REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Trunp loses again in Court

POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 20:20
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 24075
PAGE 14 of 15

Friday, May 16, 2025 8:02 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

All I see is more hatred for America and Americans from Ted today.

That and a dead link to whatever clickbait he was trying to post.






That's because you're blind. I post here to expose America haters. It's you and your kind that is doing everything it can to tear it down.

And you can pretend you don't know what is in my post but I know better. It says it in big headlines you can't miss even without watching the video. The video is provided as proof. Something you mostly don't do because the facts don't usually favor what you want. And the link works just fine Gilligan. Haven't learned how to play a video yet, aye? Get a child to show you.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 19, 2025 7:20 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.





T


Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 19, 2025 7:37 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power



Very much looking forward to your follow up on how this one goes, Theodore.

SPOILER ALERT: When we never hear this topic brought up again by Ted 72 hours from now, we will know that it ultimately didn't go Ted's way. Just like the rest of these never, ever do.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 19, 2025 7:39 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

All I see is more hatred for America and Americans from Ted today.

That and a dead link to whatever clickbait he was trying to post.



That's because you're blind. I post here to expose America haters. It's you and your kind that is doing everything it can to tear it down.



I reject wholesale your entire outlook on life.

You are a low-IQ scumbag who hates America. You should leave. Now.

Don't procrastinate and just go. You're not going to like it here anymore.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 20, 2025 7:37 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 23, 2025 8:48 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power



Very much looking forward to your follow up on how this one goes, Theodore.

SPOILER ALERT: When we never hear this topic brought up again by Ted 72 hours from now, we will know that it ultimately didn't go Ted's way. Just like the rest of these never, ever do.








Your spoiler alert is an example of how you take losses for Trump and ignore them by saying something stupid and moving on. Your points are feckless. In this thread you never provide any evidence Trump hasn't lost, while nearly every time I post I produce evidence he has lost.

Too funny...

T


California Senator Alex Padilla foiled Republicans’ attempt to pass the SAVE Act this week. Sen. Padilla joins Marc Elias to discuss protecting voters’ information from DOGE, his experience expanding ballot access as California’s secretary of state and the work Senate Democrats



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 23, 2025 8:53 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/appeals-court-allows-trump-anti-144550761.ht
ml







It was filed in a Kentucky court. They shopped for a friendly judicial district to file. It will be overruled as it goes up the food chain. The right to collective bargaining has been settled into law. And you would be an idiot to think we should give up that right which protects us from government overreach. Doesn't that clash with all your other MAGA loving posts in the past? Sure it does.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 23, 2025 9:03 AM

THG


Poor Gilligan; he complained throughout Trumps failed 2020 election bid, that the election was stolen. Even though Trump lost all 63 court cases claiming it was stolen, because his lawyers could offer no evidence at all. Jack was livid. Since then, the republicans have tried and are trying, to rig elections in their favor.

What’s my larger point? Jack is a lie. No question, no debate. Trump is stealing from the average Amercian, Jack denies it. Trump is in the midst of a soft coup. Jack remains silent. Everything Jack has complained about in the past he is for with Trump. Jack is a lie.


T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 23, 2025 6:00 PM

THG


T


A Win Against Trump






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 23, 2025 6:15 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Nobody cares about your low-IQ headline parroting, monkey.

Keep losing, loser.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 26, 2025 4:46 PM

THG


‘Unconstitutional under any view': Judge enjoins entire Trump executive order targeting law firm that previously employed top Mueller lieutenant

A Washington, D.C., judge has fully blocked one of President Donald Trump‘s executive orders targeting disfavored law firms.

In late March, the 45th and 47th president signed an Executive Order entitled “Addressing Risks from Jenner & Block” which says the Chicago-based national law firm of Jenner & Block LLP has “abandoned the profession’s highest ideals, condoned partisan ‘lawfare,’ and abused its pro bono practice to engage in activities that undermine justice and the interests of the United States.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/unconstitutional-under-any-vie
w-judge-enjoins-entire-trump-executive-order-targeting-law-firm-that-previously-employed-top-mueller-lieutenant/ar-AA1Fwjdn?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=ab36089655e44591d1363ebe0e25feb6&ei=81




T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 26, 2025 5:00 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Who cares?

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 27, 2025 8:19 PM

THG



One way Trump has fucked up big time is he is acting like a dictator with everything and everyone. It makes it easy to show in court Trump is acting out of biases. "Systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment," and not for any other, legal reason.

T


Fed up judge issues SCATHING ruling against Trump


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 27, 2025 8:23 PM

THG


T

When the Trump Administration “wolf comes as a wolf” and violates the First Amendment rights of national public radio and violates Congress’ intent on setting up NPR and PBS, they are left with no choice but to run to federal court and stop it






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 27, 2025 11:45 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


BIG ARROW CLICKBAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Shut up, Ted.

Taxpayers will no longer fund Leftist propaganda. Nobody is telling them that they can't keep running their mouths and spewing bullshit. Just that they can do it on their own dime from now on.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 1:31 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.



T


Judge Chutkan STOPS Trump COLD in Musk-Backed Power Scheme





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 2:29 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Keep cheerleading against America and Americans and see where it gets you.

This will be overturned, just like everything else always is.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 6:56 PM

THG


Judges are getting very angry with Trump. That helps when judges hear other cases. Trump says it is because this or that, and the judges though recent experences with Trump know that is bullshit.

T


Judge Strikes Down Trump's Order Targeting Law Firm



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 6:57 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


That's great. We need more of this to rush these things up the food chain and get all the appeals out of the way so we can finally bury the Democratic Party once and for all.

I don't know why you all work so hard for free for Trump, but god bless ya.

Keep up the good work guys.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 8:22 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:


OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.





This is a big deal.

T


Judge Chutkan green lights a lawsuit challenging Trump’s “tyranny” and use of Musk/DOGE, while issuing a surprise ruling involving Trump himself.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 8:27 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Judge Chutkan green lights a lawsuit challenging Trump’s “tyranny” and use of Musk/DOGE, while issuing a surprise ruling involving Trump himself.



Oh. Do be sure to keep us up to date on this one, Ted.

Riveting, edge of your seat stuff. Truly.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 10:06 PM

THG


First let me say, I told you so. Big time, I told you so.

Trump is constantly being told by the federal courts he is breaking the law. And they are blocking what he is doing, again and again and again and again and so on. The man thinks he is a dictator. Everything he is doing adds up to being a slow coup. And he is at lighting speed, being shut down.

T


Trump TARIFFS declared UNLAWFUL by Court!!!

Stunning ruling by a federal court striking down Donald Trump’s tariffs against the world.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 10:46 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


You didn't tell anybody anything worth telling, and whatever clickbait you just posted means nothing.

Nobody cares, Ted.

You did that.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025 10:49 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

A three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade, a relatively low-profile court in Manhattan, stopped Trump’s global tariffs that he imposed citing emergency economic powers


Low-level scrub activist judges.

They will be curb stomped on appeal.

*yawn*

Next.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 29, 2025 9:04 AM

THG


Trump's only hope is if more than half of the Supreme Court is 100% corrupt.

T


Trump IN SHAMBLES as PERSONALLY Chosen Court BLOWS UP His PLAN

In shocking news, Trump's chosen court, the Court of International Trade, has just found his entire Tariff plan to be unconstitutional and blocked.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 29, 2025 11:45 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


I'm sure it did, Ted. I'm sure it did.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 29, 2025 12:32 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK




--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 29, 2025 5:00 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two


Striking Down Trump’s Tariffs Isn’t a Judicial Coup

Congress, not the executive branch, has the power to enact tariffs.

By Conor Friedersdorf | May 29, 2025, 10:09 AM ET

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/05/trump-tariffs-court-
rulings/682964
/

The debate over President Donald Trump’s tariffs often focuses on whether they are prudent. Defenders insist that Trump’s tariffs will help make America great again and boost national security. Critics counter that they’ll wreck the economy. But the strongest argument against the tariffs is actually that they are unlawful. Neither the Constitution nor any statute authorizes Trump to impose what he ordered.

Now, months after sticklers for the rule of law began making that argument, it has finally been vindicated: Yesterday, the United States Court of International Trade, the federal court with jurisdiction over civil actions related to tariffs, struck down almost all of Trump’s tariffs in a 49-page ruling. The decision includes a detailed discussion of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the 1977 law delegating increased power over trade to the president during national emergencies, which the White House had cited to support its moves. It concludes that the law does not authorize any of Trump’s tariff orders. https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf

Administration officials quickly challenged the ruling’s legitimacy. “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. “The judicial coup is out of control,” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller posted on social media. But their objections are dubious, not because the judiciary never overreaches, but because at least three features of this dispute make the argument for judicial overreach here especially weak.

First, the Constitution is clear: Article I delegates the tariff power to Congress, and Article II fails to vest that power in the presidency. So the Trump administration begins from a weak position. And the court’s ruling did not arrogate the tariff power to the judiciary, which might have warranted describing it as “a judicial coup.” It merely affirmed Congress’s power over tariffs. Americans need not fear a judicial dictatorship here. Congress can do whatever it likes. Indeed, it could pass a law reinstating all of Trump’s tariffs today without violating the court’s ruling. But Congress is extremely unlikely to do so, in part because Trump’s tariff policy clearly lacks public support; for example, a recent poll found that 63 percent of Americans disapprove of it.

Second, the plaintiffs in this particular lawsuit include the states of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, and Vermont––all democratically accountable entities in a federal system where states are meant to act as a check on unlawful exercises of federal power. All of those states asked the court to rule in this manner to vindicate their rights under the law. As Oregon’s attorney general put it, “We brought this case because the Constitution doesn’t give any president unchecked authority to upend the economy.” States controlled by both Republicans and Democrats routinely file lawsuits asking the judiciary to strike down purportedly unlawful actions by the president. There is bipartisan consensus that such judicial review is legitimate, not couplike, and such rulings have constrained presidents from both parties.

Third, when Congress created the Court of International Trade and later defined its jurisdiction, its precise intent was to create an arm of the judiciary that would exercise authority over trade disputes. Congress made a deliberate choice to alter an earlier law vesting that power in the Treasury Department, under the executive branch, and deliberately vested it in a court instead. To quote from the 1980 law that defined its powers, “The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced against the United States, its agencies, or its officers, that arises out of any law of the United States providing for tariffs.” Policing whether or not a tariff complies with the law and the Constitution is central, not peripheral, to the court’s ambit.

If the Trump administration kept its criticism of the judiciary to edge cases, where there is real doubt about how the Constitution separates powers, it could plausibly claim to be engaged in the sort of dispute that is inevitable when branches of the federal government are checking one another as intended. That it seeks to delegitimize even this ruling suggests contempt for any check on the power of the presidency, not principled opposition to judicial overreach.

The Constitution explicitly vests the tariff power in Congress, and wisely so: Empowering one person to impose taxes and pick economic winners and losers tends toward corruption and dictatorship. Going forward, Congress should set tariff policy itself, and impeach any president who tries to usurp its authority.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 29, 2025 8:38 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Striking Down Trump’s Tariffs Isn’t a Judicial Coup



Yes. It is.

And they will soon be ignored and dealt with accordingly.

Tick Tock

The world you thought you were living in 6 months ago is dead. Forever.

Get used to it.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 30, 2025 3:31 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


Justice Jackson’s Dissent in Maine Transgender Case Cites an Unlikely Authority — Justice Amy Coney Barrett

https://www.nysun.com/article/justice-jacksons-dissent-in-maine-transg
ender-case-cites-an-unlikely-authority-justice-amy-coney-barrett




Amy Coney Barrett BETRAYS Trump, SIDES With Liberals Over Trump Deportations




Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
and dealt with accordingly.



dealt with by the Supreme Amy that he appointed?


Trump administration has lost a shocking 96% of rulings in federal district courts so far this month, a new analysis shows. The rulings against the president came from judges across the ideological spectrum.

https://x.com/DemocracyDocket/status/1928090695505523076

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 1, 2025 3:34 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by second:

Striking Down Trump’s Tariffs Isn’t a Judicial Coup

Congress, not the executive branch, has the power to enact tariffs.

By Conor Friedersdorf | May 29, 2025, 10:09 AM ET

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/05/trump-tariffs-court-
rulings/682964
/

The debate over President Donald Trump’s tariffs often focuses on whether they are prudent. Defenders insist that Trump’s tariffs will help make America great again and boost national security. Critics counter that they’ll wreck the economy. But the strongest argument against the tariffs is actually that they are unlawful. Neither the Constitution nor any statute authorizes Trump to impose what he ordered.

Now, months after sticklers for the rule of law began making that argument, it has finally been vindicated: Yesterday, the United States Court of International Trade, the federal court with jurisdiction over civil actions related to tariffs, struck down almost all of Trump’s tariffs in a 49-page ruling. The decision includes a detailed discussion of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the 1977 law delegating increased power over trade to the president during national emergencies, which the White House had cited to support its moves. It concludes that the law does not authorize any of Trump’s tariff orders. https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf

Administration officials quickly challenged the ruling’s legitimacy. “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. “The judicial coup is out of control,” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller posted on social media. But their objections are dubious, not because the judiciary never overreaches, but because at least three features of this dispute make the argument for judicial overreach here especially weak.

First, the Constitution is clear: Article I delegates the tariff power to Congress, and Article II fails to vest that power in the presidency. So the Trump administration begins from a weak position. And the court’s ruling did not arrogate the tariff power to the judiciary, which might have warranted describing it as “a judicial coup.” It merely affirmed Congress’s power over tariffs. Americans need not fear a judicial dictatorship here. Congress can do whatever it likes. Indeed, it could pass a law reinstating all of Trump’s tariffs today without violating the court’s ruling. But Congress is extremely unlikely to do so, in part because Trump’s tariff policy clearly lacks public support; for example, a recent poll found that 63 percent of Americans disapprove of it.

Second, the plaintiffs in this particular lawsuit include the states of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, and Vermont––all democratically accountable entities in a federal system where states are meant to act as a check on unlawful exercises of federal power. All of those states asked the court to rule in this manner to vindicate their rights under the law. As Oregon’s attorney general put it, “We brought this case because the Constitution doesn’t give any president unchecked authority to upend the economy.” States controlled by both Republicans and Democrats routinely file lawsuits asking the judiciary to strike down purportedly unlawful actions by the president. There is bipartisan consensus that such judicial review is legitimate, not couplike, and such rulings have constrained presidents from both parties.

Third, when Congress created the Court of International Trade and later defined its jurisdiction, its precise intent was to create an arm of the judiciary that would exercise authority over trade disputes. Congress made a deliberate choice to alter an earlier law vesting that power in the Treasury Department, under the executive branch, and deliberately vested it in a court instead. To quote from the 1980 law that defined its powers, “The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced against the United States, its agencies, or its officers, that arises out of any law of the United States providing for tariffs.” Policing whether or not a tariff complies with the law and the Constitution is central, not peripheral, to the court’s ambit.

If the Trump administration kept its criticism of the judiciary to edge cases, where there is real doubt about how the Constitution separates powers, it could plausibly claim to be engaged in the sort of dispute that is inevitable when branches of the federal government are checking one another as intended. That it seeks to delegitimize even this ruling suggests contempt for any check on the power of the presidency, not principled opposition to judicial overreach.

The Constitution explicitly vests the tariff power in Congress, and wisely so: Empowering one person to impose taxes and pick economic winners and losers tends toward corruption and dictatorship. Going forward, Congress should set tariff policy itself, and impeach any president who tries to usurp its authority.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two





Here we go...

T


Supreme Court GEARS UP for MAJOR Rulings this WEEK



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 2, 2025 3:26 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
dealt with by the Supreme Amy that he appointed?


Trump administration has lost a shocking 96% of rulings in federal district courts so far this month, a new analysis shows. The rulings against the president came from judges across the ideological spectrum.



Tim doing his clickbait sthick after he's taken nothing but a year of hard financial losses, and some random twitter account called "Democracy Docket".

Not worried about any of that in the slightest.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 2, 2025 5:37 PM

THG


When Trump first went after law firms some capitulated. Big mistake; their best and biggest clients are walking away because they don't want pussies representing them.

These law firms should now sue because they were clearly blackmailed by Trump.

T


Trump’s Plan to Control Law Firms Just BLEW UP in His Face






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 2, 2025 5:57 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Complete horseshit. Just like every post you've made in the last 12 years.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:11 AM

THG


tick tock

T


Trump’s OWN Lawyers FORCE HIM into SUBMISSION






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:25 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Complete horseshit. Just like every post you've made in the last 12 years.






Laughing here Gilligan. The Trump administration has lost 96 percent of all their court cases since he took office. He has lost 26 of 27 cases in May alone.

You look like an ass saying otherwise. Plain and simple. It's like you’ve thrown in the towel. Super smart Jack is not so smart after all. In fact, you’ve never had a winning response to what I’ve posted. Why, because you’re a moron. You still haven’t learned you can’t look smart arguing against the facts.

I’m laughing in your face dip shit. For many years I've been laughing in your face.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 5, 2025 8:42 PM

THG


Laughing here Gilligan. The Trump administration has lost 96 percent of all their court cases since he took office. He has lost 26 of 27 cases in May alone. And here are 4 more.

T


Donald Trump Loses FOUR COURT CASES Within Hours!





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 5, 2025 9:31 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


So thirsty.

So desperate.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 6, 2025 4:21 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

I see you have a big fucking mouth in two non-related threads tonight, Ted, but you didn't reply to this one, didja?

Curious that, innit?








Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been returned from El Salvador Gilligan. What does that mean? It means I was right and you were wrong.

Remember, say something brilliant so that I no longer wish to return and post here ever again.

T


For The First Time, Trump Administration Facilitated The Return Of A Man They Wrongfully Deported!



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 6, 2025 5:23 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

I see you have a big fucking mouth in two non-related threads tonight, Ted, but you didn't reply to this one, didja?

Curious that, innit?








Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been returned from El Salvador Gilligan. What does that mean? It means I was right and you were wrong.

Remember, say something brilliant so that I no longer wish to return and post here ever again.

T


For The First Time, Trump Administration Facilitated The Return Of A Man They Wrongfully Deported!




You asked for it, you got it...

You are celebrating the re-invasion of a drug and human trafficking criminal illegal alien gang member, affiliated with a gang that is now considered a terror group, who will face his charges and will be immediately deported again.

Sounds pretty expensive for the US Taxpayer just so you can get your nut off for the day.

There is nothing to argue with you here Ted. This is just more proof of you being an idiot and/or that you hate America and American citizens. Same old shit, different day.


The only thing that has changed is just how low your bar is set in 2025. It was bad enough they had you blowing Liz and Dick Cheney out of desperation in 2024, now they've got you sucking on illegal alien Venezuelan gang member cock with glee.


By all means. Celebrate your little "win" here, if that's how you really perceive it, for whatever good that does you and your dead party. Whatever it takes, I suppose, so you don't slit your wrists at this point.



As for the "wrongfully deported" part, that hasn't made its way up to the Supreme Court yet. All the laws will be rewritten over the next 3 years and set in stone. Not only will it have been legal to deport him under the incoming major changes to immigration law you're going to witness soon, but they will also encompass 10's of millions more, including women and children. They're all going back home.




Three things happened with this illegal criminal's return. Nothing more, nothing less:

1. Ideologues like you with no ability for critical thinking finally got your first "happy" headline in weeks.

2. The majority of Americans on the other side will be enraged by this and will dig their heels in even harder against criminal illegal aliens.

3. The normies in the middle get to see, yet again, who the Democrats really care about and realize even more how good of a choice they made when they voted Not Democrat in 2024.



So yeah. Party up tonight. Such a major win for you personally, I'm sure.

Tell your non-existent grand kids one day all about the fact that for the additional court and legal costs it will take to process this one scumbag who should never have been here in the first place, you could have put all of them through college for free with money to spare.

Job well done, Democrats. What now?

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 6, 2025 5:56 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Oh...

And for the short stint he will be here before he gets sent right back home, you'd better hope he doesn't hurt and/or kill any American Citizens while he's back in the US.

If I were you, I'd be sweating bullets about that after your little celebration. They tend to do that. And they really love raping and murdering young white women.

But then again, if I were you, I would be way too smart to behave like you do at all and I'd have nothing to worry about.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 6, 2025 8:28 PM

THG


My one and only concern has always been the rule of law. Everyone gets due process. Without that our democracy is done. Now it looked like when he got back, he would have his day in court and then be shipped out.

If you saw the press conference, you'd know Pam Bondi may have fuck that up big time. She listed off a lot of the same things Gilligan said. However, he is only facing one charge, trafficking aliens. Why, because the rest is bullshit. Watch the video.

T


Trump DOJ Presser INSTANTLY DESTROYS Case

AG Pam Bondi should stop giving press conferences, because all it does is give Federal Judges like Judge Xinis ample evidence to find her and the Trump Administration in contempt of court, this time in the Armando Garcia matter.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 6, 2025 9:11 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


We aren't giving any illegals "due process", Ted. It would take 120 years to get them out if we did that. Citizens get Due Process. Non-Citizens get the boot.

We're just playing ball until we steamroll your activist judges and the Supreme Court allows us to start the removals en masse. If you don't have a social security number, you're out. Period. And we're going to remove the anchor babies too.

This is what happens when you allow your party to go nuts for 12 years straight and you don't call them out on any of it.

The over-correction will be as severe as it is swift. And there's not a goddamned thing you can do about it.

Party up this weekend. Celebrate the life of another degenerate thug, just like you did for 5 years with George Floyd. You guys just look like bigger assholes every week.

The world you thought you knew no longer exists. And you have nobody but yourself to blame.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 7, 2025 11:51 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.





T


Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power







Remember this clickbait from May 19th, Ted?


Supreme Court hands DOGE two big wins in FOIA and Social Security access cases

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/3434327/supreme-
court-doge-wins-foia-social-security-access
/

Be sure to thank your Democrats for fast tracking everything all the way up the ladder for us at that record pace I warned you against.




Quote:

Two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the American Federation of Teachers — filed the lawsuit against DOGE. They alleged that the DOGE employees’ access to personal data could violate the Privacy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.


Well... These unions have no more concern about this than 300 Million other people do...

Unless they were trying to hide something. They weren't trying to hide anything, do you think Ted?

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 7, 2025 12:14 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:

Two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the American Federation of Teachers — filed the lawsuit against DOGE. They alleged that the DOGE employees’ access to personal data could violate the Privacy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.


Well... These unions have no more concern about this than 300 Million other people do...

Unless they were trying to hide something. They weren't trying to hide anything, do you think Ted?




Like this, perhaps?

Nearly One-Quarter Of U.S. Public School Enrollment Could Be Anchor Babies

https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/05/nearly-one-quarter-of-u-s-public-
school-enrollment-could-be-anchor-babies
/


I feel bad for the Citizen children who have had their education disrupted by this, and Covid and Democratic Party bullshit for generations.

That's coming to an end soon.



It's going to be a real shame when the 9 Million illegal kids are the way we get to everyone here illegally who hasn't already fled.

A lot of them will be fleeing and we won't even have to pay for their removal.

Tick Tack

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 8, 2025 12:42 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


NBC News: The questions raised by the new charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

The potential political fallout for Democrats and why a federal prosecutor resigned days before the indictment remain unanswered.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kilmar-abrego-garcia-questions-rc
na211601


Quote:

The sudden return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States on Friday to face federal charges of smuggling migrants across the country was a messaging triumph for the Trump administration.

The news deflected public attention from a series of unanimous court rulings — including a Supreme Court decision — that President Donald Trump did not have the power to unilaterally detain and deport individuals to foreign prisons without a review by a judge.

And the allegations against Abrego Garcia are damning. A federal grand jury found that the 29-year-old was an MS-13 member who transported thousands of undocumented immigrants, including children, from Texas to states across the country for profit for nine years. He allegedly also transported firearms and drugs, abused female migrants and was linked to an incident in Mexico where a tractor-trailer overturned and killed 50 migrants.

Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, a lawyer representing Abrego Garcia, said Saturday that he planned to meet his client for the first time on Sunday, but declined to further comment.

A former senior law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing fear of retaliation, said he was struck by the large amount of resources the DOJ put into investigating Abrego Garcia.

"They came hard at a relatively low level guy, which does not necessarily make it improper — just odd. Perhaps they wanted the last word, which seems childish," said the former official. "Typically, you work up the chain; not down it. That said, at least he gets his due process rights this time around."

In a telephone interview with NBC News’ Kristen Welker on Saturday, Trump hailed Abrego Garcia’s indictment and predicted it would be easy for federal prosecutors to convict him. “I think it should be,” he said. “It should be.”

Multiple questions about Abrego Garcia, the case against him, and the political fallout remain unanswered.

Will Democrats pay a political price?

For months, Abrego Garcia’s lawyers, his wife, and some Democrats, have denied that he was an MS-13 gang member. They generally portrayed him as a Maryland construction worker and claimed he was transporting co-workers when a Tennessee state trooper stopped him on Interstate 40 on Nov. 30, 2022.

The indictment paints a different picture: Abrego Garcia was transporting nine Hispanic males without identification or luggage in a Chevrolet Suburban. Prosecutors allege he “knowingly and falsely” told the trooper they “had been in St. Louis for two weeks doing construction” and were returning to Maryland.

However, license plate reader data showed that the Suburban had not been near St. Louis for 12 months. Instead, it had been in Houston where, according to prosecutors, Abrego Garcia had picked up the men. The vehicle was not carrying tools or construction equipment, but its rear cargo area had been modified with makeshift seating to transport more passengers.

The apparent strength of the government’s case could reignite debate among Democrats about the risks of focusing on Abrego Garcia’s case. For weeks, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and other Democrats emphasized that their criticism targeted Trump’s decision to unilaterally deport Abrego Garcia without judicial oversight, not a defense of Abrego Garcia himself.

When Kristen Welker of NBC News asked Trump about Van Hollen, the President mocked the senator and said defending the Abrego Garcia would backfire on Democrats.

“He’s a loser. The guy’s a loser,” Trump said, referring to Van Hollen. “They’re going to lose because of that same thing. That’s not what people want to hear. He’s trying to defend a man who’s got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular.”

Van Hollen defended his stance in a CNN interview. “You know, I will never apologize for defending the Constitution,” he said. “In fact, it’s the Trump administration and all his cronies who should apologize to the country for putting us through this unnecessary situation.”
What happened inside the Trump administration?

In an Oval Office visit on April 15, 2025, Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi and other Trump administration officials asserted that it was not possible for the Trump administration to “facilitate” the return of Abrego Garcia’s return from El Salvador as the Supreme Court had ordered.

El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele mocked a reporter for asking whether he would do so. “How can I return him to the United States? Like if I smuggle him into the United States?” Bukele said, sitting beside Trump in the Oval Office. “Of course I’m not going to do it. The question is preposterous.”

Trump, in turn, chided the assembled journalists, saying, “They’d love to have a criminal released into our country. These are sick people.”

Bondi said only El Salvador could decide whether to return Abrego Garcia. “If they want to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane,” Bondi said. “That’s up for El Salvador if they want to return him. That’s not up to us.”

Yet, in a Friday press conference at the Justice Department, Bondi described the return of Abrego Garcia as smooth and seamless. “We want to thank President Bukele for agreeing to return Abrego Garcia to the United States,” she said. “Our government presented El Salvador with an arrest warrant, and they agreed to return him to our country.”

Asked what had changed since the traffic stop in 2022, she lauded Trump. “What has changed is Donald Trump is now president of the United States,” Bondi said, “and our borders are again secure.”

In an unusual move, Bondi also described allegations against Abrego Garcia that were not included in the indictment. She said that co-conspirators alleged that Abrego Garcia “solicited nude photographs and videos of a minor” and “played a role in the murder of a rival gang member’s mother.”

For decades, attorneys general from both parties and state and local prosecutors have generally accused defendants of crimes only for which a grand jury indicted them. Discussing other potential crimes has long been regarded as an abuse of prosecutorial power, risking unfair harm to defendants’ reputations.

A former senior Justice Department official, who requested anonymity, citing fears of retaliation, said that Bondi often speaks as a partisan Trump loyalist, not a neutral law enforcement official.

“She says the president’s name every time,” said the former DOJ official. “She talks more like a politician, stumping for a candidate than an attorney general who is out there talking independently. You can see that in the words she uses.”
Why did a top federal prosecutor in Tennessee resign?

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that people close to the matter said the indictment prompted the resignation of a veteran career prosecutor who headed the criminal division at the U.S. attorney’s office where the case was filed. The Journal did not name the prosecutor.

However, days after Abrego Garcia was indicted by a federal grand jury in Nashville, Ben Schrader, the head of criminal division in the U.S. attorney’s office in Nashville, resigned.

“Earlier today, after nearly 15 years as an Assistant United States Attorney, I resigned as Chief of the Criminal Division at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Tennessee,” Schrader posted on LinkedIn. “It has been an incredible privilege to serve as a prosecutor with the Department of Justice, where the only job description I’ve ever known is to do the right thing, in the right way, for the right reasons. I wish all of my colleagues at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Nashville and across the Department the best as they seek to do justice on behalf of the American people.”

Asked about Schrader’s resignation by NBC News, a spokesperson for the Justice Department said it does not comment on personnel changes. Schrader, reached by NBC News via text on his cellphone, sent a two-word reply when asked why he had resigned: “No comment.”



Question: "Did Dems Make a Mistake By Focusing on Abrego Garcia"

Answer: Yes.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 10, 2025 4:51 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:

OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.





Brace yourself...

T


Trump HIT with NIGHTMARE SCENARIO in CA Lawsuit



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 10, 2025 4:58 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Nobody cares about your clickbait, Ted.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 10, 2025 7:23 PM

THG





It's all about due process.

T


Texas Judge SLAPS DOWN Trump's Deportation Order, says Due Process NOW!



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 10, 2025 8:07 PM

THG




Another smackdown.

T


BREAKING: Georgia Supreme Court Strikes Down GOP Rules Meant to Delay Election Certification



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL