Reavers, what's their deal? by athertonwing

Quote:
Originally posted by athertonwing:
i figured there must be a reason behind the reavers lack of human emotion...What if River and how ever many other students at the Acamdemy for the gifted werent the first people to be experimented on? what if there were preludes to these experiments. testing that went awry? the reavers. who is to say that they didnt have bits of their brains cut out? and were mangled up so badly that they were made void of the traits that humans possess left without compassion or feeling. cast out into the blackness of space in ships past their sell by date and left to drift and die.

Hmm..., I think it's more plausible that these guys were scrounging on the edge of civilized space without enough funds to maintain their shielding, and they've got brain damage, alright -- but from radiation poisoning. Don't think the Alliance would waste any money on failed experiments -- just kill 'em. No reason to give 'em ships and cast 'em off.

-----------------------------------------
MAL: "I knew you let her kiss you!"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:41 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by ItsAllShiny:
Hmm..., I think it's more plausible that these guys were scrounging on the edge of civilized space without enough funds to maintain their shielding, and they've got brain damage, alright -- but from radiation poisoning. Don't think the Alliance would waste any money on failed experiments -- just kill 'em. No reason to give 'em ships and cast 'em off.

If one felt the need to go with the “failed experiment” approach I’m sure one could plausibly present a scenario for their escape. The Alliance need not be so kind as to let them go. As far as the “radiation poisoning” theory, that could also work with the right tweaking and whatnot.

Radiation can cause insanity with adequate exposure. Of course it would also cause blindness and radiation sickness before the sanity reached the degree one might expect in a Reaver. A blind and lame Reaver might not be have the same stage present that Whedon is going for.

Of course, one could use the only Star Trek standby and invent a “special” particle.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 25, 2004 7:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
If one felt the need to go with the “failed experiment” approach I’m sure one could plausibly present a scenario for their escape...
Radiation can cause insanity with adequate exposure. Of course it would also cause blindness and radiation sickness before the sanity reached the degree one might expect in a Reaver. A blind and lame Reaver might not be have the same stage present that Whedon is going for.

Of course, one could use the only Star Trek standby and invent a “special” particle.

Something doesn't have to be scientific down to the nitty gritty details to work on television -- it just has to be plausible We have two plausible scenarios here -- one with escaped Alliance brain-damaged experimental subjects, and the other with brain-damaged (from radiation or some other unspecified cause) sub-humans on the edge of space. I think the edge of space scenario (the simpler of the two) would be easier to convey to the audience, and it's already been alluded to by Mal in "Serenity" when the reavers were introduced.

At least the mythodology was introduced. We won't know for sure what reavers are until Joss tells us. But if they are some kind of failed Alliance rejects, it's going to take some masterful skills to tell the story. Can you imagine the complicated story arc that would take? You'd have to have reavers in a whole bunch of episodes to have the characters make the necessary discoveries to go from the myth to the Alliance's doorstep. Maybe in season 2...

---------------------
I call it "Vera"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:11 PM

NOOCYTE

Ya know, the theory does have some appeal, in that it ties two big arcs together into one gnarly meta-arc.

This is one of the reasons it doesn't really sit too well with me. I kind of like the notion that these two big arcs are just sitting there, independent of each other; has more of a feel of reality, where literary connections don't necessarily pertain, and things can be all-too random.

More centrally, though, I'm rather taken with the idea of "men gone savage on the edge of space," since it is in keeping with Joss' overarching thesis that people go out into the Black and meet....themselves. Makes me think of Nietzsche, and the whole "look into the abyss and the abyss looks back into you" thing. Each of our characters is Out There, finding some aspect of themself, making meaning for each other.

Now imagine a group of people, wandering through the Black, growing less and less concerned with the basic little things which accompany Civilization: hygeine, health, nutrition (there's where your brain damage starts to happen; try living without potassium for a few months...), morality, empathy, respect for the dead. They make meaning for each other by confirming, in a host of little ways, that there is no meaning. Slippery slope.

My head keeps coming back to that line in "Bushwhacked," the "open up. See what's inside" line. What's most chilling about it is the cold, idle, empathy-less curiosity of it, like something a cat might say of the mouse it has no intention of eating, but is just going to muck with till it gets bored, or the mouse stops struggling. Whichever comes first. This is the comment of a person who is dead inside, and so has no compelling reason to give a lemur's liver about the pain which he will cause to another. Doesn't matter, since it's all the same Emptiness.

Personally, I find this orders of magnitude more creepifying then even the most sinister conspiracy. It suggests that people don't need to be Experimented on to turn that horrid...all they (WE!) need is the company of their own inner shadows in a dark enough place.

shudder

Department of Redundancy Department

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:18 PM

THECRAZYIVAN

Reavers....i want some answers. I like that theory! Just wish there were more episodes that included them and such.

~~~~~~~~~~
Take me out to the black.....

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 12:21 AM

CALHOUN

Tere has to be some sort of hierarchical comand structure and technical knowledge base/training within the reavers society. How could "insane madmen" maintain let alone fly and navigate spacecraft? And they must be fairly proficient at it too otherwise one would think that sane rational thinking pilots should be able to escape them..

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 12:27 AM

CALHOUN

Tere = There ..... How did I miss that..

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 3:24 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by ItsAllShiny:
Something doesn't have to be scientific down to the nitty gritty details to work on television -- it just has to be plausible We have two plausible scenarios here -- one with escaped Alliance brain-damaged experimental subjects, and the other with brain-damaged (from radiation or some other unspecified cause) sub-humans on the edge of space. I think the edge of space scenario (the simpler of the two) would be easier to convey to the audience, and it's already been alluded to by Mal in "Serenity" when the reavers were introduced.

Are you telling me or someone else? Because I agree. I'm just looking for the plausibility in both theories.

Quote:
Originally posted by ItsAllShiny:
At least the mythodology was introduced. We won't know for sure what reavers are until Joss tells us. But if they are some kind of failed Alliance rejects, it's going to take some masterful skills to tell the story. Can you imagine the complicated story arc that would take? You'd have to have reavers in a whole bunch of episodes to have the characters make the necessary discoveries to go from the myth to the Alliance's doorstep. Maybe in season 2...

However, I don’t think it is necessary that complicated of an arc to use the “failed experiment” approach. One need not invent it in detail, nor connect to the characters at all or right away. It is sufficient to mention a “breakout of failed experiments.” I think that would be understood, and I think it’s a good theory that has worked successfully many times.

My only concern is that such a scenario has already been done, and seems to be somewhat of a standby in Si-Fi.

Then again Star Trek has run that “special” particle thing into the ground too. But I have to say that I like the idea of the Reavers going mad on the edge of space because of failed reactor shielding. Largely because we’ve seen evidence of this in the series. This carries with it the problem of a radiation that only causes you to go mad. Such a thing might be accepted by most people. Not me, but I try to look the other way when the “special” particles come up.

My own personal opinion though: I would like to see the Reavers be 1) part human in that there savage ways are represented by a need to be savage, and 2) modified by a disease or drug that is transmitted between Reavers which enhances strength while reducing pain reception, something like PCP. Imagine it as a drug taken by deep spacefarers originally used to combat the effects of low-gravity, but which has since been outlawed and obsolete by the use of “gravity drives” and a discovered side-effect of being addictive and causing mental illness.

That may be a little complicated, I know. But maybe not so much, it’s really just typical human savagery modified with a mind-altering drug. Something that takes its plausibility from our own current experience.

Do you suppose Joss will take any advice from me? Probably not.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 3:36 AM

CONNORFLYNN

Who's to say the Experiment is over? Perhaps it is still ongoing? There have been many experiments in our own real history that involve the separation of individuals from normal society.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 3:39 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Connorflynn:
Who's to say the Experiment is over? Perhaps it is still ongoing? There have been many experiments in our own real history that involve the separation of individuals from normal society.

That’s true. None of them resulted in Reavers.

However, I see the "failed Experiment" approach as being an attempt to create a "super-soldier" of sorts. It's not an original idea, but it is one that has worked in the past.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 3:57 AM

KUGELBLITZ

Bah. Look at history if you want to find some excellent examples of organized savagery. The cult of the Thuggees in India for example. They were essentially a religion that predated upon other people. They were creepy people too, lots of ritual sacrifices. They were suppressed by the British in 1930, and some sources place their existence in the 13th century.

How long did the Independents/Alliance War last? The Thirty Years War spawned numerous atrocities created by bands of roving soldeir/mercenaries. The reavers could simply be some very, very bad people who care very little about anyone who isn't them. I don't think you have to be brain damaged to perpetrate evil acts upon innocents (or the "other side"). Sure it may help, and it may explain some of the strange attributes the revers have, but the insanity thing doesn't gel with me.

I am thinking the Reavers are some kind of violence cult/religion. One that doesn't necessarily have to be a vibrant expanding one, just one that leaves BIG footprints. There are a few religions that have dead ended for various reasons. We don't know yet how long the Reavers have been around, so reproducing their kind may not be a critical element.

Or the reaver's could be culturally separate from theirr victims. Consider the Japanese Warrior code as it applied to Allied POWs in WWII. Or the Sioux versus settlers in the west, and so on.

"We are exporting democracy because we have all of this unused democracy lying around at home. Why not make some money doing it?"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 5:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
My own personal opinion though: I would like to see the Reavers be 1) part human in that there savage ways are represented by a need to be savage, and 2) modified by a disease or drug that is transmitted between Reavers which enhances strength while reducing pain reception, something like PCP. Imagine it as a drug taken by deep spacefarers originally used to combat the effects of low-gravity, but which has since been outlawed and obsolete by the use of “gravity drives” and a discovered side-effect of being addictive and causing mental illness.

Ooh, I like that scenario! Didn't someone here write a fanfic about reavers who kidnap Jayne and use drugs on him to make him one of them? Maybe the drugs have always been elicit -- something that was originally designed to suspend the need for sleep, or something, but had drastic side effects when abused or with extended use? Side effects could have been adopted 'culturally' and glorified by the Reavers...

Quote:
Do you suppose Joss will take any advice from me? Probably not.

Ya never know...

-------------------------------
Jayne: "Can we just move away from this eerie-assed piece of work and get on with out increasingly eerie-assed day?"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 5:32 AM

BROWNCOAT1

May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.

What do we really know about the Reavers anyway? Only what speculation & the horror stories told to scare children at night tell us.

TO our knowledge there have been no survivors of a Reaver attack, so how do we know the Reavers actually eat their victims flesh? How do we know they sew their skin into their clothes? We don't. We do suspect from "Bushwhacked" that they torture their victims and make survivors watch, which causes them to snap. This would explain how they recruit.

As far as where they come from, who can say? Deserters from the war between the Alliance and the Independents? Settlers that got lost and went insane from a core leak or too long in space w/ no food and turned cannibal. Maybe there were a dozen or so that were failed experiments from the Blue Hands that escaped and stowed away aboard a ship, then later came out, killed the crew and took the ship as their own.

As far as being dumb beasts, I think that is a grave underestimation. They can obviously pilot space ships, and rig magnetic grapples, as well as lay elaborate booby traps on ships they attack. I think they are depraved, evil men and women who prey on other folk for necessity as well as some sort of sick, twisted pleasure.

"May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 6:09 AM

PALADIN

I have to say that I too have been intrigued by the mystery that is Reavers. Are they crazy, just plain mad, or are they so sane that it just blows your minds? Perhaps there is an even more sinister reason than just some failed experiments, or space-crazy cannibals.

Anyone out here familiar with H.P. Lovecraft? Heard about the Necronomicon ? A book bound in human flesh and containing a depth of secrets about the true nature of the cosmos so soul-crushing that most all who read it go mad. It was said that dark and unknown cults existed in order to bring about the return of the elder races from their slumber benetah the surface of the Earth. They preformed disturbing rituals of such horrifying and blasphemous natures that I would be forever cursed to mention them aloud.

What if the Reavers are the survivors of such a cult? Driven by a darker force, different from that which any man has known. For their dark masters have awakened on the "Earth that Was," and they now aim to move others of their kind into this dimension. From the blackness of space and chaos, a plane undescribeable in its ancient and cyclopean horrors comes a fear older than time itself. The Reavers have come. And to face them is to join them, or spend eternity wishing they had killed you before skinning and wearing you.

Just a thought. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go turn on all the lights in the room.

------------
"If you take sexual advantage of her, you're going to burn in a very special level of Hell, a level they reserve for child molesters and people who talk at the theater." -Book

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 6:17 AM

CYBERSNARK

The PCP analogy would also make a cool/ironic Buffyverse reference (Principal Snyder's initial "cover story" explained vampires as teens high on PCP). Maybe Jayne (or even River) could compare Reavers to vampires in a throwaway line. . .

Quote:
Originally posted by Noocyte:
More centrally, though, I'm rather taken with the idea of "men gone savage on the edge of space," since it is in keeping with Joss' overarching thesis that people go out into the Black and meet....themselves. Makes me think of Nietzsche, and the whole "look into the abyss and the abyss looks back into you" thing. Each of our characters is Out There, finding some aspect of themself, making meaning for each other.

I agree.

More, when dealing with a conspiracy, you have to wonder who benefits. Who has something to gain from wandering bands of savages out on the edge of space slaughtering everyone they meet?

The Alliance? Blue Sun? Maybe, but I don't think getting rid of the last traces of the independents (who probably would've gravitated toward the frontier just like Mal did) doesn't seem high enough a priority to waste the time and effort necessary to set up something like this.

If anything, it occurs to me that having someone like River or Early end up face-to-face with Reavers might be a very bad thing.

River would probably end up as their queen or something. . .

-----
We applied the cortical electrodes but were unable to get a neural reaction from either patient.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 6:29 AM

KALIMEERI

Just an odd, dark thought. Supposing what originally drove the Reavers away from humanity was the same type of disillusionment that Mal has experienced... and they just kept going to the dark side. Nothing at all matters to them. Have to admit that he "understood" the mechanics of that thought pattern, from his experiences in Serenity Valley. The only thing keeping him from continuing that descent is the ship and the crew.

Jen dao mei.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 6:40 AM

BROWNCOAT1

May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.

Cybersnark wrote:

Quote:
River would probably end up as their queen or something. . .

Now that is just downright creepifying.

"May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 8:07 AM

FIVEBYFIVE

Quote:
Cybersnark wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
River would probably end up as their queen or something. . .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NO! JAYNE IS THE REAVERS' GOD! And they have a song devoted to him and everything! It's like 'Hero of Canton' but just guttural growling. It's like "Rrrrr RAH Gargh Rah Ger Ger, Rrrrr J-A-Y-N-E!"
Best. Movie. Ever.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 8:41 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up

Seems to me that Reavers are just pirates. The dictionary defines reavers as those who rob and despoil. Sounds like pirates to me. Many pirates, both current and historical, have the habits of torture and leaving no survivors behind. Most are not really expecting an old age pension, so they're not too worried about long-term health or sanitation. Also, contemporary stories about pirates usually exaggerate their ferocity and savagery, hence the flesh-eating and skinning. Many pirates recruited from their captives.

How did they originate? Same as pirates here on earth-that-will-be-was. Privateers or militia crews who kept on plundering after the war. Mutineers who took over a ship and went raiding. Crooked captains who found a like-minded crew and moved from petty theft to piracy. There's probably pirate moons out there with supplies and doxies, just like in the Carribean in the 17th/18th centurys.

Also, I have a problem with blaming Blue Sun for absolutely everything wrong in the 'verse.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 10:16 AM

HKCAVALIER

Ladies and gentlemen, the reavers eat human flesh and sew human skin into their clothing. Nobody short of Jeffrey Daumer does stuff like that. What's my point? I can't believe that just being subjected to the vacuum of space will do that to a person. And though the pirates of old weren't averse to a little torture, humans en masse tend to draw the line at cannibalism and sewing skin into clothes. I don't think they're like Mal only much more so. I don't think that "futuristic radiation poisoning" would do the trick either. Wash was surprised that they were running their ship "without containment." If reavers always did that, Mal would have said as much. However I can imagine good people being so disturbed themselves by the void that they imagine (as Mal does) that the reavers suffer from (as Ren would say) SPACE MADNESS.

I'm pretty sure Blue Sun had a hand (get it?) in their creation. The way I see it, the first round of experiments were done on ordinary soldiers and the results were absolute uncontrolable barbarism. The surgical tampering theory also accounts for the fact that they can pilot ships; they're not so much crazy as very aggressive, sadistic and utterly devoid of feeling. Oh, and if they had been very, very messed with by somebody, had their humanity stripped from them, they would be very, very angry and not a little vengeful. They would organize and plot revenge on the human race. The River phase of the experiment is about finding a strong enough mind to withstand the treatment and still be deployable.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 11:06 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Geezer:
Seems to me that Reavers are just pirates. The dictionary defines reavers as those who rob and despoil. Sounds like pirates to me. Many pirates, both current and historical, have the habits of torture and leaving no survivors behind. Most are not really expecting an old age pension, so they're not too worried about long-term health or sanitation. Also, contemporary stories about pirates usually exaggerate their ferocity and savagery, hence the flesh-eating and skinning. Many pirates recruited from their captives.

I’m not fully familiar with the pirate stories of the period you are talking about, but I have studied a little about the Viking era, which I think has some similarities. It is certainly true that local stories about Vikings were often exaggerated. Just look at early Christian dogma painting Pagan’s as “devil.” Today we ignorantly blame this is on “Christian intolerance.” But the truth is that it was more probable a result of a terrified Christian Europe seeking to justify the acts of ‘inhumanly’ barbarous pagan Vikings. The Vikings were exaggerated as demons and devils, but we know that they did skin people alive. It was quite the typical Viking practice. As someone mentioned earlier in this thread, human nature is not incapable of inhuman butchery. Even today, skinning people alive is a practice that one might still encounter if one goes walking aimlessly undefended in the Hills of Afghanistan or Pakistan. There are bands of roving “reavers” no less barbarous. They are real. As far as cannibalism, not necessarily practiced by the Viking, but nonetheless, not entirely absent in the activities of barbarians, even today.

I agree with you, up to a point. We know (at least based on one event) that Reavers mutilate themselves. Tatooing and disfiguring of the human body were acts used by many barbarians, but this would not have been done in the careless manner portrayed in the show. It would have been done ritualistically, with careful precision to avoid extensive tissue damage and limit pain. This is where the Reavers of Firefly part with the barbarians of reality.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 11:08 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up

Quote:
Originally posted by HKCavalier:
Ladies and gentlemen, the reavers eat human flesh and sew human skin into their clothing. Nobody short of Jeffrey Daumer does stuff like that.
HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

Many aboriginal cultures keep part of a victim as a talisman; scalps, shrunken heads, ears, etc. The Nazis bound books and made lampshades of human skin. Cannibalism isn't that rare either.

And ethics aren't that strong in parts of the Firefly 'verse, what with slavery either legal or winked at, for example.

Also recall the vendor selling tasty cuts of "Good Dogs" off the grill in "Serenity: Part 1" and Jayne's comment "If wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak." maybe cannibalism isn't that much of a leap for desperate folk.

I still vote for pirates. Really nasty pirates, maybe, but pirates nevertheless.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 12:59 PM

KALIMEERI

I tend to agree.

Jen dao mei.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 1:52 PM

KUGELBLITZ

I favor the simplest explanation. The Reavers are mean people. Not brain wacked super soldiers, or virus infected psychos. They are just plain mean. In the great Yin and Yang, they are probably THE balance to the alliance.

"We are exporting democracy because we have all of this unused democracy lying around at home. Why not make some money doing it?"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 2:30 PM

PEACE

For me there have always been problems with the Reavers. Joss is correct in placing them on the frontier of space after a civil war; piracy often springs up in the wake of civil disturbances or wars, when weapons are plentiful and civil authority weak; for example, SE Asian waters today. What bothers me is the extreme way in which they are portrayed, and the methods they use.

Pirates historically have often been cruel, take-no-prisoners sorts, and many have been damaged men (and women) caught in the wake of traumatic social upheaval; but they have also shown considerable thought in how they operate. Modern pirates, in fact, often have high-rolling backers, employ sophisticated methods of attack, and understand how to decoy and deceive the various maritime authorities in order to launder the cargoes and even the ships they steal. Pirates in the Caribbean in the late 17th and early 18th Centuries usually had bases of operation (e.g. Port Royal on Jamaica) and conducted their affairs with other pirate vessels in a fairly orderly manner (if there were disputes between pirate crews, the captains of all the vessels in port would often sit in council together to adjudicate the matter). All of this is worlds away from the animalistic image we get of the Reavers from the episodes. It is an important point that a ship, esp. a spaceship, implies a base, repair facilities, and backers-- even a pirate ship needs repairs and upgrades and fresh fruit (Heinlein made this point in "Citizen of the Galaxy"). Ships run on the Reaver plan probably wouldn't last a month.

And then there's the Reaver recruitment methods. Frankly, the "torture them until they join us" method never rang true for me. It might work, but not in a matter of hours or days; we're talking about a method of brainwashing that would take months to break down the ingrained habits and attitudes of a lifetime; and then it would not work on everyone. Historical pirates, esp. those on the Spanish Main, often employed very rational methods of recruitment. When they took a ship, they would usually kill the captain, because he would be the most likely to resist to the end. Any specialist crew members, such as cooks, carpenters, sailmakers, etc., were usually forced to join the pirates, with special priviledges, extra shares and a promise that they'd be released after a certain term of service (a promise that was usually kept). Oridnary sailors, believe it or not, often clamored to join the pirates, despite the risk of hanging-- the life of a pirate was much more free and easy than that of an ordinary sailor on a merchantman of the era.

The only way the Reavers as they are in the series would work for me is if they were some sort of religious cult-- and there have been plenty just as violent and grotesque in history. But nothing in the episodes has set that up.

I hope Joss rethinks the Reavers if he uses them in the movie.

Oh, bugger! Now I have to wait for someone to wake up!

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 3:30 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kugelblitz:
I favor the simplest explanation. The Reavers are mean people. Not brain wacked super soldiers, or virus infected psychos. They are just plain mean. In the great Yin and Yang, they are probably THE balance to the alliance.

That’s hardly a simple explanation. “Mean” people might maim, torture and otherwise inflict disfiguring pain on other people, but they aren’t likely to perform the same actions on themselves. That’s simply contrary to human nature, and it’s self-defeating, because one can hardly be a successful “pirate” if one is wreaked with pain from self-inflicted wounds.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 3:34 PM

BENSHAHN

The “predecessors of River” idea is an interesting one, but there is nothing in the actual series to support it. So far, there are two possibilities that are based on what is in the series.
1. The Reavers are exactly what we've been told they are
2. The Reavers are former Alliance soldiers tortured into madness by the Independents.
In Safe, there is a possible allegory for this. The young River talks about a pretend Alliance group that is cut off by the Independents. The Alliance members resort to cannibalism
Mal knows more than most about the Reavers.
When the survivor in Bushwacked mutilates himself, the Alliance officer says he hasn't seen that kind of torture since the war and he says it with disgust. He is accusing Mal, who he knows to be a former Independent of doing it.
This idea of the Reavers and Mal’s possible knowledge or involvement in it fits nicely with Whedon's writing style; wanting to surprise the viewer with the unexpected, main characters with dark backgrounds, and the theme of redemption. When Mal says," Nothing worse than a monster thinks he's right with god", what if he knows this because he's also talking about himself?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 26, 2004 3:53 PM

Quote:
And then there's the Reaver recruitment methods. Frankly, the "torture them until they join us" method never rang true for me. It might work, but not in a matter of hours or days; we're talking about a method of brainwashing that would take months to break down the ingrained habits and attitudes of a lifetime; and then it would not work on everyone.

Well, they'd just eat the ones who didn't show signs of breaking really fast!

--------------
Zoe: "If they board us, they'll rape us to death, eat our flesh, and sew our skins into their clothing. And if we are very lucky, they'll do it in that order."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 5:02 AM

CAPNRAHN

My twopenny join-in:

I feel the Reavers are in Joss's 'Verse are much like the Fremen in Frank Herbert's Dune 'Verse.

Tough nasty scrappers that have a myth of them that is based on fact, yet not fully on the nose with the details of the gory series of legends that encompass those known as Reavers.

They could be comprised of various 'special' people, much like River or other oddities. With attitudes closer in relation to the more agressive Native Americans and most definitly the Mongols. The combination of both real cultures really illustrates what I see as the potential Reaver worldview and their understanding of yin-yang of full spectrum of life. That means that Death and its ilk is the stuff of everyday life for the Reaver, not to be feared. They probably are taught that fear is the mind-killer and panic will ALWAYS kill. So all who 'become' Reavers are taught to confront fear standing firmly on their feet. In addition, I can also see them trained on how to CAUSE panic in their enemies.

How iz that?

"Remember, there is only ONE absolute - There ARE NO absolutes!!!"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 5:50 AM

i think that part about "cattle" might be important. if for some reason you stop thinking of humans as different from animals, as "special" then it wont be long until need and desperation will do the rest. crashland in a place, where you cant find food and if your will to survive is strong enough it will defeat any morals that keep you from eating the others. flesh is flesh, you can eat it and stay alive or dont and be food for the others.

and there you have it. there arent any cows floating in space, but humans will do. natural ressources, too scared to fight back. self mutilation probably helps with that, or maybe that way of life actually DID spawn some sick rituals and beliefs. get rid of all your moral and ethics, do what you have to do to survive and satisfy your needs and youre probably pretty close to reavers.

of course there is one little problem: if you need food, clothes and sex and attack ships, then they should have "normal" food on board and wear normal clothes. so unless youre so many that you need more than that or dont find enough victims to make use of EVERYTHING you can get theres no reason to eat and skin them. and nothing should stop them from having sex among themselves (except maybe looking for something different and maybe a "partner" thats not looking like a walking tool kit).

if they have been out there for several generations, how long would it take to arrive at one thats nothing but intelligent animals. they wont forget how to fly ships or "hunt" in a pack and pass that knowledge on, because its vital. humanity isnt, it just gets in the way.

still wouldnt explain how just watching them can cause you to become like them (even if that might be on a smaller scale and just imitation). id rather expect the opposite, disgust and hatred letting you lose your own ethics and humanity when dealing with reavers. it would take far too much time to convince survivors of their ways. though it might be along the lines of "be strong and in control or be cattle waiting to be slaughtered and at the mercy of others". a little like nice guys becoming jerks when they are fed up with watching them get the girls ,-)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 10:20 AM

In all this discussion about the dynamics of Reavers, their origins, etc., I think we're forgetting the most important thing -- humans have a viceral fear of being prey animals ourselves.

Seriously, if you don't agree, just try this experiment: Sit down and imagine what it would be like to be eaten alive. You're trying to get away -- adrenaline pumping -- the beast swipes at you and brings you down -- you try to struggle, but loss of blood is making you weak -- your flesh is being ripped, tugged, bitten off in chunks -- you begin to go into shock -- finally you succumb to unconsciousness and death. (If any of you don't get the willies and an almost uncontrollable urge to look over your shoulder, then man, are you a robot!)

And Reavers, thanks to Joss, are the ultimate predatory monster because they eat people alive, abuse the people and their corpses in unspeakable ways, are really out there lurking in the dark, and they have the intelligence of humans. When you ponder the notion of someone breaking from watching their friends and family raped and eaten alive (or vice versa) for weeks on end, all the while knowing that your turn is coming, remember that fear we all have of being eaten alive -- how tough do you really think you are?

Personally, I think I would kill myself, but there are people who are more doggedly stubborn about holding onto life than I am, and it doesn't take a very large leap to see them adopting the horror as a way to survive. Plus, history is rife with examples of people who have done just that because it was the only way to survive -- take most of the medical personnel in the Nazi regime, for instance. Splitting off the good and bad and adopting the bad as 'good' is a well-worn psychological/sociological process. [Ref: "The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence," E. Staub, Cambridge University Press, 1989.)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 11:04 AM

FIREFLYTHEMOVIE

Quote:
so unless youre so many that you need more than that or dont find enough victims to make use of EVERYTHING you can get theres no reason to eat and skin them. and nothing should stop them from having sex among themselves (except maybe looking for something different and maybe a "partner" thats not looking like a walking tool kit).

Gotta disagree here. As mentioned earlier, lots of violent cultures take trophies from their victims. It's not about not having enough clothes, it's about sewing the skins of your victims into the clothes you have.

Also, as far as cannibalism goes, (a) it's not that rare if you just count by percentage of cultures that do it on a fairly regular basis rather than number of people (the larger cultures tend to find cannibalism utterly distasteful these days), (b) it might be considered a display of machismo to eat the flesh of your fallen enemy, and (c) they have space rations on Serenity. Not overly tasty stuff. Forgetting for the moment how you feel about cannibalism (which I've already said is far from a universal aversion), would you rather have space rations or fresh meat?

And finally, sex: when's the last time you heard of reason factoring into rape? Desperation, sure, sometimes, but many rapists have plenty of opportunities for consensual sex. It's also a pretty recent thing that society hasn't considered rape of a fallen enemy acceptable. The Bible talks about what to do with conquered survivors: kill the men and non-virgin females. Take the virgins home to be your wife. The virgins had no say in the matter. Other cultures were often not quite so picky about virginity, and some just raped the women and left them to fend for themselves, but rape and warfare have gone hand in hand, probably since before we split with chimps.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 11:51 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fireflythemovie:
Gotta disagree here. As mentioned earlier, lots of violent cultures take trophies from their victims. It's not about not having enough clothes, it's about sewing the skins of your victims into the clothes you have.

good point, guess i was a little too fixed on everything they do as being need driven.

concerning cannibalism, its really not rare, considering cultures where its quite normal to eat dead relatives (or some of the organs or their ashes) or your enemies heart to get his strength (might be a common practice for reavers when i think about this babbling about being "weak".. the simple concept of strong=good and weak=unpleasant end of food chain might be their kind of thing).

hmm.. so far i saw the reason for war and rape being closely connected in the simple fact that youre usually surrounded by other men. but then there might be more reasons. trying to imagine a situation where youre enemy is reduced to a body that has to be killed or at least heavily wounded women automatically become bodies that can be used. not a nice thought, but most likely a natural reaction to the situation.

and interesting enough, watching reavers do all that to your friends and family might easily result in you wanting to do the same to them. if for some reason you cant it might cause a displacement activity(?) and instead you do it to whatever potential victim is available. much in the same way like some very sad people might lose their job and beat their wives because they cant beat their former boss.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Jared:
hmm.. so far i saw the reason for war and rape being closely connected in the simple fact that youre usually surrounded by other men. but then there might be more reasons. trying to imagine a situation where youre enemy is reduced to a body that has to be killed or at least heavily wounded women automatically become bodies that can be used. not a nice thought, but most likely a natural reaction to the situation.

The act of taking women as brides in the spoil of war was quite common among ancient cultures. In fact wars were sometimes fought expressly to get another tribes women and or slaves. This wasn’t really done so much out of a need to violate the enemy as it was to broaden the gene pool. It may be difficult for us to understand this today, because we’re packing over 6 billion people on this planet, but that’s been relatively recent. A thousand years ago, most people lived in very isolated and small villages and tribes. And often it was necessary to bring in fresh blood to keep the number of toes constant.

Quote:
Originally posted by ItsAllShiny:
Personally, I think I would kill myself, but there are people who are more doggedly stubborn about holding onto life than I am, and it doesn't take a very large leap to see them adopting the horror as a way to survive. Plus, history is rife with examples of people who have done just that because it was the only way to survive -- take most of the medical personnel in the Nazi regime, for instance. Splitting off the good and bad and adopting the bad as 'good' is a well-worn psychological/sociological process. [Ref: "The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence," E. Staub, Cambridge University Press, 1989.)

That’s true. But what you are referring to is generally an act of desperation conducted under desperate circumstances. It’s not a permanent transformation. There’s little evidence of Jews becoming Nazis and remaining that way. In fact, in general, the desperate acts of captive Jews under the Nazi regime generally served to heighten the hatred for the Nazis. The impression I get from the show is that becoming a Reaver is something of a permanent transformation, which should suggest that it is a not an act of psychological desperation. Although, that may be what Whedon is going for.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:36 PM

ARDEN

Although the concept of Reavers as being essentially pirate bands who sprung up after the war seems historically valid in our own world, I'm curious how this might work in the timeline of the Firefly verse. Primarily in that in "Serenity" when the Reavers are brought up, Simon reacts to them as if they are a sort of urban legend ('versal legend?). He's obviously heard stories/rumors, but never particularly believed they existed. While this holds water in that he is a moneyed individual from a priviledged society, and as far as we know had very little to do with the war, it also leads one to believe that the stories must have been around for quite a while in order to spread so far and wide- to exist as a legend throughout the 'verse. The show takes place what, 6 years after the end of the war? I somehow doubt it's enough time for a powerful enough urban legend/folktale to form that spread throughout space. Even Jayne has apparently never seen a Reaver ship before, but he's deathly afraid of them from their first mention. I would think that the stories would need to be around for many, many years to have developed that much widespread exposure and belief.

Anyone with more detailed knowledge on pirate history might be able to help out here, and it's not me. If you are out there, any ideas how long it took for traditional pirates to become a commonly known or feared concept in our world? Moreover, was there a specific rash of piracy or the like that sprang up after the American Civil War, and might have served as Joss's inspiration in creating the Reavers?

You got a wife? All I got is that dumbass
stick sounds like its raining.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 1:21 PM

BUTTERFLY043

Quote:
Originally posted by Kurukami:
Only problem is, that theory has some holes in it. Namely the "survivor" found onboard the derelict in "Bushwhacked". That guy didn't seem to have had any surgery done on him -- as evidenced by the fact that he was running around less than two weeks after his ship went missing. And there's very little voluntary about watching savages cut your family and friends apart.

I don't know if this has already been commented on, but that guy they found was a victim of the reavers, not a reaver himself. The original theory at the top of this thread could still be valid. The 'gone wrong' experiments could have overtaken the ship and killed all of them except that one whom they made watch while his family were killed. Then they left, and he was trying to turn himself into one of them. But he wasn't one.

I don't really think that the reavers have turned the way they have by unnatural causes though. I don't think they are even human to begin with. I don't mean they are 'monsters' but I just think they are cdifferent from us.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 1:53 PM

FIREFLYTHEMOVIE

Quote:
The act of taking women as brides in the spoil of war was quite common among ancient cultures. In fact wars were sometimes fought expressly to get another tribes women and or slaves. This wasn’t really done so much out of a need to violate the enemy as it was to broaden the gene pool.

I think you give the people of ancient cultures too much credit when it comes to their knowledge of genetics and inbreeding. Marrying first cousins was not only common, it was often more or less a requirement (and still is in many parts of the world.) Better mixing of the gene pool was a side effect of this kind of thing, but I have to think it wasn't the main purpose: mixing happened regardless, and even if it didn't, there are large parts of the world where the genetic benefits to breeding with someone who isn't traceably related to you are far from well known.

The more reasonable explanation is this: say you're a man living in a tribe of 40ish people. Maybe you're just getting to be old enough to marry, or maybe your wife just died, or maybe you just want a 2nd or 5th wife. There aren't going to be a whole lot of women available for you to marry, whether the custom is to marry within your tribe, or to marry women from 1 or several neighboring allied tribes, and there's no guarantee that the few available women won't go to someone else.

Now, you have a few friends/relatives in the same situation. And there's this other tribe that has an obvious vulnerability that will allow you to kill off the men fairly easily (or maybe not even that easily--some of you may die, but you can't say which ones, and you're almost guaranteed to be on the winning side). If you end up victorious, there's maybe 10 new women that you can split between you and your friends/relatives.

Women are often viewed as a valuable commodity. In fact, possibly the most valuable commodity. For anything else (food, water, clothing, etc.) you get to a point that you have all you could possibly ever use in your current situation, and more food, etc., is worthless to you. But if you have one wife, you can have n children with her. If you have 2 wives, you can have 2n children, and so on.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 3:05 PM

PEACE

Quote:
Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
Quote:
Originally posted by ItsAllShiny:
Personally, I think I would kill myself, but there are people who are more doggedly stubborn about holding onto life than I am, and it doesn't take a very large leap to see them adopting the horror as a way to survive. Plus, history is rife with examples of people who have done just that because it was the only way to survive -- take most of the medical personnel in the Nazi regime, for instance. Splitting off the good and bad and adopting the bad as 'good' is a well-worn psychological/sociological process. [Ref: "The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence," E. Staub, Cambridge University Press, 1989.)
That’s true. But what you are referring to is generally an act of desperation conducted under desperate circumstances. It’s not a permanent transformation. There’s little evidence of Jews becoming Nazis and remaining that way. In fact, in general, the desperate acts of captive Jews under the Nazi regime generally served to heighten the hatred for the Nazis. The impression I get from the show is that becoming a Reaver is something of a permanent transformation, which should suggest that it is a not an act of psychological desperation. Although, that may be what Whedon is going for.

I think most people under the circumstances described in the show would not have an overwhelming need to join the Reavers to deal with what they've experienced, but would be filled with a raging need for vengeance, and woe betide the first Reaver who unties them (try the thought experiment of seeing your nearest-and-dearest tortured, consumed and/or killed and I think you'll see what I mean). Striking back, not identification, appears to me to be the natural reaction. There are circumstances in which victims of violence and oppression do things to appease and even ape their oppressors, but as Finn says, this generally only serves to heighten the victim's hatred of the oppressor. Let the tables be turned-- let the concentration camp be liberated, for example-- and the most beaten-down prisoner will often rise up and be the most vicious in attacking the former guards.

Maybe it's just me, but I do think it is "a very large leap to see them adopting the horror as a way to survive." I don't think the Reavers were very well thought out.

Oh, bugger! Now I have to wait for someone to wake up!

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 27, 2004 10:20 PM

how about a misunderstanding coupled with already being out of your mind. after going through all this, you are discovered, attacked, knocked out, locked away, tied to a table and have a group of people pressing you down. sufficiently confused the difference between being operated and slaughtered might not be so clear to you. nobody really seemed to try and convince them that they are friendly and want to help. first you get hit by reavers, then by smugglers, then by alliance and all the time youre helpless until you snap.

if he really couldnt tell his "saviours" from reavers, his imitation might make sense, as a way to not be discovered. babbling about cattle, maybe repeating what he heard, self mutilation to look like them and not be discovered. thinking it didnt work when ending up on that op table and trying to fight his way out.

still not really working out too well, especially since it all happenend in a very short time. and how would mal know so much about it? he seems to know that he will start acting like them. thats making the above theory kind of pointless.

and i have my doubts that after buffy and angel joss would go for "they found something evil at the edge of the galaxy and it consumed them".

he doesnt seem like the kind of writer who is just making something up because it's cool, so i'll trust he has a perfectly fine explanation for them. and even if its not 100% water tight, scientifically accurate or historically correct, i can live with that as it's still fiction and maybe in 500 years humanity will have changed on a psychological level, too.
think of the people believing that violent video games and movies will turn children into brutal killers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 28, 2004 8:43 PM

DARTHVEGAS

I also thought of them as some sort of cult that has taken thier belifes WAAAAY off the deep end. It allows them to keep order within thier society, and allows for them to commit all sorts of nastyness on the outside since anyone who isnt a Reaver isnt 'pure'.

we also may have been only part of the story about Reavers, sort of the Dread Pirate Roberts thing. Sure they are mean and nasty and will kill ya as soon as look at ya, but they have amped up thier rep to make thier job easier.

Just thinkin....

No power in the 'Verse can stop me.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 28, 2004 8:47 PM

DARTHVEGAS

Quote:
Originally posted by Jared:

and i have my doubts that after buffy and angel joss would go for "they found something evil at the edge of the galaxy and it consumed them".

Oooo, THAT would be kinda cool, something I didnt think of, sort of a Babylon 5 type of idea.

No power in the 'Verse can stop me.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 29, 2004 12:30 AM