Sign Up | Log In
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
Movies that hold up to repeate viewing
Friday, April 22, 2005 9:33 PM
SERGEANTX
Saturday, April 23, 2005 2:00 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Quote: The movies I'm talking about reveal themselves over time. They always seem to be holding something back, some little quirk or previously unnoticed angle that gives you a little more insight into the soul of the work.
Saturday, April 23, 2005 2:29 AM
SGTGUMP
Saturday, April 23, 2005 2:58 AM
EMBERS
Saturday, April 23, 2005 3:21 AM
DECKROID
Saturday, April 23, 2005 4:40 AM
EST120
Saturday, April 23, 2005 4:53 AM
CHRONICTHEHEDGEHOG
Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:10 AM
CALHOUN
Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:35 AM
CHRISISALL
Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:39 AM
MANWITHPEZ
Important people don't do field work.
Saturday, April 23, 2005 6:11 AM
ARAMINA
Saturday, April 23, 2005 6:28 AM
ZOL
Saturday, April 23, 2005 6:30 AM
CAPTAINCDC
Saturday, April 23, 2005 6:32 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:47 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: ....I'll have to get back and think about this a bit.
Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:53 AM
STARRBABY
Saturday, April 23, 2005 8:27 AM
Quote:Originally posted by chronicthehedgehog: ...The Truman Show - Brilliant social commentary.
Quote:Interviewer: Christof, let me ask you. Why do you think that Truman has never come close to discovering the true nature of his world, until now? Christof: We accept the reality of the world with which we're presented, it's as simple as that. (cut to two viewers nodding blankly) ..... (later, responding to phoned in questions from a protester) Caller: He's not a performer, he's a prisoner. Look at him, look at what you've done to him. Christof: He could leave at any time. If his was more than just a vague ambition, if he was absolutely determined to discover the truth, there's no way we could prevent him. I think what distresses you really caller, is that ultimately, Truman prefers his 'cell' as you call it.
Saturday, April 23, 2005 9:04 AM
CYBERSNARK
Saturday, April 23, 2005 9:54 AM
Saturday, April 23, 2005 10:56 AM
ASTRAGYNIA
Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:11 AM
PALADIN
Quote:Originally posted by chronicthehedgehog: Leon - Love this movie, only gets better.
Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:38 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SergeantX: For those of you kind enough to respond, what is it about the movies you listed that really makes them work over and over again?
Saturday, April 23, 2005 12:49 PM
Quote:SergeantX wrote: Saturday, April 23, 2005 07:47 We seem to have a pretty good list of movies here. I've definitely added several to my rental wish list. But I was hoping someone would take the bait and venture into the why of it all. What makes some movies get better as you watch them, while some just seem to grow stale?
Saturday, April 23, 2005 1:28 PM
CHRISTHECYNIC
Quote:Originally posted by captaincdc: Star Treks 2, 4, 6, 8
Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:01 AM
Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:15 AM
Quote:Originally posted by manwithpez: I LOVE Tai-Chi Master! That movie is so cool. Wait...you're talking about the one with Jet Li and Michelle Yeoh, right?
Sunday, April 24, 2005 3:18 AM
MSCKAREN
Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by msckaren: ...What I don't get is the many mentions of The Big Lebowski. This one got a mental shrug from me even though I love Jeff Bridges. I definitely prefer him in Starman (another movie that can stand up to a few extra viewings)...
Sunday, April 24, 2005 6:03 AM
COZEN
Sunday, April 24, 2005 6:49 AM
Quote:Originally posted by chrisisall: Enchanted April I forgot about! Absolutly marvelous! Thanks for reminding us. Magic luvin' Chrisisall
Sunday, April 24, 2005 8:28 AM
CLIOMUSE
Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:02 PM
Quote:Originally posted by msckaren: I think the funniest movie ever is Big Trouble in Little China. I've probably watched this movie on purpose more often than any other.
Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:23 PM
THESOMNAMBULIST
Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:42 PM
Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:44 PM
CAPNERIC
Quote:Originally posted by Astragynia: I guess it's a little-known miniseries rather than a movie, but... Neverwhere. (For those of you who haven't discovered it yet, it's a BBC series based - in fact, near word-for-word - on the book by Neil Gaiman). Ok, the stunts and special effects look like they were produced on about $5, but there're just so many little details that you don't notice the first few times through, and the witty, sarcastic exchanges between the eclectic group of characters never gets old... hmm, sounds like another series we know of... :)
Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by chrisisall: Speaking of War Of The Worlds, have any hopes the new one by Spielberg will outdo the fifties one? I think it just might, I think Speilberg wants to cut loose with a good old fashioned fifties-like cheesefest! Hopeful Chrisisall
Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:02 PM
Quote:Originally posted by TheSomnambulist: Quote: I am hoping Spielberg will pull out the stops and do a really good Apocalyptic alien invasion flick.
Quote: I am hoping Spielberg will pull out the stops and do a really good Apocalyptic alien invasion flick.
Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:02 PM
YT
the movie is not the Series. Only the facts have been changed, to irritate the innocent; the names of the actors and characters remain the same
Quote:Originally posted by SergeantX: look at the opening scene of the movie where the Dude is in the supermarket. On the television behind the checkout is George Bush senior making war noises against Saddam Hussein. The camera pans down to the check the Dude is writing. If you look, the date on the check is 9/11. Kinda spooky, no?
Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:41 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SergeantX: To be clear, I'm not necessarily saying these movies are better, especially if the intent is for them to be viewed only once. There are many great movies that I'd have no interest in owning, because you pretty much get it all in the first serving. The movies I'm talking about reveal themselves over time. They always seem to be holding something back, some little quirk or previously unnoticed angle that gives you a little more insight into the soul of the work.
Quote:I'd like to see if we can discuss what elements make a movie worthy of this kind of digging.
Sunday, April 24, 2005 5:01 PM
LEELU777
Sunday, April 24, 2005 5:02 PM
Sunday, April 24, 2005 5:16 PM
THATWEIRDGIRL
Quote:Originally posted by TheSomnambulist: Belly of an Architect
Sunday, April 24, 2005 5:21 PM
GUNRUNNER
Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:03 PM
STARBERRYGIRL
Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:56 PM
NORUDDINWAY
Sunday, April 24, 2005 9:50 PM
Quote:Originally posted by YT: I see that the Somnambulist listed four movies by Peter Greenaway, but did not include the Draughtsman's Contract. Did anyone notice the homage to D'sC in Hudson Hawk? Might be worth watching them again.
Sunday, April 24, 2005 10:03 PM
Quote:Originally posted by thatweirdgirl: I love 'The Thief' but I had trouble with 'Architect.' Perhaps I need to watch it again.
Monday, April 25, 2005 4:50 AM
Quote:Originally posted by TheSomnambulist: Hudson Hawk I've always liked. Couldn't understand why it received such a bashing. Sandr Bernhard is hilarious in it.
Monday, April 25, 2005 11:29 AM
Quote:Originally posted by TheSomnambulist: Greenaway's obsessions are usually very difficult at first though. Most of the time I don't relate to what he's saying or fully understand
Quote:Also how could I forget Billy Wilder's Some Like it Hot and The Apartment Which are absolutely repeat viewing films. :) and Singing in the Rain
Monday, April 25, 2005 11:45 AM
Quote:Originally posted by TheSomnambulist: Hudson Hawk I've always liked. Couldn't understand why it received such a bashing.
Quote:Sandr Bernhard is hilarious in it.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL