REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Bradley Manning's treatment

POSTED BY: CANTTAKESKY
UPDATED: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 18:27
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3567
PAGE 1 of 2

Thursday, April 7, 2011 3:08 PM

CANTTAKESKY


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/04/bradley-manning-british-mo
ral-authority


Quote:

British diplomats will express with officials in Washington for a second time MPs' concerns about the treatment of a US soldier charged with leaking thousands of sensitive cables to WikiLeaks, the government has confirmed.

Foreign Office minister Henry Bellingham said staff at the British embassy in Washington would discuss Bradley Manning's detention with the US state department.

Bellingham made the promise after Labour MP Ann Clwyd raised the matter in parliament on Monday night.

Clwyd said Manning, who is charged with downloading 250,000 sensitive cables and passing them to WikiLeaks, had been stripped at night and held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day.

His treatment at the Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Virginia made it more difficult for the US and Britain to campaign against human rights abuses in other countries, she said.

Clwyd, chair of the all-party parliamentary group on human rights, said that the UK's credibility was at risk in "places where human rights are not nearly so well observed."

She called on the government to offer practical support to the British relatives of Manning.

"I do not want us to get drawn into a discussion of the rights and wrongs of the WikiLeaks revelations. I would like us now to concentrate on the current conditions of detention for Bradley Manning," Clwyd said at the adjournment debate speech.

"Manning's case is important because of the message it sends out to the rest of the world about what kind of treatment the United States thinks is acceptable for people in detention. And, for us, it is important what we say – or what we don't say.

"That matters in places where human rights are not nearly so well observed. People will pay attention in China and in Russia – and in Libya, where we want to be on the side of those fighting for freedom from state repression.

"And most of all in Afghanistan: it matters to those UK and US service personnel fighting in Afghanistan what kind of image Britain and the US have in the world."

Clwyd drew on her experiences during the seven years she spent as special envoy to Iraq on human rights.

"It is my view that some of the greatest damage was caused to British and American efforts in Iraq when the stories of prisoner abuse emerged," she said. "It undermined our moral authority when we needed to explain that we were fighting for a better future for Iraq.

"The United States – and the UK, in the way we respond to actions of the US – needs to preserve that moral authority if we are to have a positive impact on the world and lead by example."

Praising the Guardian's coverage of Manning's treatment in the US, Clwyd said she would be willing to visit the solider if his family asked her to.

"I have read the several accounts of Bradley's treatment which have appeared in the press. Some very good accounts have been in the Guardian, and from David Leigh in particular," she said.

But the account to which she has paid most attention is Bradley's own, in which he complains of "improper treatment" and "unlawful pre-trial punishment".

Clwyd is the only politician to have directly questioned the foreign secretary, William Hague, over the government's position on Manning.

She has sponsored an early day motion calling for the government to raise the case with the US administration. The motion is supported by 37 MPs, including co-sponsors Peter Bottomley, Jeremy Corbyn, Mark Durkan and Paul Flynn.

Hague has previously said the government has not intervened because Manning's lawyer has said the soldier "does not hold a UK passport, nor does he consider himself a UK citizen".

"Our standing on this matter is limited," Hague said during a parliamentary debate last month. "[Manning] is not asking for our help, nor considering himself British."

But Clwyd has called Hague's response a red herring. She points out that Manning's mother, Susan, is Welsh and lives in Pembrokeshire, where Manning lived between the ages of 13 and 17, and she points to calls from Manning's lawyer, David Coombs, for his client's detention status to be changed.

Manning's treatment in the military prison in Quantico, Virginia, "ignores the repeated recommendations of the marine corps' own appointed psychiatrists", Coombs has said. His treatment "serves no purpose other than to humiliate and degrade Bradley Manning. I regard it as cruel and unnecessary."

Human Rights Watch has called on the US government to "explain the precise reasons behind extremely restrictive and possibly punitive and degrading treatment" that Manning alleges he has received.

Amnesty International has said "Manning is being subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. This is particularly disturbing when one considers that he hasn't even been brought to trial, let alone convicted of a crime."

The UN special rapporteur on torture is understood to have raised his concerns with the US administration and is waiting for a response.

Clwyd quoted a recent column written for the Guardian by PJ Crowley, who resigned as spokesman for the US state department after criticising Manning's treatment, in which he repeated his conviction that it was "ridiculous, counterproductive, and stupid".




Very disturbing.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 7, 2011 4:30 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Thank you, CTS. I have been meaning to post something on Bradley Manning for sometime. He's in the shadow of Assange, but suffering so much more.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 7, 2011 8:11 PM

CANTTAKESKY


I'm afraid one day I'll turn on the news to hear that Manning has committed "suicide."

The world is an extremely unjust and cruel place.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 1:45 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
I'm afraid one day I'll turn on the news to hear that Manning has committed "suicide."

The world is an extremely unjust and cruel place.



Probably happen the day after Assange does the same.


And now we've gone from "it's not torture if we think they're terrorists" to "it's not torture if we think he did something we don't approve of".

And the Tea Party, that "bastion of libertarianism", has expressed zero outrage.

As I pointed out in another thread, there ARE true libertarians here. CTS comes to mind. A few others.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 1:52 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
And now we've gone from "it's not torture if we think they're terrorists" to "it's not torture if we think he did something we don't approve of".

Exactly. AND none of these people they are torturing have ever had a trial or a chance to defend themselves. (Not that they can torture after a trial either.)





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 1:55 AM

JONGSSTRAW


As much as I detest Manning and believe he is a traitor, he is innocent until proven guilty. He is being confined as if he had been sentenced by a judge and jury. I find his treatment despicable and inhuman, and completly without justification.








NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 5:09 AM

HARDWARE


Sorry to everyone that has so far posted on this topic. While Manning's treatment is harsh, it is not harmful, and it is entirely legal. Personnel in the armed forces are not protected by the Constitution. They protect the constitution and justice is administered under the uniform code of military justice. He is accused of committing serious breaches of security and general orders, including aiding the enemy. On this last charge he could conceivably be sentenced to death, although the prosecution has stated they do not intend to pursue that punishment.

Also, any prisoner in the brig with him is under the same general conditions. Single cells, no visual contact with anyone but a guard. He is not allowed to sleep during the day. He gets 1 hour of exercise daily. He is under a protection from injury order. While under that order he joked about strangling himself with his boxer shorts and thong sandals. Those items were then removed.

Complain if you want. But these are routine conditions in a military prison, with the exception of the protection order.

His pre-trial hearing is supposed to take place in May or June.


The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 6:08 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
But these are routine conditions in a military prison, with the exception of the protection order.

That doesn't make it right.

Torture is torture. Just because torture is routine doesn't mean it's acceptable.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 6:21 AM

HARDWARE


Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
But these are routine conditions in a military prison, with the exception of the protection order.

That doesn't make it right.

Torture is torture. Just because torture is routine doesn't mean it's acceptable.


How, exactly, are you defining torture? What are the torturous conditions Manning is being subject to? Deprivation of cable television???

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 8:08 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
How, exactly, are you defining torture? What are the torturous conditions Manning is being subject to? Deprivation of cable television???

Fair question.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Torture

It includes "severe mental pain and suffering" inflicted to extract information or to punish. Solitary confinement for more than a few weeks is considered torture by most scholars.

This alone should suffice.
1. Solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, for 7 months.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/03/30/090330fa_fact_gawande
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Solitary_confinement

Then add the following to the big picture.
2. Denied exercise in his cell, enforced by 24 hour surveillance.
3. Only exercise allowed 1 hour a day is to walk in a figure 8 in an empty room.
4. Denied pillow or sheets.
5. Denied clothing overnight, every night (beginning in March 2011); changed to forced to wear a coarse "smock."
6. Denied his eyeglasses.
7. Forced to respond to his guards every 5 minutes.
8. Allowed only one book or magazine to read at a time, with nothing kept overnight.

Then add the fact he has not been convicted.

Glenn Greenwald explains why the above is torture.
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/14/manning

Manning speaks about his forced nudity.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/11/bradley-manning-strip-clot
hing-prison


More articles re Manning's torture.
http://socialistworker.org/2011/03/08/torturing-bradley-manning
http://news.change.org/stories/un-investigating-bradley-manning-tortur
e-claims

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barton-kunstler-phd/bradley-mannings-abu
se-ar_b_831179.html


Now I have a question for you, Hardware. You keep claiming this treatment is "routine" and "appropriate" for military prisons. I would like to see sources that back up your assertion.

I suspect the convicted military rapists do not suffer the extent of degradation, humiliation, and mental torture Manning endures. However, I am too lazy/busy to go digging around to confirm my suspicion. Whatever you can provide to substantiate your claim would help prove my suspicion wrong. Thank you.

ETA: Also in military prisons, are they allowed to slap "protection orders" on inmates without a formal psychiatric evaluation or in spite of a psychiatric evaluation to the contrary?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 9:04 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
I'm afraid one day I'll turn on the news to hear that Manning has committed "suicide."



And this is exactly the reason they're keeping a 'suicide watch' on him. If he did manage to kill himself, as he's 'joked' about, a lot of folks wouldn't believe it no matter the evidence.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 9:15 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
And this is exactly the reason they're keeping a 'suicide watch' on him. If he did manage to kill himself, as he's 'joked' about, a lot of folks wouldn't believe it no matter the evidence.

Suicide watch is one thing.

Mental torture disguised as "suicide watch" is a self-fulfilling prophecy waiting to happen. Some types of "suicide watch" actually prompt the suicide it is supposed to prevent.

The intelligent way to go about preventing suicide is evaluate his mental status professionally. And withhold the mental torture.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 9:18 AM

HARDWARE


Private Manning is in a "red line" brig. Where the hardest of the hard cases are usually assigned. This is also where anyone accused of a crime that includes the possibility of capital punishment would be sent. So, Private Manning is in an appropriate location.
From a Marine's own description of a red line brig.
Quote:


A red line brig is what it is, its a brig that has one red line to all functions such as hard cells which where 4foot wide 8foot long and 8 feet tall and to the head and showers and everything was in open view, where the prisoners could be seen 24 hours a day. everywhere you went you stayed on the red line, if you refused to walk the red line you where put in the hard cell 23 hours a day and was only allowed out of the cell for head calls and chow..
if you where awaiting charges such as murder you where handcuffed with waist chains and shackles and was locked in the hard cell 24-7 this i know from experience as i was a prisoner escort at the first red line brig in Gitmo way before gitmo had there new prison...


He is not in solitary confinement. He is confined with up to 30 other prisoners. The cells are arranged in a horseshoe pattern, all facing out. He could conceivably speak to those other prisoners, but since he is in a red line brig, speaking to other prisoners is not allowed. He has contact with his guards every 5 minutes. He is allowed visitors on weekends, so I can't see how you characterize this as solitary confinement.

In the 1960's hard case military prisoners would be assigned to the 4'x8'x8' cell with a sheetless mattress, toilet in full view of the barred door. There were two painted footprints on the floor. After reveille and until taps, the prisoner would stand at parade rest with his feet on those painted footprints. The hallway outside the cells was carpeted so prisoners could not hear a guard approaching. Meals were served on a tray, the prisoners would eat while standing. Private Manning has a relatively comfortable incarceration compared to that.

http://www.bobrohrer.com/sea_stories/loreth.pdf

The purpose of denying him sheets is to prevent a hanging attempt. His enforced nudity was only implemented after he commented that he could kill himself with the elastic from his underwear or his thong sandals, and now he is allowed to wear a hospital gown, presumably paper. He is allowed access to reading materials and brief viewing of television. Yes, his treatment sucks and I would not want to live that way. But he is accused of a crime, has not denied it under questioning. Due to that he is a prisoner and is being denied any comfort and privileges.

And again, he has very few rights in the military. You can be ordered to undergo medical treatment. Denying or evading the treatments results in charges of disobeying an order. There are no appeals and very few loopholes.

This is a whole different world. He decided to go into the military and thought it would be like his suburban lifestyle. In fact, the language control swirling around this is fascinating. I love how everyone refers to him as "Bradley Manning" like he's some kid who works at the Jamba Juice and just got caught up in something. He is Private Manning, United States Army. He signed the papers, and swore an oath. He is accused of committing crimes and high treason. If he is convicted he will most likely go to Leavenworth and join the company of such notables Hasan Akbar, Charles Graner and William Caley.

Oh, and why is there no liberal furor of this officer who was just sentenced to 6 months and discharge from the army?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20025992-504083.html

I'm not saying I agree with him. But I am saying if there's all this furor over military prisons, are you going to cherry pick who you support?

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 9:53 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
so I can't see how you characterize this as solitary confinement.



Here is the link again.
Quote:



http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/14/manning

From the beginning of his detention, Manning has been held in intensive solitary confinement. For 23 out of 24 hours every day -- for seven straight months and counting -- he sits completely alone in his cell. Even inside his cell, his activities are heavily restricted; he's barred even from exercising and is under constant surveillance to enforce those restrictions. For reasons that appear completely punitive, he's being denied many of the most basic attributes of civilized imprisonment, including even a pillow or sheets for his bed (he is not and never has been on suicide watch). For the one hour per day when he is freed from this isolation, he is barred from accessing any news or current events programs. Lt. Villiard protested that the conditions are not "like jail movies where someone gets thrown into the hole," but confirmed that he is in solitary confinement, entirely alone in his cell except for the one hour per day he is taken out.



Now if you are saying Glenn Greenwald is mistaken or lying, I would like to see sources to substantiate your version of Manning's prison conditions.

The only link you sent me about military conditions was about a prison in the 50's. May I quote?

Quote:

This brig was so tough the maximum confinement was 30 days....
Within the Butler Building brig was a cage that contained about 16 double bunks. There were two cells for solitary confinement outside the cage, along one bulkhead.



No solitary confinement for most. 2 solitary confinement cells for a maximum of 30 days. This doesn't support your contention that Manning's conditions are "routine" in military prisons, even in a prison that is supposedly extra tough.

Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
I'm not saying I agree with him. But I am saying if there's all this furor over military prisons, are you going to cherry pick who you support?

Was this birther in a red line brig?

If everyone in the red line brig is treated the same way as Manning is, solitary confinement for months and months, with a few visits here and there, then everyone in the red line brig is being tortured. I would oppose it no matter who it was. Even if it were those people on the "kill team."

There must be minimum standards on how to treat other human beings, no matter how much you hate what they've done.





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 1:34 PM

HARDWARE


Apologies for missing the link. Text pasted below.

From the website of PFC Manning's attorney.
Quote:



18 december 2010

A Typical Day for PFC Bradley Manning

PFC Manning is currently being held in maximum custody. Since arriving at the Quantico Confinement Facility in July of 2010, he has been held under Prevention of Injury (POI) watch.

His cell is approximately six feet wide and twelve feet in length.

The cell has a bed, a drinking fountain, and a toilet.

The guards at the confinement facility are professional. At no time have they tried to bully, harass, or embarrass PFC Manning. Given the nature of their job, however, they do not engage in conversation with PFC Manning.

At 5:00 a.m. he is woken up (on weekends, he is allowed to sleep until 7:00 a.m.). Under the rules for the confinement facility, he is not allowed to sleep at anytime between 5:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. If he attempts to sleep during those hours, he will be made to sit up or stand by the guards.

He is allowed to watch television during the day. The television stations are limited to the basic local stations. His access to the television ranges from 1 to 3 hours on weekdays to 3 to 6 hours on weekends.

He cannot see other inmates from his cell. He can occasionally hear other inmates talk. Due to being a pretrial confinement facility, inmates rarely stay at the facility for any length of time. Currently, there are no other inmates near his cell.

From 7:00 p.m. to 9:20 p.m., he is given correspondence time. He is given access to a pen and paper. He is allowed to write letters to family, friends, and his attorneys.

Each night, during his correspondence time, he is allowed to take a 15 to 20 minute shower.

On weekends and holidays, he is allowed to have approved visitors see him from 12:00 to 3:00 p.m.

He is allowed to receive letters from those on his approved list and from his legal counsel. If he receives a letter from someone not on his approved list, he must sign a rejection form. The letter is then either returned to the sender or destroyed.

He is allowed to have any combination of up to 15 books or magazines. He must request the book or magazine by name. Once the book or magazine has been reviewed by the literary board at the confinement facility, and approved, he is allowed to have someone on his approved list send it to him. The person sending the book or magazine to him must do so through a publisher or an approved distributor such as Amazon. They are not allowed to mail the book or magazine directly to PFC Manning.


Due to being held on Prevention of Injury (POI) watch:

PFC Manning is held in his cell for approximately 23 hours a day.

The guards are required to check on PFC Manning every five minutes by asking him if he is okay. PFC Manning is required to respond in some affirmative manner. At night, if the guards cannot see PFC Manning clearly, because he has a blanket over his head or is curled up towards the wall, they will wake him in order to ensure he is okay.

He receives each of his meals in his cell.

He is not allowed to have a pillow or sheets. However, he is given access to two blankets and has recently been given a new mattress that has a built-in pillow.

He is not allowed to have any personal items in his cell.

He is only allowed to have one book or one magazine at any given time to read in his cell. The book or magazine is taken away from him at the end of the day before he goes to sleep.

He is prevented from exercising in his cell. If he attempts to do push-ups, sit-ups, or any other form of exercise he will be forced to stop.

He does receive one hour of “exercise” outside of his cell daily. He is taken to an empty room and only allowed to walk. PFC Manning normally just walks figure eights in the room for the entire hour. If he indicates that he no long feels like walking, he is immediately returned to his cell.

When PFC Manning goes to sleep, he is required to strip down to his boxer shorts and surrender his clothing to the guards. His clothing is returned to him the next morning.


http://www.armycourtmartialdefense.info/2010/12/typical-day-for-pfc-br
adley-manning.html


Now, unless Salon has some top-secret information that PFC Manning's attorney doesn't, I take it you'll accept this information?

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 1:34 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


This whole situation demonstrates what an inhumane society the US has become. What do we fight for,isn't that one of the major reasons for Iraq? That the government was inhumane, corrupt and vicious. The last couple of years have demonstrated that the major force that fought there isn't much better.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 1:46 PM

HARDWARE


Another point that is missed amongst all the hand-wringers and chest beating is that the alternative is putting PFC Manning in general confinement. He would be sharing a cell with 0-24 other prisoners. He would be performing his bodily functions in open view of the other prisoners.

Some of those other prisoners, who may be in for anything from absent without orders to serious crimes may consider him a traitor. In general confinement he may not live to stand a court martial.

I am led to believe, by an e-mail I received from a relative on duty in the Navy, that Quantico has a more strict level of detention than Manning is in.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 3:39 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
This whole situation demonstrates what an inhumane society the US has become. What do we fight for,isn't that one of the major reasons for Iraq? That the government was inhumane, corrupt and vicious. The last couple of years have demonstrated that the major force that fought there isn't much better.



Indeed.

And "Hardware" here seems more than happy to "just follow orders", doesn't he?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 4:34 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
Another point that is missed amongst all the hand-wringers and chest beating is that the alternative is putting PFC Manning in general confinement. He would be sharing a cell with 0-24 other prisoners. He would be performing his bodily functions in open view of the other prisoners.

Some of those other prisoners, who may be in for anything from absent without orders to serious crimes may consider him a traitor. In general confinement he may not live to stand a court martial.

I am led to believe, by an e-mail I received from a relative on duty in the Navy, that Quantico has a more strict level of detention than Manning is in.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36



Last time I checked, Manning has not been found guilty of anything, but awaiting trial.

The conditions he awaits trial in :

"On July 29, 2010, Manning was moved from Kuwait to the Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, and classified as a "maximum custody detainee" held under a "Prevention of Injury" assignment. As of January 2011 he was being held in a 6 x 12 ft cell, with no window, furnished with a bed, toilet and sink, and with meals taken in his cell. According to The Washington Post, the facility has 30 cells built in a U shape, and although the detainees may talk to one another, they are unable to see each other. If Manning were to try to speak to any of them, the guards would view it as disruptive, according to his lawyer, David Coombs, a former military attorney and member of the United States Army Reserve; Coombs said in December 2010 that the guards were professional, and had not tried to bully, harass, or embarrass Manning. He was being allowed outside his cell to walk for up to one hour a day, shackled. There was access to television for limited periods when it was placed in the corridor outside his cell. He was allowed to keep one book and one magazine in his cell—according to Leigh and Harding, he requested Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781)—but otherwise no writing materials, though access to them was given during allotted times. He was being shackled during visits.[29]
Wikinews has related news: US military brig officials order whistle-blowing suspect to sleep naked

A Prevention of Injury order is one stop short of suicide watch. It entails checks by guards every five minutes, and no sleeping during the day. His lawyer said he was not allowed to sleep between 5 am (7 am at weekends) and 8 pm, and if he tried to, was made to stand or sit up. He was required to remain visible at all times, including at night, which entailed no access to sheets, no pillow except one built into his mattress, and a blanket designed not to be shredded. Until March 2011 he was required to sleep in boxer shorts, and had experienced chafing of the skin from the heavy blanket.[29] On March 2, he was told that an Article 138 complaint filed in January by his lawyer—asking that he be removed from maximum custody and prevention-of-injury watch—had been denied. His lawyer said Manning subsequently joked to the guards that, if he wanted to harm himself, he could do so "with the elastic waistband of his underwear or with his flip-flops." This resulted in him being required to sleep without clothing and present himself naked outside his cell for morning inspection, which his lawyer described as ritual humiliation, though from around March 10 onwards he was given a garment to sleep in. In response to the incident, the brig psychiatrist classified him as at low risk of suicide.[30] According to psychiatrist and prison expert Terry Kupers, "The problem with the argument that Manning is being kept in long-term solitary confinement to prevent his suicide is that long-term solitary confinement causes suicide."

Regardless of whether this is standard practice for your military, this would constitute cruel and unusual punishment. I might add that this would not be considered appropriate treatment for someone convicted of murder either.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 4:35 PM

BYTEMITE


Hmm. I would not be surprised if Manning was being treated in the way described. I definitely don't agree with it...

However, I personally have my doubts that his treatment is very unusual, or illegal under US law. From the accounts I hear it's not uncommon for the US judicial system and US military system to turn a blind eye to treatment of prisoners when convenient, even if it means ignoring international law.

On the other hand, the initial article is written from a very pathos angle, DRIPPING with it, which immediately makes me wonder what the ulterior agenda is.

The world's gone mad. What happens in the dark is inhuman and then even things that seem to have good intentions may be pushing things worse, tightening the noose. In an ideal world, I wouldn't have to be so paranoid that someone calling out a real and troubling problem will only institute an even worse solution.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 5:02 PM

HARDWARE


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
This whole situation demonstrates what an inhumane society the US has become. What do we fight for,isn't that one of the major reasons for Iraq? That the government was inhumane, corrupt and vicious. The last couple of years have demonstrated that the major force that fought there isn't much better.



Indeed.

And "Hardware" here seems more than happy to "just follow orders", doesn't he?


Legal orders, yes. And as I have stated many times in this thread, all the orders he is accused of breaking were legal orders. Just as the orders regarding his detention are legal.

When you serve you have one right that cannot be taken away. The right to bitch about your assignment.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 8, 2011 5:11 PM

HARDWARE


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Hmm. I would not be surprised if Manning was being treated in the way described. I definitely don't agree with it...

However, I personally have my doubts that his treatment is very unusual, or illegal under US law. From the accounts I hear it's not uncommon for the US judicial system and US military system to turn a blind eye to treatment of prisoners when convenient, even if it means ignoring international law.



It isn't illegal under the UCMJ. It is uncomfortable, but not torturous or illegal.

If the military wanted him dead it would have been a simple matter of transferring him to a line infantry unit, identifying a minefield and ordering him to walk across it. He refused an order under combat conditions any superior in his chain of command is theoretically allowed to shoot him on the spot. All in the name of keeping good order and discipline in the unit.

This is the constant collision of cultures between civilians and the military. He's not a civilian with rights. He's a soldier. He can still be ordered, legally, to conduct an action that will result in his death. And if those orders are later reviewed and found that it was necessary to sacrifice one soldier to complete the mission or save other lives there will be nothing more said. That is the brutal reality of the military.

He is supposed to be protecting your rights. He may have done exactly that and still get sent to Leavenworth to make little rocks out of big rocks.

Make sure you thank him for his sacrifice when he is released.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 9, 2011 1:10 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Yeah, the military definitely didn't have a hard time getting Pat Tillman dead once he became a problem...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 9, 2011 6:23 PM

HARDWARE


I spoke to a couple of veteran friends of mine today, just to get their take on PFC Manning's treatment. All of them served since 1986. The most common comment was that they were treated worse in boot camp. In boot they were not allowed television, or allowed visitors. Their day was strictly controlled from time to rise, all activities, meals, and training were controlled. They had NO recourse.

One of them worked in the Army JAG office. She confirmed that Manning is probably going to be in isolation for his whole prison sentence. That's a when, not an if, as Manning already admitted releasing documents to Wikileaks. He is going to be under close supervision because putting him in general detention is a death sentence. The rank and file of the Army considers him a traitor that may have contributed to other soldiers dying.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 9, 2011 8:12 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Great. Glad you support inhumane treatment of prisoners. Really says a lot about who you are and what your value system is.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 9, 2011 10:37 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
I spoke to a couple of veteran friends of mine today, just to get their take on PFC Manning's treatment. All of them served since 1986. The most common comment was that they were treated worse in boot camp. In boot they were not allowed television, or allowed visitors. Their day was strictly controlled from time to rise, all activities, meals, and training were controlled. They had NO recourse.



Hello,

Boot Camp is designed to destroy your nature and reprogram you. One of its goals is to break you down. I'm not sure it's a good yard stick for measuring compassionate treatment of detainees.

--Anthony



Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 9, 2011 10:53 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


I thought the idea was that you were innocent until proven guilty, via a trial. If you have to be held in remand, its because you might be a danger to others or skip the country. That if you held pending a trial, that the trial be timely. That if you are sentenced, that your punishment be the loss of liberty and personal freedoms for the period deemed appropriate.

Being stripped and humiliated, kept in solitary for lengthy periods of time, sleep deprivation, prevented from having contact with the outside world are all inhumane, and most of these would constitute torture.

Why is he even in prison?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:59 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
I spoke to a couple of veteran friends of mine today, just to get their take on PFC Manning's treatment. All of them served since 1986. The most common comment was that they were treated worse in boot camp. In boot they were not allowed television, or allowed visitors. Their day was strictly controlled from time to rise, all activities, meals, and training were controlled. They had NO recourse.

One of them worked in the Army JAG office. She confirmed that Manning is probably going to be in isolation for his whole prison sentence. That's a when, not an if, as Manning already admitted releasing documents to Wikileaks. He is going to be under close supervision because putting him in general detention is a death sentence. The rank and file of the Army considers him a traitor that may have contributed to other soldiers dying.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36




"NO recourse", eh?

I guess Manning should just quit the prison, then.

I'm sure if you spoke to a group of prison guards, they'd tell you that prison isn't so bad, at least for them.

Colonel Sanders probably thought his chickens had it pretty good, too.

Point being, you should probably look at your sampling group; you seem to be asking a biased group. Hard to believe a bunch of military folks would be pro-military, right?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:36 AM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
I'm afraid one day I'll turn on the news to hear that Manning has committed "suicide."

The world is an extremely unjust and cruel place.



Probably happen the day after Assange does the same.


And now we've gone from "it's not torture if we think they're terrorists" to "it's not torture if we think he did something we don't approve of".

And the Tea Party, that "bastion of libertarianism", has expressed zero outrage.

As I pointed out in another thread, there ARE true libertarians here. CTS comes to mind. A few others.




Would this be Bush's fault if he was still in office? Wouldn't you, Maddow, and big ole Ed be going ape shit over this? Write Barry a letter if you disapprove of his administration/military/justice dept., but you won't ever do that....you still have a crush on Obama....or you could keep on blaming tea partiers' reactions for the liberal god's deeds... coming off as a partisan douche....

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:48 AM

HARDWARE


Quote:

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
I thought the idea was that you were innocent until proven guilty, via a trial. If you have to be held in remand, its because you might be a danger to others or skip the country. That if you held pending a trial, that the trial be timely. That if you are sentenced, that your punishment be the loss of liberty and personal freedoms for the period deemed appropriate.


Again, all these concepts of "rights" you keep referring to are concepts that apply to civilian justice. The principle right PFC Manning has, and he has not been stripped of, is one of legal representation. I posted a link to his lawyer's website earlier, it makes for some illuminating reading. Especially since what his lawyer is stating about his conditions of confinement are in direct opposition to media articles. Who has better information? His lawyer, who can visit him. Or the media, which are specifically barred from contact?

Quote:


Being stripped and humiliated, kept in solitary for lengthy periods of time, sleep deprivation, prevented from having contact with the outside world are all inhumane, and most of these would constitute torture.

Why is he even in prison?


He is in a single holding cell for his own protection. He is under suicide watch so he does not cheat justice. He was not forced to be naked until he made threats to use the articles of clothing he was allowed to harm himself. Now he is given a hospital gown, so he is no longer nude. He has never been deprived of sleep. He is merely having the hours he is allowed to sleep restricted to nighttime, 8pm to 5am. Certainly more than enough to allow for sufficient rest. He is in the military, and any service member can have visitation restricted depending on duty. However, he is able to receive visitors on weekends, according to his lawyer. He is also allowed to receive and send mail. I don't see how any of your objections are factual.


The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:51 AM

HARDWARE


Now, for all of you admirers of Wikileaks, let's compare PFC Manning's release with Daniel Ellsberg's release of the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times. The Times carefully vetted the information, only releasing information that pertained to their case that President Johnson had lied to the American public. The information released held no operational data and did not in any way jeopardize field operation in Vietnam or South East Asia. Wikileaks dumped everything onto their site. Any memo, no matter how mundane or uninvolved with Iraq or Afghanistan was released. Operational data was not censored. In some cases specific servicemen's names were mentioned. Those named had to be removed from operations for their own safety. Even in the case of the Pentagon Papers Ellsberg was charged under the Espionage Act. The government never dropped its case against him. His case was declared a mistrial due to technical irregularities in the government's prosecution.

Even at that, in Ellsberg's own words;
Quote:


I felt that as an American citizen, as a responsible citizen, I could no longer cooperate in concealing this information from the American public. I did this clearly at my own jeopardy and I am prepared to answer to all the consequences of this decision.
— Ellsberg on why he released the Pentagon Papers to the press



Unfortunately, PFC Manning is not being judged or prosecuted as a citizen. He is being prosecuted as a member of the military, under legal orders. Maybe, if he had only released information documenting an alleged war crime or other offense, he may have gotten a slap on the wrist or even had charges dismissed. Unfortunately he decided to air all the laundry in public. I don't really see a future for him that doesn't involve isolation.



The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:57 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Most Americans have no idea who Manning is, and couldn't care less.

"Bradley ? Is he related to Payton? "




" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:36 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
Now, unless Salon has some top-secret information that PFC Manning's attorney doesn't, I take it you'll accept this information?

This information does not appear to contradict Salon's account. The only thing that may be in dispute is that Manning specifies is that he is only allowed to have one book or magazine at a time, not 15. Maybe the attorney means 15 total? I don't know. Minor point.

So redirect. Solitary confinement for 7 months and counting is torture.

Everything at the link you sent me confirms he has been in solitary confinement for 7 months and counting. Therefore he is being tortured. You have shown no evidence to the contrary.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:27 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Most Americans have no idea who Manning is, and couldn't care less.

"Bradley ? Is he related to Payton? "




" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "



A lot of Americans think that Australia is an island off the coast of California, and could not accurately point out where either Iraq and Afghanistan are on a world map, and do not know the difference between ww1 and ww2.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:43 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:

Again, all these concepts of "rights" you keep referring to are concepts that apply to civilian justice.


I guess that is a difference between us. I believe that human rights also apply to military personal (including so called unlawful combatants}, and people accused of terrorism. Basically I believe all people should not have their human rights violated. I know this is probably a difficult concept for you...

Quote:


He is in a single holding cell for his own protection. He is under suicide watch so he does not cheat justice.

according to what I have read, he WAS low suicide risk. Except that being kept in long term solitary actually increases a persons desire to suicide. Go figure.

Quote:

He was not forced to be naked until he made threats to use the articles of clothing he was allowed to harm himself. Now he is given a hospital gown, so he is no longer nude.
Not anything to do with the campaign?

Quote:

He has never been deprived of sleep. He is merely having the hours he is allowed to sleep restricted to nighttime, 8pm to 5am.
Restricted = deprived. Let's get clear here. You are nicing up the terms to confuse the issues. This man is in solitary confinement, with limited access to anything which would help pass the time. What do you think people normally do in solitary?

Basically this man has been held in jail, which again if you get real is where he is, for over a year awaiting an outcome based on 'prevention of injury', which is clearly a trumped up claim. The US personnel is acting in a punitive, harsh and cruel manner because they are pissed off that their disgraceful, unethical and inhumane actions have been made public so that the world can see what a big bag of bullshit the war in Iraq has been.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:27 PM

HARDWARE


And you are over-dramatizing his situation to suit your ends. If he is put into general detention with other prisoners and he is murdered the liberal media will rail at the injustice. If he is placed in isolated detention you rail against the injustice. Which one do you want? A dead PFC Manning or a live one?

Not solitary. In solitary confinement he has no contact at all. PFC Manning's guards communicate with him every 5 minutes. But I suppose you find the lack of privacy torturous too.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:55 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
And you are over-dramatizing his situation to suit your ends. If he is put into general detention with other prisoners and he is murdered the liberal media will rail at the injustice. If he is placed in isolated detention you rail against the injustice. Which one do you want? A dead PFC Manning or a live one?

Not solitary. In solitary confinement he has no contact at all. PFC Manning's guards communicate with him every 5 minutes. But I suppose you find the lack of privacy torturous too.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36



Personally, I don't think he should be in detention at all. I'm a big believer in people serving sentences once they have been sentenced. Call me an idealist...

I haven't read anywhere that he has been placed in solitary for his own protection against anyone else, but as protection against him self, and that has been cast as a fairly dubious claim.

The defintion of solitary confinement is being away from other prisoners, and does not include prison guards.

The UN outlines its recommendations for the treatment of prisoners, that they be afforded basic human rights, and that the use of solitary confinement should be limited and rarely used.

It seems perfectly clear that Manning is being punished, pre trial, for his part in wikileaks.

From the Telegraph

Pte Manning, who has been charged on 34 counts, including illegally obtaining 250,000 US government cables and 380,000 records related to the Iraq war, is being held in solitary confinement in a maximum security military prison. He is shackled at all times.

In a letter signed by more than 250 of America's leading legal scholars, published in the New York Review of Books, the signatories claim his alleged treatment is a violation of the US constitution, specifically the eighth amendment which forbids cruel and unusual punishment and the fifth amendment which prevents punishment without trial.

"The administration has provided no evidence that Manning's treatment reflects a concern for his own safety or that of other inmates," the letter states. "Unless and until it does so, there is only one reasonable inference: this pattern of degrading treatment aims either to deter future whistleblowers, or to force Manning to implicate WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in a conspiracy, or both."

The list of signatories includes Laurence Tribe, who worked as a legal adviser in the US justice department until three months ago, and was writer by Bruce Ackerman from Yale University and Yochai Benkler of Harvard.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:48 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
And you are over-dramatizing his situation to suit your ends.

I am simply using common definitions of "solitary confinement."

Let's look at wikipedia again, shall we?

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Solitary_confinement

"Solitary confinement is a special form of imprisonment in which a prisoner is denied or is given only limited contact with any other persons, though often with the exception of members of prison staff....It is considered by many legal scholars[1] to be a form of psychological torture when the period of confinement is longer than a few weeks or is continued indefinitely."

1. No or limited contact with other persons.
2. Contact with prison staff doesn't count.
3. Considered psychological torture when this limited contact endures indefinitely.

Here is another definition:

Quote:



http://www.solitaryconfinement.org/uploads/Istanbul_expert_statement_o
n_sc.pdf


Definition
Solitary confinement is the physical isolation of individuals who are confined to their cells for twenty-two to twenty-four hours a day. In many jurisdictions prisoners are allowed out of their cells for one hour of solitary exercise. Meaningful contact with other people is typically reduced to a minimum. The reduction in stimuli is not only quantitative but also qualitative. The available stimuli and the occasional social contacts are seldom freely chosen, are generally monotonous, and are often not empathetic.



No doubt you are imagining solitary confinement as Chateau D'If in the Count of Monte Cristo, or "The Hole" in Alcatraz, or the "Hot Box" in Jaynestown. Certainly, some types of solitary confinement is more tortuous and abusive than others.

But just because it is not the worst type ever of solitary confinement doesn't mean it isn't solitary confinement at all.

The Istanbul Expert Statement on Solitary Confinement (linked above) is worth reading in its entirety. It closes with this:

"As a general principle solitary confinement should only be used in very exceptional cases, for as short a time as possible and only as a last resort."

It should most definitely not be "routine."

Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
Which one do you want? A dead PFC Manning or a live one?

What's with rash of false dilemma fallacies? You did it too on the pepper spray thread.

What do you want? Guns in every home and millions of gunshot victims a year? Or reasonable gun control so that the psychos can't get them and no more Columbines or Loughner shootings? Dead people or live people?

See how annoying a forced choice is? Wouldn't it be nice to give you a third option? Live people WITH guns?

How about giving me the option of a live PFC Manning WITHOUT solitary confinement?



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:29 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


I feel that his current situation is over kill, especially since he hasn't been found guilty yet. But I don't know a lot about these things and it sounds like Hardware has friends who know more and it sounds like he's done some research on it, as has CTS. I don't have much to say here since I don't know much about these things.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:31 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Most Americans have no idea who Manning is, and couldn't care less.

"Bradley ? Is he related to Payton? "




" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "



'nuff said...lol

Kwicko, I formally condemn your mother for not aborting you. Yeah, I'm sure her brother was happy to have a son, but you are inexcusable....

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 8:27 AM

HARDWARE


CTS,
Please, go read the website of PFC Manning's lawyer. He or his staff have been updating it several times a month since he signed on to represent Manning. The issues the legal counsel has with the conditions have to deal with the extended length of taking the case to a court martial. Yet, the defense has filed motions that even they admit in their blog, will greatly extend the time to take the case to a court.

The other issues he has are when the brig violates their own standing orders. In which case the attorney cites case law that shows this can get charges dismissed or grant Manning credit for time already served.

The lawyer doesn't have a issue with the general state of Manning's detention, only specific issues.

I linked the site earlier in this thread. Sorry, I don't have time to re-post the link right now.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 8:53 AM

DREAMTROVE


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
I'm afraid one day I'll turn on the news to hear that Manning has committed "suicide."



And this is exactly the reason they're keeping a 'suicide watch' on him. If he did manage to kill himself, as he's 'joked' about, a lot of folks wouldn't believe it no matter the evidence.

"Keep the Shiny side up"




Geezer,

Ever wondered why the suicide rate was so high among politicians, financiers and people in power? It's like, once you get to a position of power you become a lovesick teen. Same holds for political prisoners.

PN is right. The sheeple are stoopid. They're expected to believe this. I expect better of you and everyone here at FFF

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 9:17 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
CTS,
Please, go read the website of PFC Manning's lawyer.

I did. Nothing he says contradicts my assertion that 1) Manning is in solitary confinement or 2) indefinite solitary confinement is torture.

Quote:

Yet, the defense has filed motions that even they admit in their blog, will greatly extend the time to take the case to a court.
So are you saying his attorneys are in part to blame for Manning's torture?

Quote:

The lawyer doesn't have a issue with the general state of Manning's detention, only specific issues.
I don't see anywhere where he says he doesn't have an issue with the general state of his detention. He may choose not to pursue these concerns legally, which only means they are not legal issues he wants to tackle.

But for argument's sake, let's say yes, his attorneys are extending his torture and aren't trying to improve his prison conditions. Maybe he has really sucky lawyers. Maybe they are trying to target battles they can win, and ignoring his pain and suffering. Maybe they know that torture through solitary confinement has become routine in maximum security military prisons, and that is not a battle they are paid to fight. Maybe they are incompetent. Maybe they are evil. Maybe they are good hearted and are trying to save Manning's life FIRST. I don't know. I don't care.

Whatever. What his lawyers are choosing to do or not do DOESN'T CHANGE the definition of solitary confinement.

Here are the two main objections to defining Manning's cell as solitary confinement:

1. Manning is not in a dark, hot box making friends with rats and cockroaches. Cause only THAT qualifies as "solitary confinement."
2. Manning's treatment is routine for that part of military prison.

And here is my rebuttal.

1. Solitary confinement is defined by extremely limited access to human empathy, eye contact, and social interaction. It is characterized by extremely monotonous, impersonal, and rote activities. All these lead to the kind of social and sensory deprivation that causes severe psychological pain. The human mind is not meant to exist in a social and sensory desert, even if it is not a complete vacuum.

Just because it is not the worst case scenario of solitary confinement doesn't mean it isn't solitary confinement. It would be like saying a girl who was raped after being drugged wasn't really raped, because only 5 men holding down a girl qualifies as rape.

No, you identify psychologically essential criteria about both crimes (lack of consent in rape, and extreme and extended social/sensory deprivation in SC). You check the situation to see if it meets those criteria. You call it for what it is, no matter how hygienic the situation appears to be.

2. If Manning's treatment is "routine," then torture has become routine in American military prisons. Indeed, this type of torture has become routine is some civilian max security prisons as well. Torture being commonplace and "standard operating procedure" doesn't make it NOT torture. It only means we have become a very sadistic and unempathetic civilization.


So Hardware, do this for me as an exercise in empathy.

1. Imagine yourself in Manning's shoes, and think about how much pain YOU would be in.
2. Temporary put aside your convictions that whoever is suffering that pain is so inhuman that he/she deserves this pain.
3. For one minute, try to see the person enduring the pain, not as a convict or evil monster or despicable traitor. But as a human being, just like you.

Now if you want to tell me that Manning deserves to be tortured, that is one thing. That is a different argument. But I don't think one can deny that Manning, and everyone else in his brig getting the same treatment, is in severe psychological pain, that kind that qualifies as torture.





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 9:49 AM

HARDWARE


The alternative being putting him in general detention. So we put him in a cell with up to 23 other soldiers, marines, airmen and sailors. Some of whom doubtlessly consider him a traitor. In general detention they have access to toiletries. Their meals are served in the cells and they take exercise in a common exercise yard.

With these as a given, calculate how many hours go by before PFC Manning has a sharpened toothbrush stabbed into his kidney. For extra credit, calculate the likelihood of 4 or more fellow detainees holding PFC Manning down on his bunk with a blanket while other detainees pound on his head with his own boots.

They are going to deliver him to his court martial alive. From their point of view nothing else matters. Yes, that may blow the case, or diminish the charges. They obviously consider it a worthwhile bargain.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 11:39 AM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


You haven't responded to why he is in jail in the first place. Is it always necessary to have someone in jail pre trial? Is this also commonplace?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 11:51 AM

BYTEMITE


...Yes, generally, that's US law at least. You can get out and have kinda house arrest instead if you can meet the bail, though in cases like Manning they generally set the bail high.

So it's really a no win. you get high bail for pettiness, but they technically can't let any harm come to you while you're in holding that they can't cover up, so they put you in solitary to protect you from the other inmates and guards. But they still don't like you, so they also do a lot of petty stuff to you while you're in solitary.

That's assuming military court has bail, I'm not sure they do.

On the plus side if they really wanted to be rid of him they COULD have just thrown him to the violent types and had them take care of him pre-trial. Though I'm not ruling out they might try that anyway.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 12:32 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


My understanding is that miltary prison is not necessarily full of violent types, much less so than ordinary prison, because you are in prison for breeching military rules, not civilian law. Not saying that the military doesn't have its fair share of psychos, which of course they will have, but they'll generally be running the show and not in detention.

Everyone who goes into detention faces the possibility of harm from others, who knows whether those inside detention would see Manning as a traitor or a hero. All of them there will have breeched military conduct in some way, so possibly they might revere him. Perhaps that is what the authorities are so worried about.

In any event, no one has said that Manning is in solitary for his protection from others, just from himself.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 12:43 PM

BYTEMITE


? It's a military prison. That means any one who's in there is trained for war and combat. Even navy guys know how to haze someone.

What people will feel about it we can be less sure about, but the military, even the more rogue members, probably don't look highly on people considered traitors. I don't imagine they would have gotten involved with the military if they didn't believe in some idea of "defending the nation from threats."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 4:24 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
The alternative being putting him in general detention.

That's one alternative. And it is not necessarily a deadly one, as you imply. These military prisoners aren't exactly big fans of the military, you know. He might have as many protectors as he has enemies.

Here's an alternative. Less restrictive versions of solitary confinement. Maybe meals or exercise in the general population or with a small group of other prisoners who are "safe." More activities to stimulate his mind. More phone calls. More family visits.

Here's another alternative. Bail. Though, I suspect this might be more dangerous for him than his being in the GP.

In other news, the UN Investigator sent to see if Manning is being tortured has been denied an "official" visit. Big surprise. He is allowed a "private" visit, but then everything Manning says can be used in his court-martial.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/04/11/135325033/un-torture-in
vestigator-says-hes-been-denied-access-to-wikileaks-suspect?print=1






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 11, 2011 4:27 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
I don't imagine they would have gotten involved with the military if they didn't believe in some idea of "defending the nation from threats."

I think it is likely that there is a significant portion of the prison population that is disillusioned with those ideals. We really don't know what they would think about Manning either way. I don't think we can assume that someone will murder him if he is out amongst them.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL