BUFFYVERSE

Buffy-related question: Are the live-action Scooby Doo movies any good?

POSTED BY: CHRISISALL
UPDATED: Saturday, October 14, 2006 12:54
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 4555
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:37 PM

CHRISISALL


Well, sort of Buffy-related...

Rrrisisrall


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:57 PM

SIMONWHO


No, they're not. The first one was almost two movies in one - they didn't know until they started editing if they were making a kids movie or a movie targeted at teens and nostalgic 20-somethings. The only plus point is the climactic reveal of the villain of the piece.

The second movie they knew they were making a kids film. They (presumably) didn't know it was going to be so bad.

Check out my Serenity Auctions for Equality Now!

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=004&item=1400121002
83

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=004&item=1400120938
86

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=004&item=1400121031
71

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:12 PM

LISSA37


I've only seen the first one, but I thought it was pretty good. It kind of depends on what you want from it, though.

If you want a movie that's exactly like the cartoon, you might be disappointed. There are definitely changes. Some of the characters are different (Daphne is the most different. Velma and Fred are a little off, too, though they're closer than Daphne. Shaggy and Scooby, however, are dead-on, I thought.)

It still had the charm of the cartoon, though, even if it was different. It was funny and it had a good storyline. It had the same element of a well-done mystery.

So, was it the cartoon? No. But, was it a good movie? I thought so. I enjoyed it and so did the rest of my family (the people I watched it with).


*****
"I'm a leaf on the wind..." - Wash

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 7:37 AM

CHRISISALL


What?
Simon and Lissa are the only two that saw any of them?

Bumping Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 7:41 AM

LISSA37


Wow, I do believe this is a first.

It's always me who hasn't seen anything that everyone else is talking about. Now, I'm one of only two people (in a rather large crowd, too!) who've seen something?

Nah, not possible! lol There must be some others on here who've seen these. What did you all think?

*****
"I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar!" - Wash

98% of teens have smoked pot, if you are one of the 2% that haven't, copy this into your signature

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 7:43 AM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


Huh. That's odd. I never did get around to seeing the second one. Oh, well.

So, the first one was... interesting. I agree with Lisa - Shaggy and Scooby were right-on. In fact, that's the only reason I sat through the whole movie.

---

Forgive me, for I am new.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:13 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by chrisisall:
What?
Simon and Lissa are the only two that saw any of them?



Kinda answers your question, don't ya think?

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:18 AM

DEEPGIRL187


I only saw the first one, didn't bother with the second. If you have to go see it, the only stand-outs are Matthew Lillard and Linda Cardellini, who play Shaggy and Velma, respectively. It won't exactly heighten your opinion of SMG; she was way better in Buffy.

**************************************************

"See, this is a sign of your tragic space dementia. All paranoid and crotchety, it breaks the heart."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:21 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
Quote:


Originally posted by chrisisall:
What?
Simon and Lissa are the only two that saw any of them?



Kinda answers your question, don't ya think?


The Bash-king speaks again.

Get 'im Scooby Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:26 AM

SHINYYUKARI


It wasn't bad, but looking back on it, I think they were trying to make Daphne more Buffy-esque in the movie because she was tired of being the damsel in distress.

"Well next time you be the bait!"~Andy Hurley
"Okay! Everybody not talking about sex, in here. Everybody else, elsewhere."~Wash
Browncoats are the coolest fans I've ever seen.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:40 AM

CHRONICTHEHEDGEHOG


Can't speak for the second movie but no, the first isn't any good. It is however, an awful lot of fun.

-------------------------------------------------

Read my fanfic!
http://www.fireflyfans.net/sunroomitem.asp?i=8267

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:44 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by chronicthehedgehog:
Can't speak for the second movie but no, the first isn't any good. It is however, an awful lot of fun.


Does not fun=good?

Quizical Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:46 AM

CHRONICTHEHEDGEHOG


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by chronicthehedgehog:
Can't speak for the second movie but no, the first isn't any good. It is however, an awful lot of fun.


Does not fun=good?

Quizical Chrisisall



What I mean is, it's not particularily well acted (except for Shaggy) or directed, the plot isn't great, the effects are so-so... There's nothing you can look at and say 'they did that well'. Despite this, it somehow manages to be really enjoyable.

-------------------------------------------------

Read my fanfic!
http://www.fireflyfans.net/sunroomitem.asp?i=8267

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:49 AM

ECGORDON

There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.


If I was to ever see it, it wouldn't be because of Sarah, but rather for Linda Cardellini.




wo men ren ran zai fei xing.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 8:52 AM

SIMONWHO


If by "fun" you mean "oh my god, this is so dull, why won't it stop, end, end, end" then yes, I agree with you.

Still two out of three projects with Seth Green & SMG being home runs isn't a bad set of odds.

And the movies also got a nice payoff in Looney Tunes: Back in Action.

Check out my Serenity Auctions for Equality Now, including DVDs and Posters signed by all 9 BDHs + Joss!

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=004&item=1400121002
83

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=004&item=1400120938
86

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=004&item=1400121031
71

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 9:47 AM

EMBERS


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
What?
Simon and Lissa are the only two that saw any of them?

Bumping Chrisisall


I tried to watch the first one but it was unwatchable...for me...
I understand it is HUGE with the five and under crowd!

**********************************************
River Dancing on River's Dream images at Cafe Press:
http://www.cafepress.com/embersartwork

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 4, 2006 10:21 AM

BSCPANTHERFAN


As someone who grew up watching the Original Scooby Doo cartoons, I was happy with the way the first one ended. I wouldn't be bored enough to turn it off if either of them came on, but I wouldn't seek them out per se, either.

Linda Cardellini was a good Velma, though, and I really enjoyed Matthew Lillard as Shaggy. I watched Without A Paddle solely because of him and Seth Green, and was glad I did.

So who is he?
He's my husband.
Well who in the damn galaxy ain't!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 5, 2006 1:55 PM

JOSSISAGOD


I enjoyed the first Scooby-Doo, it was good for a laugh, but, it wasn't as close to the cartoon as I thought. I haven't seen Scooby-Doo 2, I've heard it was only so-so. Frankly though, I truely believe Sarah Michelle Gellar belongs on T.V., not on mindless television but on intelligent shows where she has time to create a character and make the character grow as the seasons progress. With movies(ALL MOVIES, not just ones Sarah has been in!) I feel like, we are introduced to pre-fab characters, that are born,they live, and then die after a short period. With intelligent television, we have more time to get to know the characters and I feel more of a conection with those characters by the time the show finishes. Back to the point, the live action Scoobies are good for a laugh, but not much more.

JOSSIS(Most Definitely)AGOD

Self appointed Forsaken! Been on the list for a while now!
98% of teens have smoked pot, if you are one of the 2% that haven't, copy this into your signature.
"Look at me, I'm STUPID!" The Doctor.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 5, 2006 2:29 PM

SHINYCRYSTAL


I really liked the first one. I thought it had some funny moments and it was cute. I wasn't expecting much from it and I was pleasantly surprised.

I remember absolutely nothing about the second one. That probably says something about it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 6, 2006 8:00 AM

CYBERSNARK


Didn't see the second one, but the first. . . didn't totally suck.

Of course, I only saw it from morbid curiosity, having been pretty thouroughly sickened of Scooby-Doo by Teletoon (Canada's "cartoon" network --45% Scooby-Doo, 45% Looney Toons/Bugs & Tweety Show, 10% pre-school "edutainment" ).

-----
We applied the cortical electrodes but were unable to get a neural reaction from either patient.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 14, 2006 12:54 PM

WINDSTRUCK


It was pretty fun.
Not that bad actually the first movie.
The second movie, was really bad.

Daphne went buffy-like. I thought there was that Buffy sound bit when she was fighting the wrestler guy.

I like the first movie for the fun stuff. Little 5 year old siblings like it very much, kept re-watching it.

They just thought Mr. Bean was funny. Oh wait! That was me!




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
The anti-Joss anti-Buffy fever
Fri, January 20, 2023 20:16 - 4 posts
Oh boy... Joss gets triple teamed by Buffy / Angel alums - Charisma, Sarah , Amber
Wed, April 7, 2021 10:55 - 81 posts
Felicia Day On Escape!
Sun, February 28, 2021 20:17 - 6 posts
Is there life after Buffy...??
Sat, January 26, 2019 17:27 - 7 posts
Buffy Comics Reading Order?
Thu, July 19, 2018 03:00 - 3 posts
BUFFY BRACKETOLOGY - Round 7
Wed, January 31, 2018 20:35 - 1 posts
BUFFY BRACKETOLOGY - Round 6
Wed, January 31, 2018 20:30 - 1 posts
Just finished watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer for the first time
Mon, October 31, 2016 23:08 - 17 posts
Chop wifes head off... get a free hug
Sun, October 30, 2016 12:30 - 3 posts
Sarah Michelle Gellar wins People Choice Award 2014
Wed, April 20, 2016 18:51 - 4 posts
Xander goes wild ! Nicholas Brendon arrested for rowdy antics in hotel room.
Thu, September 3, 2015 08:16 - 9 posts
SMG is a dork
Wed, April 15, 2015 04:09 - 4 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL