Quote:

---

Originally posted by dreamtrove:

I disagree that we need regime change. A fair number of the presidents staff and advisors make me nervous, and some of them I actively distrust, but I don't really have major problems with the president himself. I have no problem with him staying.

I think the more logical approach would be to push the president to have some personnel changes as Bush and Clinton did, just in a more libertarian direction.

---

Quote:

---

I think we need to see a shake up of the economic team. At least an equal share of Austrian school mon the team would improve things tremendously, even a few decent fiscal conservatives would help a lot.

Suggestions ?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by antimason:
true.. but mark my words, when it comes down to message, Rand Paul will win. in their hearts, people believe in liberty

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by antimason:
true.. but mark my words, when it comes down to message, Rand Paul will win. in their hearts, people believe in liberty

---

Quote:

---

And here were we few, who know (not suspect) that you serve an evil empire.

---

Quote:

---

“These petty dictators say that to stop climate change it’s about ending capitalism, they are explicit, and the President by attending Copenhagen gives credibility and credence to these folks and he should not go. I have a message, a message from the Tea Party, a message that is loud and clear and does not mince words: We have come to take our government back!"
-Dr Rand Paul MD, US Senate acceptance speech

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/05/18/tuesday.primaries/index.html?hp
t=T1&iref=BN1

Now we just need to get Ron Paul to replace Obama and we will have a fighting chance at turning this country around and making things right!

:))

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:

Its amazing to me that people STILL think this is about parties.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
"Remember, die-hard Republican loyalists like "Hero" *STILL* hate Ron Paul and everything he stands for; do you think they'll be lining up behind his son?"

Its amazing to me that people STILL think this is about parties.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Sig,

Your "truth" is that corporations run everything and hurt everyone, and that all weath should be passed around.

My truth is that people should be free, to do as they wish, keep what they earn fully, and if they are smart enough to come up with something to better mankind, benefit from it.

Lets see who *wins*.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Story,

Sorry if you arn't some "white boy".

But it isn't my fault.

Take your racism and bitterness someplace else.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Story,

Sorry if you arn't some "white boy".

But it isn't my fault.

Take your racism and bitterness someplace else.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:

We should never "bailout" a company. But thats YOUR guys MO isn't it?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
"In your world, are corporations like BP responsible for the damage they do? Or should the taxpayers get stuck with the bills for bailing them out? What are the limits to those "benefits" they are allowed to reap? ARE there any limits, in your ideal world?"

Of course corporations are responsible for what they do.

---

Quote:

---

There are no benefits (financially). Except in the case where they must make their product affordable to the general public. (If I came up with a cure for cancer, damn right I better be one of, if not, THE richest man on the planet... but not by making it unaffordable to most people)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:

We should never "bailout" a company. But thats YOUR guys MO isn't it?

---

What, you cover your eyes and ears and sing "nyah nyah nyah" when Bush put Tarp through.... or are you just an idiot?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
That, or Wulfie was too busy whining "Tha's raciss!""

Sorry Kwiks...

Thats you and your guys MO.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
That, or Wulfie was too busy whining "Tha's raciss!""

Sorry Kwiks...

Thats you and your guys MO.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Ehhh, I understood what you meant.

Doesn't make a diff.

Don't you get that?

No matter what "they" push on us... no matter how much "they" try and shape us.

There will always be a resistance.

I'm just happy to be on the right side of things.

:)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Kwicko:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
"In your world, are corporations like BP responsible for the damage they do? Or should the taxpayers get stuck with the bills for bailing them out? What are the limits to those "benefits" they are allowed to reap? ARE there any limits, in your ideal world?"

Of course corporations are responsible for what they do.

---

100% responsible, without limits or caps?

Quote:

---

We should never "bailout" a company. But thats YOUR guys MO isn't it?

---

Never? EVER? What if it's the only hospital in a 100-mile radius? No government funding at all? Should they be required to treat people if they aren't sure they can pay?

Quote:

---

There are no benefits (financially). Except in the case where they must make their product affordable to the general public. (If I came up with a cure for cancer, damn right I better be one of, if not, THE richest man on the planet... but not by making it unaffordable to most people)

---

You obviously don't work for a pharmaceutical company if this is your belief. If you work for them, you don't own your work, and you're due nothing more than your usual paycheck for that work. They, however, are entitled to as much as they can squeeze out of people, under the current system.

And yes, a cancer cure would indeed be unaffordable to most people, at least here in the U.S., and they'd bankrupt themselves trying to afford it. Maybe you've had your head in the sand (or somewhere else); that happens every single day here in the "land of the free"

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Right Kwick,

So, you are for communism then I take it? Or socialism?

---

Quote:

---

As for me.. if I were to figure out the cure for cancer, damn right Im getting paid for it.

---

Quote:

---

lol My last name ISN'T Kalashnikov.

---

Quote:

---

However, that said, I would do everything to make it affordable for everyone.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/rand_paul_telling_t
he_truth.html

Please read the article before making a comment...

---