Sign Up | Log In
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
Ron Glass Support Thread
Monday, March 15, 2004 7:42 AM
DUKE
Monday, March 15, 2004 7:45 AM
LISSA
Monday, March 15, 2004 7:52 AM
SCIFIDO
Quote:Firefly, or Serenity, just would not be the same without either Shepherd Book, or Ron Glass.
Monday, March 15, 2004 7:56 AM
PHOTINUSPYRALIS
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:20 AM
DEBBIEBUK1
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:28 AM
MILORADELL
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:31 AM
Quote:Originally posted by MiloraDell: I LIKE HIM AND HIS HAIR!!!! Reason enough to keep him around, methinks . There's something about the character of Book that just has a real resonance - all the reasons heretofore mentioned, and more I can't quite put my finger on.
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:40 AM
MANIACNUMBERONE
Quote:Originally posted by PhotinusPyralis: Quote:Originally posted by MiloraDell: I LIKE HIM AND HIS HAIR!!!! Reason enough to keep him around, methinks . There's something about the character of Book that just has a real resonance - all the reasons heretofore mentioned, and more I can't quite put my finger on. Oh yes! Forgot the hair!! Photinus Pyralis
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:47 AM
SAINT JAYNE
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:49 AM
CYBERSNARK
Quote:One of these days you're gonna tell us how it is a preacher knows so damn much about crime.
BROWNCOAT1
May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:58 AM
PALADIN
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:21 AM
T
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:26 AM
LINDALE
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:28 AM
ASTRIANA
Quote:Originally posted by Paladin: Sudden idea-- maybe they could at least get Ron to record a message for the opening of the movie. "Anyone who speaks during the film will go to a special hell. Thank you, and enjoy Serenity."
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:34 AM
GHOULMAN
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:35 AM
STILLSHINY
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:36 AM
GNOC
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:44 AM
CARDIE
Monday, March 15, 2004 9:59 AM
KNIBBLET
Monday, March 15, 2004 10:40 AM
STEVE580
Monday, March 15, 2004 11:04 AM
Monday, March 15, 2004 12:14 PM
MLSVRKSGN
Monday, March 15, 2004 12:24 PM
SHINY
Quote:Originally posted by mlsvrksgn: A season of build up w/no payoff? Ack.
Monday, March 15, 2004 12:51 PM
Monday, March 15, 2004 1:26 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Monday, March 15, 2004 1:56 PM
LEAFY
Monday, March 15, 2004 3:19 PM
WHOODAHN
Quote:Originally posted by MiloraDell: I LIKE HIM AND HIS HAIR!!!! Reason enough to keep him around, methinks .
Monday, March 15, 2004 4:48 PM
VETERAN
Don't squat with your spurs on.
Monday, March 15, 2004 5:16 PM
ECMORGAN69
Monday, March 15, 2004 5:23 PM
SAMUS
Monday, March 15, 2004 6:29 PM
STEALTH
Monday, March 15, 2004 6:39 PM
LEMAT
Monday, March 15, 2004 8:10 PM
BOMBA
Monday, March 15, 2004 11:00 PM
SASJA
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:56 AM
Quote:Originally posted by mlsvrksgn: Aaaah, yes, the dangers of planning/writing for a series that may never come. Just a bit nerve-wracking, that.
Quote:And regardless, I'm not sure that even Mr Whedon can write a movie that will pull people in w/o doing some serious reveals on the characters. Not everything, certainly, but some serious development just seems to be necessary. And if he's planning on writing for a new series, then there is the question of WHICH character's mystery to reveal.
Quote:River's looks to be the most complex, and therefore the least likely to be used. After all, word was that that was the original plan, w/c had to be scrappd once it was understood that he might be writing a new series springboard. So that really seems to leave Inara's or Book's background to go with. Inara seems the obvious way to go, given that using her would give more screen time to the movie's "principal" (Mal/NFillion) because of their relationship. However, JWhedon may prefer to save that one for the series and that leaves....Shepherd Book. Of course, he may blow ALL that off, and just write a two hour episode. It's just that, in the main, movies that just seem to be looooong episodes havent done very well (witness the first Star Trek flick [wince]). Regardless, though, I regarded Book as a valuable player in the show, as I'm sure did we all, and I feel that his lack in the movie would leave a great big gaping hole in the character dynamics.
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:58 AM
MARAJADE
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:54 AM
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:18 AM
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:38 AM
TALLGRRL
Quote:Originally posted by Lindale: Everything everyone else has said, plus if Book's not there, who's Jayne supposed to hang out with? Who'll spot him? By the Left Frontal Lobe of the Great Sky Demon, I shall obliterate them!!
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:28 PM
DRAGONLORD
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:05 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BrownCoat1: [ I can see your reasoning on wanting to pull new fans in w/ some revealing of secrets of certain major characters, and the fear that a movie may be nothing more than a two hour episode. Joss said that he intended to make the movie more epic than anything he could he do on TV and I trust in him to make the best movie he can. The cast has the talent and the chemistry to work magic on film, and if Universal does not second guess Joss or the script, I think we will have a great movie to see in 2005. "May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:16 PM
BOCMAN
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:16 PM
OUTLANDER
Wednesday, March 17, 2004 5:10 PM
ANKHAGOGO
Quote:Originally posted by T: As a person who practices faith, I loved how he was written. He wasn't sappy, or holier than thou. He was like most people of faith. Television rarely portrays people of faith well, but Book was a great example of many people who have some type of spiritual belief. Besides, he seems to have many secrets which look like they could be interesting to learn.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL