REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Extinction by 2040

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2014 19:11
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5139
PAGE 1 of 2

Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:19 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


This article has been vastly edited for readability. However, like all good scientists, Guy McPherson provides literally hundreds of references in this paper. If you want to track them down, you can read them at http://guymcpherson.com/2013/01/climate-change-summary-and-update/ The sum of his outlook on what we are to do about our imminent extinction, as he sees it: Don't spend your time grabbing for that last gun or that last can of beans. Love the people you're with. Grab a bottle of wine, make good, strong memories with your loved ones and close friends because those are the memories you will be replaying as you die.

One thing about his prediction- it's within most of our lifetimes. It will be just a few short years until we know whether he was completely right, partially right, or off his nut.

Quote:


American actress Lily Tomlin is credited with the expression, “No matter how cynical you become, it’s never enough to keep up.” With respect to climate science, my own efforts to stay abreast are blown away every week by new data, models, and assessments. It seems no matter how dire the situation becomes, it only gets worse when I check the latest reports.

THE ACTORS
The response of politicians, heads of non-governmental organizations, and corporate leaders remains the same. They’re mired in the dank Swamp of Nothingness....

Near-term extinction of humans was already guaranteed, to the knowledge of Obama and his administration (i.e., the Central Intelligence Agency, which runs the United States and controls presidential power). Even before the dire feedbacks were reported by the scientific community, the administration abandoned climate change as a significant issue because it knew we were done as early as 2009. Rather than shoulder the unenviable task of truth-teller, Obama did as his imperial higher-ups demanded: He lied about collapse, and he lied about climate change. And he still does.

Worse than the aforementioned trolls are the media. Fully captured by corporations and the corporate states, the media continue to dance around the issue of climate change....

Mainstream scientists minimize the message at every turn. As we’ve known for years, scientists almost invariably underplay climate impacts. And in some cases, scientists are aggressively muzzled by their governments.... [i.e. USA]...

WE THINK CHANGE WILL COME SLOWLY
Gradual change is not guaranteed, as pointed out by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in December 2013: “The history of climate on the planet — as read in archives such as tree rings, ocean sediments, and ice cores — is punctuated with large changes that occurred rapidly, over the course of decades to as little as a few years.” [because].... “a suite of amplifying feedback mechanisms, such as massive methane leaks from the sub-sea Arctic Ocean, have engaged and are probably unstoppable.” .... Skeptical Science finally catches up to reality on 2 April 2014 with an essay titled, “Alarming new study makes today’s climate change more comparable to Earth’s worst mass extinction.” The conclusion from this conservative source: “Until recently the scale of the Permian Mass Extinction was seen as just too massive, its duration far too long, and dating too imprecise for a sensible comparison to be made with today’s climate change. No longer.” If you’re too busy to read the evidence presented below, here’s the bottom line: On a planet 4 C hotter than baseline, all we can prepare for is human extinction .... 4 C terminates the ability of Earth’s vegetation to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide.

On the topic of tipping points, we crossed the Rubicon in 2007 at about 0.76 C warming. At this point, according to David Spratt’s excellent September 2013 report, “Is Climate Already Dangerous?”, not only had Arctic sea-ice passed its tipping point, but the Greenland Ice Sheet was not far behind, as the Arctic moves to sea-ice-free conditions in summer. Glaciologist Jason Box, an expert on Greenland ice, agrees. Box was quoted in a 5 December 2012 article in the Guardian: “In 2012 Greenland crossed a threshold where for the first time we saw complete surface melting at the highest elevations in what we used to call the dry snow zone. … As Greenland crosses the threshold and starts really melting in the upper elevations it really won’t recover from that unless the climate cools significantly for an extended period of time which doesn’t seem very likely.”


These [IPCC] assessments fail to account for significant self-reinforcing feedback loops. The IPCC’s vaunted Fifth Assessment continues the trend as it, too, ignores important feedbacks. As with prior reports, the Fifth Assessment “has been altered after the expert review stage, with changes added that downplay the economic impacts of a warming planet.” Consider, for example, the failure to mention Arctic ice in the Working Group Summary released 31 March 2014.

We have not yet begun to see the warming that this recent doubling of greenhouse gases will bring.”... [and yet]... We’ve clearly triggered the types of positive feedbacks the United Nations warned about in 1990... And, as reported in the journal Global and Planetary Change in April 2013, every molecule of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980 comes from human emissions. Not to be outdone, methane levels reached an average mean of 1800 parts per billion (ppb) on the morning of 16 June 2013. Tacking on a few of the additional greenhouse gases contributing to climate change and taking a conservative approach jacks up the carbon dioxide equivalent to 480 ppm. [A level not seen in 3-5 million years]


THE POSITIVE FEEDBACKS

1. METHANE HYDRATE
Methane hydrates are bubbling out the Arctic Ocean (Science, March 2010). As described in a subsequent paper in the June 2010 issue of Geophysical Research Letters, a minor increase in temperature would cause the release of upwards of 16,000 metric tons of methane each year. According to NASA’s CARVE project, these plumes were up to 150 kilometers (90 miles) across as of mid-July 2013. Global-average temperature is expected to rise by more than 4 C by 2030 and 10 C by 2040 based solely on methane release from the Arctic Ocean ....

Catastrophically rapid release of methane in the Arctic is further supported by Nafeez Ahmed as well as Natalia Shakhova’s 29 July 2013 interview with Nick Breeze (note the look of abject despair at the eight-minute mark).





In early November 2013, methane levels well in excess of 2,600 ppb were recorded at multiple altitudes in the Arctic. Later that same month, Shakhova and colleagues published a paper in Nature Geoscience suggesting “significant quantities of methane are escaping the East Siberian Shelf” and indicating that a 50-billion-tonne “burst” of methane could warm Earth by 1.3 C. Such a burst of methane is “highly possible at any time.” By 15 December 2013, methane bubbling up from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean had sufficient force to prevent sea ice from forming in the area. Nearly two years after his initial, oft-disparaged analysis, Malcolm Light concluded on 22 December 2013, “we have passed the methane hydrate tipping point and are now accelerating into extinction as the methane hydrate ‘Clathrate Gun’ has begun firing volleys of methane into the Arctic atmosphere.”




2. WARM ATLANTIC WATER IS DEFROSTING THE ARCTIC
as it shoots through the Fram Strait (Science, January 2011). Subsequent melting of Arctic ice is reducing albedo, hence enhancing absorption of solar energy. “Averaged globally, this albedo change is equivalent to 25% of the direct forcing from CO2 during the past 30 years”.

3 SIBERIAN METHANE VENTS
have increased in size from less than a meter across in the summer of 2010 to about a kilometer across in 2011 (Tellus, February 2011). According to a paper in the 12 April 2013 issue of Science, a major methane release is almost inevitable, which makes me wonder where the authors have been hiding. Almost inevitable, they report, regarding an ongoing event.

4. PEAT IN THE WORLD'S BOREAL FORESTS
is decomposing at an astonishing rate (Nature Communications, November 2011)

5. INVASION OF TALL SHRUBS
warms the soil, hence destabilizes the permafrost (Environmental Research Letters, March 2012)

6. GREENLAND ICE IS DARKENING
(The Cryosphere, June 2012)

7. METHANE RELEASE FROM THE ANTARCTIC TOO
(Nature, August 2012). According to a paper in the 24 July 2013 issue of Scientific Reports, melt rate in the Antarctic has caught up to the Arctic and the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is losing over 150 cubic kilometres of ice each year according to CryoSat observations published 11 December 2013, and Antarctica’s crumbling Larsen B Ice Shelf is poised to finish its collapse, according to Ted Scambos, a glaciologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union. Further confirmation of large methane releases is revealed by noctilucent clouds over the southern hemisphere from 21 November 2013 to 6 December 2013.

8. RUSSIAN FOREST AND BOG FIRES ARE GROWING, AS ARE FIRES IN N AMERICA
(NASA, August 2012), a phenomenon consequently apparent throughout the northern hemisphere (Nature Communications, July 2013). The New York Times reports hotter, drier conditions leading to huge fires in western North America as the “new normal” in their 1 July 2013 issue. A paper in the 22 July 2013 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates boreal forests are burning at a rate exceeding that of the last 10,000 years.

9. Cracking of glaciers accelerates in the presence of increased carbon dioxide (Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, October 2012)

10. BEAUFORT GYRE REVERSES COURSE
(U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center, October 2012)

11. ACCELERATED CARBON EMISSIONS FROM ACCELERATED PERMAFROST THAWING
Exposure to sunlight increases bacterial conversion of exposed soil carbon, thus accelerating thawing of the permafrost (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, February 2013). Subsequent carbon release “could be expected to more than double overall net C losses from tundra to the atmosphere,” as reported in the March 2014 issue of Ecology. Arctic permafrost houses about half the carbon stored in Earth’s soils, an estimated 1,400 to 1,850 petagrams of it, according to NASA.

12. The microbes have joined the party, too, according to a paper in the 23 February 2013 issue of New Scientist

13. SUMMER ICE MELT IN ANTARTICA ALSO REDUCES ALBEDO
Summer ice melt in Antarctica is at its highest level in a thousand years: Summer ice in the Antarctic is melting 10 times quicker than it was 600 years ago, with the most rapid melt occurring in the last 50 years (Nature Geoscience, April 2013). A research paper published in the 28 August 2013 of Nature indicates the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) has undergone rapid changes in the past five decades. The latter is the world’s largest ice sheet and was previously thought to be at little risk from climate change. But it has undergone rapid changes in the past five decades, signaling a potential threat to global sea levels. The EAIS holds enough water to raise sea levels more than 50 meters.

14. INCREASED ARIDITY AND TEMPERATURE SOUTHWEST NORTH AMERICA
facilitates movement of dust from low-elevation deserts to high-elevation snowpack, thus accelerating snowmelt, as reported in the 17 May 2013 issue of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

15. FLOODS SILTING UP THE BEAUFORT SEA
painting brown a wide section of the Arctic Ocean near the Mackenzie Delta brown (NASA, June 2013). Pictures of this phenomenon are shown on this NASA website.

16. ICE SHEET MELTING
softening the ice and letting it flow faster, according to a study accepted for publication in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface (July 2013). It appears a Heinrich Event has been triggered in Greenland. Consider the description of such an event as provided by Robert Scribbler on 8 August 2013: In a Heinrich Event, the melt forces eventually reach a tipping point. The warmer water has greatly softened the ice sheet. Floods of water flow out beneath the ice. Ice ponds grow into great lakes that may spill out both over top of the ice and underneath it. Large ice damns (sic) may or may not start to form. All through this time ice motion and melt is accelerating. Finally, a major tipping point is reached and in a single large event or ongoing series of such events, a massive surge of water and ice flush outward as the ice sheet enters an entirely chaotic state. Tsunamis of melt water rush out bearing their vast floatillas (sic) of ice burgs (sic), greatly contributing to sea level rise. And that’s when the weather really starts to get nasty. In the case of Greenland, the firing line for such events is the entire North Atlantic and, ultimately the Northern Hemisphere.

17. BREAKDOWN OF THE THERMOHALINE CONVEYOR BELT
(Like The Day After Tomorrow) is happening in the Antarctic as well as the Arctic, thus leading to melting of Antarctic permafrost (Scientific Reports, July 2013). In the past 60 years, the ocean surface offshore Antarctica became less salty as a result of melting glaciers and more precipitation, as reported in the 2 March 2014 issue of Nature Climate Change.

18. LOSS OF ARCTIC SEA ICE
is reducing the temperature gradient between the poles and the equator, thus causing the jet stream to slow and meander (see particularly the work of Jennifer Francis). One result is the creation of weather blocks such as the recent very high temperatures in Alaska. As a result, boreal peat dries and catches fire like a coal seam. The resulting soot enters the atmosphere to fall again, coating the ice surface elsewhere, thus reducing albedo and hastening the melting of ice. Each of these individual phenomena has been reported, albeit rarely, but to my knowledge the dots have not been connected beyond this space. The inability or unwillingness of the media to connect two dots is not surprising, and has been routinely reported (recently including here with respect to climate change and wildfires) (July 2013)

19. ARCTIC ICE GROWING DARKER
hence less reflective (Nature Climate Change, August 2013)

20. EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS
drive climate change, as reported in the 15 August 2013 issue of Nature (Nature, August 2013)

21. DROUGHT INDUCED TREE MORTALITY
contributes to increased decomposition of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and decreased sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Such mortality has been documented throughout the world since at least November 2000 in Nature, with recent summaries in the February 2013 issue of Nature for the tropics and in the August 2013 issue of Frontiers in Plant Science for temperate North America.

One extremely important example of this phenomenon is occurring in the Amazon, where drought in 2010 led to the release of more carbon than the United States that year (Science, February 2011). In addition, ongoing deforestation in the region is driving declines in precipitation at a rate much faster than long thought, as reported in the 19 July 2013 issue of Geophysical Research Letters. An overview of the phenomenon, focused on the Amazon, was provided by Climate News Network on 5 March 2014.

22. OCEAN ACIDIFICATION
leads to release of less dimethyl sulphide (DMS) by plankton. DMS shields Earth from radiation. (Nature Climate Change, online 25 August 2013). Plankton form the base of the marine food web, and are on the verge of disappearing completely, according to a paper in the 17 October 2013 issue of Global Change Biology. ** As with carbon dioxide, ocean acidification is occurring rapidly, according to a paper in the 26 March 2014 issue of Global Biogeochemical Cycles. **

23. SEA LEVEL RISE
causes slope collapse, tsunamis, and release of methane, as reported in the September 2013 issue of Geology. In eastern Siberia, the speed of coastal erosion has nearly doubled during the last four decades as the permafrost melts.

24. RISING OCEAN TEMPERATURES
will upset natural cycles of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and phosphorus, hence reducing plankton (Nature Climate Change, September 2013)

25. EARTHQUAKES
trigger methane release, and consequent warming of the planet triggers earthquakes, as reported by Sam Carana at the Arctic Methane Emergency Group (October 2013)

26. SMALL PONDS
in the Canadian Arctic are releasing far more methane than expected based on their aerial cover (PLoS ONE, November 2013). This is the first of several freshwater ecosystems releasing methane into the atmosphere, as reviewed in the 19 March 2014 issue of Nature.

27. MIXING OF THE JET STREAM
is a catalyst, too. High methane releases follow fracturing of the jet stream, accounting for past global-average temperature rises up to 16 C in a decade or two (Paul Beckwith via video on 19 December 2013).

28. FEWER CLOUDS AS THE PLANET WARMS
meaning less sunlight is reflected back into space, driving temperatures up further still” (Nature, January 2014)

29. EVEN MORE METHANE... NOT JUST THE OLD STUFF
“Thawing permafrost promotes microbial degradation of cryo-sequestered and new carbon leading to the biogenic production of methane” (Nature Communications, February 2014)

30. SLOWING OF DEEP OCEAN CURRENTS
According to one of the authors of the paper, “we’re likely going to see less uptake of human produced, or anthropogenic, heat and carbon dioxide by the ocean, making this a positive feedback loop for climate change.” Because this phenomenon contributed to cooling and sinking of the Weddell polynya: “it’s always possible that the giant polynya will manage to reappear in the next century. If it does, it will release decades-worth of heat and carbon from the deep ocean to the atmosphere in a pulse of warming.” (Nature Climate Change, February 2014; model results indicate “large spatial redistribution of ocean carbon,” as reported in the March 2014 issue of the Journal of Climate)

31. ARCTIC DRILLING
Arctic drilling was fast-tracked by the Obama administration during the summer of 2012

32. SUPERTANKERS
Supertankers are taking advantage of the slushy Arctic, demonstrating that every catastrophe represents a business opportunity, as pointed out by Professor of journalism Michael I. Niman and picked up by Truthout (ArtVoice, September 2013)


As nearly as I can distinguish, only the latter two feedback processes are reversible at a temporal scale relevant to our species. Once you pull the tab on the can of beer, there’s no keeping the carbon dioxide from bubbling up and out. These feedbacks are not additive, they are multiplicative: They not only reinforce within a feedback, the feedbacks also reinforce among themselves. Now that we’ve entered the era of expensive oil, I can’t imagine we’ll voluntarily terminate the process of drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic (or anywhere else). Nor will we willingly forgo a few dollars by failing to take advantage of the long-sought Northwest Passage.

The climate situation is much worse than I’ve led you to believe, and is accelerating far more rapidly than accounted for by models. The Arctic could well be free of ice by summer 2015, an event that last occurred some three million years ago, before the genus Homo walked the planet. Among the consequences of declining Arctic ice is extremes in cold weather in northern continents (thus illustrating why “climate change” is a better term than “global warming”).

An increasing number of scientists agree that warming of 4 to 6 C causes a dead planet. And, they go on to say, we’ll be there much sooner than most people realize.

It’s not merely scientists who know where we’re going. The Pentagon is bracing for public dissent over climate and energy shocks, as reported by Nafeez Ahmed in the 14 June 2013 issue of the Guardian. According to Ahmed’s article: “Top secret US National Security Agency (NSA) documents disclosed by the Guardian have shocked the world with revelations of a comprehensive US-based surveillance system with direct access to Facebook, Apple, Google, Microsoft and other tech giants. New Zealand court records suggest that data harvested by the NSA’s Prism system has been fed into the Five Eyes intelligence alliance whose members also include the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.” In short, the “Pentagon knows that environmental, economic and other crises could provoke widespread public anger toward government and corporations” and is planning accordingly. Such “activity is linked to the last decade of US defence planning, which has been increasingly concerned by the risk of civil unrest at home triggered by catastrophic events linked to climate change, energy shocks or economic crisis — or all three.”

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:44 PM

CHRISISALL


It is NOT the job of the President to tell the American people the truth, it is his job to avoid undue catastrophic reaction to the truth. The Earth is going through a big change right now; we as a species will most certainly survive it IMO. But it most certainly will not be fun. Interesting I think is the term. If we can avoid food wars, it might not be too bad. If we can't, it could be very bad.
I'm waiting for the day there is no ice in the Arctic. What will the deniers say then? Oh it's there, you're just not showing it. Ya think?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:55 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I think what this person is saying is that PLANTS can't survive, the OCEAN can't survive, and therefore not a single large mammal (his characterization) will survive either.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:03 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I think what this person is saying is that PLANTS can't survive, the OCEAN can't survive, and therefore not a single large mammal (his characterization) will survive either.


I think that's a bit too far. A dead planet? What about that asteroid? Didn't kill the planet then. I don't believe this climate change will be an extinction level event (For most species). But it will change life as we know it. Hell, it's doing so even now... this is just the beginning.
I will admit though, the plankton thing was disturbing.:(

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:17 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Predicting the end of the world used to be an annual crackpot event. But now, agenda-funded by billions in Govt. and private grants, it has become almost a daily event. The only E.L.E. I see is the complete loss of reason and common sense by people who ought to know better than be fooled by such rubbish.





NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:26 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


There's an interim marker to see if he's on the right track: "The climate situation is much worse than I’ve led you to believe, and is accelerating far more rapidly than accounted for by models. The Arctic could well be free of ice by summer 2015, an event that last occurred some three million years ago, before the genus Homo walked the planet."

I personally don't think it'll matter much if it's 2014, 2015, or 2020. It would be a significant event no matter when it occurred, and something occurring far sooner than anyone anticipated.
Many scientists have attempted to estimate when the Arctic will be "ice-free". In doing so, they have noted that climate model predictions have tended to be overly conservative regarding sea ice decline.[8][9] Wang and Overland, in 2009, predicted that there would be an ice-free Arctic in the summer by 2037.[10] Similarly, a 2006 paper by Marika Holland et al. predicted "near ice-free September conditions by 2040,"[11] and Boé et al. found that the Arctic will probably be ice-free in September before the end of the 21st century.


FWIW I've sat with more than one relative as they died. My repeated mistake has been to hold on to hope far longer than was realistic. If near-term extinction is in the cards, my motto 'always have an exit plan' will be a useful guide. But my poor timing will be a problem.



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:28 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

The only E.L.E. I see is the complete loss of reason and common sense by people who ought to know better than be fooled by such rubbish.
If you are not here to discuss the possibilities because you either do not want to or do not have the High School science background fresh in your memory to understand the discussion on some level, I'd invite you not to post.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:31 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Meanwhile, I see jongsie has replied with the usual armamentarium of facts and logic that group is known for. /sarcasm



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:34 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
FWIW I've sat with more than one relative as they died. My repeated mistake has been to hold on to hope far longer than was realistic.

I'd like to think that's not the case here with me. I know if we destroy the oceans, we really WILL have an extinction level event on our hands. I need more data on plankton levels before I buy into that in any real way.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:45 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Well, I think by the time the phytoplankton are declining, human existence will have already become painful. I see the phytoplankton as the last symptom of a planet that's already dead, not the early warning sign.



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:55 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Looking further, this is what the 4C 'terminus est' was about

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131216154851.htm

Global warming: Four degree rise will end vegetation 'carbon sink', research suggests

Latest climate and biosphere modelling suggests that the length of time carbon remains in vegetation during the global carbon cycle -- known as 'residence time' -- is the key "uncertainty" in predicting how Earth's terrestrial plant life -- and consequently almost all life -- will respond to higher CO2 levels and global warming, say researchers.

Carbon will spend increasingly less time in vegetation as the negative impacts of climate change take their toll through factors such as increased drought levels -- with carbon rapidly released back into the atmosphere where it will continue to add to global warming.

Researchers say that extensive modelling shows a four degree temperature rise will be the threshold beyond which CO2 will start to increase more rapidly, as natural carbon 'sinks' of global vegetation become "saturated" and unable to sequester any more CO2 from the Earth's atmosphere.
So, from what I can see, at that point the plants that are the sink for CO2 will become a source. At that point CO2 will increase exponentially in a positive feedback loop.




"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:13 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by CHRISISALL:
Quote:

The only E.L.E. I see is the complete loss of reason and common sense by people who ought to know better than be fooled by such rubbish.
If you are not here to discuss the possibilities because you either do not want to or do not have the High School science background fresh in your memory to understand the discussion on some level, I'd invite you not to post.


You'd invite me not to post? Glad to see you haven't lost your sense of humor.

As for Antarctica, I guess you missed the recent news event when climate scientists doing research there got stuck in the record amount of ice. Their rescue ship also got stuck in the record amount of ice. They all had to be airlifted out from the record amount of ice.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:18 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, from what I can see, at that point the plants that are the sink for CO2 will become a source. At that point CO2 will increase exponentially in a positive feedback loop.

....and in a blinding display of scientific MacGuyver-ness, the Human race dropped their wars and focused on the real enemy- CO2. It was found that a synthetic peat moss mass-produced and implanted across the globe saved the planet!

Maybe?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:23 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
As for Antarctica,

Yes, yes, the ice down under has had a decade of growth. And the ice up north a decade of decline. No one said climate change (aka global warming) would be a simple + & - that any novice would understand. You need to, you know, study stuff & s**t.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:28 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw
As for Antarctica, I guess you missed the recent news event when climate scientists doing research there got stuck in the record amount of ice. Their rescue ship also got stuck in the record amount of ice. They all had to be airlifted out from the record amount of ice.

Jongsie, the fact was that the ice was pack ice that came off a disintegrating (ie rapidly melting and breaking up) glacier, that got blown into a bay.



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:39 PM

CHRISISALL


"It looks like it was fast ice attached to the continent on the other side of the Mertz glacier and, for whatever reason, it was broken up and with strong southeasterly winds, chunks of ice were driven across our path. It was one of those events which happens occasionally (and with little warning). We were unfortunate enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time."
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-25833307
This?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:40 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by CHRISISALL:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
As for Antarctica,

Yes, yes, the ice down under has had a decade of growth. And the ice up north a decade of decline. No one said climate change (aka global warming) would be a simple + & - that any novice would understand. You need to, you know, study stuff & s**t.


Whatever you say Mr. Wizard. I still can't jump start my car battery with a potato. Betcha I'm using too much sour cream.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:41 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Chris,isall

Well, I was thinking about what this says. The 4C limit has been around for a long time and is a well-established ultimate limit. It was the basis for the Nature letter that gave an absolute amount for the total CO2 that can be released into the atmosphere to have 50% chance of staying under 4C. What that calculation didn't take into account was other greenhouse gases (ie the methane that figures so prominently into the scenario posted) or black carbon. In the post at the top of the thread, methane is a prominent driver of climate change. And due to warming of clathrates as well as warming of permafrost and the floors of water bodies, methane release has increased considerably and will drive up temperatures significantly all on its own. That increase will cause more methane to be released etc. AFAIK what the author is saying is that CO2-driven warming has triggered methane release, which is already in a positive feedback state.



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 7:43 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Whatever you say Mr. Wizard. I still can't jump start my car battery with a potato. Betcha I'm using too much sour cream.

Reality is far too complicated for you, it seems.



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 8:02 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
AFAIK what the author is saying is that CO2-driven warming has triggered methane release, which is already in a positive feedback state.

I agree that it's in a positive feedback state right now, but what about possible re-tipping? We haven't been around long enough to SEE a bounce-back. And I've seen no theories on it (not that I looked all that hard I'll admit).
Warm her up enough, & she'll cool down hard at some point. Ice age & CO2 taming all in one.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 8:40 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I've been looking around to try and figure out what are the immediate negative feedback loops, but I haven't found any that would work in the short-term - ie, in a time frame that keeps us or the planet from being decimated.

In the meantime, I'll look for an ice-free Arctic to see if the prediction is on-track.



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:22 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Even if people die off completely, the feedback loops keep operating until they exhaust the material that supplies them. At least, that's what I've gotten out of that train of thought.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:28 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Pity.

I had sorta hoped to catch Haley's comet come 'round again.




Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:36 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Even if people die off completely

Die off? I don't wanna die off.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 9:52 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by CHRISISALL:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Even if people die off completely

Die off? I don't wanna die off.



Seriously. Where's that get fun ?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 10:12 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Where's that get fun ?



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 10:39 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live." -Sanora Babb, "Whose Names Are Unknown"



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 10:43 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live." -Sanora Babb, "Whose Names Are Unknown"

Looks like a great novel. I assume you'd recommend it highly?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 11:08 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I haven't read it yet. The quotes drew me to it.

"Sanora Babb’s long-hidden novel Whose Names Are Unknown tells an intimate story of the High Plains farmers who fled drought dust storms during the Great Depression. Written with empathy for the farmers’ plight, this powerful narrative is based upon the author’s firsthand experience."

She was an outreach person working for The Farm Security Administration in California, which worked to improve the lives of poor farmers, sharecroppers, migrant workers etc during the Dust Bowl. Her notes were sent by her boss to Steinbeck, who used them to write The Grapes of Wrath - he scooped her novel. Consequently, she didn't get published until 2004.





"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 11:17 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Even if people die off completely, the feedback loops keep operating until they exhaust the material that supplies them. At least, that's what I've gotten out of that train of thought."

If there are negative feedback loops, they seem to be so long-term as to be meaningless to the immediate problem of survival. That's what I was trying to get across.



"To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

-- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis No. V (1776)

OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 6, 2014 11:20 PM

CHRISISALL


Reviews are excellent. I might have to get it.
Thanks.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2014 2:37 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


You're welcome.


To argue with a man who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. - Thomas Paine The American Crisis
OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2014 11:20 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Just as an FYI _ would have to look far enough into McPherson's data and logic in order to be able to do a back-of-the-envelope calculation.

The thought of a catastrophic methane clathrate release has been in the back of my head ever since I read Mother of Storms, which pre-supposes that such an event takes place in the near future. I don't recommend the book- about 30% is focused on the weather, 50% on sex, and 20% on a totally improbable geo-engineering fix. But for a description of storms - the like of which we have never seen before- the author did his homework.

In the long run, though (or on the short run, if you think McPherson is correct) there will be huge swaths of the earth which will become entirely uninhabitable simply because of heat and humidity- ie, when the "wet bulb" temperature goes over 95 deg F.

Some people call this thermogeddon
http://barringtonstewart.wordpress.com/thermogeddon-when-the-earth-get
s-too-hot-for-humans
/
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/21/9552
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/21/9552.figures-only


Anyway, I've tossed out the information because I thought it was too important not to share. Now its time to put on thinking caps.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 8, 2014 10:29 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by G:
I remember when I lived there, walking from our car in an outdoor parking lot in the dead of winter, to the front door of a movie theatre. It started out as a casual walk and then turned into a run as the cold was so searing on any exposed skin. And yet MPLS thrives because they have adapted. Sure, if it was like that year round it would be much less populated, but many would remain and tough it out. From my years there I'd say some would even like the cold thinning out the population.
If the wet bulb scenario happened we'd adapt as well. In a similar manner to MPLS' indoor, hamster warren of tunnels and enclose city walkways, we'd probably find solace underground. Tunnels and caves and underground living have been a refuge for many human from many bad things over our lifetime on earth. Solar & wind on the surface to run air circulation, de-humidifying, and lights for plants and humans and other services. Maybe we need a good kick up the back side to put things into perspective?

I see a great science fiction story in this, G.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:42 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

And yet MPLS thrives because they have adapted. Sure, if it was like that year round it would be much less populated, but many would remain and tough it out. From my years there I'd say some would even like the cold thinning out the population.
If the wet bulb scenario happened we'd adapt as well. In a similar manner to MPLS' indoor, hamster warren of tunnels and enclose city walkways, we'd probably find solace underground. Tunnels and caves and underground living have been a refuge for many human from many bad things over our lifetime on earth.

Humans don't "adapt". For example, WE don't become, over a few generations, more able to lower our metabolism to tolerate heat better. No, what we do is modify our environment.

In any case, if Thermageddon comes to pass, maybe humans will shift to living underground, but what about all of the cows and hogs in-between MPLS and Galveston? What are we going to do- keep all of our livestock underground?

And even if we managed that, what about the deer and elk and bobcats and other wild animals between here and there? The plants? It seems to me that we would be degrading (if not destroying) a whole environment, not just our personal living spaces.

'Fraid your projections won't work.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:52 AM

CHRISISALL


And if we had to go underground you're STILL talking about 98% of the human race gone...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 10:06 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Been real busy, but I did a little thinking about the topic. I don't have the data, but I have a few of the possible processes in mind and an idea about what data would need to be looked at.

One of the feedbacks into thermal runaway is the release of methane into the atmo. Methane is a MORE EFFICIENT greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. In other words, it traps more heat per molecule than CO2. (It's a matter of physics.)

There is a lot of methane trapped in various places- in clathrates in the ocean or even under the ocean floor (if you remember the problem they were having with methane-laden ice building up at the BP-Macondo-Deepwater Horizon blowout, that was a clathrate burst). There is methane trapped in the permafrost at the poles, and in the shallower cold areas of the Siberian shelf. There is literally gigatons and gigatons - billion and billions of tons- of the stuff frozen in various parts of the globe.

As the earth (including the oceans) warm, more methane is released. Which creates more heat. Which releases more methane.

See how that goes? It could create a thermal runaway.

The globe is at a carbon dioxide concentration of about 400 ppm- a concentration not seen for three million years or so. The North Pole sea ice will probably be completely melted within a few summers- not coincidentally an event ALSO not seen for three million years or so. That means that methane which has been stored for three million years is going to start being released.

Hmm... once I put it THAT way, it doesn't sound so hopeful.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 10:10 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Chris- I hate to be a buzzkill, but -more importantly- we're talking about the environment which supported 7 billion people being gone.

I ended my thermageddon train of through at the shoreline, but... what about the oceans? Hundreds of thousands of square miles of fish suffocating in hot, anoxic (lack of oxygen), acidified water. We already have large "dead zones" off our coasts...

Really, quite frankly, I think we may have already passed the tipping point into thermal runaway.

And on this site, we have GREAT examples of why we're going right over the cliff! Because, when you're faced with catastrophe, there's nothing quite as effective in dealing with the situation as arguing about whether Obama is a Muslim, or whether John Hancock's signature is on the DoI or the Constitution!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:55 AM

MUTT999



I'm more worried about all the nukes on this planet, and all the nuts that have their fingers on the button. I saw On The Beach as a kid and it still haunts me.

I think saying 2040 is being way too generous.



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:29 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Really, quite frankly, I think we may have already passed the tipping point into thermal runaway.

But, hasn't that happened before? If that many gigatons of methane is trapped, surely that means at one time it was all free BEFORE getting trapped. What I'm saying basically, we'll see crazy climate change like from before there were Humans here. We'll be witnessing something fascinating.
Umm, before we mostly die out.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:26 PM

OONJERAH



Very many people knew this would happen. A few of those could afford to prepare.

Theory:
Self-sustaining habitats have been built in secret.

7 billion of us will die with the animals. A tiny handful will survive.

Islands in the Sky (Clarke). Bubbles on, burrows under the earth.
I been saying it for years.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:52 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
Theory:
Self-sustaining habitats have been built in secret.

That's where money vanishes to?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:14 PM

OONJERAH



Since money is mostly electronic (= semi-real) now,
It can easily appear or disappear from anywhere.

Refer to the "$6 Billion Goes Missing" thread, for example.

Are you too young to remember the Gold Standard?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:37 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
Are you too young to remember the Gold Standard?

Goldfinger would have HATED Nixon...
Yeah, I remember it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:41 PM

OONJERAH



Fallout or Doomsday Shelters.
I've been told -- haven't seen 'em -- that there are many square miles of
these underneath several of our major cities ever since the Cold War.

I.e. Habitats exist. But ...
They must/will be converted from short-term use by the many to long
term use by the few. They must be indefinitely self-sustaining : farmable.
With a nice atmosphere.

So ... much of the Habitat already exists.
.....

While I don't claim to understand the chemistry, I can easily believe what
Signym is saying about the methane "bomb," "it's within most of our life-
times." Been thinking that the 2 generations after me are gonna have it
the worst. ... Or, they may just die young.

"At some point- yes- we really have to get off this rock as a form of
ultimate self-preservation. But my point was that until we learn to
solve ourselves, we'll take our self-destruction with us wherever we
go." ~Signym


<:============================= :>

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2014 9:29 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by G:
I was giving you a proposal for what to do if that Event time comes.

Yeah, but as my Son would say, you're too eager to 'break physics'.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2014 9:30 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I'm more worried about all the nukes on this planet, and all the nuts that have their fingers on the button. I saw On The Beach as a kid and it still haunts me.

I think saying 2040 is being way too generous.

Well, you can have the best of both worlds!

How's this? Our 435 pre-deployed worldwide dirty bombs (nuclear reactors) NEED power in order NOT to go "boom". After all, look at Fukushima! On the road to extinction, providing those power plants with enough power to keep them cooled and stable will be far down on the list of priorities. And of course, after extinction, the priorities disappear entirely. Imagine.... 435 Fukushimas, all spewing their radioactive guts out all over the planet.

What an ending!

BTW- I saw On the Beach too, it was a harrowing movie.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2014 9:37 AM

CHRISISALL


Basically, Joss is a prophet of sorts.... unfortunately.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2014 9:41 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Yeah, unfortunately there's no Firefly universe out there for us to inhabit. No FTL travel. No new moons to screw up.

Nearly every apocalyptic sifi book I ever read had an improbable happy ending, which depended on some kind of technology which (so far) looks like it's not about to happen.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57 AM

CHRISISALL


I was just wondering so I looked this up:
http://world.time.com/2013/05/27/fears-grow-of-a-himalayan-tsunami-as-
glaciers-melt
/

Even there, stuff is melting.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, November 23, 2024 10:01 - 7494 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:59 - 4753 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:21 - 944 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:11 - 182 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 08:57 - 4795 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:23 - 421 posts
Idiot Democrat Wine Mom
Sat, November 23, 2024 05:26 - 1 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:40 - 11 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:33 - 41 posts
Biden admin quietly loosening immigration policies before Trump takes office — including letting migrants skip ICE check-ins in NYC
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:15 - 3 posts
RCP Average Continues to Be the Most Accurate in the Industry Because We Don't Weight Polls
Sat, November 23, 2024 00:46 - 1 posts
why does NASA hate the moon?
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:54 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL