Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM

THG

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.

---

For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM

THG

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.

---

For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:


OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM

THG

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.

---

For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.

---

For every post you make in here of Trump losing a case initiated by an Obama/Clinton/Biden* appointee and never bother updating, there are 10 more that have been appealed in a higher court.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM

THG

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.

---

For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.

---

For every post you make in here of Trump losing a case initiated by an Obama/Clinton/Biden* appointee and never bother updating, there are 10 more that have been appealed in a higher court.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
'Both reasonable and proportionate': Trump ordered to pay $800,000 in legal fees over failed Steele dossier lawsuit

A British judge sitting in London on Thursday ordered President Donald Trump to pay some $800,000 to a private intelligence company owned by former MI6 spy Christopher Steele over a data protection lawsuit which was dismissed by a different judge last year.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/both-reasonable-and-proportion
ate-trump-ordered-to-pay-800-000-in-legal-fees-over-failed-steele-dossier-lawsuit/ar-AA1Cjok4?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=0f36254067b54106dbb032e8a8d17180&ei=104

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Appeals court refuses to halt an order for the rehiring of thousands of fired federal workers

WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court in California has refused to halt a judge’s order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of federal workers who were let go in mass firings.

A split 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel turned back an emergency motion late Wednesday to pause the order from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a case brought by labor unions and nonprofits as Republican President Donald Trump moves to dramatically downsize the federal workforce. Alsup is one of two judges who found legal problems with the way the firings of probationary workers were carried out.

Two of the three judges on the panel ruled against the request for an emergency stay. The dissenting judge said the government had a strong argument against reinstating the workers.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeals-court-refuses-to-halt-an-ord
er-for-the-rehiring-of-thousands-of-fired-federal-workers/ar-AA1BLTPh?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=95d016bd9b324cc88256c043441ad072&ei=24

---

Trump suffers another loss.

T

Quote:

---

The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a federal judge’s sweeping order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of fired federal employees, marking an early legal win for the president’s plan to slash government bureaucracy.

In a brief, unsigned order, the high court sided with the administration and froze a March 13 injunction from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, who ordered six agencies to reinstate 16,000 recently hired probationary employees pending litigation over the legality of their mass terminations.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Appeals court refuses to halt an order for the rehiring of thousands of fired federal workers

WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court in California has refused to halt a judge’s order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of federal workers who were let go in mass firings.

A split 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel turned back an emergency motion late Wednesday to pause the order from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a case brought by labor unions and nonprofits as Republican President Donald Trump moves to dramatically downsize the federal workforce. Alsup is one of two judges who found legal problems with the way the firings of probationary workers were carried out.

Two of the three judges on the panel ruled against the request for an emergency stay. The dissenting judge said the government had a strong argument against reinstating the workers.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeals-court-refuses-to-halt-an-ord
er-for-the-rehiring-of-thousands-of-fired-federal-workers/ar-AA1BLTPh?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=95d016bd9b324cc88256c043441ad072&ei=24

---

Trump suffers another loss.

T

Quote:

---

The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a federal judge’s sweeping order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of fired federal employees, marking an early legal win for the president’s plan to slash government bureaucracy.

In a brief, unsigned order, the high court sided with the administration and froze a March 13 injunction from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, who ordered six agencies to reinstate 16,000 recently hired probationary employees pending litigation over the legality of their mass terminations.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
US Supreme Court upholds order to facilitate return of deportee sent to El Salvador in error

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/us-supreme-court-upholds-order-to
-facilitate-return-of-deportee-sent-to-el-salvador-in-error/ar-AA1CHFjn?ocid=BingNewsSerp

---

This is what you call, settled law. Trump loses with a 9-0 supreme court ruling. Now, it turns out two thirds of the others sent have no criminal records. Let's see what the courts do with that.

T

Quote:

---

The decision means the administration does not immediately have to try to return Abrego Garcia to the United States because a judge-imposed deadline has already expired, but it "should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps," the unsigned decision said.

The district court judge may have exceeded her authority in saying the government had to not just "facilitate" but also "effectuate" Abrego Garcia's return, the court added. The court has to "clarify its directive, with due regard to the deference owed to the executive branch in the conduct of foreign affairs," the court order said.

A Justice Department spokesman said in a statement that the Supreme Court decision recognized that "it is the exclusive prerogative of the president to conduct foreign affairs."

As a result, the ruling "illustrates that activist judges do not have the jurisdiction to seize control of the president's authority to conduct foreign policy," the spokesman added.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
This president is so corrupt it's hard to keep up with all the charges against him and his administration.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Oh.

It turns out there WAS a ruling. Just not one that Reuters wanted Ted to know about.

Here's what really happened...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-trump-adm
in-must-facilitate-release-kilmar-abrego-garcia-rcna200284

Quote:

---

The decision means the administration does not immediately have to try to return Abrego Garcia to the United States because a judge-imposed deadline has already expired, but it "should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps," the unsigned decision said.

The district court judge may have exceeded her authority in saying the government had to not just "facilitate" but also "effectuate" Abrego Garcia's return, the court added. The court has to "clarify its directive, with due regard to the deference owed to the executive branch in the conduct of foreign affairs," the court order said.

A Justice Department spokesman said in a statement that the Supreme Court decision recognized that "it is the exclusive prerogative of the president to conduct foreign affairs."

As a result, the ruling "illustrates that activist judges do not have the jurisdiction to seize control of the president's authority to conduct foreign policy," the spokesman added.

---

And all that above was a 9-0 vote.


Trump won. That's what actually happened.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

---

Quote:

---

The Supreme Court on Thursday required President Donald Trump’s administration to “facilitate” the return of a Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador but stopped short of requiring the government to return him to the United States.

---

Quote:

---

The court did not give the administration a deadline for when Abrego Garcia should be returned. The opinion was unsigned and no dissents were noted.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.

---

Tear em up...

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
We have rights in this country, even though that seems to bother Trump.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
We have rights in this country, even though that seems to bother Trump.

---

You and I have rights. Criminal illegal alien invaders do not.

Do be sure to keep up with all these court cases and witness how they all go the opposite way you want them to go, just like they always have up until this point.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Maine Wins Court Ruling Against Trump: Constitutional Threat

Knewz.com is reporting that U.S. District Court Judge John Woodcock Jr. recently ordered the U.S. Department of Agriculture to release federal funding for Maine's child nutrition program. The decision comes after Maine sued the USDA over its suspension of funds, claiming it was based on non-compliance with Title IX related to transgender athletes. Woodcock’s ruling requires the USDA to unfreeze these vital funds and prevents future freezes on Maine's federal funding without following legal procedures.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/maine-wins-court-ruling-agains
t-trump-constitutional-threat/ss-AA1DlSfQ?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=900472aa5b6c4ad69f8b79f490550d76&ei=14

---

Donald Trump, trying to take food away from children. He is a pig.

T