REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

...not as I do.

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 03:51
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2873
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, October 26, 2008 1:24 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Seems like the first three paragraphs and the last three paragraphs exemplify the old adage, "Do as I say, not as I do".

Quote:

Mr Obama, returning to the campaign trail after two days off in which he flew to his ailing grandmother in Hawaii, said a negative campaign was not what the country needed.

"In the final days of campaigns, the say-anything, do-anything politics too often takes over..." he said in Las Vegas, Nevada.

"The American people don't want to hear politicians attack each other - you want to hear about how we're going to attack the challenges facing middle-class families each and every day."

Later, in Albuquerque, New Mexico, he sought to tie Mr McCain to the policies of the outgoing Republican President, George W Bush.

"John McCain's mad at George Bush, so opposed to George Bush's policies, that he voted with him 90% of the time for the past eight years," he told a mass rally.

"That's right, he decided to really stick it to George Bush 10% of the time... It's like Robin getting mad at Batman."



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7691374.stm



"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 1:37 AM

KHYRON


False equivalence. I haven't heard anything that comes close to "palling around with terrorists" or "socialist" or some of the others.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 3:03 AM

FUTUREMRSFILLION


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Seems like the first three paragraphs and the last three paragraphs exemplify the old adage, "Do as I say, not as I do".




Huh?

I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"

FORSAKEN original

Trolls Against McCain




“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Mahatma Gandhi

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 4:31 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by FutureMrsFIllion:
Huh?




Sen. Obama says, "The American people don't want to hear politicians attack each other..."

Then proceeds to attack Sen McCain. "That's right, he decided to really stick it to George Bush 10% of the time... It's like Robin getting mad at Batman."

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 4:37 PM

FUTUREMRSFILLION


There is a difference between fulminating lies like - "He's a Muslim" or "He consorts with terrorists" and "He voted with Bush 90% of the time".


The former 2 are perjorative and false.

The latter is objective and based on fact.





I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"

FORSAKEN original

Trolls Against McCain




“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Mahatma Gandhi

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 5:56 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

The latter is objective and based on fact.



Especially when McCain himself said it in a photo op, and was proud of that fact, saying that he'd voted with Bush more than even some of his Republican comrades.

Also, to give equal time, Palin said she'd like to see campaigns without the notorious "robo-call" ads - and then released her own robo-call the very same day!

So while we all might LIKE to see a campaign without attacks, that's not the way modern politics is being played, unless you want to lose.

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 5:58 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.



Except that it's not true. The Congress found McCain had broken no US laws, nor has he broken any Senate rules. He did nothing wrong.

Palin acted with in the law. The claim that she violated any ethics rules."In order to violate the ethics law, there has to be some personal gain.. " . No such gain was shown to have occurred w/ the Trooper-gate investigation, so any such claims are purely political b.s.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 6:11 PM

HKCAVALIER


Hrm. A single comparison on a matter of policy of the Republican candidate with the Republican incumbent in a speech vs. an entire campaign built on fabricated, scatter-shot character assassinations to the point of implying that the Democratic candidate is involved in high treason. Yeah, damn that Obama for goin' negative! That no good hypocrite!

WTF?



HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 7:23 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh, Geezer is just a troll. Smoother than most, but still a troll. Pay him no mind.

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 26, 2008 10:52 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Except that it's not true.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015130.ph
p


------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 2:29 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by FutureMrsFIllion:
The former 2 are perjorative and false.

The latter is objective and based on fact.



Doesn't matter. The "Batman and Robin" form of Sen. Obama's remark goes against his statement that..."The American people don't want to hear politicians attack each other..." He could have left that out and just stated facts, but had to get the little extra dig in.

Besides, he's wrong. In the movie 'Batman and Robin' Robin did argue with Batman.


"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 2:34 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
Hrm. A single comparison on a matter of policy of the Republican candidate with the Republican incumbent in a speech vs. an entire campaign built on fabricated, scatter-shot character assassinations to the point of implying that the Democratic candidate is involved in high treason. Yeah, damn that Obama for goin' negative! That no good hypocrite!

WTF?



Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much. High treason? Never mentioned or even hinted at. I was just interested in the juxtaposition of a plea to stop attacks on candidates with an attack on a candidate. I expect that the BBC was interested in the same thing, based on the way they structured their article.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 3:10 AM

FUTUREMRSFILLION


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by FutureMrsFIllion:
The former 2 are perjorative and false.

The latter is objective and based on fact.



Doesn't matter. The "Batman and Robin" form of Sen. Obama's remark goes against his statement that..."The American people don't want to hear politicians attack each other..." He could have left that out and just stated facts, but had to get the little extra dig in.

Besides, he's wrong. In the movie 'Batman and Robin' Robin did argue with Batman.


"Keep the Shiny side up"



You still don't get it. Telling people about someone's voting record IS NOT an attack.

I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"

FORSAKEN original

Trolls Against McCain




“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Mahatma Gandhi

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 5:39 AM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much. High treason? Never mentioned or even hinted at.

So where are McCain's crowds getting the idea that Obama is a friend of terrorists? If supporting terrorists isn't treason, I don't know what is. C'mon Geezer, you're a master of innuendo yourself, surely you can appreciate McCain & Co.'s admittedly ham-handed attempts to paint Obama as a mysterious anti-American, anti-democratic, anti-Christian, anti-freedom insurgent. McCain's crowds are getting the message--why aren't you?

Quote:

I was just interested in the juxtaposition of a plea to stop attacks on candidates with an attack on a candidate.
If Obama had said, "Americans are tired of hearing Politicians make reasoned criticisms of their opponents based on their voting record over the past eight years" you'd have a case.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 6:21 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

You still don't get it. Telling people about someone's voting record IS NOT an attack.
It's about on-par with pointing out that Obama voted "present" on many occasions. And yet I don't hear Geezer whining about THAT being "negative"!

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 6:45 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Besides, he's wrong. In the movie 'Batman and Robin' Robin did argue with Batman.



Yeah, and look how well that movie did! Two words: "Un" and "watchable". ;)



Mike

What, no catchy sig-line?

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 6:49 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


khyron - when all you can do is post a link with nothing more than an editor's note, their own OPINION, and nothing resembling the facts, it's a clear sign you've lost it.

Thanks for playing though.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 7:41 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by FutureMrsFIllion:
You still don't get it. Telling people about someone's voting record IS NOT an attack.



But telling of someone's past associations is? One is as true as the other.

Using the "Batman and Robin" remark (which you continue to ignore) to describe Sen. McCain's voting record doesn't seem that much different to me that Gov. Palin's "palling around with terrorists" remark does to describing Sen. Obama's association with Bill Ayers.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 7:53 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
So where are McCain's crowds getting the idea that Obama is a friend of terrorists?


Got me. Possibly exaggeration of his acquaintance with Bill Ayers. Where did you see it mentioned in this thread? Oh, you brought it up, so you could go on a rant about it. I was just noting contradictions in Sen. Obama's statements.

Quote:

surely you can appreciate McCain & Co.'s admittedly ham-handed attempts to paint Obama as a mysterious anti-American, anti-democratic, anti-Christian, anti-freedom insurgent. McCain's crowds are getting the message--why aren't you?


So, although Sen. Obama doesn't want to hear politicians attack each other, it's OK for you to do so?

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 9:31 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"But telling of someone's past associations is."
LYING about someone's past associations (as the repubicans have made a point of doing) IS an attack.

"Where did you see it mentioned in this thread?"
Was the topic about THIS thread ?

So your point was ? Once again --- after you subtract out the negatives, divide by partisanship, carry the obfuscation ...


You have no point.


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 10:28 AM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
khyron - when all you can do is post a link with nothing more than an editor's note, their own OPINION, and nothing resembling the facts, it's a clear sign you've lost it.

Opinion? Did you see the part where he said he did a little digging and came up with this historical fact!? Do you expect me to go through the note line by line and interpret it for you? It's really not that difficult to comprehend.

But whatever AURaptor, at the moment I've got more important stuff to do than banging my head against a wall.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 10:34 AM

KHYRON


Oh wait, I get it now. Geezer's trying to say that McCain supporting Bush's policies is just as bad as Obama "palling around with terrorists"! Have to say Geezer, that's pretty hardcore, never thought you'd be he one equating Bush's policies with domestic terrorism!



------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 3:33 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Oh wait, I get it now. Geezer's trying to say that McCain supporting Bush's policies is just as bad as Obama "palling around with terrorists"! Have to say Geezer, that's pretty hardcore, never thought you'd be he one equating Bush's policies with domestic terrorism!




Khyron, you have a bright future writing political ads.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 3:38 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
You have no point.



Sen. Obama says politicians should not attack each other.

You believe he follows this rule.

Then to you, PolitiFact is apparently a tool of the McCain campaign.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/barack-obama/att
acksby
/

Not saying Sen. McCain's campaign doesn't do this too; just noting that Sen. Obama is not spotless in the area of attacking his opponent, although he thinks it's wrong.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 3:57 PM

FUTUREMRSFILLION


ok dude let me break this down for you -

reiterating your opponents policy or voting record is NOT ATTACKING

trying to falsely link some one to terrorists because they have a foreign middle name;

saying they consort with terrorists;

lieing about where they were born and their citizenship;

basically pulling shit out of your ass IS ATTACKING



I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"

FORSAKEN original

Trolls Against McCain




“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Mahatma Gandhi

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 5:50 PM

MALBADINLATIN


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer: Then to you, PolitiFact is apparently a tool of the McCain campaign.
Politifact is a wholly owned project within, and created by, folks working for the Ultra Conservative St Petersburg Times.

Think of Conservia as a bunch of specialty companies owned by Warren Buffet, only Karl Rove is the real owner, and it should begin to come clear if your logic has more control over your critical reasoning skills than your fading hopes for a McCain victory.

The RNC
Fox News
The White House Press Corp
The McCain/Palin campaign

All other Conservative Media act freely, but get all the information they build on from these four companies and all of it is filtered through a choke hold bottle neck called Karl Rove's spin approval. That's why all four of those companies don't bring up Bush very much. That way Conservative voters are on message, Conservative media is on message, and that's why Politifact always says John McCain lies less than Obama.


Trolls against McCain

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 5:59 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


Not saying Sen. McCain's campaign doesn't do this too; just noting that Sen. Obama is not spotless in the area of attacking his opponent, although he thinks it's wrong.



So you would condemn McCain's and Palin's robo-calls as well, and call them hypocrites on that score, yes? After all, they've both spoken out against such things, yet continue to use them.

Looks like neither campaign is against attacking the other, no matter how much they say they shouldn't.

Mike

What, no catchy sig-line?

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 27, 2008 9:42 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Khyron, you have a bright future writing political ads.

Thanks for the endorsement, Geezer! You taught me everything I know, and I'll try to make you proud!

Seriously though, do you honestly think the statements "Politicians attack each other" and "Politicians attack each others' policy choices" are equivalent? To me, the first one sounds like it implies personal attacks, so that's the way I read Obama's statement, that he thought personal attacks were inappropriate - and attacking McCain's support of Bush's policies is not a personal attack.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:57 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

Looks like neither campaign is against attacking the other, no matter how much they say they shouldn't.



YOU GOT IT!!!!

Both sides are politicians, and both will say one thing and do another if they think it'll get them elected.

I get concerned at the number of folk who have drunk the Obama kool-aid to the extent that they won't believe, and react violently to, any suggestion that the man is less than perfect. If this is the controlling spirit in his administration, I expect the Sedition Act of 2009 shortly.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 3:03 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by MalBadInLatin:
Politifact is a wholly owned project within, and created by, folks working for the Ultra Conservative St Petersburg Times.



So, aside from a chain of supposition that would make PN proud, you got any substantiation that PolitiFact has actually biased it's analysis in Sen. McCain's favor? Blogs probably shouldn't count, since I've found then that run both ways.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:51 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

I expect the Sedition Act of 2009 shortly.


Wouldn't that be redundant? We already have the "Patriot" Act, right?

If you think that *I* think Obama's anywhere close to "perfect", you're obviously drinking something - Kool-Aid, tequila, absenthe...

My *only* hope is that Obama's just a smidge less corrupt and ingrained into "the machine" than is McCain. That's about how "perfect" I think he is.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:08 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Wouldn't that be redundant? We already have the "Patriot" Act, right?



175,000 people were jailed between 1918 and 1921 under the provisions of the Sedition Act, for doing stuff like protesting the draft, defaming the President, or just saying that the U.S. shouldn't be involved in in WWI. The Patriot Act is tame by comparison.

I suspect many of the more out-there liberals in RWED wouldn't object to making criticism of Pres. Obama or his policies a crime, based on how they react to anything less than worshipful adoration here.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:19 AM

STORYMARK


Hmm, late to this thread.

But Geezer, that is one assinine comparison.

Stop living up to your name. Get a nap, take some vitamins. Come back when you can come off as less laughable.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:08 AM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
YOU GOT IT!!!!

Both sides are politicians, and both will say one thing and do another if they think it'll get them elected.

I get concerned at the number of folk who have drunk the Obama kool-aid to the extent that they won't believe, and react violently to, any suggestion that the man is less than perfect. If this is the controlling spirit in his administration, I expect the Sedition Act of 2009 shortly.

Uh, I don't think you'll find anybody here claiming Obama's perfect. The example you gave doesn't help underline your point, though, since I still don't see how he was contradicting himself.

If he's the hypocrite you claim he is, shouldn't there be an example far less ambiguous that you could find? It really looks like you're clutching at straws with this one.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:18 AM

KHYRON


Another thing, Geezer, why is it that you take some statements that aren't really an example of Obama hypocrisy and expect Obama supporters here to fall over themselves admitting that Obama's not perfect, but out of the dozens and dozens of examples of hypocrisy from the McCain, Palin and RNC side that I and others have listed here over the last couple of weeks, I can't recall anybody from the right, including you, once saying "Yeah, they're hypocrites".

Different standards for Obama supporters, eh? Give me an example where Obama really was being a hypocrite and I'll admit he was being a hypocrite, which is more than what you've been able to do when it comes to the McCain campaign so far.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 12:36 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by MalBadInLatin:
Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer: Then to you, PolitiFact is apparently a tool of the McCain campaign.
Politifact is a wholly owned project within, and created by, folks working for the Ultra Conservative St Petersburg Times.

Think of Conservia as a bunch of specialty companies owned by Warren Buffet, only Karl Rove is the real owner, and it should begin to come clear if your logic has more control over your critical reasoning skills than your fading hopes for a McCain victory.

The RNC
Fox News
The White House Press Corp
The McCain/Palin campaign

All other Conservative Media act freely, but get all the information they build on from these four companies and all of it is filtered through a choke hold bottle neck called Karl Rove's spin approval. That's why all four of those companies don't bring up Bush very much. That way Conservative voters are on message, Conservative media is on message, and that's why Politifact always says John McCain lies less than Obama.


Trolls against McCain


I assume you're talking about the Saint Petersburg Times that endorsed Obama, and the Warren Buffet who was a Hillary Clinton supporter. Seems like kind of a stretch to call either "ultra conservative".

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 1:03 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Conservatives - and ultra-conservatives - are endorsing Obama.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:02 PM

MALBADINLATIN


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
I assume you're talking about the Saint Petersburg Times that endorsed Obama, and the Warren Buffet who was a Hillary Clinton supporter. Seems like kind of a stretch to call either "ultra conservative".

Rupert Murdoch donated money to Hillary. Hard righties work in mysterious ways?? And I am the most unlikely person to ever defend them.

Besides...what is important is the political inclination of whomever is making the "pants on fire" or whatever judgements.

Now thank you for pointing out the TSPT is guilty of Liberal behavior. I hadn't known they'd done that. I got my opinion from reading thier editorials from time to time. I spent some time reading more, and after several conservative editorials I found one editorial piece critical of the US for not supporting Georgia with force during the Russian occupation. Like we kind of promised. Or so the TSPT says. So "Arch Conservative" would be incorrect. They may even approach "nuanced" conservative.

Which kind of severs the link between the "Then to you, PolitiFact is apparently a tool of the McCain campaign" statement and my multi tiered Spanish Inquisition Salem Witch Hunt Big Brother scandalous characterization of Conservative Media? Which leaves my rant off topic. (MalBad tips his hat, says "this one's on me Kirkules", throws down 2 silver dollars and leaves the bar)

Trolls against McCain

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 3:20 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:

175,000 people were jailed between 1918 and 1921 under the provisions of the Sedition Act, for doing stuff like protesting the draft, defaming the President, or just saying that the U.S. shouldn't be involved in in WWI. The Patriot Act is tame by comparison.



Which sounds an awful lot like you're defending the Patriot Act. Is a bad law magically good if you can point out a worse one in our history? Aren't they BOTH bad?

Quote:



I suspect many of the more out-there liberals in RWED wouldn't object to making criticism of Pres. Obama or his policies a crime, based on how they react to anything less than worshipful adoration here.



Well, in your own words,

Quote:


I have to say, that's about the most pointless comment I have ever seen you make...and that's saying a lot.



Mike

What, no catchy sig-line?

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:32 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
The example you gave doesn't help underline your point, though, since I still don't see how he was contradicting himself.



Since I don't support either one, Sen. Obama's "Batman and Robin" comment seems as much an attack to me as Gov. Palin's "palling around" comment. There's a kernel of fact in there somewhere, but distorted quite a bit.

BTW, did you know that Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain made the same choice on 75% of the bills relating to abortion since Sen. Obama was elected? This is absolutely true, and you can check it on Votesmart.org.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:41 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Which sounds an awful lot like you're defending the Patriot Act. Is a bad law magically good if you can point out a worse one in our history? Aren't they BOTH bad?



There's parts of the Patriot Act I don't care for, but, based on its actual impact, as compared to other and greater abuses initiated by folks who are widely considered our greatest presidents, I find it hard to see it as the MOST EVIL THING EVER IN THE ENTIRE WORLD!!!!, like many folk here do.

It will be interesting to see if Pres. Obama trys to get rid of it. I'm betting no. If he doesn't, is he evil?

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:51 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Yes. If he doesn't, he is evil.

He voted in favor of telco immunity though, so I already know which way that vote is going to go.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Wed, December 4, 2024 13:42 - 4886 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, December 4, 2024 13:16 - 4813 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Wed, December 4, 2024 12:37 - 427 posts
Pardon all J6 Political Prisoners on Day One
Wed, December 4, 2024 12:31 - 7 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, December 4, 2024 07:25 - 7538 posts
My Smartphone Was Ruining My Life. So I Quit. And you can, too.
Wed, December 4, 2024 06:10 - 3 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Tue, December 3, 2024 23:31 - 54 posts
Vox: Are progressive groups sinking Democrats' electoral chances?
Tue, December 3, 2024 21:37 - 1 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Tue, December 3, 2024 20:35 - 962 posts
Trump is a moron
Tue, December 3, 2024 20:16 - 13 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, December 3, 2024 11:39 - 6941 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Mon, December 2, 2024 21:22 - 302 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL