Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
TO ALL THE KIDS WHO SURVIVED the 1930's 40's, 50's, 60's and 70's !!
Friday, May 20, 2005 2:01 AM
CONNORFLYNN
Friday, May 20, 2005 6:36 AM
DIETCOKE
Friday, May 20, 2005 10:05 AM
SIGMANUNKI
Friday, May 20, 2005 10:38 AM
SIMONWHO
Friday, May 20, 2005 11:09 AM
Friday, May 20, 2005 11:26 AM
CHRISISALL
Friday, May 20, 2005 12:08 PM
Friday, May 20, 2005 12:28 PM
Friday, May 20, 2005 4:23 PM
RUE
I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!
Friday, May 20, 2005 6:16 PM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Saturday, May 21, 2005 2:51 AM
Saturday, May 21, 2005 3:44 AM
Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:33 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: Conner- What country is that? I'd like to plan a vacation.
Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: I remember a lot of GOOD things from my childhood- duck and cover, the Cuban Missile crisis, white flight, nuns banging kids' heads on blackboards until their noses bled, bullies... ah... life was sweet!
Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:47 AM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Saturday, May 21, 2005 1:59 PM
Saturday, May 21, 2005 3:14 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SimonWho: How many other posts in this forum (not the whole of FFF.net, just the real world event forum) are jokes? Pretty much none of them. By putting the e-mail in here, you're either expecting fifty replies of "That's so funny because that is true" (which would disappoint, on so many levels) or you're going to hear what people actually think. And some people think that both in terms of content and attitude, it's a load of go dink ney diss. And it was the author of the e-mail that was keen to show the horror of today's existence, not us.
Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:39 PM
PIRATEJENNY
Quote:Originally posted by SimonWho: He's talking about mothers drinking and smoking during pregnancy as though it was a quaint old custom that had been ruled out by killjoys. That's why I can't just "leave it as that". At best, it's facetious, at worst, it's encouraging pregnant women to drink and smoke because "my parents used and it didn't affect me". The ones that survived, survived. Unfortunately innumerate ones didn't and yes, it was the fault of choking on buttons from badly produced toys or birth defects caused by smoking. It's like the 80 year old who boasts about how he drinks five pints every evening and smokes a pipe and it never harmed him. Well, sure, but it killed every single other person who could have reached 80 had they taken better care of themselves. >> The current generation has playstations, etc but lacks proper etiquette b/c of a lack of proper socialization b/c they are only playing on there playstation and not actually talking to people. Substitute "comic books" or "Dungeons and Dragons" or "rock and roll" or "dance music" (as in jive) or "cinemaphiles" or "bicycle riders" or indeed pretty much any technological advancement in entertainment and you'd have the same argument of the generation 10, 20, 50, 100 years past. It's not just the philistinical argument that bothers me. It's the accusation seemingly aimed at us about our "lawsuit happy, overprotective society" when they are the generation that created it. Not every generation has progressed society. Some have taken it down horrific corridors. Could you really argue the generation of the "cultural revolution" in China advanced their society? Of course not, they set it back decades, as well as destroying irreplacable pieces of their heritage. Edit- just to catch up with the posts since the one I was replying to: our average lifespan has jumped 18 years since 1930. And if you like looking on the positive side of life so much, you should hate that negative "glass used to be half full, now it's half empty" original e-mail. Life was simpler then, sure. But that's because everything was over-simplified. I love this brave new world. I can't imagine a world where I can't send a text message to my brother in Australia while reading e-mails from people in America. Heck, I can't imagine a world without the Internet and I got through the first 19 years of my life without it. What I hate is this awful "life used to be great" rubbish which was true if, like me, you grew up in a nice, rich, middle class, white family. Unfortunately most people were in the mud and stayed that way. But you're doubtlessly right, this was just a jolly e-mail poking fun at the modern world. I should really not analyse this sort of stuff.
Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:46 PM
Quote:Connor, Connor, Connor. What ever possessed you to try and post something lighthearted in this forum?
Saturday, May 21, 2005 5:37 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: Geezer- I WAS being lighthearted!!!
Saturday, May 21, 2005 6:20 PM
CALLMEATH
Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:23 PM
MONTANAGIRL
Quote:Originally posted by CallMeAth: I lived 31 days in the 70's. Does that count?
Saturday, May 21, 2005 10:53 PM
CHRONICTHEHEDGEHOG
Sunday, May 22, 2005 1:57 PM
Sunday, May 22, 2005 2:41 PM
CYBERSNARK
Sunday, May 22, 2005 5:52 PM
OPUS
Quote:Originally posted by Cybersnark: We also had Transformers. The dawning of the greatest toys the human race has ever created.
Monday, May 23, 2005 6:32 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Opus: I'm sorry, I can't let that slip by, TRANSFORMERS...you're kidding, you poor deprived child.
Monday, May 23, 2005 7:18 AM
Quote:I am heading to the Catskills today. It's in the high 50's. The air is unbelievable. None of the restaurants accept credit cards and gas is only $2.14 a gallon. Most places don't have cable. Not that you really need it all that much. We are visiting a little town called Andes. I plan to visit 4 art galleries. Have an awesome lunch. Chat with the local yokels. Go sit and enjoy the sun and serenity and find my way to a nice local diner for dinner, where I plan to eat something very very fattening, not good for me probably healthwise but great for my soul, followed by some cocktails and a display put on by some lightning bugs. Hehe.
Monday, May 23, 2005 11:49 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: SignyM whines in frustration and paws the door. Hope ya had fun!
Monday, May 23, 2005 1:56 PM
Quote:Originally posted by CallMeAth: Quote:Originally posted by Opus: I'm sorry, I can't let that slip by, TRANSFORMERS...you're kidding, you poor deprived child. I'm sorry, but you can't try to tell me that your giant, non-articulating G.I. Joe dolls were up to par with transforming robots, some that combined to form even larger robots. As for them being tiny, I still have one that's nearly 2 feet tall. Also, Tranformers was a wonderful show and movie. How many Autobots died in the movie? Not to mention watching the leader, my hero at the time, die on screen. Heart-breaking.
Monday, May 23, 2005 2:47 PM
Monday, May 23, 2005 2:53 PM
Monday, May 23, 2005 3:24 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Cybersnark: My rational for Transformer loving: My rational for not liking the whole robot thing. I've never been a fan of Japanimation, going back to speed racer and astroboy, and manga..grrr don't get me started. So just from that stand point I'm biased against the robots, be it Transformers or Zolton or any of the others. The concept of an intelligent machine choosing it's own gender and why, as well as other things, I'll agree is intriguing and would be better handled in either a different medium, or not in a toy franchise. Call me old fashion but I long for the days when toys were derived from popular cartoons, not cartoons derived from popular toys. Opus
Monday, May 23, 2005 3:26 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL