Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Evidence supports officer’s account of shooting in Ferguson

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-
account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
The NY Times reported there will be no Federal civil rights violation charges made in this case. So the pressure is now on the Grand Jury to bring a criminal indictment against the officer. With the ongoing racial tension over this case they almost have to to bring it to trial, just like they did in Sanford, Florida.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
The NY Times reported there will be no Federal civil rights violation charges made in this case. So the pressure is now on the Grand Jury to bring a criminal indictment against the officer. With the ongoing racial tension over this case they almost have to to bring it to trial, just like they did in Sanford, Florida.

---

Why give a token gesture to taking this to trial when there's no evidence ? Cost the tax payer's MORE money, to put on a dog and pony show, which will end, predictably, with the cop not being convicted, which will only outrage the paid protesters, the race merchants and anarchists all that much more, resulting in more property damage, more injuries , incarcerations, and possibly lives ?

THIS is what PC madness feels like.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
One way or another the taxpayers are gonna pay; either for the trial, or the riots, or both. And when the dust settles from all the damage and mayhem, nothing will have changed as Sharpton and his vile ilk slither back to their race-mongering day jobs.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Nope, he went there and I believe it was because he thought the cop was guilty. I further think he had access to the grand jury testimony and realized the black community would demand he act when there was no indictment of the cop. I think he did not want to get caught up in having to tell the community that the cops testimony is the real way it went down and the shooting was justified.

In other words I believe the sheriff left town.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Class & Holder have never been introduced.

They are total strangers.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am not against Eric Holder. I want to say that up front. He did retire right before the shit was to hit the fan with this. I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am not against Eric Holder. I want to say that up front. He did retire right before the shit was to hit the fan with this. I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

---

I'm reposting this because you some how missed the glaring gaff you made the first time.

" ... because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure JUSTICE was served "

Exactly how do YOU define " justice " ? How do you think Holder defines " justice " ???

If Justice is truly blind, then shouldn't the facts speak for themselves ?

What you MEANT to say is that Holder couldn't , after seeing the facts, fulfill his promise to exact REVENGE on Officer Wilson.

Because that's what we're talking about here. Not justice.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

I believe Holder thought the cop was going to go to trial and lose. To him this provided cover when he suggested to the community he would see to it justice would be served. This happened before the facts were known to him. It was a poor choice of words on my part. If you look at the content of the post carefully you should understand where I was going with that. If not my bad.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am not against Eric Holder. I want to say that up front. He did retire right before the shit was to hit the fan with this. I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
I'm talking about the fantasy world you live in.

Holder has a lot more class than that.

---

Quote:

---

SGG

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Nope, he went there and I believe it was because he thought the cop was guilty. I further think he had access to the grand jury testimony and realized the black community would demand he act when there was no indictment of the cop. I think he did not want to get caught up in having to tell the community that the cops testimony is the real way it went down and the shooting was justified.

In other words I believe the sheriff left town.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Class & Holder have never been introduced.

They are total strangers.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

I believe Holder thought the cop was going to go to trial and lose. To him this provided cover when he suggested to the community he would see to it justice would be served. This happened before the facts were known to him. It was a poor choice of words on my part. If you look at the content of the post carefully you should understand where I was going with that. If not my bad.

---

You and I see Mr Holder entirely differently. I think this was, in his view, a giant make up call, not just for Trayvon, but for injustices against blacks through out the US, and its history.

But speaking out before the facts are known, that's become a staple for this administration.

- The Cambridge police acted stupidly


I was looking at what you WROTE. You see, Holder's version of "justice " does not exactly sync up w/ the definition that MOST folks think of w/ regards to justice.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

You are a dick. I explained what I wrote and you still refuse to change your view of it. Look moron, you are claiming what I am but are to stupid to see it.

---

Quote:

---

Our only difference is you are an ideolog who hates anything liberal and so you hate Holder.

I do not, but I do call it as I see it.

Rappy

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
The Prosecutor has acted appropriately here; nothing like the Prosecutor in the Zimmerman circus.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
The Prosecutor has acted appropriately here; nothing like the Prosecutor in the Zimmerman circus.

---

Do you think he will be successful against the race-baiters?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
As thinking people know, it wasn't the first shot that killed Brown. With any luck the officer will be held accountable for shooting an unarmed suspect who was surrendering.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, let's total up the disinformation

cigars - paid for
officer - no broken eye socket
Brown - not a suspect, matching the description of the robbery which had just taken place.
Brown - not killed in a close-quarters struggle

- meanwhile the Ferguson town council and PD look worse and worse -

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:

Far as I know, nobody's established that the video is legit, much less that it shows Mike Brown.


I realize we all look alike to you, but you're going on nothing but baseless conjecture.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Except liquor stores and fast food joints.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:



Ferguson Store Owner Says He Doesn’t Believe That’s Mike Brown On Surveillance Video

Quote:

---

The surveillance tapes supposedly shows Michael Brown “robbing” a Ferguson convenience store market. But in spite of the fact that the “robbery” was carried out without the brandishing of a weapon, and in spite of the fact that this was really more a case of petty theft shoplifting, this Friday, for the first time, the owners of the store have said that they never said they believed Michael Brown was the individual who stole the item from their store.

In fact, while the owners are speaking out through an attorney about the surveillance video, the mainstream, corporate media are largely ignoring everything they said, pretending that this video definitively identifies Michael Brown as the strong arm shoplifter.

The owners claim that this is a claim the police have come up with on their own. For his part, Dorian Johnson, a witness to the shooting of Michael Brown, has reportedly confessed to being with Brown in the convenient store. But for now, that has not been corroborated by the store owner, employees or eye witnesses. As well, we are not hearing this from Johnson himself, so a number of questions remain.

Through their attorney, the owner of the store also even dispute the claim that they or an employee called 911. They say that a customer inside the store made the call. This is pretty strange if this was indeed a “robbery”.

As well, in addition to clarifying that they never said they believed, nor identified the suspect with Michael Brown, they claimed that the St. Louis County issued the warrants for the hard drive of surveillance video Friday, based on the police claiming that Brown fit the description of the person in the video… the person who the owners and employees of the store were not even going to call the police on. Again, the owner clarifies that neither the management, nor any employee ever identified Brown as the suspect in that video.

They simply never said they believed that, this was a claim made by the police alone. So the real question is why the media has been taking the word of the police on this matter, even over the word of the eye witnesses and the store owner?

---

http://countercurrentnews.com/2014/08/ferguson-store-owner-says-he-doe
snt-believe-thats-mike-brown-on-surveillance-video/


But the raptard has already verified the video, so the store owner's account of things is moot, right?



Right?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Except liquor stores and fast food joints.

---

Oh, the irony.

Monday Night in Ferguson, MO.

---

Quote:

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Are there no racists complaining about the Cleveland cops who shot the kid who was armed with a realistic replica gun and refused to obey officer commands, and pulled out the gun from his waistband while cops were aiming their guns at him?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Are there no racists complaining about the Cleveland cops who shot the kid who was armed with a realistic replica gun and refused to obey officer commands, and pulled out the gun from his waistband while cops were aiming their guns at him?

---

Whitey's just gunning black kids in the street everywhere.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Not a minor fraction as much as blackies gunning black kids in the street.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
I see the racists are howling again.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
I see the racists are howling again.

---

Sharpton, Holder, NBPP, and oh yeah...

---

Quote:

---

Yep.



( btw - this shooting had zero to do w/ race, what so ever )

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

---

Quote:

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Thread title should be ' Another violent thug attacks police officer '

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Nope, he went there and I believe it was because he thought the cop was guilty. I further think he had access to the grand jury testimony and realized the black community would demand he act when there was no indictment of the cop. I think he did not want to get caught up in having to tell the community that the cops testimony is the real way it went down and the shooting was justified.

In other words I believe the sheriff left town.

---

And you thought of this all on your lonesome. Well, there are some things in life that go unexplained, I'm guessing this will be one.
I'm talking about the fantasy world you live in.

Holder has a lot more class than that.

Funny how information from the secret grand jury finds it's way into the local & national press. Someone is leaking out information about the Grand Jury. Hmmmmmm, who could it be? Could it be SATAN!?


But seriously, only one person (aside from the secret panel of jurors) knows what is actually happening in the panel's room. The prosecutor. And yet, bits and pieces of info manage to get out to the press, as though they were preparing for something.

8 people have testified and given their accounts of the day's events and 1 person has given his account of the events that fatal day. The only other person that knew the accounts better than anybody, but he's dead. Hmmmmm, Trayvon, that other young man in Florida and now Brown. All the shooters claim self defense, all the dead people were unarmed, and each shooter claiming self defense in fear of an unarmed teen who went for their gun.


Always remember leave no witnesses. In Trayvon's case - it was the perfect crime, plus no witnesses.

---

Quote:

---

Zimmerman made sure of that. The other two, not so much. But it always pays to have an ace up your sleeve when lying isn't enough, stack the deck in your favor. The DA is presenting ALL of the evidence to the GJ, so as to appear that he's being fair. Actually, and usually, the DA presents his side of the case (in favor of the prosecution), but usually his/her case against the defendant. He's trying the case before the GJ so as not to get an indictment.

There is another possibility as to why info is being leaked. Perhaps the DA wishes to cause a mistrial. Food for thought.

The DA does not want this to go to Trial. End of story!

P.S. Now the Indictment Date has been pushed back. We were told originally the end of October. Now the news out of Ferguson is that the DA's office believes it will be another month or two. To borrow another motto from the Church Lady "Now isn't that Special"


SGG

---