REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Saddam's On the Clock

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Wednesday, January 3, 2007 05:30
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 8879
PAGE 4 of 4

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 4:43 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Finn,

I was replying to this: "And frankly, I have a lot more condemnation for countries that didn’t turn an about-face vis-à-vis Iraq, then I do with those that did."

Since that condemnation didn't come after Hussein's civilian CW attacks, or after his invading Kuwait, what is/ are your criteria for condemning Iraq?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:22 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

No. I'm saying that sometimes, no matter which decision you make, even if it is to make no decision at all, bad things ensue. Sometimes not being involved is not the best choice of a limited number of bad choices. If Iran had prevailed in the Iran-Iraq war, I can't see the world being better off now.
So, can you think of something else to do besides supporting the use of chemical warfare, or applying sanctions? (which BTW is not "doing nothing").


---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:27 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


I think both US and British support for Iraq was gone or heavily eroded by 1990. And most other countries had had it with Hussein by then too.




Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:41 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


But the condemnation you refer to didn't come until over ten years later, with the invasion of Iraq.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:47 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
So, can you think of something else to do besides supporting the use of chemical warfare, or applying sanctions? (which BTW is not "doing nothing").



Not really. Either one leads to a less than optimal result. Sometimes that's the best you can get. Would the 1984 creation of a fundamentalist Islamic state that encompassed both Iran and Iraq, which would include Iraq's chemical and biological weapons programs, be a better outcome?

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 6:24 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


No, the condemnation I refer to came one year later with the invasion of Iraq, weapon’s inspections and sanctions.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 3, 2007 4:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Geezer, I support a more proactive solution that applies to Iran as well as Iraq. Among other things, it involves not using proxies to fight wars. Seems we get into the deepest sh*t that way. Gotta get ready for the day. TTUL.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 3, 2007 5:30 AM

SHINYED


It's a real shame that we can't put Saddam & his 2 boys back in power in Iraq...they sure knew how to control the religious maniacal killers in that country.

We need to get out of Iraq as fast as possible...let all the old Baathists go free and let them get Iraq back under their dominance.

Saddam & his Baathists were useful idiots for America after the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, and they are needed more than ever now ...again, to thwart the maniacal and diabolical plans of Iran's newest mass-murderer wannabe.

Nathan's kilts rule!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
MAGA movement
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:04 - 14 posts
Will Your State Regain It's Representation Next Decade?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:53 - 113 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:44 - 170 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:40 - 42 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sun, November 24, 2024 01:01 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 23:46 - 4761 posts
Australia - unbelievable...
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:59 - 22 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:33 - 4796 posts
More Cope: David Brooks and PBS are delusional...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:32 - 1 posts
List of States/Governments/Politicians Moving to Ban Vaccine Passports
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:27 - 168 posts
Once again... a request for legitimate concerns...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:22 - 17 posts
What's wrong with conspiracy theories
Sat, November 23, 2024 15:07 - 19 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL