[quote]Rep. Edward Markey on Monday challenged the assertion by oil giant BP's chief executive that no underwater oil plumes have formed because of the G..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Underwater oil plumes? Naw...

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Tuesday, June 1, 2010 05:50
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 408
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, May 31, 2010 9:53 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Rep. Edward Markey on Monday challenged the assertion by oil giant BP's chief executive that no underwater oil plumes have formed because of the Gulf of Mexico spill.

In a letter to BP, Markey, D-Massachusetts, said scientific evidence showed that such plumes have formed, and he asked for BP CEO Tony Hayward to provide evidence to back up Hayward's claim Sunday that the oil had gone to the surface.

On Sunday, Markey, who heads the House Energy and Environment subcommittee, accused BP of issuing false statements about the spill.

"BP in this instance means 'Blind to Plumes,' " Markey said in a statement Monday.

There was no immediate response from BP.

Markey's letter to BP said "the confirmation of the presence of large quantities of oil sub-surface could help to inform clean-up and response efforts, and it is vital that there is unfettered access to all relevant data or analysis."

The letter noted that University of South Florida researchers recently reported finding a 22-mile-long plume of dispersed oil.

Naw, they wouldn't lie to us, they're good guys. It was just an accident, as we all know, and after all, "shit happens", right?

From the same article
Quote:

On Sunday, the Obama administration questioned BP's oil spill numbers.

On NBC's "Meet the Press," Carol Browner, Obama's assistant on energy and climate change, said BP may have had an ulterior motive for underestimating the amount of oil leaking.

"BP has a financial interest in these numbers. They will pay a penalty based on the number of barrels per day," she said.

BP had originally said that about 5,000 barrels of oil per day were leaking.

The latest estimate, Browner said, is between 12,000 and 19,000 barrels per day.

That must be wrong, too; after all, they said they'd clean EVERYTHING up, every little speck of it, and pay damages to everyone involved. So they must be good guys...




To our President: “Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar. Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.... oh, go fuck yourself, Mr. President” ...Raptor

To Anthony, unquestionably the most civil person on this forum: “Go fuck yourself. On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you. ...Raptor

To Frem: “You miserable piece of shit.” ...Raptor

...so much for "together"...this, instead, weakens us...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 1, 2010 5:50 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


There's more here that we're not being told - BY ANYONE , Gov't or private.

Nuclear option might be used.

It's been used before -



( this well burned for 3 years before it was put out )





** ANYONE ** who thinks the Fed Gov't has done " all it possibly can " in response the Gulf Coast oil disaster, or who thinks Obama isn't lying to us all - I have no use for you. You deserve all the animosity and any vulgar "tone" directed your way. ( Anthony , that includes you, buddy. Sorry )

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL