REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

The rape of cheeryhill

POSTED BY: MOCKROMANCER
UPDATED: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 851
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:19 AM

MOCKROMANCER


Public sector unions at their finest.



New Jersey spent more than $3 million this fiscal year on clothing allowances for white-collar workers who aren't required to wear uniforms, according to a new report from the state comptroller.

Under collective bargaining agreements, New Jersey provides an annual clothing allowance for uniforms to certain employees of $700 a year for full-time workers and $350 for part-time workers. The allowance is a flat amount included in payroll checks and doesn't require that employees provide a receipt.

Overall, the state spends more than $22 million a year on clothing allowances, with more than 20 percent going to white-collar workers, such as day care counselors, computer technicians and teaching assistants. About half of them don't wear uniforms, the report said.

"It's absurd," said state comptroller Matthew Boxer. "The state spends millions of dollars every year to cover the cost of uniforms for state employees who don't actually wear uniforms."


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:15 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


That would be stupid.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 5:04 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Hey, if an employer demands you dress upscale, they can DAMN well pay for the threads - no matter who they are.

I got into a verbal spat with a security company once when their goddamn rep snarled at me for not having a decent haircut or wearing a suit to the interview - cause where the HELL was I gonna get either when my address of record was a fucking park bench at the time ?

So there's a point to that - demanding "professional dress" damn well ought to mean paying for it, especially if the shit job doesn't pay enough over base (your intended employees life-overhead, mortgage, student loan, car payment, bills) to cover wardrobe as well.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 5:23 PM

DREAMTROVE


I'm with Frem. These guys demand a level of dress, even if they have no uniform or dress code, it's expected.

The costs associated with employment are what drive us into debt. I used to have a job that was a 45 hour commute to do code that I could have done at home, connecting to the server remotely, they would have been able to log my time and progress, and they did it for another worker, because his commute was just over an hour which was the breakoff. But 1.5 hours per day, the miles, the wear and tear. This costs money. Or I could move closer, and that would cost money. Collectively, I was making no money I think out of $30k, I cleared $2k a year.

Jobs make expectations, they should pay for them.


That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:17 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Okay, I can understand paying to begin with, for when you first start the job, but after? Why do people care so much about what one wears anyways? They could just have some basic requirements, like a certain amount of modesty and cleanliness, other than that why do people care? Also I can see having a rule about shirts with slogans at work. I've gotten away with my "I can kill you with my brain" shirt at NAMI, but I don't want to push it, so I've only worn it there a couple of times. And I never wear it to the day centers I help at, don't want my folk to be bothered. Though I doubt they would be, but its the principle of the thing, so I don't wear it on Mon. or Thurs.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:45 PM

DREAMTROVE



Corporations care how they look, to other corporations, customers and workers. Why cathedrals and priest robes? it's the same thing. The audience needs to be impressed, and the main target audience is the faithful, in this case, the workers.

If there's no steel and glass tower with a 20 foot ceiling and shiny floor, and everyone is just sitting around in jeans in a basement, pretty soon people realize that they're doing nothing important and clearing 7 grand a year, and they walk.


That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Wed, December 4, 2024 13:42 - 4886 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, December 4, 2024 13:16 - 4813 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Wed, December 4, 2024 12:37 - 427 posts
Pardon all J6 Political Prisoners on Day One
Wed, December 4, 2024 12:31 - 7 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, December 4, 2024 07:25 - 7538 posts
My Smartphone Was Ruining My Life. So I Quit. And you can, too.
Wed, December 4, 2024 06:10 - 3 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Tue, December 3, 2024 23:31 - 54 posts
Vox: Are progressive groups sinking Democrats' electoral chances?
Tue, December 3, 2024 21:37 - 1 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Tue, December 3, 2024 20:35 - 962 posts
Trump is a moron
Tue, December 3, 2024 20:16 - 13 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, December 3, 2024 11:39 - 6941 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Mon, December 2, 2024 21:22 - 302 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL