GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

serenity spoilers

POSTED BY: NAKEDANDARTICULATE
UPDATED: Saturday, December 18, 2004 14:32
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 10794
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 6:49 AM

NAKEDANDARTICULATE


After reading the reviews(all lite on spoilers)I gotta tell ya---I want more! I'm sorry if this upsets some fellow browncoats,but I say to you what every parent who complains about violence in movies or tv should hear---dont watch.Yes you are stronger than my weak mind,but gorrammit spill the beans!....please? Oh and for those who are angry at me for posting this thread,when "ripping me a new asshole" please be gentle. Thank you and goodnight,coming up next--your local forcast.

"Hamsters is nice."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:03 AM

PURPLEBELLY


Indeed. If we don't get a good supply of spoilers, how can we have prepared minds when the screener hits Usenet?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 8:01 AM

WILLOWY


I'm not going to rip you one, and I don't think anyone else should either. There are two sides to the spoiler coin, and if you see the word and don't want to be, then don't click on the thread!

Just like fundamentalist christians, the majority of spoiler-phobes think we have no right to be spoiled if we want to be. That their way is the only way, and aren't we VILE for not thinking the way they think?

B.S.

I'm an adult, and I will decide for myself if I want to be spoiled ahead of time. I was spoiled for the entire runs of Buffy and Angel and it did not ruin one single heartfelt moment for me.

So leave me (and others like me) alone, spoiler-phobes. I'll make my own decisions, thank you very much.

"Once, in flight school, I was laconic..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 8:06 AM

NAKEDANDARTICULATE


Amen!---oh wait im not a fundamentalist christian,can i use that word?Anyhee,thanks Willowy,I too watched Buffy and Angel and I would read the spoilers(sometimes)and it didnt ruin it for me.Keep flying!

"Hamsters is nice."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 8:37 AM

WILLOWY


"You can't take the spoilers from me..."

Heh.

Sorry.

;)


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 9:28 AM

RABIT


Sorry? Why?

Personally, I was hitting SpoilerSlayer every day looking for info in Angel and Buffy. I love spoilers, as they let me watch the wonder that is the show without being distracted by the surprises. I felt that the shows were even more interesting when I did know what was going on.

My wife, however, is significantly spoiler adverse. She hates knowing beforehand what's going on, as it ruins it for her.

Different people have different personalities. If people can't accept that, well...

Guess that's their problem.

Rabit

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 9:42 AM

WILLOWY


Heh, Just said I was sorry for the lame manip of the theme song, not to being spoiler lusty.

And I totally agree with your post.

"Once, in flight school, I was laconic..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 10:01 AM

RABIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Willowy:
Heh, Just said I was sorry for the lame manip of the theme song, not to being spoiler lusty.

Heheh... My apologies - I didn't seperate my two comments well enough. I was asking why you were sorry because I liked the gag about the theme song!

Then I babbled my way into my response to the rest of the thread...

Ah, well - it's definitely been one of those days! (With the exception of the information from the screening, of course! )

Rabit

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 15, 2004 10:53 AM

CONNORFLYNN


Okies..time to open the can of whoopass!

Where are the spoilers?!?!?!?!?!

Ya get my mouth all a waterin for some spoiler action and nada..zip..zero..

Thats just wrong

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:36 AM

WYDRAZ


Hmm, no one seems to be biting.

So how about I give you a spoiler?

Did you ever notice that almost everyone in the show has been wounded... except Inara? Well, there is a reason for that. She is an android! No one knows it, but when Mal finds out, he goes bananas!

Sorry, that was just made up. I'm so desperate to hear something new about Serenity that I'm spewing nonsense.



Oh, and play Strange Adventures in Infinite Space. http://digital-eel.com/sais

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:07 AM

ISAWTHEMOVIE


from Willowy...

I'm an adult, and I will decide for myself if I want to be spoiled ahead of time. I was spoiled for the entire runs of Buffy and Angel and it did not ruin one single heartfelt moment for me.

So leave me (and others like me) alone, spoiler-phobes. I'll make my own decisions, thank you very much.

**************

So just because you want to know we have to tell you? Those of us at the screening are adults too and can share information or not. That's our right and it sure as hell doesn't make any of us "fundamentalist Christians".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:08 AM

JILTEDTOO


I'll answer any spoiler questions about the movie. Though, I have a feeling the screener I saw will not be what is released.

I will say, I was disappointed we never find out more about Book, and probably will never get the chance.

JT

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:19 AM

WILLOWY


Isawthemovie, you missed my point. I wasn't saying that you who saw it have to tell us anything!

I simply meant that if some people were to post spoilers, that there are some of us out there that would enjoy reading them, and that it doesn't make me a bad person because I like being spoiled.

You can do whatever you want! Just like the rest of us!

"Once, in flight school, I was laconic..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:37 AM

CARDIE


Quote:

Originally posted by Jiltedtoo:
I'll answer any spoiler questions about the movie. Though, I have a feeling the screener I saw will not be what is released.

I will say, I was disappointed we never find out more about Book, and probably will never get the chance.

JT



Someone on whedonesque implied that there are certain things Book says concerning another character that could be interpreted to be a characterization of himself in the past.

Select to view spoiler:


I was wondering if my favorite theory, that Book might have been an Operative in his past, could gain some support from the movie?



Cardie

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:53 AM

PURPLEBELLY


Quote:

I will say, I was disappointed we never find out more about Book, and probably will never get the chance.
So, Book dies? This is a question about the movie

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:26 AM

NAKEDANDARTICULATE


"its not about good or evil its about power."
see,thats one thing thats annoying me,the ones who have seen it arent biting, instead there showing off."i saw the movie and you didnt nananananaaaaaaa." look i know people out there dont like spoilers but there are people who do,so for those who have seen it please feed this crack addict some of that sweet crack known on the streets as "serenity baby". not trying to be mean just how i feel.

"Hamsters is nice."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:58 AM

PURPLEBELLY


elided

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:59 AM

PURPLEBELLY


Quote:

see,thats one thing thats annoying me ...
You can think of this game like tickling trout. If you go splashing about, grabbing wildly at anything shiny, you just scare the fish away. Be calm, gently encouraging - they want to tell you. Being dim encourages people to be more explicit, but being belligerent encourages absence. Maybe.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 12:04 PM

ISIGE


Quote:

Originally posted by wydraz:
Did you ever notice that almost everyone in the show has been wounded... except Inara?



Doesn't Jubal bloody Inara's nose a bit in Objects in Space?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 12:04 PM

NAKEDANDARTICULATE


you're right...........i like fish.

"Hamsters is nice."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 12:47 PM

ZOID


Hey! Since we're on the topic (sorta): What'd y'all get for Chanukah/Christmas/Diwali/Kwanza(a)/Winter Solstice Sacrifice-a-Goat Day? (Sorted by alpha; no moral order of preference should be inferred.) I mean, y'all surely didn't wait to open your presents, right? What would be the fun in that, when instant gratification beckons with its little endorphin-laced tendrils?


Enticingly,

zoid

P.S.
Here's a spoiler for you: The Earth ends when the Sun depletes its fuel and expands beyond the orbit of Mars. Sadly, I don't see a sequel happening...

P.P.S.
P'Belly ... "Being dim encourages people to be more explicit..." Behold! For he is the Kwisatz B.O.H(aderach)!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 1:03 PM

DEBBIEBUK


Maybe this is what Zoid just said but in more words, who knows? but I always think spoilers *are* a bit like getting your presents still in their wrapping - you can pick them up, feel the weight and rattle or squeeze them. But you still don't really know what's in there until you take the wrapping off. I loved spoilers once I found Spoiler Slayer, somehow it was always seeing exactly how the bits you knew fitted in with the stuff that couldn't easily be conveyed in words which was fun. Even when you've got the script, there's so much more to the experience, visual, music and sound etc.

It's about antici ----------pation.

If you don't see the prezzies at all it's not the same

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:14 PM

JILTEDTOO


To be honest you really do not learn anything new about Book.

In one scene where he is talking to Mal, Mal asks the question we all would like to ask Book. Simply Mal asks what the deal is with Book's past. The sad thing about Books answer is it is almost written for the audience, in the sense that Books past is no longer important since the show is no longer around to show it.

Book tells Mal that his history is not importnant anymore.

Quote:

Originally posted by Cardie:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jiltedtoo:
I'll answer any spoiler questions about the movie. Though, I have a feeling the screener I saw will not be what is released.

I will say, I was disappointed we never find out more about Book, and probably will never get the chance.

JT



Someone on whedonesque implied that there are certain things Book says concerning another character that could be interpreted to be a characterization of himself in the past.

Select to view spoiler:


I was wondering if my favorite theory, that Book might have been an Operative in his past, could gain some support from the movie?



Cardie



JT

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:18 PM

JILTEDTOO


Book was barely in the movie, which was sad. Because I did like the character. One of the reasons why the show was so great was because of the balance of the characters.

highlite to see the answer to your question:

Select to view spoiler:


book does die



Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleBelly:
Quote:

I will say, I was disappointed we never find out more about Book, and probably will never get the chance.
So, Book dies? This is a question about the movie



JT

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:31 PM

GREENOZNIC


Jiltedtoo, what sort of storyline was there between Mal and Inara, do we get any romance at all between the two?

Also, someone on the other spoiler thread said that two of our heros die, is this true or just a horrible lie?

thanks

I'll be in my bunk.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:32 PM

PURPLEBELLY


Thanks, JT. In one sense, it's good to know that all the potential narrative arcs of the TV show haven't been shoe-horned into a movie. We wouldn't expect anything uncraftsman-like from Whedon, but confirmation is good.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:49 PM

JILTEDTOO


There is no more real romance between the two then there was in the show.

Select to view spoiler:


Kaylee & Simon make there *relationship* offical though



Yes it is true there is more then one character death in the movie. I actually answered about who dies and how they die in that thread.

Quote:

Originally posted by greenoznic:
Jiltedtoo, what sort of storyline was there between Mal and Inara, do we get any romance at all between the two?

Also, someone on the other spoiler thread said that two of our heros die, is this true or just a horrible lie?

thanks

I'll be in my bunk.



JT

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:53 PM

JILTEDTOO


duplicate post

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:54 PM

JILTEDTOO


I wanted to say, I really really loved the movie. The first 45 minutes of the movie felt so much like the show, it was unreal. I have watched the episodes of the show a few times and the feeling of watching the characters in new situations, saying new things, just blew me away.

The sad part about this movie is it doesn't feel like a new life to the show Firefly. It feels like an end to the old show. It doesn't give me new hope to see the characters again. It gave me a sense of closure to the old show I have grown to cherish.

I enjoy talking about the show with other fans. It is hard to find people who have even heard about the show.

Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleBelly:
Thanks, JT. In one sense, it's good to know that all the potential narrative arcs of the TV show haven't been shoe-horned into a movie. We wouldn't expect anything uncraftsman-like from Whedon, but confirmation is good.



JT

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:20 PM

PURPLEBELLY


As an encouragement to potential spoiler-mongers, do you notice how JT top-posts but no-one has flamed? There are benefits to sharing

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:25 PM

PURPLEBELLY


Quote:

Originally posted by Jiltedtoo:
It gave me a sense of closure to the old show I have grown to cherish.

I am so happy about this, I'm almost inclined to disbelieve it My, often expressed, hope was that Whedon would find a new voice in the changed medium, but that he should be able to manage a transition is bliss

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 17, 2004 7:59 AM

JILTEDTOO


Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleBelly:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jiltedtoo:
It gave me a sense of closure to the old show I have grown to cherish.

I am so happy about this, I'm almost inclined to disbelieve it My, often expressed, hope was that Whedon would find a new voice in the changed medium, but that he should be able to manage a transition is bliss



I had hoped for a transition also. Though honestly, I think the movie will do well, but not good enough for more major motion pictures. A TV series would have been great, but from what I hear Universal cannot do it, and Whedon doesn't like the idea of a TV show anymore.

JT

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 17, 2004 8:38 AM

NAKEDANDARTICULATE


well if there arent anymore movies i hope the novel and comic book series does well enough.i love these characters and as much as i love the actors i want more adventures.that being said when it was first rumored that simon was gonna die i was upset and now that its been "confirmed" that

Select to view spoiler:


book and walsh





are gonna die,i am really sad today at work.i love all of these characters and to see any of them go hurts.yes i know whedon has killed characters before but unlike wesley(sob) we didnt get to know these characters long enough.to me the movie is the 15th episode and joss pulls a "doyle"(another angel ref.)only this time it hurts more because he wrote these characters so well.anyhoo,im rambling but i just want this film to do well enough to have 2 more films but the way jt is talking theres "not so much" hope in that. this is nakedandarticulate putting back on his clothes in honor of our fallen browncoats.

"Hamsters is nice."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 17, 2004 11:07 AM

HILARYJANEUK


The point is, however, that apparently all 9 actors signed contracts for three movies. That being so, it does seem strange for Joss to kill off two of the actors, unless for some strange reason two of the actors wanted out of their contracts, which seems unlikely. That being so, unless Joss plans on doing prequels for the other two movies (if they get made), it may simply be that the test screening was just that, a test to see the fans' and cinemagoers' reactions to the deaths. Let's face it, the test screening very rarely resembles the finished product.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 17, 2004 5:55 PM

BRUISERSMOM


Here! Here! I agree. If you don't like spoilers, don't click on the threads that say spoilers.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 18, 2004 10:03 AM

PURPLEBELLY


Here's the other thread, BruisersMom

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 18, 2004 2:03 PM

REEQUEEN


HilaryjaneUK wrote:

Quote:

The point is, however, that apparently all 9 actors signed contracts for three movies. That being so, it does seem strange for Joss to kill off two of the actors, unless for some strange reason two of the actors wanted out of their contracts, which seems unlikely. That being so, unless Joss plans on doing prequels for the other two movies (if they get made), it may simply be that the test screening was just that, a test to see the fans' and cinemagoers' reactions to the deaths. Let's face it, the test screening very rarely resembles the finished product.


Yay! Somebody said it! Woo-hoo! Sorry.

One of the most consistent things I've read, during my (obsessive) search for things Firefly and/or Serenity has been the "all major actors have signed on for a trilogy" nugget. This isn't tv, wherein an actor can sign on for the whole season then decide, nah, or get shitcanned for whatever reason and thereby written out of the series. The contracts for the putative second and third parts would probably specify something like "should the movie do well, blahdeblahdeblah, then you, the undersigned agree to appear in Space Monkeys (temporary title) and They Were Clones! (temporary title)." Not being a lawyer for either side, of course, I can only say that the previous is the most likely scenario, probably with caveats. (I mean, yeah, contracts get broken all the time, but on such a tight budget, I'm assuming no one wants that.)

Anyway, my point is that, while the whole trilogy talk thing may be just that, talk, I lean more towards it being an actual thing, more set in stone than a screening version of Serenity would be (you can do many, many, things with editing, I'm just sayin').

I've been to screenings (I used to live in LA), and I know what they're looking for is neutrality, and that they didn't get that with the Serenity screening. I also know that the versions of the movies I saw either a) changed pretty significantly before release, or b) went straight to video, if that.

I also have the sneaking suspicion that "they" probably knew that the screening was going to be loaded with Browncoats (not a bad thing, but not quite what is wanted when tweaking a film), and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if the cut was skewed towards throwing everybody off. Because whatever confidentiality may have been hoped for, or however those who viewed it try to be good and not tell us anything (oops!), the cat will eventually be let out of the bag. People just like to talk, and secrecy is not really our thing.

Having been around for a while, and having seen screenings, trailers, and marketing stuff for movies (since I don't live in a cave), I also know that between when the buzz starts on a movie, and the rumours that follow, and the movie actually hitting the screen (I've waited two years between seeing a trailer at a theater and a movie actually coming out, so things can also get pushed back further than would otherwise be believed), things can change almost beyond recognizability. I don't think we can count on what spoilers (most especially regarding "shocking" plot points) we learn here actually showing up in the final product, and I consider that a good thing. It means I can spoil myself mightily, and still be surprised when I see the actual film.

No changes would surprise me, come Serenity Day.

"Today we get to meet the real you." Niska - War Stories

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 18, 2004 2:13 PM

PURPLEBELLY


Quote:

Originally posted by ReeQueen:
No changes would surprise me, come Serenity Day.

Here's hoping for a series of screeners, with alternative original character deaths. In the final version, everyone dies - bliss

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 18, 2004 2:25 PM

REEQUEEN


Heh.

"Today we get to meet the real you." Niska - War Stories

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 18, 2004 2:27 PM

DARKJESTER


Quote:


Here's hoping for a series of screeners, with alternative original character deaths. In the final version, everyone dies - bliss



Only PurpleBelly believes this.......

MAL "You only gotta scare him."
JAYNE "Pain is scary..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 18, 2004 2:32 PM

REEQUEEN


Quote:

In the final version, everyone dies - bliss


Addendum: You realize, of course, that in the next few months, this is going to be the biggest rumour concerning the movie?

"Today we get to meet the real you." Niska - War Stories

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Fan-Made ‘Green Lantern’ Trailer Receives Nathan Fillion’s Endorsement
Fri, December 20, 2024 18:31 - 9 posts
MERRY CHRISTMAS
Fri, December 20, 2024 17:58 - 5 posts
Why Firefly deserved to die
Wed, December 18, 2024 16:34 - 99 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Tue, December 17, 2024 08:58 - 56 posts
What if... Firefly had been British?
Tue, December 17, 2024 08:40 - 44 posts
Shiny New Year 2025 — Philadelphia, PA
Sun, December 15, 2024 15:25 - 2 posts
Joss was right... Mandarin is the language of the future...
Fri, December 13, 2024 20:35 - 36 posts
James Earl Jones, commanding actor who voiced Darth Vader, dies at 93
Thu, December 12, 2024 09:17 - 6 posts
What's wrong with Star Trek Voyager, and Enterprise?
Thu, December 12, 2024 09:14 - 30 posts
WE WAITED 18 YEARS FOR A REBOOT AND DISNEY IS GOING TO DO IT...AND THEN STERILIZE COMPANIONS???!
Tue, December 10, 2024 14:25 - 95 posts
Host the 2025 Browncoat Ball! - Request for Proposals
Mon, December 2, 2024 00:22 - 4 posts
Is Joss Whedon finished as a film maker, is his future destiny to be some muttering version of Brigitte Bardot, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, Charlie Sheen, Danny Glover?
Sun, November 24, 2024 06:15 - 13 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL