Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Add another thread to the pile.

Name your wager.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Does that stand for all who take the wager ? Or just for me ?

And what if I think there's a likelihood he DID know ? Do I have to refer to myself as KING of RWED for a month too ?

ETA - With state and Federal entities looking into the matter, does it not make sound prudent sense to hire legal counsel, regardless ? What if someone Christie fired, with just cause, decides they don't want the negative attention, and tries to put the blame on him instead ? Should Christie just blindly accept that he'll be exonerated, and folks will simply see he's a good guy and being wrongly accused ? Or should he do what ever it takes to defend himself.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

I would have advised him to do so from the moment Senator Weinstein began her inquiry back in September.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

I would have advised him to do so from the moment Senator Weinstein began her inquiry back in September.

---

Really ? Before the November election ? I believe that would have only made matters exponentially worse for him, not better. The national MSM would have jumped all over that, and the story would have carried well into the election. Might have bumped hurricane Sandy as THE election issue. I can't see the wisdom of that tactic.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:
"I question his judgment and managing acumen". I agree; maybe I'm naïve, but it seems to me that if he'd jumped on it immediately, fired all involved FOR INCOMPETENCE right away and taken it seriously, there might not even have BEEN investigations into the "why". People are so accustomed to incompetence, and if he'd acted like a concerned, responsible Governor, apologized for what happened and decried it to the heavens, it might never have gone any further. Like I said, maybe I'm naïve, but I can easily see that scenario playing out.

Retaining counsel is a logical thing to do, with everything swirling around the way it is now...everyone's suspicious, and since we STILL have no answer as to "why", it keeps it alive.

As to the threads about this compared to those about Benghazi, I think our righties have a helluvalot of counting to do before there's any comparison, especially given the fact that Benghazi happened how long ago, and there's two NEW threads about it right now?? My gawd, they harped on virtually nothing ELSE for months and months, and have never stopped talking about it...this just all hit the fan only a week or two ago, and I repeat, it's almost exclusively Shiny and I who've been discussing it...not to mention that it took quite a while for me to think it was anything other than a couple of rogue staffers.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:
Just for the fun of it, I took a minute and checked. In JUST the past year, there have been twenty threads with the word "Benghazi" in them (I wasn't about to look harder than that) with 218 posts. Benghazi happened in September of 2012--a year and a half ago (I wasn't about to go back that far to count either), but that gives you just an inkling of how long and how far any "discussion" of the Christie bridge scandal (which is just now unfolding) would have to go on to even come CLOSE; in other words, how ridiculous can you get?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Anyone care to make a small wager?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:
Just for the fun of it, I took a minute and checked. In JUST the past year, there have been twenty threads with the word "Benghazi" in them (I wasn't about to look harder than that) with 218 posts. Benghazi happened in September of 2012--a year and a half ago (I wasn't about to go back that far to count either), but that gives you just an inkling of how long and how far any "discussion" of the Christie bridge scandal (which is just now unfolding) would have to go on to even come CLOSE; in other words, how ridiculous can you get?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:
Just for the fun of it, I took a minute and checked. In JUST the past year, there have been twenty threads with the word "Benghazi" in them (I wasn't about to look harder than that) with 218 posts. Benghazi happened in September of 2012--a year and a half ago (I wasn't about to go back that far to count either), but that gives you just an inkling of how long and how far any "discussion" of the Christie bridge scandal (which is just now unfolding) would have to go on to even come CLOSE; in other words, how ridiculous can you get?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Id be more inclined to believe he didn't know if, when the first questions started coming up, he didn't attack those who asked. It seems, to me at least, that he was trying to turn the story around from that moment, which indicates, again,m to me at least, that he knew.




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

---

Quote:

---

I'll add a wager to your wager. I bet that if any of the RWAs had the balls to take your wager, when it comes time to pay they'll disappear. At best, they'll try to do a greased pig slide, as in: "I wasn't *really* wrong, you just didn't understand what I was saying... "

---

Quote:

---

Or Hillary pushed the story of the video, knowing it wasn't at all about a video.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:

Quote:

---

Or Hillary pushed the story of the video, knowing it wasn't at all about a video.

---

*Opens mouth, closes, considers*

You forgot the conversation we had about this.

...That actually explains a lot.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:
Just for the fun of it, I took a minute and checked. In JUST the past year, there have been twenty threads with the word "Benghazi" in them (I wasn't about to look harder than that) with 218 posts. Benghazi happened in September of 2012--a year and a half ago (I wasn't about to go back that far to count either), but that gives you just an inkling of how long and how far any "discussion" of the Christie bridge scandal (which is just now unfolding) would have to go on to even come CLOSE; in other words, how ridiculous can you get?

---

And how many threads did you start in one week alone regarding The government shutdown and Cruz?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:

. It actually did stir up a lot of anti-American sentiment for the lead up and planning stages of the attack.

---

Quote:

---

I conveyed this to you, you went quiet, I'm guessing you decided it wasn't important or relevant or forgot. Which is fine, because it actually isn't really all that important and it also clearly isn't information that would alter your behaviour or opinion in any way.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

I'll add a wager to your wager. I bet that if any of the RWAs had the balls to take your wager, when it comes time to pay they'll disappear. At best, they'll try to do a greased pig slide, as in: "I wasn't *really* wrong, you just didn't understand what I was saying... "

---

Again, what does RWA mean? I assume something " right wing ", huh? And why do you blindly assume that the Right would leap to Christie's defense? Because that's what the Left routinely does? You're judging others by who YOU are, not as they are themselves.

Either he knew or he didn't. It's not political .

Like Obama knowingly lied about his HC bill. Or Hillary pushed the story of the video, knowing it wasn't at all about a video.


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

Forget the wager, it's not that important. I wanted to show that I was backing my comments 100%.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:

Ha, the only TRUE King, is the Burger King!



-F

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ:
The wager I REALLY want is the one where they promise that if, after 10 years, Obamacare is doing fine, they'll STFU and never bitch again. But you know they won't. These RWA morons can't stand up to the test of time.

As for Christie, all I have to say is

BENGHAZI

BENGHAZI

BENGHAZI

BENGHAZI

BENGHAZI

B
E
N
G
H
A
Z
I

B
I
T
C
H
E
S
!
!
!



Do I win now?



*-------------------------------------------------------------*
MAL4PREZ: Clearly [The Rap]'s doing nothing but trolling now.
STORYMARK: And not even cleverly.
RAPPY: [My trolling] did its job, did it not? Easiest marks in the 'verse.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=57146
*-------------------------------------------------------------*

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ:
The wager I REALLY want is the one where they promise that if, after 10 years, Obamacare is doing fine, they'll STFU and never bitch again.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:(In response to Niki)
And how many threads did you start in one week alone regarding The government shutdown and Cruz?

---

Well, you could do like she did and check - but that would actually require you to do something, so we know that's not happening.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

O-Care will never be 'fine'. In 10 years, it will have long since collapsed. As it was always intended.

---

Quote:

---

In 10 years I will place the final nail in your little troll-y coffin.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ:
The wager I REALLY want is the one where they promise that if, after 10 years, Obamacare is doing fine, they'll STFU and never bitch again.

---

That is what Obama is hoping for, but hopefully it will not take 10 years. It is kind of his only hope to be remembered as anything other than being the first black president, IMHO.
Has anything really improved or worsened when considered on the whole?
Has there really been much change at all or has it been more of the same?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:(In response to Niki)
And how many threads did you start in one week alone regarding The government shutdown and Cruz?

---

Well, you could do like she did and check - but that would actually require you to do something, so we know that's not happening.

---

December 16th to December 10th anti G.O.P. threads started by Niki - 12

December 6th to December 2nd positive Obamacare threads started by Niki - 7

October 29th to October 26th anti G.O.P. threads started by Niki - 8

October 22nd to October 17th Cruz and shutdown threads started by Niki - 10

October 12th to October 7th Cruz and shutdown threads started by Niki - 20

So 20 threads about Benghazi in 1 year is ridiculous but 20 threads about Cruz and the shutdown in 5 days seems completely rational?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Yay, you can count!!

I never said anything about them being rational, though. Apparently your brain isn't capable of simple counting and reading comprehension at the same time.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Embassy deaths during Obama's term = National Tragedy.

Temporary lane closures during Christies term = National Tragedy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Embassy deaths during Bush's term = Cost of doing business, and never to be mentioned.

Embassy deaths during Obama's term = National Tragedy.

I actually agree with the second part. Its sad how transparent the righties are about the first, though.




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Embassy deaths during Obama's term = National Tragedy.

Temporary lane closures during Christies term = National Tragedy.

---

Fixed that for ya Marky.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Yay, you can count!!

I never said anything about them being rational, though. Apparently your brain isn't capable of simple counting and reading comprehension at the same time.

---

You also said that me looking up the information would never happen. I guess instead of admitting your mistake it was easier to shift the goalposts, hypocrite.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Thats adorable, that the only way you can contribute is to deliberately change what others say so you don't have to deal with the point. You make zit the bagel fucker look like an intellectual, and he's barely smart enough to breath.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Shifting goal posts means I set a new criteria - I didn't you, blithering fuckwit - I mocked your dumb ass, and pointed out a fallacious argument. Sorry you can't grasp such simple distinctions.

Hypocrite has a specific meaning, idiot, and isn't a catch-all comeback for simpletons with a loose grasp on the language, like yourself.

Now, keep living up to your name, the one thing you actually do well - you worthless sack of go-se.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Thats adorable, that the only way you can contribute is to deliberately change what others say so you don't have to deal with the point. You make zit the bagel fucker look like an intellectual, and he's barely smart enough to breath.

---

What's adorable is you pitching a fit when someone else uses your tactics. Continue to troll away sir, you are the king!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Shifting goal posts means I set a new criteria - I didn't you, blithering fuckwit - I mocked your dumb ass, and pointed out a fallacious argument. Sorry you can't grasp such simple distinctions.

Hypocrite has a specific meaning, idiot, and isn't a catch-all comeback for simpletons with a loose grasp on the language, like yourself.

Now, keep living up to your name, the one thing you actually do well - you worthless sack of go-se.

---

Simply admit you were wrong about me looking up the info and leave it at that. It must be hard for you, even though you are often wrong and should be used to it by now.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:

You are not used to dealing with adults on a meaningful level.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:



It should be noted that Christie has hired a top CRIMINAL defense attorney.

---