REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

U.S. government told Iran strikes wouldn't work:

POSTED BY: GINOBIFFARONI
UPDATED: Monday, March 27, 2023 09:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 611
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, July 2, 2006 5:24 PM

GINOBIFFARONI



Found this article interesting

http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2006/07/02/hersh-iran.html

" Senior United States military commanders have told the Bush administration that military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities would probably fail to destroy them, the New Yorker magazine reported on Sunday.

The senior commanders also warned that any attack could have "serious economic, political, and military consequences for the United States," the article says, citing unidentified U.S. military officials. "

And the scary part

" The official also says U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his aides "really think they can do this on the cheap, and they underestimate the capability of the adversary."


A recipe for mayhem ?








" Over and in, last call for sin
While everyone's lost, the battle is won
With all these things that I've done "

The Killers

http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/killers/allthesethingsthativedone.html



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 3, 2006 3:25 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Here's a link to Mr. Hersh's article.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060710fa_fact

Absent Mr. Hersh's bias and the opinions of some un-named sources with unknown political agendas, this looks like the Administation asked for a feasability study on bombing Iran's nuclear facilities, and was told it isn't feasible due to intelligence shortcomings and possible political fallout. Wow.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 3, 2006 9:36 AM

CHRISISALL


"Don't tell me that again, Science Officer!
We may go up into the biggest ball of flame since the last sun in these parts exploded, BUT WE'VE GOT TO TAKE THAT ONE IN TEN-THOUSAND CHANCE!"

-Bush to an advisor concerning the nuking of Iran



There's a Trek line for everything Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 3, 2006 10:14 AM

CITIZEN


Bush: I don't care if people die, just put my cartoons back on.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 3, 2006 10:20 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
Bush: I don't care if people die, just put my cartoons back on.


I think he empathizes with that big frog-lookin' character...he prolly doesn't like Penfold all that much.

And he ain't no DM Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 3, 2006 10:45 AM

CITIZEN


its Bushy its Bushy and the Brain Brain Brain...
Narf!



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 3, 2006 3:44 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


OK. Here's the lead-in from Mr. Hersh's New Yorker article:
Quote:

On May 31st, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced what appeared to be a major change in U.S. foreign policy. The Bush Administration, she said, would be willing to join Russia, China, and its European allies in direct talks with Iran about its nuclear program. There was a condition, however: the negotiations would not begin until, as the President put it in a June 19th speech at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, “the Iranian regime fully and verifiably suspends its uranium enrichment and reprocessing activities.” Iran, which has insisted on its right to enrich uranium, was being asked to concede the main point of the negotiations before they started. The question was whether the Administration expected the Iranians to agree, or was laying the diplomatic groundwork for future military action.


Sounds pretty ominous, doesn't it? The US administration causing trouble by imposing unrealistic pre-conditions for negotiation, as a leadup to "future military action."

No mention, however, of this.

Quote:

But the Americans, along with Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany _ the six nations that endorsed the package _ insist that Iran suspend its nascent enrichment activities before talks begin.


http://wtop.com/?nid=105&sid=577859

So it's not just us, it's also Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany who insist that Iran stop enrichment before talks can begin. Wonder if they're all planning "future military action" as well? Or maybe Mr. Hersh's piece reads more to his liking if he leaves this little bit about multi-national agreement on suspending enrichment out. Ya think?



"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, March 27, 2023 9:55 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, April 18, 2024 13:13 - 6260 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, April 18, 2024 12:59 - 2268 posts
Why does THUGR shit up the board by bumping his pointless threads?
Thu, April 18, 2024 12:38 - 9 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Thu, April 18, 2024 10:21 - 834 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, April 18, 2024 09:47 - 776 posts
FACTS
Thu, April 18, 2024 09:41 - 547 posts
Biden's a winner, Trumps a loser. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Thu, April 18, 2024 00:50 - 147 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, April 17, 2024 23:58 - 1005 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, April 17, 2024 23:29 - 3529 posts
Sentencing Thread
Wed, April 17, 2024 22:02 - 364 posts
With apologies to JSF: Favorite songs (3)
Wed, April 17, 2024 20:05 - 50 posts
Share of Democratic Registrations Is Declining, but What Does It Mean?
Wed, April 17, 2024 17:51 - 4 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL