Sign Up | Log In
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
FIREFLY COMING BACK??
Thursday, June 4, 2009 4:46 PM
JP826
Thursday, June 4, 2009 4:53 PM
JOSSISAGOD
Thursday, June 4, 2009 5:53 PM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Thursday, June 4, 2009 5:57 PM
Thursday, June 4, 2009 6:45 PM
T3HMOTO
Thursday, June 4, 2009 9:34 PM
OPPYH
Quote:Originally posted by jp826: More Firefly Coming? Speaking of Whedon’s previous series with FOX, blogger Nick C claims to have some inside information that the network could consider bringing that franchise back. Supposedly the renewal of Dollhouse has jogged their memories of the show and how Firefly well did with its DVD release and he suggests that they could look at testing whether interest in the show, cancelled in 2002.
Friday, June 5, 2009 4:33 AM
LURKER99
Friday, June 5, 2009 4:47 AM
BLUESUNCOMPANYMAN
Friday, June 5, 2009 5:03 AM
BYTEMITE
Friday, June 5, 2009 5:18 AM
RIPWASH
Friday, June 5, 2009 5:22 AM
ZEEK
Friday, June 5, 2009 8:59 AM
BROWNCOAT01
Friday, June 5, 2009 11:07 AM
GODSMACKSERENITY
Friday, June 5, 2009 11:54 AM
SHINYVERA2517
Friday, June 5, 2009 12:20 PM
Friday, June 5, 2009 1:11 PM
DMAANLILEILTT
Friday, June 5, 2009 4:56 PM
Friday, June 5, 2009 5:49 PM
BORIS
Friday, June 5, 2009 5:57 PM
FREELANCERTEX
Monday, June 8, 2009 1:28 PM
BEATLESFAN
Tuesday, June 9, 2009 11:44 AM
SCHISM
Tuesday, June 9, 2009 12:13 PM
WASHNWEAR
Quote:Originally posted by RIPWash: It would be creepy, but I think Wash and Book should still "linger" in the form of flashbacks or delusional halucinations. Heck, I'd even go for a character that is Wash's twin simply to have Alan Tudyk still around. But this guy would have been locked away in an assylum somewhere. Oh wait, that would make it a little too similar to River, I guess. But he could have been in flight school with Wash, but he cracked under the pressure of trying to compete with his brother or something like that. ********************************************* "It's okay! I'm a leaf on the wind!!!" "What does that mean?!?!?!"
Tuesday, June 9, 2009 12:35 PM
IMNOTHERE
Quote:Originally posted by Schism: A) Pick up after the movie
Tuesday, June 9, 2009 12:39 PM
Tuesday, June 9, 2009 4:20 PM
GOODWOLF
Quote:Originally posted by RIPWash: It would be creepy, but I think Wash and Book should still "linger" in the form of flashbacks or delusional halucinations.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:37 AM
SWORDNG1
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:42 AM
VERASAMUELS
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:29 AM
M52NICKERSON
DALEK!
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:09 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:19 AM
TWO
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Plus you have the fact that if the original crew comes back you would have to write in that passage of time. I think it is far to hard to believe that only a short time has passed when the actors have changed over the years. I think Firefly and Serenity are near perfect little gems. I don't know if you can add to them with dulling their shine.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:52 AM
Quote:Inara's sex poison anyone?
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 5:51 PM
RIONAEIRE
Beir bua agus beannacht
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:00 AM
Quote:Originally posted by RionaEire: I'm siding with Nick on this one. I don't trust anyone to make cannon. Fanfic sure go ahead, I can read or ignore as I see fit. But if Joss makes more Firefly I would have to concede it as cannon, no matter how crummy it may be, what with the movie, the nearly 10 year hiatus and all. I can't fully trust anyone in the world, much someone I've never actually met in regards to my very favorite show and a notable part of my life. "A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:44 PM
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 11:17 AM
SHINYGOODGUY
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 11:50 AM
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:01 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: It all depends on the success of The Avengers film. If it kicks butt at the Box Office, Joss will be hot again and Fox may consider it. Of course, you may see some major tweeks to the overall demeanor of the show. Here's hoping that The Avengers sets box office records. SGG
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:40 PM
THESOMNAMBULIST
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:48 PM
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 7:29 PM
EBFIDDLER
Thursday, November 17, 2011 5:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Bytemite: I've learned to allow for people ignoring canon, but I don't understand why people are so dismissive of the comic books, or even the movie. Joss worked on them, or in the later comic books directed another Whedon in work on them, that's good enough for me to consider it official.
Thursday, November 17, 2011 6:46 AM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: For me the comics just do not live up to the series nor the movie. Mainly because I think the story lines were weak. Shepard’s Tale made little sense when you look at the reaction of the Alliance soldiers in Safe, or all his knowledge of crime and how an Operative would work.
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Better days, I find silly that the crew would gain all this wealth then have it conveniently stolen from them to make them poor again.
Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:06 AM
Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:20 AM
Quote:It's not convenient. Mal betrayed everyone to the thieves. Everyone's fantasy involved leaving the ship. Mal didn't want to lose his tight nit family. So, he got rid of the money.
Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:01 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: How so? It's implied that they let Book slither away and kept his role quiet in the disaster he organized. So, most likely he's somewhat of a legend in the alliance. Some great general who mysteriously retired. He was also a member of a shady group of rebels. I'd imagine there's some crime knowledge from all of that. He was also fairly high up in the alliance. So, why shouldn't he know about operatives? The doctor in Serenity seemed to know about them just fine.
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: It's not convenient. Mal betrayed everyone to the thieves. Everyone's fantasy involved leaving the ship. Mal didn't want to lose his tight nit family. So, he got rid of the money.
Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:18 AM
Quote:Book was also recognized in the comic as the person who was responsible for the Alliances losses. So I don't see his failure being that hush-hush.
Quote:In him possibly undoing the crews chances to be happy, and in a way that prevents them from keeping at least some of the money, he also puts them right back in the dangers they faced before. Meaning Mal could lose them all the way the Shepard and Wash were lost.
Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:23 AM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: How so? It's implied that they let Book slither away and kept his role quiet in the disaster he organized. So, most likely he's somewhat of a legend in the alliance. Some great general who mysteriously retired. He was also a member of a shady group of rebels. I'd imagine there's some crime knowledge from all of that. He was also fairly high up in the alliance. So, why shouldn't he know about operatives? The doctor in Serenity seemed to know about them just fine. Book was also recognized in the comic as the person who was responsible for the Alliances losses. So I don't see his failure being that hush-hush. The doctor only knew after he looked at the Operatives credentials, and was surprised that he did not have a rank or name. The Doctor also had no idea how an Operative worked or he would have tried to run right away. Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: It's not convenient. Mal betrayed everyone to the thieves. Everyone's fantasy involved leaving the ship. Mal didn't want to lose his tight nit family. So, he got rid of the money. ...and what does that make Mal then? I understand that Mal would not want to lose people, I agree with that. In him possibly undoing the crews chances to be happy, and in a way that prevents them from keeping at least some of the money, he also puts them right back in the dangers they faced before. Meaning Mal could lose them all the way the Shepard and Wash were lost. In the end using Mal's fear of losing his family is just part of a way to take the money away and end the story with the crew in the same shape it started in. I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.
Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:37 AM
Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:55 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Bytemite: Well, that was probably only because the man who attacked him had a brother on the I.A.V. Alexander. The Alliance probably fed him and his family a line, but either he managed to put two and two together anyway, or he blamed the commanding officer (Book) despite whatever tale of heroics was made up about the battle. People in grieving sometimes do that.
Quote:Originally posted by Bytemite: Exactly. It's excellent dramatic irony. And I also stand by my comment that Mal was really in a catch 22. And besides, who's to say they wouldn't have all decided to have just blown the money and stay on Serenity anyway? We know of at least one other time the crew had a fortune from the novelization of the movie, and that's when they finally sold the Lassiter. They decided to buy an expensive hovermule, upgrade Serenity's engine and do some remodeling. It's actually rather western. Very few people on the frontier ever made a lot of money, and those who did tended to waste it or lose it very quickly. Story-wise, that kind of thing makes for Of Mice And Men and other American classics.
Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Zeek: The doctor sure seemed to know that "an operative of the parliament" deserved respect. I also don't think operatives are simply assassins. He could have been there for other reasons. So no need for the doctor to be worried until the operative started talking about death. The man who recognized Book lost his brother on that mission. He could have easily heard that his brother was working for such a famous up and coming general before things went wrong. Yeah Mal was being a selfish jerk IMO. I think we're supposed to be shocked by how despicable he acted. Mal is not an infallible hero.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL