REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Big 3: Bailout, bankruptcy, or...?

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 06:24
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1579
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, December 12, 2008 11:05 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Senate Repubs killed the bailout. Cheney, of all people, said that w/o the bailout peeps will remember this as "Herbert Hoover" time. The auto industry accounts for about 2 million jobs. Not only that, but GM has issued a shitload of corporate bonds and stocks, held by banks, investment firms, etc. GMs bankruptcy would create not only an economic problem (lost production, lost jobs etc.) but a credit and financial problem as well.

OTOH- I don't think it's possible to rescue GM. Management has made an SUV-full of bad decisions, including giving up the fuel-efficient market to the Japanese, awarding themselves huge bonuses, focusing on short-term profits instead of market share, underfunding basic engineering research and product development etc. ALL vehicle manufacturers are experiencing losses: Toyota, Honda, and Ford sales are down about 30%; German auto exports are down about 30% etc. In this shitty market... when what is really required is a reduction in production capacity... does it make sense to launch a "new" (slightly refurbished) company?

I'm thinking that if I were Prez, I'd give GM just enough to keep them hanging around until other parts of my economic stimulous package was in the works. There is more than 2 million infrastructure-rebuilding jobs "out there" if funded by the govt. An auto worker can make windmills as well as autos. Once the stimulous package was underway, I'd drop GM like a hot potato. The ONLY auto compmany I'd be willing to loan to is the one that needs it least: Ford.

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 12, 2008 11:12 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


My understanding is that the automakers focused on their financial arms as their moneymakers - auto production was a side job, with GM more so than the others.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 12, 2008 11:17 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


That too. GMAC is the part of GM in deepest doodoo. They were not capitalized enough to qualify as a "bank" and therefore could not get TARP funds. But the latest analysis that I read is that once GMAC goes, the rest of the company follows.

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 12, 2008 2:16 PM

OUT2THEBLACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
I don't think it's possible to rescue GM. Management has made an SUV-full of bad decisions, including giving up the fuel-efficient market to the Japanese, awarding themselves huge bonuses, focusing on short-term profits instead of market share, underfunding basic engineering research and product development etc.

...does it make sense to launch a "new" (slightly refurbished) company?




No...

What would make sense is for that crowd of morons to run for Congress...

They'd fit right in...


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 12, 2008 2:41 PM

WHOZIT


This bailout is for the UAW, not GM, or Ford, or Mopar, or The House, or The Senate, or us.

I'm going to microwave a bagel and have sex with it - Peter Griffin

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 12, 2008 2:59 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Why do they need to make good decisions when they can go up on capitol hill and beg the gov to screw it out of taxpayers instead of ripping them off directly ?

There's an old military maxim, never reinforce defeat, but it seems the very opposite of that is the american economic system, that and a combination of the peter principle.

I am *especially* pissed at them bailing out Shittygroup, aka Citigroup, cause as criminal, corrupt and crooked as those asshats are, I highly suspect they cooked the books to get that bailout as they shovel the real profits through a dominican republic "laundry" service - and do not ask why I suspect this, cause I ain't sayin.

Punishing good business practices (you know, like me taking it on the chin here cause I have no record with the credit bastards cause I don't never owe no one money!) and then rewarding failure by propping it up - that ain't free enterprise, not at all.

And GM did not pull themselves out of the swan dive, made no real effort to even try, cause they KNEW they could force the Gov to hand them the profits that actual business sense would have made them, but this way they get the money without payin tax on it.

It's all a scam, and I refuse to do business with any recipient of these bailouts and will in fact sabotage them to the limit of my ability every chance I get.

That's MY fuckin money, and I want it back.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 12, 2008 9:29 PM

OUT2THEBLACK


Hmm , 1973 was like , almost 3 DOZEN Years Ago...



Los Angeles – November 18, 2008 --

Former California State Senator and Los Angeles City Councilman Nate Holden is holding a news conference, speaking out against American auto manufacturers and in support of mass-production of the electric car. The Honorable Nate Holden believes that the taxpayers should not bailout the auto manufacturers without The Big Three agreeing to mass-produce the electric car as an incentive.

Nate Holden states the following points:

In 1990, the State of California enacted a zero-emissions mandate, forcing auto manufacturers who sold their cars in the State of California to require that at least 10% of the automobiles that are sold here have zero-emissions.

In 2002 the Bush administration sided with the automakers to fight the zero-emissions mandate. The Bush administration, General Motors, other U.S. automakers and the oil companies committed sabotage against the American people and the environment. Because of the lawsuit, California will not make any strides in improving our air quality. To continue to build internal combustion engines will result in more photochemical smog and will cause more lung cancer and respiratory disease.

At about that time, General Motors embarked on a program to deceive the public and the lawmakers. They introduced the EV1 as a revolutionary concept car. The EV1 had all the whistles and bells and if mass-produced, could have saved the automobile industry from its financial woes. At the beginning, General Motors and the other auto manufacturers never intended for the electric vehicle to be a successful program, specifically the EV1.

It turned out to be nothing but a hoax when General Motors built 1,100 EV1s and allowed the public to lease and road test them. Without a doubt, the EV1, as a prototype vehicle, met the test acceptance program. In fact, in many circles there are those who are of the opinion that it exceeded the testing program. The consumers who leased the EV1 offered to purchase the EV1 vehicle from General Motors. They knew the EV1 was a zero-emission, cost effective automobile.
General Motors said "no" and (in)voked the terms and conditions of the lease requiring that those vehicles be returned to General Motors and they were subsequently destroyed.

General Motors has had at least ten years notice to develop and mass-produce an electric vehicle and they have failed to do so. They have continuously brainwashed the public and the elected officials, claiming that they were on our side and they are not! Here they are again, demanding that the hard-working taxpayers bail them out. (Them being the automobile manufacturers) They are demanding the bailout funding without any pre-conditions. Shame on them!

Congress should not give auto manufacturers another dime until the commitment is made that they will build the electric vehicle as a top priority. We must stop importing our oil from the Middle East. The mass production of the electric vehicle can be our way of achieving that goal.

Nate Holden served four terms on the Los Angeles City Council (1987 to 2003). He served as Chairman of the Air Quality and Waste Management Committee and eight years as the Chairman of the Transportation Committee. Holden served as Chairman of the Inter-Government Relations Committee and Vice-Chairman of the Public Safety Committee. Holden also served as a Vice-Chairman of the Rapid Transit District (RTD), a member of the LA County Transportation Committee (LACTC), and as a member of the LA Metropolitan Transit Authority (LAMTA).

Holden previously served four years as a California State Senator where he authored and co-authored more than 70 bills that became law. While in the Senate, he served as Vice-Chairman of the very important Public Utilities Transit and Energy Committee.

Prior to that, Holden served as Assistant Chief Deputy to then Los Angeles County Supervisor Kenneth Hahn for 12 years.

Holden spent 17 years in the aerospace industry where he was assigned to innovative projects, including the Surveyor Lunar Landing spacecraft mission.

http://www.ev1.org/holden.htm

http://ev1-club.power.net/




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 13, 2008 5:04 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by out2theblack:
Hmm , 1973 was like , almost 3 DOZEN Years Ago...



Los Angeles – November 18, 2008 --

Former California State Senator and Los Angeles City Councilman Nate Holden is holding a news conference, speaking out against American auto manufacturers and in support of mass-production of the electric car. The Honorable Nate Holden believes that the taxpayers should not bailout the auto manufacturers without The Big Three agreeing to mass-produce the electric car as an incentive.

Nate Holden states the following points:

In 1990, the State of California enacted a zero-emissions mandate, forcing auto manufacturers who sold their cars in the State of California to require that at least 10% of the automobiles that are sold here have zero-emissions.

In 2002 the Bush administration sided with the automakers to fight the zero-emissions mandate. The Bush administration, General Motors, other U.S. automakers and the oil companies committed sabotage against the American people and the environment. Because of the lawsuit, California will not make any strides in improving our air quality. To continue to build internal combustion engines will result in more photochemical smog and will cause more lung cancer and respiratory disease.

At about that time, General Motors embarked on a program to deceive the public and the lawmakers. They introduced the EV1 as a revolutionary concept car. The EV1 had all the whistles and bells and if mass-produced, could have saved the automobile industry from its financial woes. At the beginning, General Motors and the other auto manufacturers never intended for the electric vehicle to be a successful program, specifically the EV1.

It turned out to be nothing but a hoax when General Motors built 1,100 EV1s and allowed the public to lease and road test them. Without a doubt, the EV1, as a prototype vehicle, met the test acceptance program. In fact, in many circles there are those who are of the opinion that it exceeded the testing program. The consumers who leased the EV1 offered to purchase the EV1 vehicle from General Motors. They knew the EV1 was a zero-emission, cost effective automobile.
General Motors said "no" and (in)voked the terms and conditions of the lease requiring that those vehicles be returned to General Motors and they were subsequently destroyed.

General Motors has had at least ten years notice to develop and mass-produce an electric vehicle and they have failed to do so. They have continuously brainwashed the public and the elected officials, claiming that they were on our side and they are not! Here they are again, demanding that the hard-working taxpayers bail them out. (Them being the automobile manufacturers) They are demanding the bailout funding without any pre-conditions. Shame on them!

Congress should not give auto manufacturers another dime until the commitment is made that they will build the electric vehicle as a top priority. We must stop importing our oil from the Middle East. The mass production of the electric vehicle can be our way of achieving that goal.

Nate Holden served four terms on the Los Angeles City Council (1987 to 2003). He served as Chairman of the Air Quality and Waste Management Committee and eight years as the Chairman of the Transportation Committee. Holden served as Chairman of the Inter-Government Relations Committee and Vice-Chairman of the Public Safety Committee. Holden also served as a Vice-Chairman of the Rapid Transit District (RTD), a member of the LA County Transportation Committee (LACTC), and as a member of the LA Metropolitan Transit Authority (LAMTA).

Holden previously served four years as a California State Senator where he authored and co-authored more than 70 bills that became law. While in the Senate, he served as Vice-Chairman of the very important Public Utilities Transit and Energy Committee.

Prior to that, Holden served as Assistant Chief Deputy to then Los Angeles County Supervisor Kenneth Hahn for 12 years.

Holden spent 17 years in the aerospace industry where he was assigned to innovative projects, including the Surveyor Lunar Landing spacecraft mission.

http://www.ev1.org/holden.htm

http://ev1-club.power.net/




NOBODY WANTS THOSE STUPID ELECTRIC CARS!!!!!!

I'm going to microwave a bagel and have sex with it - Peter Griffin

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 13, 2008 5:35 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

NOBODY WANTS THOSE STUPID ELECTRIC CARS!!!!!!
Since you have no personal experience with EVs, you haven't talked with anyone whos' driven one, and you have no engineering background I'd have to chalk this up as Another perfectly ignorant statement from Whozit.

Why am I not surpised?

Actually, the peeps who drove them LOVED them. They have GREAT torque and acceleration! Off the line, they'll beat almost every car on the road. They're quiet. They're simple to maintain: no oil changes, no carburetors/ fuel injectors/ fuel filters to clog up, no valves, no timing belts... just great smooth power.

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 13, 2008 5:38 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


EVs are great smooth power , which have short range and cost too damn much. Other than that, folks love them.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 13, 2008 5:55 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


The peeps who had them leased them, for the most part. Their monthly payments were no greater than a typical car lease. When GM pulled back the EV1, their customers offered... begged.. to be able to buy them. But GM refused, took them off the road, and crushed them. Peeps like electrics so much, they're modifying hybrids on their own into near all-electric by adding in batteries. (Near all-electric because it's too damn complicated to remove the gasoline engine part, and remake the transmission into a single drive.)

AFA range is concerned... in most metro areas- where pollution is the worst- peeps driving range is well under the EVs range, stop-and-go. That's where the EVs shine, because they have regenerative breaking. (Using the action of braking as a stator-rotor combination to regenerate electricity.) At our workplace, we have a solar carport: solar panels generate electricity to recharge EV batteries. But they would not do well in rural areas where peeps may drive hundreds of miles each day. In that case, it would be better to stick with either hybrids, LNG, or CNG. (BTW- LNG/ CNG vehicles are also better than gasoline. A coworker's dad who was a farmer converted his 200,000 mile gasoline truck to burn CNG. The CNG burned out all the old carbon, and the truck ran for another 200,000 miles.)

AFA cost... Battery technology has come a long way from the lead-acids of the "old days". (LiMH) But- yes, they are still expensive. Only mass production would bring the costs down.



---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 9:57 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 11:02 AM

DREAMTROVE


What should happen: They should either deal or split up, sell off companies such as lincoln, pontiac, etc. to smaller firms or investors. I wouldn't be against govt. aid for restructuring to this end.

What will happen: they will either deal or be bought by some financial concern, probably foreign. Toyota could buy them all out right now.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 1:10 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


It's gonna get tougher for the automakers if Pres. Obama pushes the EPA to allow states to set their own emission regulations. Unless states coordinate their efforts, each model of car is likely to have several different versions to meet the states' differing, and possibly conflicting, requirements. This is gonna cost a bunch. He's also talking about pushing the mileage requirements currently set for 2020 back to 2011. This'll be fun because the auto companies have already finished the 2011 designs and are getting ready to tool u for manufacturing. Having to scrap the current design and redo the whole thing would make the cost of different emissions setups look cheap.

As for electric cars, they, and plug-in hybrids, are getting pretty close to production. Meanwhile, Ford is coming out with a hybrid model of the Fusion which tests better(mileage, comfort, performance) than similar offerings from Toyota, Nissan, and Honda.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 3:31 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


It's gonna get tougher for the automakers if Pres. Obama pushes the EPA to allow states to set their own emission regulations. Unless states coordinate their efforts, each model of car is likely to have several different versions to meet the states' differing, and possibly conflicting, requirements. This is gonna cost a bunch.



Tell me about it...

As a "car guy", the one model you DIDN'T want to buy (if you wanted anything approaching performance) was a "California car". For so long, they were castrated, weak-sister models because they had to conform to California's ever-stricter emissions standards.

Honda finally had a revelation, and started out by engineering their cars to the California regs, and STILL figured out how to make them as powerful as before (or more so) while getting better mileage AND cleaner tailpipe emissions. So they started selling their "California cars" to every state.

When Cali started classifying Ultra-Low Emissions Vehicles (ULEVs) and Super-Ultra-Low Emissions Vehicles (SULEVs), Honda looked at its lineup and said, "Yeah, we've got it." Their regular production models of the Civic and Accord were already there!

And then there's the problems you run into if you want a DIESEL... The nightmare morass Geezer refers to is already being played out in the world of diesel cars - many carmakers offer wonderful diesels, just not in the U.S., because it seems that every state has different regs and rules for them. California wants one level of particulates ("soot"), New Hampshire another, someone else has problems with the oxides of nitrogen in the emissions, yet another area wants low-sulfur diesel only, somebody else wants urea injection to be mandatory, and so on, until many of the automakers just said "screw it - no diesel for you!".

And meanwhile, they tell *US* that Americans don't like diesels because they're noisy and smelly. Tell that to Audi, who have won the 24 Hours of Lemans with a diesel a few times now - and it's so quiet that they have to rely on the shift-light to tell them when to upshift, because they can't hear the engine over the noise of the wind!

So yeah... Pick ONE Federal standard that you're going to go by, and stick to it.

One thing that does bug me about the Big Three, though, is this: It seems like every time CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards are raised, or if there's even TALK of raising them, the Big Three put up the hew and cry, screaming "We can't do it!" Meanwhile, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan just go about their business, put their heads down, and say, "Yup, we can do that; not a problem."

It's not that the Big Three *can't* do it; it's just that they don't want to.




Mike

"It is complete now; the hands of time are neatly tied."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 4:00 PM

PIRATECAT


I was part of the 9/11 fallout. The big companies are doing what they wanted to do just at a quicker pace. They are laying off more people than they need to. Maximizing profits. A grab for free money is on. Bail me out were sinking. These big companies are like little goverments. They can't manage them correctly so they downsize them. Of course its the mexican, the scab, the nonunion, and union workers fault. Come on its the jackasses at the top. I don't have problem with Obama if he gives money to build stadiums. I do if it is about friggen sky boxes. Enough with the elite worried about catching germs. FDR projects worked the Hoover Dam, the Blue Ridge Highway, and things like that. I don't want to see another B1 project or rich cats getting sky boxes. There is a good book out by an ex NY times writer called No Free lunch. It will wake you up to the scams the rich are putting on us.

"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 4:48 PM

DREAMTROVE


There will be a federal standard.

I expect that Obama will need to rebuild america's industrial infrastructure if only to support a new war machine. That means not sinking the autos. But so far, he's been hesitant. I'm not sure what to make of the whole thing.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 4:48 PM

DREAMTROVE


Double post

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 26, 2009 6:16 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

One thing that does bug me about the Big Three, though, is this: It seems like every time CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards are raised, or if there's even TALK of raising them, the Big Three put up the hew and cry, screaming "We can't do it!" Meanwhile, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan just go about their business, put their heads down, and say, "Yup, we can do that; not a problem."



Compare gas prices in Europe and Asia with what we have here(except in brief bumps). Europe is currently $4.50 to $6.50 a gallon, due largely to high tax on fuel. Japan is $4.25. Here in Virginia it's around $2.00. The Japanese and European carmakers make economical cars because that's what sells in the global market(less the U.S.). Japanese and European governments also have progressive taxes on cars with larger, less fuel-efficient, engines. Notice that in the U.S. Japanese makers have begun selling full-size pickups and SUVs. Even the cars they sell here(Acura TL, Toyota Avalon, etc.) are larger than what they sell in their home markets. Demand drives this market, and a lot of folk still want larger cars and SUVs.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 4:13 AM

DREAMTROVE


Japan has a serious parking issue, esp. in Tokyo. This is why the local cars are like 8 feet long. This is an issue in Europe too. They also have higher fuel prices, no real local production.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 4:40 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


One of the many things about these bailouts that burns, is the fact that you know with these giant dollar amounts they are making general calculations on what they need and then DOUBLING that number.

They have to be laughing behind closed doors, "Gawd! That was TOO easy! Why didn't we think of this before? I loved how you guys showed up in those hybrids... man, the stones on you guys. I will eat crow every effin' day if it tastes this good!"

Their trump card is jobs.

Just watched "Who Killed The Electric Car," and while it's over long and nothing much new, you do get a fresh appreciation of how unaccountable these automakers believe themselves to be.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 6:24 AM

DREAMTROVE


Quote:

PIZMO

One of the many things about these bailouts that burns, is the fact that you know with these giant dollar amounts they are making general calculations on what they need and then DOUBLING that number.



You mean there's an actual logic? I thought they just pulled those numbers out of their assets, so to speak.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Will Your State Regain It's Representation Next Decade?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:53 - 113 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:44 - 170 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:40 - 42 posts
MAGA movement
Sun, November 24, 2024 01:26 - 13 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sun, November 24, 2024 01:01 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 23:46 - 4761 posts
Australia - unbelievable...
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:59 - 22 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:33 - 4796 posts
More Cope: David Brooks and PBS are delusional...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:32 - 1 posts
List of States/Governments/Politicians Moving to Ban Vaccine Passports
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:27 - 168 posts
Once again... a request for legitimate concerns...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:22 - 17 posts
What's wrong with conspiracy theories
Sat, November 23, 2024 15:07 - 19 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL