards caused the excess deaths.
LIBTARDS CAUSE DEATH.
38% increase of suicide, just because of lockdown. Skyrocketing murder rates.
Baloney. I PERSONALLY know two elderly people who died OF COVID. Not because of "isolation" and NOT because of "suicide" but because they were elderly and frail ... and they didn't die until after they got sick with Covid.

A lot of the early deaths were of the elderly (a fact that SIX was cheering on, because he hates "boomers") and that was long before the economic and social effects of lockowns took hold, and way before a vaccine was in the picture.

I don't know where you get this delusion from, that the only "real" problem with Covid-19 was the lockdowns. A lot of elderly people died from Covid.

I'm sorry, but you may have conflated 2 different posts or opinions.

There is little argument that Covid did kill some elderly. Governors of NY, NJ, MI effectively used Covid to kill off thousands of elderly in nursing homes and retirement centers.
To see what the actual inherent rate of Covid death for elderly was, look at how FL handled it - with the largest, most concentrated, most vulnerable elderly population in America.

But, the subject brought up was excess deaths. The "excess" deaths of NY, NJ, MI, CA should not be co-mingled with the greatly mitigated deaths of FL.
Can you show FL has a great many "excess" deaths, not accounted by suicide, murder?

The elderly deaths during the early stages of the "pandemic" can not really be attributed to loneliness for a month or so, "until we flatten the curve" or whatever sombnambulistic pablum was proffered.
The detachment, isolation, forced separation from family, friends for many months DID have negative effects on elderly deaths.

Actual temporary lockdowns would not have had the same effects on suicide, fostering riots thru BLM/Antifag, murders, and elderly inactivity. Extended, perpetual neverending Lockdowns do.

I would be highly surprised to heard that the skyrocketing suicide rate was surging the first few weeks of lockdown, rather than the extended periods of unending lockdowns and isolation.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 10, 2021 8:04 PM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Quote:
Of course, you forgot to mention that medical people are so stupid that they cannot tell a Covid-19 death from a decapitation, or from 3 bullets in the chest. Funny how even lay folk can understand those, yet you cannot up until now.

Welcome to the Real World.

Well, YOU apparently can't tell the difference between a 'cause of death' as stated on a death certificate, and some random piece of gossip from somewhere, or between one random piece of gossip and the notion that everything everywhere is wrong.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, April 11, 2021 12:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
I think it's time Canada revisited our connection with the Crown. Think it's time to toss them out.
Why?

I've never understood the relationship between the Crown and its various loyal democracies, not even Britain's.

As I understand it, the Monarchy has functional role in British politics: Altho Britain has a Constitution (written and unwritten), elections, a Parliament, Prime Minister and Supreme Court, the Crown (in some fashion) can supersede all of that. I know this came up on some matter relating to Brexit (I think it was about proproguing Parliament) and once it has wrung its way thru Parliament and the Supreme Court there was a real question as to whether the Queen would assent to the decision ... or something like that ... but in the end she chose not to change the judgment. And I know the Crown owns a lot of land which generates revenues for (among other things) maintenance of the Royal family.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_land

But none of this applies to Canada, right? Canada has its own Constitution, correct? Crown does not hold Canadian lands? Taxes don't go to Britain? Queen (or King) can't supersede Parliament and the Canadian Supreme Court? Britain can't determine Canadian foreign policy? (I thought that was the USA's CIA anyway.)

So aside from maybe having an image of the Queen on your currency (and I'm not sure you een have that anymore) and a residual fondness for the monarchy, what does the British Royal Family have to do with Canada, and Canadians?

Just curious how you see it, and explain how this works.
Canada is still part of the Commonwealth. So there is that, which means we are obliged to help out various other Commonwealth Nations if they need it.

Yes, we have our own Constitution and it was brought back to Canada by Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. The Crown has no control over anything that happens on Canadian soil. The Canadian government(Federal) runs everything.

Yes, we do. Her face is on the $20 and still scattered on some coinage, like the quarter.

My personal feeling is that we are long past the Colonial stage and we don't need a figure head coming over here. It's just show and we, meaning the Canadian taxpayer has to foot the bill for them being here and for however long they stay. I find their visits to patronizing.
Can you describe any differences between Canada and Australia? What other Commonwealths are there? Are your obligations in writing, codified?

To answer your questions JSF, there are 52 member states in the Commonwealth of Nations.

From what I've read Australia seems to have closer ties to the British Crown than Canada.

IF you would go and read about the Commonwealth you would see that it is a intergovernmental association which means that it serves the needs of its member governments and citizens in political, economic and social development. That is its primary mandate. It also provides a forum for deliberation, problem solving and consensus decision making for any action needed to be taken by the Commonwealth.

This is all written down most likely in a treaty.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, April 11, 2021 5:53 AM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Apparntly, the Commonwealth nations have no FORMAL obligations to each other. In order to be a Commonwealth nation, the prospective member must recognize the Monarch as the head of the Commonwealth (but who has no decision-making authority, that resides in the Secretariat) and use English as the common language. There is some verbiage in there about recognizing human rights.

Some of the Commonwealth Nations accept the British monarch a their actual ruler. Others nations have their own monarchies and others are republics.

It's not a military alliance (like NATO), not a trade organization (like WTO), not a political union (like the EU), does not collect taxes or fees or maintain an army, and - quite honestly- I can't think of a single decision in the past 30 years that the "Commonwealth" has made collectively, considering that some of its members (India and Pakistan, for example) are engaged in active hostilities against each other.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, April 13, 2021 5:39 PM

Wiki sez there are 54 Nations in the Commonwealth.

Fascinating subject. I had no idea.

Does the commonwealth include any "Indians" or Native American or First Peoples Nations? It would seem not, due to the English speaking requirement.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, April 13, 2021 5:43 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
Of course, you forgot to mention that medical people are so stupid that they cannot tell a Covid-19 death from a decapitation, or from 3 bullets in the chest. Funny how even lay folk can understand those, yet you cannot up until now.

Welcome to the Real World.
Well, YOU apparently can't tell the difference between a 'cause of death' as stated on a death certificate, and some random piece of gossip from somewhere, or between one random piece of gossip and the notion that everything everywhere is wrong.

Are you saying that the cases where Cause of Death is listed as Covid while the head is decapitated are not examples of stupid people determining Cause of Death?
Or are you saying that CDC Experts on Cause of Death are too stupid to correctly read the Death Certificates?
Or a little bit of each, depending upon jurisdiction?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, April 13, 2021 7:49 PM

^ Post of the Day.

--------------------------------------------------

Imagine the hypocrisy of a government who will allow businesses to card people to get a job or buy groceries, but won't card people to vote in elections and gives millions of non-citizens free money from taxpayers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:38 PM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Quote:
Are you saying that the cases where Cause of Death is listed as Covid while the head is decapitated are not examples of stupid people determining Cause of Death?

No, I'm saying you're lying.

Prove to me you're not.

A copy of an official Death Certificate is required, and not some random piece of gossip from some random website about some information they claim came from somewhere.

ETA: In all the times you've brought that ridiculous claim - and I've read roughly a half-dozen of them - you have never once provided a link proving what you claim. And your inability to provide a link is consistent, DESPITE the fact that I've repeatedly challenged you for one. So why do you keep repeating unsubstantiated ridiculous rumors AS IF they were meaningful? Because they're not.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 1:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Wiki sez there are 54 Nations in the Commonwealth.

Fascinating subject. I had no idea.

Does the commonwealth include any "Indians" or Native American or First Peoples Nations? It would seem not, due to the English speaking requirement.

Stop being obtuse. IF you had really read the article you would have seen that most member states are FORMER British colonies. Like Australia and New Zealand, India.

So here is something for you to think on. IF the Americans hadn't broken away from the British crown over 200 years ago, the US would probably be in the Commonwealth and shoulder to shoulder with Canada and the rest of colonies.

Also we are described as Nations in the US, so treaties could be made with us for over land and resources. Treaties which the US government is very good at breaking.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
Also we are described as Nations in the US, so treaties could be made with us for over land and resources. Treaties which the US government is very good at breaking.

I have not had time to fully read up, but this is also interesting.
Nations is only used in United States?
What is the normal term elsewhere? I don't like using the term Reservation.

In most of USA, Native Americans seem to state "Nation" with a lot of pride, or indignation. I didn't know it was only used here.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 4:13 PM

Still spreading lies, Russian troll?

You're overdue for a self-inflicted fatal head wound. Get busy, you piece of shit.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 4:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
Are you saying that the cases where Cause of Death is listed as Covid while the head is decapitated are not examples of stupid people determining Cause of Death?
No, I'm saying you're lying.

Prove to me you're not.

A copy of an official Death Certificate is required, and not some random piece of gossip from some random website about some information they claim came from somewhere.

Interesting.
You expect me to obtain copies of Death Certificates where Investigative Journalists cannot.
Even when the Journalist point out that he deceased had tested negative, the idiot filling out the Death Certificate indicated that didn't matter, the patient fit the symptoms.
But all of the Death Certificates obtained had the Cause of Death redacted, to cover up the corruption.

And all of the people I hear on the radio explaining how much of a backlog there is at the Court from families suing (and paying lots of cost for real autopsy, etc) to get the Cause of Death corrected from the fake covid - those people must be all lying, it must be all a conspiracy to make 1kiki look stupid.

https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/2020/06/17/brown-count
y-coronavirus-deaths-green-bay-mom-daughter-die-covid-19/3175263001/

Quote:
The county redacted the cause of death for 28 people out of 32, making it difficult to know how the virus affected them in their final days.

Quote:
According to one report, the family of a 55-year-old woman was concerned about something being listed on her death certificate because "she had reportedly been negative." The doctor would not change the certificate because "her symptoms fit …." The rest of the sentence was blacked out.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 5:18 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
Also we are described as Nations in the US, so treaties could be made with us for over land and resources. Treaties which the US government is very good at breaking.
I have not had time to fully read up, but this is also interesting.
Nations is only used in United States?
What is the normal term elsewhere? I don't like using the term Reservation.

In most of USA, Native Americans seem to state "Nation" with a lot of pride, or indignation. I didn't know it was only used here.

Nations is also used in Canada as in First NATIONS. Here there is pride in the use of First Nations. That came into being in the 70s, to denote that we were here FIRST.

Hate to do this to JSF but reservation is used in Canada still some but it seems to mostly have been shortened to reserve. The term First Nations Land is also used up here.

I can only guess at where the indignation comes from down there but there is a lot bad blood between the tribes and the US government. 200 years worth.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 6:01 PM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

JSF - The reporting is EXTREMELY scrambled.

The only reason the paper claims that these deaths are somehow related to COVID-19 (in what the paper admits is an UNKNOWN way) is because correspondence associated with those records mentions COVID-19 (in an UNKNOWN way).

Quote:
... the records request and correspondence with officials referenced COVID-19- related deaths ...

How exactly are they related? The paper could have included the correspondence to demonstrate that point, but after going on, and on, and on, about nothing, it apparently couldn't spare a few words for a few quotes from those papers.

COVID-19 was mentioned somewhere in some way. That makes it 'related'. But my workplace, for example, having been the subject of many, many public records requests, was instructed by the lawyers to include ALL records that even mention the words, even if they were mentioned in the exclusionary. For example, if there was a request for information about ABC, we included records that said "looked at 123 but NOT ABC". Because TECHNICALLY, since it mentions ABC, it's 'related'.

Quote:
... all but confirming ...

but, according to the paper, not exactly confirming ...

Quote:
they are among the 39 deaths in Brown County linked to the disease caused by the coronavirus.

But you can't know what most of the deaths were officially caused by. Why? Because

Quote:
The county redacted the cause of death for 28 people out of 32, making it difficult to know how the virus affected them in their final days.

Among the questions were

Quote:
55-year-old woman, 54303: Family was concerned about something

That's a lesson in implication, isn't it? Why couldn't the paper state what that 'something' was?

Quote:
being listed on her death certificate because "she had reportedly

by an unknown person at an unknown time who may or may not have had accurate information - in other words - anonymous gossip.

Quote:
been negative."

Quote:
92-year-old woman, 54162: Manner of death labeled accident after an "unwitnessed fall."

Who may still have died of COVID-19, because even people who've had accidents can die of something NOT the accident. For example, a relative of mine died of hospital-acquired pneumonia after falling and breaking their hip. According to you should the Cause of Death NOT have been listed as pneumonia, because they fell first?

So

WHERE'S THAT DECAPITATION LISTED AS A COVID-19 DEATH, JSF?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 7:33 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Still spreading lies, Russian troll?

You're overdue for a self-inflicted fatal head wound. Get busy, you piece of shit.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 9:47 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
Also we are described as Nations in the US, so treaties could be made with us for over land and resources. Treaties which the US government is very good at breaking.
I have not had time to fully read up, but this is also interesting.
Nations is only used in United States?
What is the normal term elsewhere? I don't like using the term Reservation.

In most of USA, Native Americans seem to state "Nation" with a lot of pride, or indignation. I didn't know it was only used here.

Nations is also used in Canada as in First NATIONS. Here there is pride in the use of First Nations. That came into being in the 70s, to denote that we were here FIRST.

Hate to do this to JSF but reservation is used in Canada still some but it seems to mostly have been shortened to reserve. The term First Nations Land is also used up here.

Thanks for the info and insight.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, April 14, 2021 9:58 PM