Sign Up | Log In
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
Imponderable Watercooler - #error type 2 0 9 4
Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:10 AM
FLYVOTE
Quote:Originally posted by Mavourneen: Quote: I'm the fool that can't seem to get my head around certain folks of the female persuasion.
Quote: I'm the fool that can't seem to get my head around certain folks of the female persuasion.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:23 AM
MAVOURNEEN
Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:35 AM
NVGHOSTRIDER
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:10 AM
JONNYQUEST
"Did he just go crazy and fall asleep?"
Quote:Originally posted by FutureMrsFIllion: my life sucks...may i please have another?
Quote:Originally posted by Hell's Kitten: However, I must state, for the record, that I do not believe I am the cutest engineer ever. It's a nice thought, though.
Quote:Originally posted by RiverIsMyGoddess: I can smoke a quarter pound of grass and get nothing but dry eyes and very sleepy.
Quote:Originally posted by FlyVote: I snorted a Dew once
Quote:Originally posted by FlyVote: Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: I should mention that I don't go around sniffing anyone. So, I'm not just a walking sexual harassment time bomb that I know of. I can have access to any perfume from Mav that floats my way.
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: I should mention that I don't go around sniffing anyone. So, I'm not just a walking sexual harassment time bomb that I know of.
Quote:Originally posted by nvghostrider: Somehow that sounds selfish to me. I know it ain't, it just sounds like it.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:19 AM
CALIFORNIAKAYLEE
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: Quote:Originally posted by Hell's Kitten: However, I must state, for the record, that I do not believe I am the cutest engineer ever. It's a nice thought, though. Kindly provide evidence to the contrary. (Surely I am not the only voyeu…camera companion client to take exception with this statement…)
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:20 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:29 AM
RIVERISMYGODDESS
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:30 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RiverIsMyGoddess: I'm with you guys on the evidence, and I can assure you for certain that she is cuter that this engineer.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:33 AM
Quote:Originally posted by CaliforniaKaylee: I'm going to have to agree with JQ on this one (gasp!).
Quote:For the sake of comparison: The "IT Goddess Calendar", professional photography meant to show that women in tech careers can be beautiful: HK with a camera phone (on someone else's carpet, omg!): Dunno about you guys, but I think it's pretty clear who the cutest engineer is.
Quote:Btw, thanks for all the great replies to the fic I posted, both here and in the comments on the fic. I really really appreciate it.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:37 AM
DESKTOPHIPPIE
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: DTH, Thanks for answering my PM. I appreciate it.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:40 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: You're just mad because I left you out. Sorry. I was bound to miss someone.
Quote:Okay, Things to do before I die. #49,381: Read ShinyTrinket's fanfic. #49,529: Read Mavourneen's fanfic. #49,764: Read CaliforniaKaylee's fanfic.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:42 AM
Quote:Originally posted by CaliforniaKaylee: Btw, thanks for all the great replies to the fic I posted, both here and in the comments on the fic. I really really appreciate it.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:43 AM
RUGBUG
Quote:Originally posted by FlyVote: Quote:Originally posted by RiverIsMyGoddess: I'm with you guys on the evidence, and I can assure you for certain that she is cuter that this engineer. Hell, RIMG, you are cuter than this engineer.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:48 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:50 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:53 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:54 AM
KELKHIL
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:00 AM
DUG
Quote: I feel that way with my Excel program right now. For some reason, whenever I hit print preview, all my margins, footers, headers , etc go wacky. For no reason that I can find. I can't look at something before I print it. I just have to hope for the best. Bleh. GI/GO.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:02 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: I have my own thoughts on that, but the wierdest turn for me was the comparison of massage therapy to prostitution. Yes, there are a few similarities, but enough to compare them and then state 'why is it okay to rub a body all over except for once specific area?' Am I way off base thinking that the two really aren't similar enough for that?
Quote:Originally posted by Mavourneen: I have some very definite thoughts, too...but comparing massage therapy to prostitution is ridiculous.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:05 AM
ZEEK
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: Oh, Hi guys. I'm embroiled in a convo on another BB about legalizing prostitution. I have my own thoughts on that, but the wierdest turn for me was the comparison of massage therapy to prostitution. Yes, there are a few similarities, but enough to compare them and then state 'why is it okay to rub a body all over except for once specific area?' Am I way off base thinking that the two really aren't similar enough for that?
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:08 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Mavourneen: *waves goodbye, and pinches Kel's cute tush on her way out of the thread*
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:09 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: Quote:Originally posted by Mavourneen: *waves goodbye, and pinches Kel's cute tush on her way out of the thread* What the...?
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:10 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:15 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:19 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: Eh you get it regulated properly and I see no problem with legalizing it. They would need to require protection. And probably have some very large bouncers on the premises in case someone gets out of hand.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:20 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:24 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: I'm embroiled in a convo on another BB about legalizing prostitution.
Quote:Originally posted by CaliforniaKaylee: I think there can be a fine line between what's really massage therapy, and what's just a euphemism for prostitution. That said, I hate it when people assume that a "massage therapist" is really a prostitute (anyone remember the Scott Peterson trial and the big deal that was made about Amber Frey being a massage therapist?). Real massage therapy is miles away from prostitution, IMO. I think the difference between the two is all about intention and atmosphere. It's like the difference between artistic nudes and pornography: "I know it when I see it." And as long as we want to keep prostitution illegal (or even legal only with a license), we have to draw specific and sometimes arbitrary lines between what is and isn't prostitution.
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: Eh you get it regulated properly and I see no problem with legalizing it. They would need to require protection. And probably have some very large bouncers on the premises in case someone gets out of hand. You get those things taken care of and then what's the problem?
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:31 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: Two consenting adults engaging in...whatever. What's the fuss?
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:43 AM
Quote:most women who want to get laid can usually get some, and men are also dependent on being able to get it up - so theoretically, the women that really CAN'T get some are perhaps the type that most men are not going to want to sleep with, thus you'd have to be pretty damn good to get turned on at will.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:46 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: My biggest issue is that I don't think legalizing it would clear up the problems associated with it (drugs, violence, disease, last resort "career"). Nor do I believe that is okay to treat sex/women as a commodity, which is what legalizing prostitution would do. We already fight hard enough to not be seen as boobs and a vagina. With an official stamp of approval I could only imagine that fight getting harder. Like it or not, prostitution is a mainly male consumer based industry...maybe I'd feel better about it if it was more balanced.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:48 AM
Quote:Originally posted by CaliforniaKaylee: I also think we need to focus on the word "consenting". If it's 'have sex with this guy or get beaten by your pimp', that's not consent, IMO.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:50 AM
Quote:Originally posted by CaliforniaKaylee: Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: Two consenting adults engaging in...whatever. What's the fuss? That's generally my view across the board. I would add to it "in private" -- once you bring your sexual activities into a public space, different rules need to apply, for the sake of the public. I also think we need to focus on the word "consenting". If it's 'have sex with this guy or get beaten by your pimp', that's not consent, IMO. And not all adults have the mental abilities to consent, and I think they need to be protected from sexual predators as well. But with those caveats -- in private, between truly consenting adults (two or more!) -- I don't see what the fuss is, really.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:57 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: I just find it hard to believe that someone who doesn't have other significant issues would choose to sell themselves.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:58 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: My biggest issue is that I don't think legalizing it would clear up the problems associated with it (drugs, violence, disease, last resort "career"). Nor do I believe that is okay to treat sex/women as a commodity, which is what legalizing prostitution would do. We already fight hard enough to not be seen as boobs and a vagina. With an official stamp of approval I could only imagine that fight getting harder. Like it or not, prostitution is a mainly male consumer based industry...maybe I'd feel better about it if it was more balanced. RugBug were it not illegal I would take you in a manly fashion...for $50.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:59 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:00 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: I disagree Kelkil. I don't think prostitution is balanced. (Even Kaylee asks if the boy-whores are for the womenfolk. What was up with that? She had to question if they would service women?) Prostitution (and even porn) is focused on men.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:01 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: My biggest issue is that I don't think legalizing it would clear up the problems associated with it (drugs, violence, disease, last resort "career"). Nor do I believe that is okay to treat sex/women as a commodity, which is what legalizing prostitution would do. We already fight hard enough to not be seen as boobs and a vagina. With an official stamp of approval I could only imagine that fight getting harder. Like it or not, prostitution is a mainly male consumer based industry...maybe I'd feel better about it if it was more balanced. RugBug were it not illegal I would take you in a manly fashion...for $50. Ouch. I'm worth way more than that, buddy. And BTW, wouldn't it mean more if you didn't have to pay?
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: Supposedly that's from the blog of a professional dominatrix...but I tend to agree with her.
Quote:Prostitution (and even porn) is focused on men.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:06 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: My biggest issue is that I don't think legalizing it would clear up the problems associated with it (drugs, violence, disease, last resort "career"). Nor do I believe that is okay to treat sex/women as a commodity, which is what legalizing prostitution would do. We already fight hard enough to not be seen as boobs and a vagina. With an official stamp of approval I could only imagine that fight getting harder. Like it or not, prostitution is a mainly male consumer based industry...maybe I'd feel better about it if it was more balanced. RugBug were it not illegal I would take you in a manly fashion...for $50. Ouch. I'm worth way more than that, buddy. And BTW, wouldn't it mean more if you didn't have to pay? Me pay? Ha! Perhaps you need to re-read what post I was responding to.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JonnyQuest: Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: Supposedly that's from the blog of a professional dominatrix...but I tend to agree with her. I hope this isn't her: http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/052007/05142007/0514staf1
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:28 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:29 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: Hehehehehe...ooops. I did need to re-read. $50, really? Don't sell yourself short. And after a second or third reading...still ouch.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:31 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:37 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:38 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:46 AM
Quote:Originally posted by DesktopHippie: Quote:Originally posted by RugBug: I just find it hard to believe that someone who doesn't have other significant issues would choose to sell themselves. Does that include Inara? Do you think she has significant issues? Do you have issues with her line of work in the Firefly 'verse?
Quote:Originally posted by DesktopHippie: *edit* Reading this back, that sounds like I'm mad at you or something. I'm not! I'm just asking :)
Quote:Originally posted by DesktopHippie: I'm curious because Inara's role harks back to the more traditional form of prostitution in the ancient world. Back then (as far as we can gather) most cultures saw sex as sacred, social and an important part of life - as well as being a way to continue the species and a really fun hobby. The main issue with modern prostitution is that sex itself has been completely devalued in modern society. It's either seen as something dirty and wrong that should only be done to have kids, or it's all about the pleasure. Sex is so much more than that. It's an expression of perfect partnership - two people together, sharing an intense physical experience. It's an intimate form of communication, something that goes much further than words - you open yourself to another person and that person opens themselves to you. It breaks down barriers between people. The problem is we've lost all of that. We've stopped thinking of sex as anything special. So it's all come down to satisfying a craving at a given point in time. It's like replacing the Catholic Mass with a trip to McDonalds. I'm rambling. I'll stop now.
Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:00 PM
Quote:Orignally posted by RugBug: I believe that sex should be special and thus shouldn't be for sale.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL