REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Saddam's On the Clock

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Wednesday, January 3, 2007 05:30
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 10673
PAGE 4 of 4

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 4:43 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Finn,

I was replying to this: "And frankly, I have a lot more condemnation for countries that didn’t turn an about-face vis-à-vis Iraq, then I do with those that did."

Since that condemnation didn't come after Hussein's civilian CW attacks, or after his invading Kuwait, what is/ are your criteria for condemning Iraq?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:22 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

No. I'm saying that sometimes, no matter which decision you make, even if it is to make no decision at all, bad things ensue. Sometimes not being involved is not the best choice of a limited number of bad choices. If Iran had prevailed in the Iran-Iraq war, I can't see the world being better off now.
So, can you think of something else to do besides supporting the use of chemical warfare, or applying sanctions? (which BTW is not "doing nothing").


---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:27 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


I think both US and British support for Iraq was gone or heavily eroded by 1990. And most other countries had had it with Hussein by then too.




Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:41 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


But the condemnation you refer to didn't come until over ten years later, with the invasion of Iraq.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 5:47 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
So, can you think of something else to do besides supporting the use of chemical warfare, or applying sanctions? (which BTW is not "doing nothing").



Not really. Either one leads to a less than optimal result. Sometimes that's the best you can get. Would the 1984 creation of a fundamentalist Islamic state that encompassed both Iran and Iraq, which would include Iraq's chemical and biological weapons programs, be a better outcome?

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 2, 2007 6:24 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


No, the condemnation I refer to came one year later with the invasion of Iraq, weapon’s inspections and sanctions.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 3, 2007 4:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Geezer, I support a more proactive solution that applies to Iran as well as Iraq. Among other things, it involves not using proxies to fight wars. Seems we get into the deepest sh*t that way. Gotta get ready for the day. TTUL.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 3, 2007 5:30 AM

SHINYED


It's a real shame that we can't put Saddam & his 2 boys back in power in Iraq...they sure knew how to control the religious maniacal killers in that country.

We need to get out of Iraq as fast as possible...let all the old Baathists go free and let them get Iraq back under their dominance.

Saddam & his Baathists were useful idiots for America after the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, and they are needed more than ever now ...again, to thwart the maniacal and diabolical plans of Iran's newest mass-murderer wannabe.

Nathan's kilts rule!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
No Kings protests flop?
Sun, October 19, 2025 08:27 - 69 posts
Darrell Brooks Goes to Jail? Killing 6 People and Injuring Scores at Wisconsin Christmas Parade Waukesha.
Sun, October 19, 2025 08:13 - 63 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Sun, October 19, 2025 08:13 - 279 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Sun, October 19, 2025 08:11 - 3640 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, October 19, 2025 07:35 - 9096 posts
From the Desk of Donald J Trump
Sun, October 19, 2025 06:01 - 318 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Sun, October 19, 2025 05:02 - 209 posts
Trump Presidency 2024 - predictions
Sun, October 19, 2025 04:58 - 76 posts
"Feminism" really means more Femtacular than you at EVERYTHING.
Sun, October 19, 2025 04:53 - 137 posts
Trumps 10 New Maga Super Cities,
Sun, October 19, 2025 04:49 - 13 posts
Here comes sharia!
Sun, October 19, 2025 04:47 - 182 posts
Those who fail to learn from history are idiots.
Sun, October 19, 2025 04:37 - 52 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL